>From - Sat Mar 02 00:57:19 2024
Received: by 10.115.90.11 with SMTP id s11mr381676wal.20.1233965879487;
Fri, 06 Feb 2009 16:17:59 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <jm..._at_tscm.com>
Received: from swip006.ftl.affinity.com (lvs00-fl-swip006.ftl.affinity.com [216.219.253.16])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m37si6577241waf.2.2009.02.06.16.17.59;
Fri, 06 Feb 2009 16:17:59 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 216.219.253.16 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of jm..._at_tscm.com) client-ip=216.219.253.16;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 216.219.253.16 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of jm..._at_tscm.com) smtp.mail=jm..._at_tscm.com
Received: from [72.70.110.148] ([72.70.110.148]:1734 "EHLO Raphael.tscm.com")
by swip006.ftl.affinity.com with ESMTP id S752451AbZBGARx (ORCPT
<rfc822;T..._at_googlegroups.com>);
Fri, 6 Feb 2009 19:17:53 -0500
Message-Id: <7.0.1.0.2.20090206190007.088da8c0_at_tscm.com>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.1.0
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2009 19:05:39 -0500
To: TSCM-L2006_at_googlegroups.com
From: "James M. Atkinson" <jm..._at_tscm.com>
Subject: Re: [TSCM-L] {3321} Line Balance Test for Telephones
In-Reply-To: <e18e7f26-c68a-456e-8331-6df77490b28e_at_f40g2000pri.googlegro
ups.com>
References: <e18e7f26-c68a-456e-8331-6df77490b28e_at_f40g2000pri.googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
X-Mail-Filter-Gateway: Not scanned
X-Mail-Filter-Gateway-SpamDetectionEngine: not spam,
SpamAssassin (not cached, score=0.1, required 10, autolearn=disabled,
RDNS_NONE 0.10)
X-Mail-Filter-Gateway-From: jm..._at_tscm.com
X-Mail-Filter-Gateway-To: tscm-..._at_googlegroups.com
It is still a common test for any situation where you can not access
both ends of the wire and have to shoot from only one end.
You can use it on PBX lines or Ethernet cables as well as POTS with
some modifications, but any test that you can apply to a wire which
has a probability of detecting a breach of of great value.
Do not put a lot of faith in only a single test, or in only a single
piece of equipment; but rather use a multitude of tests, performed
with multiple pieces of equipment.
-jma
At 02:08 PM 2/6/2009, Chuck wrote:
>Does anyone on the list do the "line balance test" (as described by
>Taylor, Swift, etc) when checking telephone lines for compromises?
>
>If so, do you find the test is limited strictly to POTS lines - or do
>you ever employ it within a PBX system - or when checking residential
>VoIP lines?
>
>Thanks in advance
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
World Class, Professional, Ethical, and Competent Bug Sweeps, and
Wiretap Detection using Sophisticated Laboratory Grade Test Equipment.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
James M. Atkinson Phone: (978) 546-3803
Granite Island Group Fax: (978) 546-9467
127 Eastern Avenue #291 Web:
http://www.tscm.com/
Gloucester, MA 01931-8008 E-mail: mailto:jm..._at_tscm.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We perform bug sweeps like it's a full contact sport, we take no prisoners,
and we give no quarter. Our goal is to simply, and completely stop the spy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Sat Mar 02 2024 - 00:57:19 CST