Re: [TSCM-L] {6139} Update: Commonwealth v. James M. Atkinson.... Victory is Mine from secs..._at

From: <secs..._at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 15:14:37 -0400

>From - Sat Mar 02 00:57:18 2024
Received: by 10.50.178.68 with SMTP id cw4mr4575507igc.0.1337549394968;
 Sun, 20 May 2012 14:29:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: tscm-l2006_at_googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.231.2.164 with SMTP id 36ls3951275ibj.5.gmail; Sun, 20 May
2012 14:29:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.50.187.202 with SMTP id fu10mr4568876igc.5.1337549388239;
 Sun, 20 May 2012 14:29:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.50.187.202 with SMTP id fu10mr4568874igc.5.1337549388214;
 Sun, 20 May 2012 14:29:48 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <jm..._at_tscm.com>
Received: from smtpauth02.mfg.siteprotect.com (smtpauth02.mfg.siteprotect.com. [64.26.60.136])
 by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id cv4si2817373igc.0.2012.05.20.14.29.47;
 Sun, 20 May 2012 14:29:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 64.26.60.136 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of jm..._at_tscm.com) client-ip=64.26.60.136;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 64.26.60.136 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of jm..._at_tscm.com) smtp.mail=jm..._at_tscm.com
Received: from Waiting-For-A-Blue-Bird.local (unknown [71.174.17.141])
 (Authenticated sender: jm..._at_tscm.com)
 by smtpauth02.mfg.siteprotect.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 1F869C5F4
 for <tscm-..._at_googlegroups.com>; Sun, 20 May 2012 16:29:47 -0500 (CDT)
Message-ID: <4FB96249.7090302_at_tscm.com>
Date: Sun, 20 May 2012 17:29:45 -0400
From: "James M. Atkinson" <jm..._at_tscm.com>
Reply-To: jm..._at_tscm.com
Organization: Granite Island Group
User-Agent: Thunderbird 3.0a1pre (Macintosh/2008022015)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: tscm-l2006_at_googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [TSCM-L] {6176} Update: Commonwealth v. James M. Atkinson....
Victory is Mine
References: <4FB54018.4080704_at_tscm.com> <CAExG28xsxQuFH3N1WkfDCPAofCoHMdw2TH_AAnS3iF0kA-NO1g_at_mail.gmail.com> <20D790F4ECD53148A44E7B8C606D4BC8424A251D_at_BY2PRD0510MB378.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <4FB83062.40101_at_tscm.com>
In-Reply-To: <4FB83062.40101_at_tscm.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="------------090804080100060202070604"
X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown
X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A020208.4FB9624B.005C,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0

--------------090804080100060202070604
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I actually demanded a jury trial, as is my right under U.S. law.

The problems is that the prosecutors could not produce even a sliver of
evidence that I did anything wrong, and could not produce a single
person who was willing to testify under oath that I had done anything wrong.

Then there was the evidence that the police and the prosecutor hid for
29 months, that proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that I was innocent,
and that the whole thing was a set up from the very beginning.

Then court documents were presented that proved REI beyond a shadow of
a doubt that REI has been illegally manufacturing and smuggling arms for
over 10 years, likely over 20 years.

Then there court documents that proved the REI worked with my local
police department to set me up, to delay a shipment (which I had already
paid REI for in full), so the police could charge me with a crime, when
in fact I had done nothing wrong. REI has been going wild in damage
control mode over this case, especially since the issue of thier
smuggling of arms had come to light (in Fall 2007).

In fact REI actually sued me to try to not have to produce documents,
and then railroaded the case though thier local court, and I responded
by removing the case to Federal Court, and it is now in the First
Circuit Court of Appeals after the judge in the matter was caught
red-handed violating federal law, and I removed it to the Appellate
level (who do not take kindly to judicial misconduct in the lesser, more
inferior courts).

What a lot of folks may not know is that I caught REI red handed doing
massive, and I mean massively massive arms smuggling in Fall 2007, and I
confronted them over the smuggling, and at that time REI threatened me
with retaliation. I was concerned because REI had been telling me for
years that they were applying for and obtaining the required
ITAR/Department of State licenses for all exports, and I came to suspect
that they were not so I started asking questions and demanding export
paperwork. I then continued to push them for copies of the licenses on
other shipments, and even checked with Customs, Commerce and the U.S.
State Deprtment who all confirmed that REI was not obtaining ANY
licensing as required for their shipments. After that point our
relationship deteriorated, and there was the matter of millions of
dollars in commissions that they owed me that they refused to pay. In
2008 and 2009 I started noticing they were playing more and more games
with me, and then in the Fall or 2009 they took their games to a
different level and have since confessed to setting me up from the very
beginning.

