From silvio  Fri Sep 27 10:48:48 2002
Return-Path: <silvio@big.net.au>
Received: (from silvio@localhost)
	by big.net.au (8.11.0/8.11.0) id g8RHmj601483;
	Fri, 27 Sep 2002 10:48:45 -0700
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 10:48:45 -0700
From: silvio@big.net.au
To: Mikhail Iakovlev <misha@cerber.no>
Cc: full-disclosure@lists.netsys.com
Subject: THREATCON --> Re: [Full-Disclosure] scriptkids on this list
Message-ID: <20020927104845.A1363@hamsec.aurora.sfo.interquest.net>
References: <200209270341.g8R3fll96829@mailserver4.hushmail.com> <Pine.LNX.4.33.0209271402080.12846-100000@cerber.no>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0209271402080.12846-100000@cerber.no>; from misha@cerber.no on Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 02:06:56PM +0200
Status: RO
Content-Length: 1721
Lines: 79

THREATCON ADVISORY 1.21 --> "b4ck t0 th3 futur3"

Be w4rned. this advisory requires 1.21 jiggyflopz of electricity to
get you back to 1996.

-->

On Fri, Sep 27, 2002 at 02:06:56PM +0200, Mikhail Iakovlev wrote:
> 
> Can you? Doubt it.
> You should perhaps install somewhere slackware 3.0 and use old 
> mount/umount exploit for learning, than you can accuse others of 

ok.. please go to my analysis at the end of this AdViZoRRy.

> incompentense if you wish. However, since it will take you a _long_ time 
> to get to that level - here is what will happen:
> 1. You do as I described, and in process you finally get self-confidence 
> and won't even bother to react on accusation. Because you would know what 
> you are worth.
> 2. You are lazy, and you would continue to accuse other people in attempt 
> to cover your incompentense.
> 
> Choice is yours, and we all will see how it goes:)

ok captain!

> If we see your reactions still, it means simply that you are lazy bastard, 
> and you're not even worth our attention.
> As simple as that.
 
yep!

> Cheers,
> 
> Mik-

back to 1996 -->
this is util-linux-2.5

      case 't':                 /* specify file system types */
        types = parse_list (optarg);
        break;


string_list
parse_list (char *strings)
{
  string_list list;
  char *t;

  if (strings == NULL)
    return NULL;

  list = cons (strtok (strings, ","), NULL);

  while ((t = strtok (NULL, ",")) != NULL)
    list = cons (t, list);

  return list;

}

leaving 1996 for a minute, and going "b4ck 2 th3 futur3" -->

$ cat /etc/redhat-release
Red Hat Linux release 7.0 (Guinness)

$ mount -V
mount: mount-2.10m

$ mount -t ""
Segmentation fault

$ mount -t ,
Segmentation fault

--
Silvio