>From - Sat Mar 02 00:57:15 2024
X-BeenThere: tscm-l2006_at_googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.223.55.131 with SMTP id u3ls499953fag.3.p; Thu, 04 Mar 2010
00:55:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.223.5.72 with SMTP id 8mr398966fau.14.1267692904213;
Thu, 04 Mar 2010 00:55:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.223.5.72 with SMTP id 8mr398965fau.14.1267692904158;
Thu, 04 Mar 2010 00:55:04 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <tsc..._at_shaddack.mauriceward.com>
Received: from 121.235.cust.netway.cz ([85.239.224.118])
by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id 18si31068fxm.13.2010.03.04.00.55.03;
Thu, 04 Mar 2010 00:55:04 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of tsc..._at_shaddack.mauriceward.com designates 85.239.224.118 as permitted sender) client-ip=85.239.224.118;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of tsc..._at_shaddack.mauriceward.com designates 85.239.224.118 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=tsc..._at_shaddack.mauriceward.com
Received: (qmail 26593 invoked by uid 0); 4 Mar 2010 09:55:03 +0100
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2010 09:55:02 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Shaddack <tsc..._at_shaddack.mauriceward.com>
To: tscm-l2006_at_googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [TSCM-L] {4806} YouTube - hand making vacuum tubes Part 1
In-Reply-To: <4B8F70F3.6080500_at_phreaker.net>
Message-ID: <1003040950010.0_at_somehost.domainz.com>
References: <BLU149-DS9D736B56B1CB45D31DDD2BC390_at_phx.gbl> <4B8F70F3.6080500_at_phreaker.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
What about something a bit more sexy? Something solid-state electronics
still cannot entirely measure up to?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Krytron
Then there's the issue of vacuum tubes being inherently EMP-resistant.
Old tech lacks some vulnerabilities of new tech.
Thought... would a miniature vacuum tube be detectable by a NLJD?
> Gag, Flemming valves, I'd be more impressed to see him buiild an OP-Amp.
>
> Its from Onion wrote:
> >
> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gl-QMuUQhVM --
Received on Sat Mar 02 2024 - 00:57:15 CST