In the Fall of 2007 after I suspected what they were up to I properly
reported the matter to the appropriate authorities, and took appropriate
other actions (of which I am not allowed to speak), which is likely why
I got set up by them. Then they actually tried repeatedly to set me up
in 2008 without success, and then several times in early 2009, and then
repeatedly tried to get me to commit export fraud which they were not
successful in doing.

As many of you knew I actually was clinically dead as a result of this,
and was hospitalized for a while, and had to have surgery.

If you have REI equipment you would do well to seek an alternate
supplier of TSCM gear as you may soon find that you can get no customer
services, repair, calibration, or training from the company. If you are
plannign to purchase some of their equipment don't. If you are not a
U.S. Citizen and you possess any of their equipment you could be an very
serious legal trouble because you do not possess it legally. Please go
back and read that last sentence, because you could be brought up on
criminal charges for possession of their equipment as is it impossible
for you to have gotten it legally.

If you have REI gear and you are NOT a U.S. Citizen or you are the U.S>
Citizen and you took this gear outside the borders of the U.S. then you
need to contact the U.S. Embassy closest to you right away and inform
them that you are in possession of smuggled equipment that you
purchased, and which was not lawfully exported from the United States,
and that the equipment is in violation of 22 CFR 121.1 XI(b) and that
you wish to self report the illegal transaction and immediately turn
over the equipment to them or to your own government.

As a replacement for your REI gear I woudl recommend the the equipment
made by Anristu, Tektronics, Winkleman, LorNet, AudioTel, PPSL, Fluke,
and other companies. BUT, if is is TSCM gear or related supplied ensure
that first the company in question has a current State Department
license to manufacture the equipment (REI did not), and they every
import or export has a DOS-PM/DDTC export license number on all of the
paperwork.

DO not be surprised of you government comes knocking on your door to
collect both you and your illegally imported/exported equipment. Having
a candid discussion without he U.S> State Deprtment will save you a lot
of hassles.

If you woudl like to chat with someone at the U.S. State Deprtment I
woudl suggest that you speak first with Beth M. McCormick at (202)
647-0337, and then to Robert Kovac, or actually anybody at the PM/DDTC
Response Team. The PM/DDTC enforcement people will seek to have an
extended discusison with you, so study up on ITAR compliance, and the
Wassenaar Arrangement and UN Security Council arms embargoes before you
call them.

You can also reach them by E-Mail at:
"Beth M. McCormick, U.S. Department of State" <mccor..._at_state.gov>
"Robert S. Kovac, PM/DDTC, U.S. State Department" <Kov..._at_state.gov>
"Smith, Glenn E, PM/DDTC Enforcement and Compliance" <Smit..._at_state.gov>

When possible try to keep you inquiries and correspondence with them in
a written format, and remember these are the folks who ignored what REI
was doing the whole time, and who took no enforcement action against REI
for 15 years.

