>From - Sat Mar 02 00:57:16 2024
Received: by 10.90.83.18 with SMTP id g18mr5593121agb.29.1230825703441;
Thu, 01 Jan 2009 08:01:43 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <wmcdo..._at_woh.rr.com>
Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com (hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com [71.74.56.122])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 22si2379570yxr.13.2009.01.01.08.01.43;
Thu, 01 Jan 2009 08:01:43 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of wmcdo..._at_woh.rr.com designates 71.74.56.122 as permitted sender) client-ip=71.74.56.122;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of wmcdo..._at_woh.rr.com designates 71.74.56.122 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=wmcdo..._at_woh.rr.com
Received: from mcdonnellPC ([98.31.39.84]) by hrndva-omta02.mail.rr.com
with SMTP
id <20090101160140.VKFO24032.hrndva-omta02.mail.rr.com_at_mcdonnellPC>
for <TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com>; Thu, 1 Jan 2009 16:01:40 +0000
Message-ID: <070B038E89F049A3A0567CF1FD5A6818_at_mcdonnellPC>
From: "Bill & Tracy McDonnell" <wmcdo..._at_woh.rr.com>
To: <TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com>
References: <800002.50194.qm_at_web36502.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <800002.50194.qm_at_web36502.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [TSCM-L] {3175} Re: Electronic Harrasement
Date: Thu, 1 Jan 2009 11:01:36 -0500
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_04E4_01C96C00.50D47330"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6001.18000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6001.18049
------=_NextPart_000_04E4_01C96C00.50D47330
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
The year of the Lucasville Riot is what sparked my interest. The F.B.I. use=
d technology that the only people to see were the SWAT team members. I have=
been studying since. After seeing what was capable , we and mgmt started c=
hecking on the Spider system that is now in 6 of the 32 prisons in Ohio. Yo=
u can hear a whisper or a pin drop. It has thwarted riots and uprisings but=
worked against employees also. Check it out, it is amazing.=20
I hope this answers your question ED!
Bill
----- Original Message -----=20
From: ed eduardo=20
To: TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com=20
Sent: Monday, December 29, 2008 1:57 PM
Subject: [TSCM-L] {3175} Re: Electronic Harrasement
Bill
I am quite certain that the vast majority of individuals who are in=
fact targets of 'electronic harassment' would be diagnosed as mentally ill=
, this for several reasons. Firstly, the truthful reporting of the experien=
ces to a 'trained medical professional' would in itself result in a diagnos=
is of mental illness (make that misdiagnosis, of which I am certain there a=
re many), as the symptoms are textbook, the reasons for this obvious from m=
y point of view.
Secondly, the unique and individual experience of such 'harassment=
' would, as Dr. Kelley pointed out in her paper (which I will repost below)=
cause destabilization of anyone's mental state and thirdly, the misinforma=
tion that is delibertly circulated on the subject, (call it dysinformation)=
is designed to further label targeted individuals as 'kooks' (at least) wh=
o believe in fantastic technologies that are beyond the accepted realities =
of science and technology.
As you seem particularily interested in the psychiatric aspect of t=
he phenomena, I would refer you to the book by the psychiatrist Dr. Colin A=
. Ross (The CIA Doctors: Human Rights Violations by American Psychiatrists)=
which documents by use of the Freedom of Information Act the use of human =
beings for horrific mind experimentation by the profession, this for politi=
cally based purposes.=20
While no one is able to evaluate a specific case based on email pre=
sentation of the problem, I am quite certain that the probability that a go=
od percentage of individuals who report being victims of 'electronic harass=
ment' are in fact victims of destabilization from an external source. The u=
ltimate question on this matter lies with those who allow such actions in a=
society such as ours supposedly based on freedoms and individual rights as=
expressed in our Constitution. The former Soviet Union utilized psychiatry=
for political purposes, apparently a model for social control techniques n=
ow in this country.
I am curious Bill, why is someone with 20 years experience working =
with the 'criminally insane' is now interested in a TSCM list? Is there som=
ething about advanced covert electronic technologies and the criminally ins=
ane that you find of interest?=20
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
The article attributed to Dr. Kelley, the basis of which confirmed =
by articles in the local newspaper at the time. Once again, I see inaccurac=
ies.
Case Studies of Destabilization and Delusions Described as
Radio-wave Transmitted: Behavioral Implications
Kathryn Kelley
Department of Psychology, University of Albany, State University of=
New York
Albany, New York 12222, United States of America
ABSTRACT
The topic of the case studies involved in the research paradigm to =
be described
here is the use of devices which have been labeled in various ways.=
Informal
names for them have included: radio-wave hearing implants; electrom=
agnetic
auditory devices; internal, auditory, connecting devices; and radio=
-wave,
auditory, assaultive. transmitting (RAAT) implants. They refer to t=
he use of a
miniature device attached to the human auditory canal, near the tym=
panic
membrane. The goals of this research as a technique for presenting =
scenarios of
experimental, composite case studies of this phenomena are stated. =
RAAT implants
are described, as well as their implantation and detection; the tra=
nsduction
system; their physical, emotional, and cognitive effects; and socie=
tal
implications including a brief exploration of the technological inv=
olvement.
I. GOALS OF THIS RESEARCH
The purpose of these implants is the use of electromagnetism in a c=
ommunication
device which can act as a transducer. The input typically ranges fr=
om two to
seven megahertz (MHz) at low intensity. According to reports about =
individuals
who have described them, the input is described as sound resembling=
that which a
commercial radio might provide. Other descriptions of these experie=
nces have
also been included in the case studies which will be summarized. Ac=
cording to
the summaries, behavioral functions of RAAT implants can encompass =
internal,
auditory surveillance of the individual's experiences, pain deliver=
y to that
person, and transmissions of conversations as any sound heard by th=
e individual.
Examples of these functions will be part of this description.
The psychological implications of using RAAT implants are broad, no=
t the least
of which is the concern that any person reporting the existence of =
them in
one's ears, or the experience of "hearing voices' not observed by
those present, may be labeled delusional as a symptom of severe psy=
chological
disturbance. Current psychiatric diagnosis would lead to the possib=
ility that
these behavioral signs support a conclusion of paranoia as part of =
psychosis or
more narrowly, schizophrenia. Thus this research paradigm will inve=
stigate the
effects of individuals' claiming these exist or happen.
Why would a behavioral researcher undertake the study of hypotheses=
related to
such a paradigm?
For one important reason, the experiences related to RAAT implantat=
ion have, as
already pointed out, a crucial role in the diagnosis of mental dist=
urbance. To
date, no known studies have investigated the role of this phenomena=
in the
individual's perception, behavior, or well-being. According to a se=
arch of
the literature on psychopathology, no empirical knowledge exists ab=
out these
aspects of RAAT implantation as studied here, despite its contribut=
ion to the
diagnostic process in such publications as the fourth edition of th=
e Diagnostic
and Statistical Manual-IV of the American Psychiatric Association (=
1). Second,
the author as a social and personality psychologist works in a fiel=
d which has
historically initiated research in areas of social behavior by isol=
ating a focal
variable and systematically examining it from many different angles=
. This
unstudied phenomena resembles other social behaviors subjected to c=
lose,
scientific analysis using
methodological variations that can lead to reliable, valid conclus=
ions. Third,
the range of analyses in the author's field extends from abstract, =
basic
research to direct application. this paradigm brings a social behav=
ior into the
settings of basic research in order to uncover new knowledge about =
how this
phenomenon works.
The paradigm or model of research involves the use of experimental =
case studies
to examine one factor of reported use of RAAT implants among variou=
s categories
of adults. These cases are experimental in the sense that the parti=
cipants were
not in clinical populations; they were not being treated for mental=
disturbance
as a part of this study. The first step in this paradigm is to conc=
eptualize the
types of cases that could reveal how the implants effect the indivi=
dual. This
paper described the reports of individuals represented by these cas=
es, and
integrates several aspects of the =EDmplanted person's experience. =
What to do
with these accounts formed the second step in the paradigm. The tec=
hnique
selected for this research was to study the perceptions and attitud=
es of college
students about the case study experiences, and the results of the i=
nitial
findings have been reported at another conference. The third step f=
or this
research could broaden its
implications for application; one use would be to increase awarene=
ss about the
phenomena and its importance for everyday, as well as specialized, =
aspects of
one's experience.
