Re: Fwd: [TSCM-L] Re: New paint blocks out cell phone signals
>From - Sat Mar 02 00:57:17 2024
Received: by 10.11.53.59 with SMTP id b59mr1077136cwa;
Sat, 04 Mar 2006 02:23:40 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <code..._at_gmail.com>
Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.194])
by mx.googlegroups.com with ESMTP id v11si791792cwb.2006.03.04.02.23.39;
Sat, 04 Mar 2006 02:23:40 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (googlegroups.com: domain of code..._at_gmail.com designates 66.249.82.194 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Status: good (test mode)
Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id h26so572517wxd
for <TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com>; Sat, 04 Mar 2006 02:23:39 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q
s; c=nofws;
sūta; d=gmail.com;
h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
b=h6zize3+uL+2+g1NUMg0hVMUwACxCjNpOFE6tcqlqfOEg+3g/YA31n4u5kAExOP849foJFBkiYH2GF3TX6UxRy15+55syvWwXqmMinFZqFabk+7B273LtpI5VhRDW1CXQ3gHCH8lWFOfuAM6ap51eftIsm38c6uwqdy0wBdpQPY=
Received: by 10.11.120.36 with SMTP id s36mr47381cwc;
Sat, 04 Mar 2006 02:23:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.11.120.65 with HTTP; Sat, 4 Mar 2006 02:23:39 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4ef5fec60603040223h124bcbakdf435b3202dda48a_at_mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2006 02:23:39 -0800
From: coderman <code..._at_gmail.com>
To: TSCM-L2006_at_googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Fwd: [TSCM-L] Re: New paint blocks out cell phone signals
In-Reply-To: <4ef5fec60603040214y6918a484y2c6065f3994a3cbb_at_mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
References: <4ef5fec60603040214y6918a484y2c6065f3994a3cbb_at_mail.gmail.com>
On 3/4/06, Eugen Leitl <eu..._at_leitl.org> wrote:
> ...
> Lead is only useful for radiation shielding, ungrounded lead with unshiel=
ded
> windows and power wiring with no frequency filters leading outside is a n=
ot
> particularly good Faraday cage.
agreed, and thanks for the clarification. it was effective enough
kill to wifi in 2.4Ghz, but this is a far cry from TEMPEST...
Received on Sat Mar 02 2024 - 00:57:17 CST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Sat Mar 02 2024 - 01:11:44 CST