-jma

James M. Atkinson wrote:
> Simple.
>
> 1) Here is the Defendant
> 2) Here is the Judge
> 3) Here is the Jury
> 4) Here is the exculpatory evidence (tens of thousands of pages the
> defendant did nothing wrong)
> 5) No evidence of wrong doing could be provided, and any form
> 6) Here is the evidence of the innocence of the defendant that the
> police tried to hide, aggressively.
> 7) Here are the summons and the subpoenas issued to the people who
> claimed to be witnesses
> 8) Where are the empty seats where the witnesses against the defendant
> are supposed to be sitting
> 9) Here is the document that the court had to sign in order for the
> defendant to be arrested (the signatures are missing)
> 10) Here is the document that alleges the defendant did something
> wrong, but no actual probable cause is actually stated
> 11) Here is the judge looking quite pissed off at the prosecutor
> 12) Here is the jury looking at the prosecutor and the police, and boy
> do they look pissed, more pissed then the judge looks.
> 13) Here is the judge looking at the six foot high stack of records
> 14) Here is the judge reading about 22 CFR 121.1 XI(b)
> 15) Here is the judge reading about international treaties about arms
> control
> 16) Here is the judge looking at hundreds and hundreds of REI export
> Shippers Export Documents, spanning over a decade
> 17) Here is the judge looking at the State Department report that says
> that REI is not a lawful manufacture or exporter
> 18) Here is the judge looking at the Customs letter that revoked REIs
> ability to export goods for a period of time
> 19) Here is the judge looking at the annual reports published by the
> U.S. State Deprtment of all U.S. Made Exported Arms (including TSCM gear)
> 20) Here is the judge trying to find any mention of REI performing
> legal exports in State Deprtment reports (of TSCM gear exports)
> 21) Here is the judge reading the State Department report that says it
> takes 143 days on average to get legal approvals of TSCM gear
> 22) Here is the judge reading the Commerce Deprtment Reports that
> fails to list REI as getting required ITAR export licenses
> 23) Here is the judge getting progressively more pissed off
> 24) Here is the judge reading the End User Letter by the government
> of Uzbekistan, issued 2 business days before Defendant was arrested.
> 25) Here is the judge reading the E-Mails where extortionate threats
> were made unless Defendant broke the law and did an illegal export
> 26) Here is the jury looking even more pissed off then the judge
> 27) Here is the prosecutor banging his head on the table
> 28) Here is the judge looking at the Police Officer, and uttering
> most unkind works about dishonoring the uniform and something about
> tarnished badges
> 29) Here is the judge using the word perjury several times
> 30) Here is the judge apologizing to the jury
> 31) Here is the judge apologizing to the Defendant
> 32) Here is the case being dismissed
> 33) Here is the judge stating the the Defendant was the only honest
> and honorable person in the transaction
> 34) Here is the police officer stamping his feet and shouting like a
> four year old brat
> 35) Here is the police officer being "booed" out of a local restaurant
>
> Like I said, simple
>
>
>
> Gmail wrote:
>> 
>>
>> How could the case go before the jury, and be dropped due to lack of
>> witnesses at the same time???
>>
>> On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 2:14 PM, James M. Atkinson <jm..._at_tscm.com
>> <mailto:jm..._at_tscm.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Victory is mine.
>>
>> The case went before the jury today, and there was sufficient and
>> overwhelming evidence produced that proved that I did nothing wrong,
>> and proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that the Police were lying
>> their asses off the whole time, and that they had coordinated the
>> lies with two Federal agents, and with REI.
>>
>>
>
> --
> James M. Atkinson
> President, Scientist and Sr. Engineer
> "Leonardo da Vinci of Bug Sweeps and Spy Hunting"
> Granite Island Group
> jm..._at_tscm.com
> http://www.tscm.com/
> (978) 546-3803

--
James M. Atkinson
President, Scientist and Sr. Engineer
"Leonardo da Vinci of Bug Sweeps and Spy Hunting"
Granite Island Group
jm..._at_tscm.com
http://www.tscm.com/
(978) 546-3803

--------------090804080100060202070604
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>

<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
I actually demanded a jury trial, as is my right under U.S. law. 
 
The problems is that the prosecutors could not produce even a sliver of
evidence that I did anything wrong, and could not produce a single
person who was willing to testify under oath that I had done anything
wrong. 
 
Then there was the evidence that the police and the prosecutor hid for
29 months, that proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that I was innocent,
and that the whole thing was a set up from the very beginning. 
 
Then court  documents were presented that proved REI beyond a shadow of
a doubt that REI has been illegally manufacturing and smuggling arms
for over 10 years, likely over 20 years. 
 
Then there court documents that proved the REI worked with my local
police department to set me up, to delay a shipment (which I had
already paid REI for in full), so the police could charge me with a
crime, when in fact I had done nothing wrong. REI has been going wild
in damage control mode over this case, especially since the issue of
thier smuggling of arms had come to light (in Fall 2007). 
 
In fact REI actually sued me to try to not have to produce documents,
and then railroaded the case though thier local court, and I responded
by removing the case to Federal Court, and it is now in the First
Circuit Court of Appeals after the judge in the matter was caught
red-handed violating federal law, and I removed it to the Appellate
level (who do not take kindly to judicial misconduct in the lesser,
more inferior courts). 
 