In the next section, the case study method will be described briefl=
y in order
to distinguish it from other methods and to indicate its utility. F=
ollowing
sections will summarize: the RAAT implants themselves; description =
of the
devices; conditions of implanting; the transduction system; effects=
on physical
health; emotional and cognitive effects; and society's involvement =
with this
phenomenon including effects on antisocial behavior and implication=
s for the
condition of a society faced with it, for medicine, law and its enf=
orcement, and
technology.
II. HOW CASE STUDIES CAN BE INTERPRETED
In the prologue to Paul Abramson's (1984) book, Sarah: A Sexual Bio=
graphy,
the defining elements of the case study as a scientific method are =
outlined.
Abramson uses the term "slice of life" to embody the meaning of thi=
s
method, tracing it to its clinical and medical roots (2). It is an =
account of
individual human behavior that fits within a pattern that is presen=
ted
stylistically. Data from a response sheet, observations of the indi=
vidual by the
researcher and other reporters, and past histories combine into a s=
tory that
characterizes the experiences sampled for inclusion.
Behavioral case studies' content can reach into endless areas of
peoples' lives. Some areas may appear unrelated at the outset of ca=
taloging,
only to become interrelated as the process of storytelling unfolds.=
he scattered
pieces reemerge at times into a sensible whole that can lead to a c=
ompelling
study of individuals dealing with the challenges of a lifetime. Cas=
e studies as
a method tie together subjectivity with intended objectivity. Inacc=
urate memory,
distortion, and denial can result from projective methods; of cours=
e all
self-report methods including apparently objective ones like survey=
s have
received criticism due to their basic subjectivity. The richness fr=
om
interweaving the two loose ends has also been praised as an alterna=
tive method
for gaining insight into areas that can give us a "...penetrating v=
iew of a
set of circumstances that are more horrendous and more involving th=
an the
content of even the most vivid fiction," as Abramson (p.5)
describes a subject with an unusual history.
Besides describing the apparent experiences of these five functiona=
l adults who
reported presence of RAAT implants, the observations are extended i=
nto
implications for macro levels of societal trends. In the field of S=
ocial and
Personality Psychology, a technique for presenting this kind of inf=
ormation is
the scenario. Once the observations about composite cases have been=
described,
several scenarios are developed as outcomes explaining the effects =
on some
societal trends. Not every variable that can be conceptualized is r=
elated to
either the individuals' accounts or to the scenarios. Therefore, on=
ly
certain phenomena are mentioned because of the relevance to the out=
comes.
III. DESCRIPTION OF THE DEVICES
In this composite of experimental studies, the term RAAT implants w=
ill refer to
miniaturized transducers operating via low-frequency electromagneti=
sm
consistently with accounts of individuals who report awareness of t=
heir
presence. Besides communication and pain delivery, the individuals =
may also
describe functions of surveillance, tracking of their locations, an=
d direction
of their behavior by remote influence. Some devices currently avail=
able involve
some of these functions, including implants in animals for tracking=
and
identification, and similar purposes among prisoners. The latter ma=
y have, for
example, cuffs secured to their ankles for ensuring limits on their=
mobility via
notification to a remote location of their whereabouts.
The accounts by case study subjects imply certain characteristics o=
f the RAAT
implants that involve their location, probable operation, structure=
and
materials. The device would be invisible by an observer, given that=
the cases
have not revealed others' mentioning that they noticed them. Becaus=
e the
persons have not had implantation via invasive surgery, their impli=
ed location
would be internal but easily reachable. Their function would indica=
te placement
in the ear canal, near the tympanic membrane or ear drum. Transmiss=
ion of
electromagnetism would be two-way, meaning that the transducers act=
as both
receivers and transmitters. The material used for this purpose woul=
d involve
some sort of metal because of their conductiveness, although the pr=
ecise content
is not known to these case study subjects.
Some hearing assistive devices have become commercially available t=
hat resemble
them in some ways, although the aids are removable by the patients =
and are not
implanted. Some assistive devices have used electromagnetism that i=
s programmed
by a computer to a useful frequency range. Also cochlear implants c=
an be
implanted for conductive hearing loss due to nerve damage, although=
this type of
implant involves extensive surgery and follow-up. As far as RAAT im=
plants are
concerned, the USA's Food and Drug Administration regards the next =
phase of
them as devices and not implants. The distinction is relevant and d=
eserves
explanation. Because they are not placed within tissue, they qualif=
y as
nonimplants and therefore are subjected to less stringent tests of =
safety, side
effects, and toxicity.
IV. CONDITIONS OF IMPLANTING
The conditions under which RAAT implants are placed in someone's ea=
rs are
described as follows. Because most implantation seems to occur with=
out the
victim's awareness, this information has been provided by radio ope=
rators.
The accounts seem consistent in describing the typical conditions f=
or implanting
as involving general anesthesia during surgery for another purpose.=
The more
general status of the victim is to be under the care of a medical p=
rofessional
while unconscious. However, there is some indication that even newb=
orns may have
a different version of RAAT deposited in their ears. The adult vers=
ion has been
sewed into a stabilized position near the tympanic membrane or eard=
rum.
Implanted people have been found in all professions and strata of s=
ociety.
Detection of these devices can involve two major methods. The first=
is to use an
inexpensive otoscope that has a lighted funnel for viewing the audi=
tory canal
near the eardrum. In adults the usual
appearance would be darkened areas that diverge significantly from=
the
textbook appearance of the auditory canal. There may be tiny stitch=
es visable in
this area, which secure the devices in a section of the canal. Mult=
iple pairs of
implants in each ear can be forced upon the anesthetized victim whe=
n additional
surgery occurs in the future. The original view was that the instru=
ments for
RAAT implanting are too large for newborns and infants up to the ag=
e of 1.5
years, but some visibility of an obstruction in the auditory canal =
of children
who have not had anesthesia and some indication of short-distance t=
ransmission
with their implanted parents has led to a revision of this view. Ca=
se study
subjects and radio operators have reported that no doctor has admit=
ted to
viewing this abnormal appearance to victims of any age, including t=
heir own
families. A second method involves the use of a device known as a b=
ug detector,
which is available through some mail
order catalogs specializing in surveillance equipment. The appropr=
iate
detector will have enough sensitivity to signal the presence of ele=
ctromagnetic
waves below 5 MHz. It is simply pointed into the ear canal, where t=
ransmissions
can be detected depending on the strength of radio-wave activity cu=
rrently
directed in that area by radio-operators antennas. What would motiv=
ate
professionals to perform malpractice on such a large and invasive s=
cale? Some
accounts have described financial gain for the implanters themselve=
s. But the
daily denial by medical professionals about the visibility of RAAT =
implants
would be very puzzling. Descriptions of an experience among physici=
ans applying
for a medical license might provide a partial explanation. Accordin=
g to the
results of surveillance of closed, pre-licensing sessions by radio =
operators,
these physicians are exposed to an account of the scandal and its c=
over-up as it
relates to the malpractice connected with
RAAT implanting. As a condition of receiving and maintaining their=
license,
these physicians are described as agreeing not to reveal this infor=
mation.
Tactics such as threatening or psychotropically drugging patients w=
ho claim
implantation have been developed. Additionally, a similar technique=
of
maintaining denial about severely widespread malpractice has report=
edly arisen
among attorneys with respect to licensing and continuing in the pro=
fession.
Imagine the scene of a prospective plaintiff approaching two attorn=
eys to
request that a personal injury case be undertaken, concerning the p=
erson's
RAAT implantation and severe injury resulting from it. When the vic=
tim produces
a bug detector and the attorneys use it to demonstrate their own im=
plantation,
while the detector buzzes away and lights up in their own ears, the=
y amazingly
reject the case anyway.
