>From - Sat Mar 02 00:57:19 2024
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Received: by 10.151.14.5 with SMTP id r5mr66404ybi.10.1231254729357; Tue, 06
Jan 2009 07:12:09 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2009 07:12:09 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <022f4be6-bb8e-4413-bac3-34a54b32b41d_at_a12g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>
X-IP: 72.20.85.6
References: <784e17c7-a032-4dad-b97d-4ff7f8b4fe7c_at_y1g2000pra.googlegroups.com>
<022f4be6-bb8e-4413-bac3-34a54b32b41d_at_a12g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 7.0; Windows NT 6.0; SLCC1;
.NET CLR 2.0.50727; Media Center PC 5.0; .NET CLR 3.0.04506; .NET CLR
1.1.4322),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Message-ID: <7f11606b-23b2-47d8-b49c-83071c928a39_at_a12g2000pro.googlegroups.com>
Subject: Re: Telespy
From: little vine <Southern..._at_gmail.com>
To: TSCM-L Professionals List <TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com>
On Jan 1, 3:43 am, scorpion <scorpi..._at_hotmail.com> wrote:
> How has someone "jammed" your telespy?
>
> Do they block outgoing phonecalls?
>
> Have they deactivated the motion sensor?
>
> Have the deactivated the amplification of the receiver's handset?
>
> Is it possible that the device is defective, or have you replaced the
> telespy to have the same problem?
>
> From outside your house I do not see how someone can come on to your
> phone line, and electronically enter your telespy, and then enter a
> telephone number, and then again, how would someone know a deactivated
> number that is not listed? I would have to be rude, and say that your
> "fingers" remember the number, and that your fingers go through the
> process of dialing the number even though that is not the number you
> intended to dial. You will probably mention that if you had indeed
> called that number by mistake, then you would have gotten a
> disconnected call, and you would have been aware of the mistake. I do
> not know what to say to that. I would think that as desperate as the
> phone company is for numbers that this number would be back in
> service, and someone is really getting upset with these "prank" calls.
>
> The telespy is not a wireless handset, and I am confused by this
> comment. If it is a separate phone such as a cordless phone, then yes
> you can pick up the handset, and press a series of numbers, and have
> it register, and you can terminate the number prior to it dialing out.
>
> What are you using to register your out going calls? Do you have a
> separate caller ID/ outgoing number recording device?
>
> IF you know that you are being electronically jammed then I would
> assume it is someone who is close to you as they know your deceased
> grandmother. Do you have any idea who this would be doing this to
> you? Do you know why they are doing this? Can you approach them, an=
d
> ask them questions in regards to this incident? You would at least
> scare them as they now know that you are on to them, and that they had
> better stop the harrasment prior to you pressing charges, and they get
> arrested.
>
> How do you know that you are experiencing unauthorized entry? It is a
> shame that the telespy is not working to alert you that you have an
> intruder.
>
> There is a physical flaw with the device. The motion sensor is
> located at the "top" of the phone. It will detect motion even though
> it is pointed at a wall. Perhaps there is clutter near the phone
> blocking the motion sensor, or you will need to reorient the telespy
> to trigger the sensor better.
>
> Thanks for the link as I did not know that it existed! I find it
> ironic that in all of the videos that they have the phone "upside
> down", or in other words the device has the motion detector facing out
> away from the wall. If you go to make a call then the keypad is
> upside down! I wish they could have made the sensor on the "bottom"
> of the phone. I wish they made a wall mounted version so that the
> motion sensor was on the "face" of the phone so that it could detect
> motion while wall mounted. I also wish they gave the sensor settings
> so that one could change from a range of settings for the motion area
> of detection, and to also allow for trade outs for pet immune
> detectors instead.
>
> So? Who do you think is harrasing you?
Someone looking over my shoulder is passing along information that is
undermining my personal security. You tell me. Who's got the power and
technology to do that?
Received on Sat Mar 02 2024 - 00:57:19 CST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Sat Mar 02 2024 - 01:11:44 CST