What a lot of folks may not know is that I caught REI red handed doing
massive, and I mean massively massive arms smuggling in Fall 2007, and
I confronted them over the smuggling, and at that time REI threatened
me with retaliation.  I was concerned because REI had been telling me
for years that they were applying for and obtaining the required
ITAR/Department of State licenses for all exports, and I came to
suspect that they were not so I started asking questions and demanding
export paperwork. I then continued to push them for copies of the
licenses on other shipments, and even checked with Customs, Commerce
and the U.S. State Deprtment who all confirmed that REI was not
obtaining ANY licensing as required for their shipments. After that
point our relationship deteriorated, and there was the matter of
millions of dollars in commissions that they owed me that they refused
to pay. In 2008 and 2009 I started noticing they were playing more and
more  games with me, and then in the Fall or 2009 they took their games
to a different level and have since confessed to setting me up from the
very beginning. 
 
In the Fall of 2007 after I suspected what they were up to I properly
reported the matter to the appropriate authorities, and took
appropriate other actions (of which I am not allowed to speak), which
is likely why I got set up by them. Then they actually tried repeatedly
to set me up in 2008 without success, and then several times in early
2009, and then repeatedly tried to get me to commit export fraud which
they were not successful in doing. 
 
As many of you knew I actually was clinically dead as a result of this,
and was hospitalized for a while, and had to have surgery. 
 
If you have REI equipment you would do well to seek an alternate
supplier of TSCM gear as you may soon find that you can get no customer
services, repair, calibration, or training from the company. If you are
plannign to purchase some of their equipment don't. If you are not a
U.S. Citizen and you possess any of their equipment you could be an
very serious legal trouble because you do not possess it legally.
Please go back and read that last sentence, because you could be
brought up on criminal charges for possession of their equipment as is
it impossible for you to have gotten it legally. 
 
If you have REI gear and you are NOT a U.S. Citizen or you are the
U.S> Citizen and you took this gear outside the borders of the U.S.
then you need to contact the U.S. Embassy closest to you right away and
inform them that you are in possession of smuggled equipment that you
purchased, and which was not lawfully exported from the United States,
and that the equipment is in violation of 22 CFR 121.1 XI(b) and that
you wish to self report the illegal transaction and immediately turn
over the equipment to them or to your own government. 
 
As a replacement for your REI gear I woudl recommend the the equipment
made by Anristu, Tektronics, Winkleman, LorNet, AudioTel, PPSL, Fluke,
and other companies. BUT, if is is TSCM gear or related supplied ensure
that first the company in question has a current State Department
license to manufacture the equipment (REI did not), and they every
import or export has a DOS-PM/DDTC export license number on all of the
paperwork. 
 
DO not be surprised of you government comes knocking on your door to
collect both you and your illegally imported/exported equipment. Having
a candid discussion without he U.S> State Deprtment will save you a
lot of hassles. 
 
If you woudl like to chat with  someone at the U.S. State Deprtment I
woudl suggest that you speak first with Beth M. McCormick at (202)
647-0337, and then to Robert Kovac, or actually anybody at the PM/DDTC
Response Team. The PM/DDTC enforcement people will seek to have an
extended discusison with you, so study up on ITAR compliance, and the
Wassenaar Arrangement and UN Security Council arms embargoes before you
call them. 
 
You can also reach them by E-Mail at: 
"Beth M. McCormick, U.S. Department of State"
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:mccor..._at_state.gov"><mcco..._at_state.gov></a> 
"Robert S. Kovac, PM/DDTC, U.S. State Department"
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:Kov..._at_state.gov"><Ko..._at_state.gov></a> 
"Smith, Glenn E, PM/DDTC Enforcement and Compliance"
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:Smit..._at_state.gov"><Sm..._at_state.gov></a> 
 
When possible try to keep you inquiries and correspondence with them in
a written format, and remember these are the folks who ignored what REI
was doing the whole time, and who took no enforcement action against
REI for 15 years. 
 
-jma 
 
 
James M. Atkinson wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:4FB8..._at_tscm.com" type="cite">
Simple. 
 