V. THE TRANSDUCTION SYSTEM
In the system of transmitting electromagnetism to and from RAAT imp=
lants,
several factors and techniques are involved. Only the basics will b=
e summarized
here, although according to case study subjects other elements invo=
lve the use
of computers, communication satellites, and organizations such as t=
he National
Security Agency. A claim like this would appear delusional in curre=
nt diagnostic
systems, so the description here will be limited to how people and =
their
transceivers use RAAT implants. The operator of a transceiver as a =
hobbyist is
termed a short-wave or ham radio operator, and operators of citizen=
s band (CB)
radios installed in vehicles can also become involved.
SW radio operators can send and receive electromagnetic signals at =
a wide range
of frequencies and across long distances. Communications with aircr=
aft and
submarines have involved these parameters. The nonprofessional is r=
equired to
have a license from the Federal Communications Commission, but oper=
ators have
described themselves as generally unlicensed. The cost of equipment=
can exceed
several thousand dollars, and includes a tall antenna which can ser=
ve as a sign
for locating SW radio operation. A televised news report, however, =
revealed that
the 20 to 100 foot towers can be camouflaged by surprising structur=
es like a
church steeple, fake trees which might lead to a bird house, a flag=
pole, or a
grain silo. When SW operators transit to or scan RAAT implants in v=
ictims, they
can talk to the victims remotely and anonymously, and hear the vict=
ims speech
and thoughts. They can also transmit unusual noises such as loud ba=
ngs, sirens,
and telephone ringing,
that might worry a victim, whether another person can hear these n=
oises or
not. RAAT implants somehow transmit and receive signals at particul=
ar frequency
within the low range of 2 to 7 MHz as noted before. Thus, multiple =
implanted
people at the same location could receive a frequency such as 4.5 M=
Hz. They
would also transmit the sounds they make or hear in this frequency =
range. This
apparently includes bodily noises such as chewing, digestion, and e=
limination. A
later section will summarize psychological effects that would be ex=
pected from
the severe invasiveness due to this extreme internal surveillance, =
once the
victim becomes aware of it. Most implanted persons may not become a=
ware of their
condition either because they receive few transmissions or operator=
s do not
inform them.
SW radio operators at times have partially confronted the implicati=
ons of their
transmissions with implanted persons, and some might agree with the=
description
of them as "hobbyists who took a wrong turn". A more typical attitu=
de
regards their torture of these victims as fun to transmit and broad=
cast the
private lives of victims in their "cool sport". No other technology
has achieved this method of torture, after all. These illegal impla=
nts could
have been the source of fundamental knowledge about how the human m=
ind operates
with self-control and foresight if they were safe to use. However, =
the National
Institutes of Health have denied any governmental role in research =
about them.
A type of message to an implanted person that radio operators might
particularly enjoy is called a ruse. This practice is aimed at degr=
adation
through some form of abuse, in this case as a stratagem or trick. A=
ccording to
literature from the Center for Victims of Torture in Minneapolis-St=
. Paul, the
purpose of abuse which involves degradation gives torture its defin=
ing features.
Radio operators gain a sense of achievement by accomplishing the ru=
se and by
impressing other SW hobbyists. In the literature of psychopathology=
this message
could be characterized as a delusion, or a false belief that can fo=
rm a belief
system. If the belief system persists in a disorganized state, then=
psychosis is
implied; the circularity of this relationship between delusion and =
psychosis
deserves attention, particularly in the context of examining the cl=
aims of some
paranoid schizophrenics about the origins of their delusions. An ex=
ample of a
story of this type, the largest
and wealthiest corporation in the world Shell Oil Company, brought=
these
devices to a post-World War II population out of its Nazi past amon=
g its
founders or heads. The implanted person would describe the ruse as =
including a
former friend of decades ago as an heir to this wealth, who would h=
elp the
person if cooperation with operators' directions occurred. The stor=
y further
implied complicity in the cover-up by the Federal Government of a s=
candal of
immense proportions regarding RA AT implants. For example, the Depa=
rtment of
Defense would help the person to have the torturous implants remove=
d once a
targeted act had been performed. The act tended to be impossible to=
accomplish,
in this case focusing on securing a personal injury lawyer to recti=
fy the
situation within the legal system. This story has elements in commo=
n with belief
systems found in cases of paranoid, schizophrenic psychopathology t=
hat could
result in that diagnosis.
VI. PHYSICAL HEALTH EFFECTS
In an implanted person who has received numerous transmissions, a b=
ug detector
can indicate he presence of electromagnetism from the head downward=
to the
bottom of the spine, and outward toward the fingertips. The invisib=
ility of the
implants without an otoscope implies that they do not have batterie=
s or other
external power source. They would need to draw power from the perso=
n's own
life systems including the neurological system. How this energy sou=
rce works has
puzzled the case study subjects, but the ruses have suggested such =
outlandish
mechanisms as power directed from Defense Department satellites ena=
bling the use
of implants as emitters for spying purposes. Perhaps better specifi=
cations about
the implants will become available if they can become empirically d=
ocumented,
but radio operators have so far refused to provide evidence about t=
he
transmissions or their methods despite direct requests from their v=
ictims.
Effects of electromagnetism on human
health have been widely documented, in frequency ranges above and =
below that
of RAAT implants. Findings include cancer, muscular and nerve disor=
ders, tissue
damage and other serious ailments. Some of this medical literature =
is
controversial, and the frequent use of radio waves for many purpose=
s across
fields such as law enforcement, medicine, and communications undoub=
tedly has
contributed to the disputes. If one considers that the human audito=
ry system
works below one MHz while the SW transmissions extend into the mill=
ions of MHz,
the need for study and concern of potential effects can be conclude=
d. Among the
physical effects of electromagnetism due to RAAT implantation and t=
ransmissions
would be symptoms reported by their victims. These can encompass pa=
in, swelling,
and tissue damage mentioned earlier. The technique used by radio op=
erators to
produce these symptoms involves manipulating the intensity of their
transmissions, repeatedly between precise
levels. For example, chest pain could be caused by changing the in=
tensity of
the implanted person's dominant frequency between specific degrees =
on a 1 to
10 scale. A particularly troubling admission by some operators invo=
lves
seizures, in which similar manipulations produces sudden convulsion=
s. Such
effects on the health of implanted persons would be consistent with=
symptoms
documented in cases of persons described as mentally disturbed, who=
have
reported health problems that initially do not match known syndrome=
s or which
can be difficult to assess empirically. The term that can be invoke=
d to
characterize ambiguous symptomology connected with emotionality is =
somaticizing.
The severity of the symptoms can depend on the degree to which the =
implants have
been activated, the frequency and severity of transmission to them =
by multiple
operators, and their relative knowledge about producing this aspect=
of torture.
VII. EMOTIONAL AND COGNITIVE HEALTH EFFECTS
Two aspects of transmission to RAAT implants interfere with the per=
son's
functioning on a psychological level. One is the toxicity of radio =
waves used in
this method. The other is the psychological torture directed toward=
the victim,
which can take the form of constant, verbal abuse. The verbal assau=
lt includes
insults, substituting the operators' guidance for the victim in dir=
ecting
his or her behavior, and simply occupying the internal space known =
as the self
through external transmission. Radio operators have also been descr=
ibed as
conducting conversations with each other in implanted person's head=
. The
victim would of course be helpless in controlling such torture, giv=
en that the
problem is unrecognized except as a symptom of severe disturbance. =
Psychological
effects of the transduction system outlined here probably center on=
four issues:
cognition, emotion, stress, and destabilization of the self. As for=
cognition,
formation of thought, planning,
and intent, deterioration of long- and short-term memory, and unch=
aracteristic
withdrawal from external stimulation in an autistic fashion can occ=
ur. Emotional
changes can consist of a range from panic to depression, including =
fugue and,
alternatively, suicidal states. The condition can be one of extreme=
, ongoing
stress, due to the interference with recovery that treatments of po=
st-traumatic
stress disorder can reach. An analogy could be the experiences of a=
bducted
hostages or prisoners of war during their confinement. The most sev=
ere reactions
can occur among victims who have been transmitted to operators. Tre=
atment
prospects are particularly bleak for the victim. The medical commun=
ity has
supplied drugs with psychotropic properties that cannot repel trans=
missions.
However, the chemicals have purportedly doped or partially sedated =
the victims
in an unsuccessful attempt to control responsiveness to them. Remov=
al of the
stitches securing the RAAT
implants would be much preferred as the only effective, ethical co=
rrective for
the malpractice.
