Wireless Electricity Is Here (Seriously) -

From: Its from Onion <areda..._at_msn.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2009 15:07:01 -0600

>From - Sat Mar 02 00:57:19 2024
Received: by 10.100.33.4 with SMTP id g4mr643252ang.14.1233968579671;
        Fri, 06 Feb 2009 17:02:59 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <j..._at_pipeline.com>
Received: from pop04.mail.atl.earthlink.net (pop04.mail.atl.earthlink.net [207.69.200.28])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 7si794248yxg.14.2009.02.06.17.02.59;
        Fri, 06 Feb 2009 17:02:59 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 207.69.200.28 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of j..._at_pipeline.com) client-ip=207.69.200.28;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 207.69.200.28 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of j..._at_pipeline.com) smtp.mail=j..._at_pipeline.com
Received: from user-1087f5h.cable.mindspring.com ([64.131.188.177] helo=MOSCOW1)
        by pop04.mail.atl.earthlink.net with smtp (Exim 3.36 #1)
        id 1LVbb1-000194-00
        for TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com; Fri, 06 Feb 2009 20:02:59 -0500
X-Sender: j..._at_pop.pipeline.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.0
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2009 20:02:59 -0500
To: TSCM-L2006_at_googlegroups.com
From: John Young <j..._at_pipeline.com>
Subject: Re: [TSCM-L] {3323} Re: Wireless Electricity Is Here
  (Seriously) -
In-Reply-To: <0902070037250.20449_at_somehost.domainz.com>
References: <BLU149-DS69DBD23FDDF8E9124E597BCC10_at_phx.gbl>
 <BLU149-DS69DBD23FDDF8E9124E597BCC10_at_phx.gbl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Message-Id: <E1LVbb1-000194-00_at_pop04.mail.atl.earthlink.net>

Interesting questions, Thomas.

Can the electricity transmission be encrypted or otherwise
secured against sigint?

I don't recall Tesla working with encryption or electricity
security, but that may have been classified at birth by gov
or by biz or both. He had his problems with both secrecy-mongerers
neither of which hesitated in stealing ideas and claiming them
as their own, humph, in the national interest, kachink.

Cross-talk certainly was discovered fairly early in telecom
history. What is the difference among the various EMRs
which affects security means? Tempest, Nonstop, Hijack,
yes, but others? A number of terms of comsec technologies
we have received from NSA via FOIA have been redacted.
We don't even know what to ask for.

Bell Labs and comms labs must have been working on
electricity security. Those folks always had a deal with
the gov to share and be rewarded for keeping it quiet.

No doubt that will occur with the wireless electricity
gang via juicy contracts (following the cellphone secret
spying via crippled-crypto pacts). Like the Internet, the
popularization of the technology will lead to vast and
lucrative spying opportunities. Like that of using
installed wiring systems for digital distribution.

Excuse me while I steal some wireless bandwidth,
hoping its not a honey pit beyond the usual private
investigator crapola.
Received on Sat Mar 02 2024 - 00:57:19 CST