1) Here is the Defendant 
2) Here is the Judge 
3) Here is the Jury 
4) Here is the exculpatory evidence (tens of thousands of pages the
defendant did nothing wrong) 
5) No evidence of wrong doing could be provided, and any form 
6) Here is the evidence of the innocence of the defendant that the
police tried to hide, aggressively. 
7) Here are the summons and the subpoenas issued to the people who
claimed to be witnesses 
8) Where are the empty seats where the witnesses against the defendant
are supposed to be sitting 
9) Here is the document that  the court had to sign in order for the
defendant to be arrested (the signatures are missing) 
10) Here is the document that alleges the defendant did something
wrong, but no actual probable cause is actually stated 
11) Here is the judge looking quite pissed off at the prosecutor 
12) Here is the jury looking at the prosecutor and the police, and boy
do they look pissed, more pissed then the judge looks. 
13) Here is the judge looking at the six foot high stack of records 
14) Here is the judge reading about 22 CFR 121.1 XI(b) 
15) Here is the judge reading about international treaties about arms
control 
16) Here is the judge looking at hundreds and hundreds of REI export
Shippers Export Documents, spanning over a decade 
17) Here is the judge looking at the State Department report that says
that REI is not a lawful manufacture or exporter 
18) Here is the judge looking at the Customs letter that revoked REIs
ability to export goods for a period of time 
19) Here is the judge looking at the annual reports published by the
U.S. State Deprtment of all U.S. Made Exported Arms (including TSCM
gear) 
20) Here is the judge trying to find any mention of REI performing
legal exports in State Deprtment reports (of TSCM gear exports) 
21) Here is the judge reading the State Department report that says it
takes 143 days on average to get legal approvals of TSCM gear 
22) Here is the judge reading the Commerce Deprtment Reports that fails
to list REI as getting required ITAR export licenses 
23) Here is the judge getting progressively more pissed off 
24) Here is the judge reading the  End User Letter by the government of
Uzbekistan, issued 2 business days before Defendant was arrested. 
25) Here is the  judge reading the E-Mails where extortionate threats
were made unless Defendant broke the law and did an illegal export 
26) Here is the jury looking even more pissed off then the judge 
27) Here is the prosecutor banging his head on the table 
28) Here is the judge looking at the  Police Officer, and uttering most
unkind works about dishonoring the uniform and something about
tarnished badges 
29) Here is the judge using the word perjury several times 
30) Here is the judge apologizing to the jury 
31) Here is the judge apologizing to the Defendant 
32) Here is the case being dismissed 
33) Here is the judge stating the the Defendant was the only honest and
honorable person in the transaction 
34) Here is the police officer stamping his feet and shouting like a
four year old brat 
35) Here is the police officer being "booed" out of a local restaurant 
 
Like I said, simple 
 
 
 
Gmail wrote:
 <blockquote
cite="mid:20D790F4ECD53148A4..._at_BY2PRD0510MB378.namprd05.prod.outlook.com"
type="cite">
 <meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 14 (filtered medium)">
 <style></style>
 <div class="WordSection1">
 <div>
 How could the case
go before the jury, and be dropped due to lack of witnesses at the same
time???<o:p></o:p>
 <o:p> </o:p>
 <o:p> </o:p>
 On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 2:14 PM, James M.
Atkinson <<a moz-do-not-send="true" href="mailto:jm..._at_tscm.com"
target="_blank">jm..._at_tscm.com</a>> wrote:<o:p></o:p>
 Victory is mine. 
 
The case went before the jury today, and there was sufficient and
overwhelming evidence produced that proved that I did nothing wrong,
and proved beyond a shadow of a doubt that the Police were lying their
asses off the whole time, and that they had coordinated the lies with
two Federal agents, and with REI. 
 
 
 <o:p></o:p>
 </div>
 <o:p> </o:p>
 </div>
 </blockquote>
 
 <pre class="moz-signature" cols="80">--
James M. Atkinson
President, Scientist and Sr. Engineer
"Leonardo da Vinci of Bug Sweeps and Spy Hunting"
Granite Island Group
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
href="mailto:jm..._at_tscm.com">jm..._at_tscm.com</a>
<a moz-do-not-send="true" class="moz-txt-link-freetext"
href="http://www.tscm.com/">http://www.tscm.com/</a>
(978) 546-3803</pre>
</blockquote>
 
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="80">--
James M. Atkinson
President, Scientist and Sr. Engineer
"Leonardo da Vinci of Bug Sweeps and Spy Hunting"
Granite Island Group
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:jm..._at_tscm.com">jm..._at_tscm.com</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.tscm.com/">http://www.tscm.com/</a>
(978) 546-3803</pre>
</body>
</html>

--------------090804080100060202070604--
Received on Sat Mar 02 2024 - 00:57:18 CST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Mar 02 2024 - 01:11:44 CST