VIII. SOCIETAL IMPLICATIONS
In the scenario of composite case studies, application to the large=
r society
may occur as well as to the individual. Not all aspects of society =
will be
touched by the effects of having RAAT implants among us. Possible a=
reas of
concern can be summarized here. 1. The more general use of implants=
, the higher
would health care costs soar due to side effects of this device, 2.=
Crime rates
would reflect the interference by perpetrators with the individual'=
s
self-control and formation of intent to plan and reason. A high cri=
me rate could
be predicted. 3. Law enforcement and the legal system would not be =
immune to
negative effects; rates of incarceration would rise. In all three c=
ases,
demographic statistics in the United States have risen to puzzling =
levels,
given the high nutritional status, advanced health care, educationa=
l level, and
funding of law enforcement. Why this country would have one of the =
highest
health care costs and rates of violent crimes, and
a prison industry as the largest among businesses, have not been e=
xplained by
other sets of factors either. Some accounts have also suggested tha=
t computers
have become involved in the surveillance of implanted persons by ra=
dio
operators. It might be possible to observe and revise the codes and=
inputs for
computer use, thus making industrial espionage another possible con=
cern about
the effects of having RAAT implants.
REFERENCES
1. American Psychiatric Association (1994) Diagnostic and Statistic=
al Manual
(4th Edition)
2. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association
3. Abramson, P.: Sarah:A Sexual Biography. In D. Byrne and K. Kelle=
y (Eds.),
Series in Human Sexual Behavior. Albany, NY; State University of Ne=
w York Press.
SOURCE:
http://netlab.lmcc.fju.edu.tw/3rd/paper/pap116.htm
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE - This e-mail transmission and any documents=
, files or previous e-mail messages attached to it, may contain information=
that is confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the intended re=
cipient, or a person responsible for delivering it to the intended recipien=
t, you are hereby notified that you must not read or print this transmissio=
n and that any disclosure, copying, printing, distribution or use of any of=
the information contained in or attached to this transmission is STRICTLY =
PROHIBITED. If you have received this transmission in error, please immedia=
tely notify the sender by telephone or return e-mail and delete the origina=
l transmission and its attachments without reading or saving in any manner.
--- On Sun, 12/28/08, Bill & Tracy McDonnell <wmcdo..._at_woh.rr.com> =
wrote:
From: Bill & Tracy McDonnell <wmcdo..._at_woh.rr.com>
Subject: [TSCM-L] {3163} Re: Electronic Harrasement
To: TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com
Date: Sunday, December 28, 2008, 9:11 AM
I've read all the the info regarding this and it brought back many=20
memories. I worked with the criminally insane and NGRI's for 20+ years.=20
There was one who had delusions about the FBI bugging his house, the CIA=20
following him, and knowing his every move. I heard about this everyday for =
4=20
years. One day he came to me dressed differently and now he was the Agent.=
=20
He told me everything that the others were doing, planning, and more. He=20
talked to his watch everyday asking for the Government to send him a=20
helicopter to get him out of the nuthouse.
One day there was a suicide attempt and life flight came to transport, th=
e=20
patient thought that the Government had finally sent his helicopter. This i=
s=20
all been said and done, almost word for word by others that have been=20
diagnosed with multiple mental illnesses. This entire sequence was written=
=20
by a Dr. out of Ohio.
Bill
----- Original Message -----=20
From: "TedMc" <everybo..._at_gmail.com>
To: "TSCM-L Professionals List" <TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, December 27, 2008 2:34 PM
Subject: [TSCM-L] {3162} Electronic Harrasement
I have told the story of using optical lasers on the mirrors in my
house, I think this is actually called windows. Last night I had a
friend come by who I had saw in my mirror holding a sign. He had
thought I knew about it and was quick to talk about it although he did
not know how it worked. After some talking I told him which I had
though for some time I think the same thing was done to him.
This was not all done by me. I actually had some help from the
inside. In their opinion and in mine their is one person who needs to
knock on my door and tell me everything. Also if anyone from the
Prattville, al area has signed up for this group recently they may
know something. They may be someone interested in the group because I
am supposed to be the only one who knows I am a member of this group,
but the truth of the matter is this is not true..
I had to say this because I forgot to the other night in regards to
mythbusters. I like the show but it is entertainment, but it is
entertainment and I am sure they will say themselves that they could
not possibly learn everything about a subject in the time it takes to
film an episode.
I makes me wonder what they would came up with if asked without
knowing it's possiblity to use the law of optics to pick up the room
conversations from a window pane. I also read of Bernard Spindell I
think was his name who used this technique to use toilet water to do
the same thing.. Is this not the same technique that Resonant Cavity
Passive Bug uses. I also think it's possible to use a computer as
Burst Bug, or at lease direct it to transmit information in this way.
Would computers linked together not act as repeaters?
I was wondering if there are any good schools someone would recommend
as I don't know how I could go back to sales. Everyone wants their
work to mean something and I know that although I am at the point of
proving myself correct I left out the most damaging stuff because to
mention everyone would for sure think I was a nut. I also know there
are thousands out there who need help.
=20
=20
------=_NextPart_000_04E4_01C96C00.50D47330
Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; charset=3Diso-8859-1"=
>
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.6001.18183" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><STRONG><FONT face=3D"Segoe Print" size=3D4>The year of the Lucasville=
Riot is=20
what sparked my interest. The F.B.I. used technology that the only people t=
o see=20
were the SWAT team members. I have been studying since. After seeing what w=
as=20
capable , we and mgmt started checking on the Spider system that is now in =
6 of=20
the 32 prisons in Ohio. You can hear a whisper or a pin drop. It has thwart=
ed=20
riots and uprisings but worked against employees also. Check it out, it is=
=20
amazing. </FONT></STRONG></DIV>
<DIV><STRONG><FONT face=3D"Segoe Print" size=3D4>I hope this answers your q=
uestion=20
ED!</FONT></STRONG></DIV>
<DIV><STRONG><FONT face=3D"Segoe Print"=20
size=3D4> =
=20
Bill</FONT></STRONG></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE dir=3Dltr=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LE=
FT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV=20
style=3D"BACKGROUND: #e4e4e4; FONT: 10pt arial; font-color: black"><B>Fro=
m:</B>=20
<A title=3Dsanys..._at_yahoo.com href=3D"mailto:sanys..._at_yahoo.com">ed=20
eduardo</A> </DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A title=3DTSCM-..._at_googlegrou=
ps.com=20
href=3D"mailto:TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com">TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com</A>=
=20
</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Monday, December 29, 2008 1:=
57=20
PM</DIV>
<DIV style=3D"FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> [TSCM-L] {3175} Re: Elect=
ronic=20
Harrasement</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV>
<TABLE cellSpacing=3D0 cellPadding=3D0 border=3D0>
<TBODY>
<TR>
<TD vAlign=3Dtop>
<DIV id=3Dyiv740081823>Bill<BR><BR>I am quite certain that the vast=
=20
majority of individuals who are in fact targets of 'electronic=20
harassment' would be diagnosed as mentally ill, this for several=20
reasons. Firstly, the truthful reporting of the experiences to a=20
'trained medical professional' would in itself result in a diagnosi=
s of=20
mental illness (make that misdiagnosis, of which I am certain there=
are=20
many), as the symptoms are textbook, the reasons for this obvious f=
rom=20
my point of view.<BR><BR> Secondly, the unique and individual=
=20
experience of such 'harassment' would, as Dr. Kelley pointed out in=
her=20
paper (which I will repost below) cause destabilization of anyone's=
=20
mental state and thirdly, the misinformation that is delibertly=20
