>From - Sat Mar 02 00:57:18 2024
Received: by 10.229.53.77 with SMTP id l13mr889790qcg.18.1251191052073;
Tue, 25 Aug 2009 02:04:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.53.77 with SMTP id l13mr889789qcg.18.1251191052053;
Tue, 25 Aug 2009 02:04:12 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <kon..._at_phreaker.net>
Received: from aacompsec.com (aacompsec.com [205.134.161.162])
by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id 24si549268qyk.6.2009.08.25.02.04.10;
Tue, 25 Aug 2009 02:04:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 205.134.161.162 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of kon..._at_phreaker.net) client-ip=205.134.161.162;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 205.134.161.162 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of kon..._at_phreaker.net) smtp.mail=kon..._at_phreaker.net
Received: from aacompsec.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by aacompsec.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED83B505AC48E
for <tscm-..._at_googlegroups.com>; Tue, 25 Aug 2009 05:04:09 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <4A93A8FD.5070907_at_phreaker.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 05:03:57 -0400
From: kondrak <kon..._at_phreaker.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
To: tscm-l2006_at_googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [TSCM-L] {4150} Probably the worlds largest study into the cost
effectiveness of CCTV as a security tool.
References: <1137179c-a251-4d01-867b-d5591cb73d95_at_c29g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <1137179c-a251-4d01-867b-d5591cb73d95_at_c29g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>
Plus a CCTV is worthless in real time unless watched. I agree, more $
for manpower, less big-brother.
pauls..._at_faberbrent.com wrote:
> http://faberbrent.blogspot.com/2009/08/met-police-report-shows-cctv-costs=
.html
>=20
> This is probably the worlds largest study into the cost effectiveness
> of CCTV as a security tool.
>=20
> Met Police report shows CCTV costs =A320,000 per single conviction - how
> many would an extra officer get per year?
> An internal Met Police report has raised very serious questions
> regarding the value of CCTV as a cost-effective crime fighting tool.
> We have yet to see the full report but the headline is that they have
> seen one conviction for every 1,000 CCTV cameras. They have equated
> this to =A320,000 per conviction.
>=20
> >=20
>=20
Received on Sat Mar 02 2024 - 00:57:18 CST