circulated on the subject, (call it dysinformation) is designed to=
=20
further label targeted individuals as 'kooks' (at least) who believ=
e in=20
fantastic technologies that are beyond the accepted realities of sc=
ience=20
and technology.<BR><BR>As you seem particularily interested in the=
=20
psychiatric aspect of the phenomena, I would refer you to the book =
by=20
the psychiatrist Dr. Colin A. Ross (The CIA Doctors: Human Rights=
=20
Violations by American Psychiatrists) which documents by use of the=
=20
Freedom of Information Act the use of human beings for horrific min=
d=20
experimentation by the profession, this for politically based=20
purposes. <BR><BR>While no one is able to evaluate a specific =
case=20
based on email presentation of the problem, I am quite certain that=
the=20
probability that a good percentage of individuals who report being=
=20
victims of 'electronic harassment' are in fact victims of=20
destabilization from an external source. The ultimate question on t=
his=20
matter lies with those who allow such actions in a society such as =
ours=20
supposedly based on freedoms and individual rights as expressed in =
our=20
Constitution. The former Soviet Union utilized psychiatry for polit=
ical=20
purposes, apparently a model for social control techniques now in t=
his=20
country.<BR><BR>I am curious Bill, why is someone with 20 years=20
experience working with the 'criminally insane' is now interested i=
n a=20
TSCM list? Is there something about advanced covert electronic=20
technologies and the criminally insane that you find of=20
interest? <BR><BR>+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++<BR>The artic=
le=20
attributed to Dr. Kelley, the basis of which confirmed by articles =
in=20
the local newspaper at the time. Once again, I see=20
inaccuracies.<BR><BR>Case Studies of Destabilization and Delusions=
=20
Described as<BR>Radio-wave Transmitted: Behavioral=20
Implications<BR><BR>Kathryn Kelley<BR>Department of Psychology,=20
University of Albany, State University of New York<BR>Albany, New Y=
ork=20
12222, United States of America<BR><BR>ABSTRACT<BR><BR><BR>The topi=
c of=20
the case studies involved in the research paradigm to be=20
described<BR>here is the use of devices which have been labeled in=
=20
various ways. Informal<BR>names for them have included: radio-wave=
=20
hearing implants; electromagnetic<BR>auditory devices; internal,=20
auditory, connecting devices; and radio-wave,<BR>auditory, assaulti=
ve.=20
transmitting (RAAT) implants. They refer to the use of a<BR>miniatu=
re=20
device attached to the human auditory canal, near the=20
tympanic<BR>membrane. The goals of this research as a technique for=
=20
presenting scenarios of<BR>experimental, composite case studies of =
this=20
phenomena are stated. RAAT implants<BR>are described, as well as th=
eir=20
implantation and detection; the transduction<BR>system; their physi=
cal,=20
emotional, and cognitive effects; and societal<BR>implications incl=
uding=20
a brief exploration of the technological involvement.<BR><BR>I. GOA=
LS OF=20
THIS RESEARCH<BR><BR>The purpose of these implants is the use of=20
electromagnetism in a communication<BR>device which can act as a=20
transducer. The input typically ranges from two to<BR>seven megaher=
tz=20
(MHz) at low intensity. According to reports about individuals<BR>w=
ho=20
have described them, the input is described as sound resembling tha=
t=20
which a<BR>commercial radio might provide. Other descriptions of th=
ese=20
experiences have<BR>also been included in the case studies which wi=
ll be=20
summarized. According to<BR>the summaries, behavioral functions of =
RAAT=20
implants can encompass internal,<BR>auditory surveillance of the=20
individual's experiences, pain delivery to that<BR>person, and=20
transmissions of conversations as any sound heard by the=20
individual.<BR>Examples of these functions will be part of this=20
description.<BR><BR>The psychological implications of using RAAT=20
implants are broad, not the least<BR>of which is the concern that a=
ny=20
person reporting the existence of them in<BR>one's ears, or the=20
experience of "hearing voices' not observed by<BR>those present, ma=
y be=20
labeled delusional as a symptom of severe psychological<BR>disturba=
nce.=20
Current psychiatric diagnosis would lead to the possibility=20
that<BR>these behavioral signs support a conclusion of paranoia as =
part=20
of psychosis or<BR>more narrowly, schizophrenia. Thus this research=
=20
paradigm will investigate the<BR>effects of individuals' claiming t=
hese=20
exist or happen.<BR><BR>Why would a behavioral researcher undertake=
the=20
study of hypotheses related to<BR>such a paradigm?<BR><BR>For one=
=20
important reason, the experiences related to RAAT implantation have=
,=20
as<BR>already pointed out, a crucial role in the diagnosis of menta=
l=20
disturbance. To<BR>date, no known studies have investigated the rol=
e of=20
this phenomena in the<BR>individual's perception, behavior, or=20
well-being. According to a search of<BR>the literature on=20
psychopathology, no empirical knowledge exists about these<BR>aspec=
ts of=20
RAAT implantation as studied here, despite its contribution to=20
the<BR>diagnostic process in such publications as the fourth editio=
n of=20
the Diagnostic<BR>and Statistical Manual-IV of the American Psychia=
tric=20
Association (1). Second,<BR>the author as a social and personality=
=20
psychologist works in a field which has<BR>historically initiated=
=20
research in areas of social behavior by isolating a focal<BR>variab=
le=20
and systematically examining it from many different angles.=20
This<BR>unstudied phenomena resembles other social behaviors subjec=
ted=20
to close,<BR>scientific analysis using<BR> methodological=20
variations that can lead to reliable, valid conclusions. Third,<BR>=
the=20
range of analyses in the author's field extends from abstract,=20
basic<BR>research to direct application. this paradigm brings a soc=
ial=20
behavior into the<BR>settings of basic research in order to uncover=
new=20
knowledge about how this<BR>phenomenon works.<BR><BR>The paradigm o=
r=20
model of research involves the use of experimental case studies<BR>=
to=20
examine one factor of reported use of RAAT implants among various=
=20
categories<BR>of adults. These cases are experimental in the sense =
that=20
the participants were<BR>not in clinical populations; they were not=
=20
being treated for mental disturbance<BR>as a part of this study. Th=
e=20
first step in this paradigm is to conceptualize the<BR>types of cas=
es=20
that could reveal how the implants effect the individual. This<BR>p=
aper=20
described the reports of individuals represented by these cases,=20
and<BR>integrates several aspects of the =EDmplanted person's exper=
ience.=20
What to do<BR>with these accounts formed the second step in the=20
paradigm. The technique<BR>selected for this research was to study =
the=20
perceptions and attitudes of college<BR>students about the case stu=
dy=20
experiences, and the results of the initial<BR>findings have been=
=20
reported at another conference. The third step for this<BR>research=
=20
could broaden its<BR> implications for application; one use wo=
uld=20
be to increase awareness about the<BR>phenomena and its importance =
for=20
everyday, as well as specialized, aspects of<BR>one's=20
experience.<BR><BR>In the next section, the case study method will =
be=20
described briefly in order<BR>to distinguish it from other methods =
and=20
to indicate its utility. Following<BR>sections will summarize: the =
RAAT=20
implants themselves; description of the<BR>devices; conditions of=
=20
implanting; the transduction system; effects on physical<BR>health;=
=20
emotional and cognitive effects; and society's involvement with=20
this<BR>phenomenon including effects on antisocial behavior and=20
implications for the<BR>condition of a society faced with it, for=
=20
medicine, law and its enforcement, and<BR>technology.<BR><BR>II. HO=
W=20
CASE STUDIES CAN BE INTERPRETED<BR><BR>In the prologue to Paul=20
Abramson's (1984) book, Sarah: A Sexual Biography,<BR>the defining=
=20
elements of the case study as a scientific method are=20
outlined.<BR>Abramson uses the term "slice of life" to embody the=
=20
meaning of this<BR>method, tracing it to its clinical and medical r=
oots=20
(2). It is an account of<BR>individual human behavior that fits wit=
hin a=20
pattern that is presented<BR>stylistically. Data from a response sh=
eet,=20
observations of the individual by the<BR>researcher and other repor=
ters,=20
and past histories combine into a story that<BR>characterizes the=
=20
experiences sampled for inclusion.<BR><BR>Behavioral case studies'=
=20
content can reach into endless areas of<BR>peoples' lives. Some are=
as=20
may appear unrelated at the outset of cataloging,<BR>only to become=
=20
interrelated as the process of storytelling unfolds. he=20
scattered<BR>pieces reemerge at times into a sensible whole that ca=
n=20
lead to a compelling<BR>study of individuals dealing with the chall=
enges=20
of a lifetime. Case studies as<BR>a method tie together subjectivit=
y=20
with intended objectivity. Inaccurate memory,<BR>distortion, and de=
nial=20
can result from projective methods; of course all<BR>self-report me=
thods=20
including apparently objective ones like surveys have<BR>received=
=20
criticism due to their basic subjectivity. The richness=20
from<BR>interweaving the two loose ends has also been praised as an=
=20
alternative method<BR>for gaining insight into areas that can give =
us a=20
"...penetrating view of a<BR>set of circumstances that are more=20
horrendous and more involving than the<BR>content of even the most =
vivid=20
fiction," as Abramson (p.5)<BR> describes a subject with an un=
usual=20
history.<BR><BR>Besides describing the apparent experiences of thes=
e=20
five functional adults who<BR>reported presence of RAAT implants, t=
he=20
observations are extended into<BR>implications for macro levels of=
=20
societal trends. In the field of Social and<BR>Personality Psycholo=
gy, a=20
technique for presenting this kind of information is<BR>the scenari=
o.=20
Once the observations about composite cases have been=20
described,<BR>several scenarios are developed as outcomes explainin=
g the=20
effects on some<BR>societal trends. Not every variable that can be=
=20
conceptualized is related to<BR>either the individuals' accounts or=
to=20
the scenarios. Therefore, only<BR>certain phenomena are mentioned=
=20
because of the relevance to the outcomes.<BR><BR>III. DESCRIPTION O=
F THE=20
DEVICES<BR><BR>In this composite of experimental studies, the term =
RAAT=20
implants will refer to<BR>miniaturized transducers operating via=20
low-frequency electromagnetism<BR>consistently with accounts of=20
individuals who report awareness of their<BR>presence. Besides=20
communication and pain delivery, the individuals may also<BR>descri=
be=20
functions of surveillance, tracking of their locations, and=20
direction<BR>of their behavior by remote influence. Some devices=20
currently available involve<BR>some of these functions, including=
=20
implants in animals for tracking and<BR>identification, and similar=
=20
purposes among prisoners. The latter may have, for<BR>example, cuff=
s=20
secured to their ankles for ensuring limits on their mobility=20
via<BR>notification to a remote location of their=20
whereabouts.<BR><BR>The accounts by case study subjects imply certa=
in=20
characteristics of the RAAT<BR>implants that involve their location=
,=20
probable operation, structure and<BR>materials. The device would be=
=20
invisible by an observer, given that the cases<BR>have not revealed=
=20
others' mentioning that they noticed them. Because the<BR>persons h=
ave=20
not had implantation via invasive surgery, their implied=20
location<BR>would be internal but easily reachable. Their function =
would=20
indicate placement<BR>in the ear canal, near the tympanic membrane =
or=20
ear drum. Transmission of<BR>electromagnetism would be two-way, mea=
ning=20
that the transducers act as both<BR>receivers and transmitters. The=
=20
material used for this purpose would involve<BR>some sort of metal=
=20
because of their conductiveness, although the precise content<BR>is=
not=20
known to these case study subjects.<BR><BR>Some hearing assistive=
=20
devices have become commercially available that resemble<BR>them in=
some=20
ways, although the aids are removable by the patients and are=20
not<BR>implanted. Some assistive devices have used electromagnetism=
that=20
is programmed<BR>by a computer to a useful frequency range. Also=20
cochlear implants can be<BR>implanted for conductive hearing loss d=
ue to=20
nerve damage, although this type of<BR>implant involves extensive=
=20
surgery and follow-up. As far as RAAT implants are<BR>concerned, th=
e=20
USA's Food and Drug Administration regards the next phase of<BR>the=
m as=20
devices and not implants. The distinction is relevant and=20
deserves<BR>explanation. Because they are not placed within tissue,=
they=20
qualify as<BR>nonimplants and therefore are subjected to less strin=
gent=20
tests of safety, side<BR>effects, and toxicity.<BR><BR>IV. CONDITIO=
NS OF=20
IMPLANTING<BR><BR>The conditions under which RAAT implants are plac=
ed in=20
someone's ears are<BR>described as follows. Because most implantati=
on=20
seems to occur without the<BR>victim's awareness, this information =
has=20
been provided by radio operators.<BR>The accounts seem consistent i=
n=20
describing the typical conditions for implanting<BR>as involving ge=
neral=20
anesthesia during surgery for another purpose. The more<BR>general=
=20
status of the victim is to be under the care of a medical=20
professional<BR>while unconscious. However, there is some indicatio=
n=20
that even newborns may have<BR>a different version of RAAT deposite=
d in=20
their ears. The adult version has been<BR>sewed into a stabilized=
=20
position near the tympanic membrane or eardrum.<BR>Implanted people=
have=20
been found in all professions and strata of society.<BR>Detection o=
f=20
these devices can involve two major methods. The first is to use=20
an<BR>inexpensive otoscope that has a lighted funnel for viewing th=
e=20
auditory canal<BR>near the eardrum. In adults the=20
usual<BR> appearance would be darkened areas that diverge=20
significantly from the<BR>textbook appearance of the auditory canal=
.=20
There may be tiny stitches visable in<BR>this area, which secure th=
e=20
devices in a section of the canal. Multiple pairs of<BR>implants in=
each=20
ear can be forced upon the anesthetized victim when=20
additional<BR>surgery occurs in the future. The original view was t=
hat=20
the instruments for<BR>RAAT implanting are too large for newborns a=
nd=20
infants up to the age of 1.5<BR>years, but some visibility of an=20
obstruction in the auditory canal of children<BR>who have not had=
=20
anesthesia and some indication of short-distance transmission<BR>wi=
th=20
their implanted parents has led to a revision of this view. Case=20
study<BR>subjects and radio operators have reported that no doctor =
has=20
admitted to<BR>viewing this abnormal appearance to victims of any a=
ge,=20
including their own<BR>families. A second method involves the use o=
f a=20
device known as a bug detector,<BR>which is available through some=
=20
mail<BR> order catalogs specializing in surveillance equipment=
. The=20
appropriate<BR>detector will have enough sensitivity to signal the=
=20
presence of electromagnetic<BR>waves below 5 MHz. It is simply poin=
ted=20
into the ear canal, where transmissions<BR>can be detected dependin=
g on=20
the strength of radio-wave activity currently<BR>directed in that a=
rea=20
by radio-operators antennas. What would motivate<BR>professionals t=
o=20
perform malpractice on such a large and invasive scale? Some<BR>acc=
ounts=20
have described financial gain for the implanters themselves. But=20
the<BR>daily denial by medical professionals about the visibility o=
f=20
RAAT implants<BR>would be very puzzling. Descriptions of an experie=
nce=20
among physicians applying<BR>for a medical license might provide a=
=20
partial explanation. According to the<BR>results of surveillance of=
=20
closed, pre-licensing sessions by radio operators,<BR>these physici=
ans=20
are exposed to an account of the scandal and its cover-up as=20
it<BR>relates to the malpractice connected with<BR> RAAT=20
implanting. As a condition of receiving and maintaining their=20
license,<BR>these physicians are described as agreeing not to revea=
l=20
this information.<BR>Tactics such as threatening or psychotropicall=
y=20
drugging patients who claim<BR>implantation have been developed.=20
Additionally, a similar technique of<BR>maintaining denial about=20
severely widespread malpractice has reportedly arisen<BR>among atto=
rneys=20
with respect to licensing and continuing in the profession.<BR>Imag=
ine=20
the scene of a prospective plaintiff approaching two attorneys=20
to<BR>request that a personal injury case be undertaken, concerning=
the=20
person's<BR>RAAT implantation and severe injury resulting from it. =
When=20
the victim produces<BR>a bug detector and the attorneys use it to=
=20
demonstrate their own implantation,<BR>while the detector buzzes aw=
ay=20
and lights up in their own ears, they amazingly<BR>reject the case=
=20
anyway.<BR><BR>V. THE TRANSDUCTION SYSTEM<BR><BR>In the system of=
=20
transmitting electromagnetism to and from RAAT implants,<BR>several=
=20
factors and techniques are involved. Only the basics will be=20
summarized<BR>here, although according to case study subjects other=
=20
elements involve the use<BR>of computers, communication satellites,=
and=20
organizations such as the National<BR>Security Agency. A claim like=
this=20
would appear delusional in current diagnostic<BR>systems, so the=20
description here will be limited to how people and their<BR>transce=
ivers=20
use RAAT implants. The operator of a transceiver as a hobbyist=20
is<BR>termed a short-wave or ham radio operator, and operators of=
=20
citizens band (CB)<BR>radios installed in vehicles can also become=
=20
involved.<BR><BR>SW radio operators can send and receive electromag=
netic=20
signals at a wide range<BR>of frequencies and across long distances=
.=20
Communications with aircraft and<BR>submarines have involved these=
=20
parameters. The nonprofessional is required to<BR>have a license fr=
om=20
the Federal Communications Commission, but operators have<BR>descri=
bed=20
themselves as generally unlicensed. The cost of equipment can=20
exceed<BR>several thousand dollars, and includes a tall antenna whi=
ch=20
can serve as a sign<BR>for locating SW radio operation. A televised=
news=20
report, however, revealed that<BR>the 20 to 100 foot towers can be=
=20
camouflaged by surprising structures like a<BR>church steeple, fake=
=20
trees which might lead to a bird house, a flag pole, or a<BR>grain =
silo.=20
When SW operators transit to or scan RAAT implants in victims,=20
they<BR>can talk to the victims remotely and anonymously, and hear =
the=20
victims speech<BR>and thoughts. They can also transmit unusual nois=
es=20
such as loud bangs, sirens,<BR>and telephone ringing,<BR> that=
=20
might worry a victim, whether another person can hear these noises=
=20
or<BR>not. RAAT implants somehow transmit and receive signals at=20
particular frequency<BR>within the low range of 2 to 7 MHz as noted=
=20
before. Thus, multiple implanted<BR>people at the same location cou=
ld=20
receive a frequency such as 4.5 MHz. They<BR>would also transmit th=
e=20
sounds they make or hear in this frequency range. This<BR>apparentl=
y=20
includes bodily noises such as chewing, digestion, and elimination.=
=20
A<BR>later section will summarize psychological effects that would =
be=20
expected from<BR>the severe invasiveness due to this extreme intern=
al=20
surveillance, once the<BR>victim becomes aware of it. Most implante=
d=20
persons may not become aware of their<BR>condition either because t=
hey=20
receive few transmissions or operators do not<BR>inform them.<BR><B=
R>SW=20
radio operators at times have partially confronted the implications=
of=20
their<BR>transmissions with implanted persons, and some might agree=
with=20
the description<BR>of them as "hobbyists who took a wrong turn". A =
more=20
typical attitude<BR>regards their torture of these victims as fun t=
o=20
transmit and broadcast the<BR>private lives of victims in their "co=
ol=20
sport". No other technology<BR>has achieved this method of torture,=
=20
after all. These illegal implants could<BR>have been the source of=
=20
fundamental knowledge about how the human mind operates<BR>with=20
self-control and foresight if they were safe to use. However, the=
=20
National<BR>Institutes of Health have denied any governmental role =
in=20
research about them.<BR><BR>A type of message to an implanted perso=
n=20
that radio operators might<BR>particularly enjoy is called a ruse. =
This=20
practice is aimed at degradation<BR>through some form of abuse, in =
this=20
case as a stratagem or trick. According to<BR>literature from the C=
enter=20
for Victims of Torture in Minneapolis-St. Paul, the<BR>purpose of a=
buse=20
which involves degradation gives torture its defining features.<BR>=
Radio=20
operators gain a sense of achievement by accomplishing the ruse and=
=20
by<BR>impressing other SW hobbyists. In the literature of=20
psychopathology this message<BR>could be characterized as a delusio=
n, or=20
a false belief that can form a belief<BR>system. If the belief syst=
em=20
persists in a disorganized state, then psychosis is<BR>implied; the=
=20
circularity of this relationship between delusion and=20
psychosis<BR>deserves attention, particularly in the context of=20
examining the claims of some<BR>paranoid schizophrenics about the=
=20
origins of their delusions. An example of a<BR>story of this type, =
the=20
largest<BR> and wealthiest corporation in the world Shell Oil=
=20
Company, brought these<BR>devices to a post-World War II population=
out=20
of its Nazi past among its<BR>founders or heads. The implanted pers=
on=20
would describe the ruse as including a<BR>former friend of decades =
ago=20
as an heir to this wealth, who would help the<BR>person if cooperat=
ion=20
with operators' directions occurred. The story further<BR>implied=
=20
complicity in the cover-up by the Federal Government of a scandal=
=20
of<BR>immense proportions regarding RA AT implants. For example, th=
e=20
Department of<BR>Defense would help the person to have the torturou=
s=20
implants removed once a<BR>targeted act had been performed. The act=
=20
tended to be impossible to accomplish,<BR>in this case focusing on=
=20
securing a personal injury lawyer to rectify the<BR>situation withi=
n the=20
legal system. This story has elements in common with belief<BR>syst=
ems=20
found in cases of paranoid, schizophrenic psychopathology that=20
could<BR>result in that diagnosis.<BR><BR>VI. PHYSICAL HEALTH=20
EFFECTS<BR><BR>In an implanted person who has received numerous=20
transmissions, a bug detector<BR>can indicate he presence of=20
electromagnetism from the head downward to the<BR>bottom of the spi=
ne,=20
and outward toward the fingertips. The invisibility of the<BR>impla=
nts=20
without an otoscope implies that they do not have batteries or=20
other<BR>external power source. They would need to draw power from =
the=20
person's own<BR>life systems including the neurological system. How=
this=20
energy source works has<BR>puzzled the case study subjects, but the=
=20
ruses have suggested such outlandish<BR>mechanisms as power directe=
d=20
from Defense Department satellites enabling the use<BR>of implants =
as=20
emitters for spying purposes. Perhaps better specifications about<B=
R>the=20
implants will become available if they can become empirically=20
documented,<BR>but radio operators have so far refused to provide=
=20
evidence about the<BR>transmissions or their methods despite direct=
=20
requests from their victims.<BR>Effects of electromagnetism on=20
human<BR> health have been widely documented, in frequency ran=
ges=20
above and below that<BR>of RAAT implants. Findings include cancer,=
=20
muscular and nerve disorders, tissue<BR>damage and other serious=20
ailments. Some of this medical literature is<BR>controversial, and =
the=20
frequent use of radio waves for many purposes across<BR>fields such=
as=20
law enforcement, medicine, and communications undoubtedly=20
has<BR>contributed to the disputes. If one considers that the human=
=20
auditory system<BR>works below one MHz while the SW transmissions e=
xtend=20
into the millions of MHz,<BR>the need for study and concern of pote=
ntial=20
effects can be concluded. Among the<BR>physical effects of=20
electromagnetism due to RAAT implantation and transmissions<BR>woul=
d be=20
symptoms reported by their victims. These can encompass pain,=20
swelling,<BR>and tissue damage mentioned earlier. The technique use=
d by=20
radio operators to<BR>produce these symptoms involves manipulating =
the=20
intensity of their<BR>transmissions, repeatedly between=20
precise<BR> levels. For example, chest pain could be caused by=
=20
changing the intensity of<BR>the implanted person's dominant freque=
ncy=20
between specific degrees on a 1 to<BR>10 scale. A particularly trou=
bling=20
admission by some operators involves<BR>seizures, in which similar=
=20
manipulations produces sudden convulsions. Such<BR>effects on the h=
ealth=20
of implanted persons would be consistent with symptoms<BR>documente=
d in=20
cases of persons described as mentally disturbed, who have<BR>repor=
ted=20
health problems that initially do not match known syndromes or=20
which<BR>can be difficult to assess empirically. The term that can =
be=20
invoked to<BR>characterize ambiguous symptomology connected with=20
emotionality is somaticizing.<BR>The severity of the symptoms can d=
epend=20
on the degree to which the implants have<BR>been activated, the=20
frequency and severity of transmission to them by multiple<BR>opera=
tors,=20
and their relative knowledge about producing this aspect of=20
torture.<BR><BR>VII. EMOTIONAL AND COGNITIVE HEALTH EFFECTS<BR><BR>=
Two=20
aspects of transmission to RAAT implants interfere with the=20
person's<BR>functioning on a psychological level. One is the toxici=
ty of=20
radio waves used in<BR>this method. The other is the psychological=
=20
torture directed toward the victim,<BR>which can take the form of=
=20
constant, verbal abuse. The verbal assault includes<BR>insults,=20
substituting the operators' guidance for the victim in directing<BR=
>his=20
or her behavior, and simply occupying the internal space known as t=
he=20
self<BR>through external transmission. Radio operators have also be=
en=20
described as<BR>conducting conversations with each other in implant=
ed=20
person's head. The<BR>victim would of course be helpless in control=
ling=20
such torture, given that the<BR>problem is unrecognized except as a=
=20
symptom of severe disturbance. Psychological<BR>effects of the=20
transduction system outlined here probably center on four=20
issues:<BR>cognition, emotion, stress, and destabilization of the s=
elf.=20
As for cognition,<BR>formation of thought, planning,<BR> and=
=20
intent, deterioration of long- and short-term memory, and=20
uncharacteristic<BR>withdrawal from external stimulation in an auti=
stic=20
fashion can occur. Emotional<BR>changes can consist of a range from=
=20
panic to depression, including fugue and,<BR>alternatively, suicida=
l=20
states. The condition can be one of extreme, ongoing<BR>stress, due=
to=20
the interference with recovery that treatments of=20
post-traumatic<BR>stress disorder can reach. An analogy could be th=
e=20
experiences of abducted<BR>hostages or prisoners of war during thei=
r=20
confinement. The most severe reactions<BR>can occur among victims w=
ho=20
have been transmitted to operators. Treatment<BR>prospects are=20
particularly bleak for the victim. The medical community has<BR>sup=
plied=20
drugs with psychotropic properties that cannot repel=20
transmissions.<BR>However, the chemicals have purportedly doped or=
=20
partially sedated the victims<BR>in an unsuccessful attempt to cont=
rol=20
responsiveness to them. Removal of the<BR>stitches securing the=20
RAAT<BR> implants would be much preferred as the only effectiv=
e,=20
ethical corrective for<BR>the malpractice.<BR><BR>VIII. SOCIETAL=20
IMPLICATIONS<BR><BR>In the scenario of composite case studies,=20
application to the larger society<BR>may occur as well as to the=20
individual. Not all aspects of society will be<BR>touched by the ef=
fects=20
of having RAAT implants among us. Possible areas of<BR>concern can =
be=20
summarized here. 1. The more general use of implants, the=20
higher<BR>would health care costs soar due to side effects of this=
=20
device, 2. Crime rates<BR>would reflect the interference by perpetr=
ators=20
with the individual's<BR>self-control and formation of intent to pl=
an=20
and reason. A high crime rate could<BR>be predicted. 3. Law enforce=
ment=20
and the legal system would not be immune to<BR>negative effects; ra=
tes=20
of incarceration would rise. In all three cases,<BR>demographic=20
statistics in the United States have risen to puzzling levels,<BR>g=
iven=20
the high nutritional status, advanced health care, educational leve=
l,=20
and<BR>funding of law enforcement. Why this country would have one =
of=20
the highest<BR>health care costs and rates of violent crimes,=20
and<BR> a prison industry as the largest among businesses, hav=
e not=20
been explained by<BR>other sets of factors either. Some accounts ha=
ve=20
also suggested that computers<BR>have become involved in the=20
surveillance of implanted persons by radio<BR>operators. It might b=
e=20
possible to observe and revise the codes and inputs for<BR>computer=
use,=20
thus making industrial espionage another possible concern about<BR>=
the=20
effects of having RAAT implants.<BR><BR>REFERENCES<BR><BR>1. Americ=
an=20
Psychiatric Association (1994) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual<BR=
>(4th=20
Edition)<BR>2. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association<BR>=
3.=20
Abramson, P.: Sarah:A Sexual Biography. In D. Byrne and K. Kelley=
=20
(Eds.),<BR>Series in Human Sexual Behavior. Albany, NY; State Unive=
rsity=20
of New York Press.<BR><BR>SOURCE:=20
http://netlab.lmcc.fju.edu.tw/3rd/paper/pap116.htm<BR><BR><BR><BR>C=
ONFIDENTIALITY=20
NOTICE - This e-mail transmission and any documents, files or previ=
ous=20
e-mail messages attached to it, may contain information that is=20
confidential or legally privileged. If you are not the intended=20
recipient, or a person responsible for delivering it to the intende=
d=20
recipient, you are hereby notified that you must not read or print =
this=20
transmission and that any disclosure, copying, printing, distributi=
on or=20
use of any of the information contained in or attached to this=20
transmission is STRICTLY PROHIBITED. If you have received this=20
transmission in error, please immediately notify the sender by tele=
phone=20
or return e-mail and delete the original transmission and its=20
attachments without reading or saving in any manner.<BR><BR>--- On=
=20
<B>Sun, 12/28/08, Bill & Tracy McDonnell=20
<I><wmc..._at_woh.rr.com></I></B> wrote:<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: rgb(16,1=
6,255) 2px solid">From:=20
Bill & Tracy McDonnell <wmc..._at_woh.rr.com><BR>Subject:=
=20
[TSCM-L] {3163} Re: Electronic Harrasement<BR>To:=20
TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com<BR>Date: Sunday, December 28, 2008, 9:1=
1=20
AM<BR><BR><PRE> I've read all the the info regarding this and it =
brought back many=20
memories. I worked with the criminally insane and NGRI's for 20+ years.=20
There was one who had delusions about the FBI bugging his house, the CIA=20
following him, and knowing his every move. I heard about this everyday for =
4=20
years. One day he came to me dressed differently and now he was the Agent.=
=20
He told me everything that the others were doing, planning, and more. He=20
talked to his watch everyday asking for the Government to send him a=20
helicopter to get him out of the nuthouse.
One day there was a suicide attempt and life flight came to transport, th=
e=20
patient thought that the Government had finally sent his helicopter. This i=
s=20
all been said and done, almost word for word by others that have been=20
diagnosed with multiple mental illnesses. This entire sequence was written=
=20
by a Dr. out of Ohio.
Bill
----- Original Message -----=20
From: "TedMc" <everyb..._at_gmail.com>
To: "TSCM-L Professionals List" <TSC..._at_googlegroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, December 27, 2008 2:34 PM
Subject: [TSCM-L] {3162} Electronic Harrasement
I have told the story of using optical lasers on the mirrors in my
house, I think this is actually called windows. Last night I had a
friend come by who I had saw in my mirror holding a sign. He had
thought I knew about it and was quick to talk about it although he did
not know how it worked. After some talking I told him which I had
though for some time I think the same thing was done to him.
This was not all done by me. I actually had some help from the
inside. In their opinion and in mine their is one person who needs to
knock on my door and tell me everything. Also if anyone from the
Prattville, al area has signed up for this group recently they may
know something. They may be someone interested in the group because I
am supposed to be the only one who knows I am a member of this group,
but the truth of the matter is this is not true..
I had to say this because I forgot to the other night in regards to
mythbusters. I like the show but it is entertainment, but it is
entertainment and I am sure they will say themselves that they could
not possibly learn everything about a subject in the time it takes to
film an episode.
I makes me wonder what they would came up with if asked without
knowing it's possiblity to use the law of optics to pick up the room
conversations from a window pane. I also read of Bernard Spindell I
think was his name who used this technique to use toilet water to do
the same thing.. Is this not the same technique that Resonant Cavity
Passive Bug uses. I also think it's possible to use a computer as
Burst Bug, or at lease direct it to transmit information in this way.
Would computers linked together not act as repeaters?
I was wondering if there are any good schools someone would recommend
as I don't know how I could go back to sales. Everyone wants their
work to mean something and I know that although I am at the point of
proving myself correct I left out the most damaging stuff because to
mention everyone would for sure think I was a nut. I also know there
are thousands out there who need help.
</PRE></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV></TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE><BR><BR>
------=_NextPart_000_04E4_01C96C00.50D47330--
Received on Sat Mar 02 2024 - 00:57:16 CST