>From - Sat Mar 02 00:57:22 2024
Received: by 10.213.3.78 with SMTP id 14mr2191331ebm.4.1326257645337;
Tue, 10 Jan 2012 20:54:05 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: tscm-l2006_at_googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.213.20.20 with SMTP id d20ls31620ebb.1.gmail; Tue, 10 Jan 2012
20:53:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.14.18.88 with SMTP id k64mr811368eek.3.1326257636310;
Tue, 10 Jan 2012 20:53:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.14.18.88 with SMTP id k64mr811367eek.3.1326257636293;
Tue, 10 Jan 2012 20:53:56 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <tsc..._at_shaddack.mauriceward.com>
Received: from 121.235.cust.netway.cz ([85.239.254.200])
by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z54si198170eej.0.2012.01.10.20.53.55
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
Tue, 10 Jan 2012 20:53:55 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of tsc..._at_shaddack.mauriceward.com designates 85.239.254.200 as permitted sender) client-ip=85.239.254.200;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of tsc..._at_shaddack.mauriceward.com designates 85.239.254.200 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=tsc..._at_shaddack.mauriceward.com
Received: (qmail 26032 invoked by uid 0); 11 Jan 2012 05:53:54 +0100
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 05:53:54 +0100 (CET)
From: Thomas Shaddack <tsc..._at_shaddack.mauriceward.com>
To: tscm-l2006_at_googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [TSCM-L] {5995} Taking your stuff! Your rights are going....
In-Reply-To: <SNT107-W11954B8CA29F8DBACFCC06BC980_at_phx.gbl>
Message-ID: <1201110533580.10447_at_somehost.domainz.com>
References: <SNT107-W11954B8CA29F8DBACFCC06BC980_at_phx.gbl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="655872-784680247-1326257634=:18654"
--655872-784680247-1326257634=:18654
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
That's typical.=20
Another person who's permanently harassed by the US border drones is Jacob =
Appelbaum.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacob_Appelbaum
For more data see the article, and visit its references 19-25.
As of privacy enforcement for personal electronics, the Electronic=20
Frontiers Foundation published a fairly good guide.
https://www.eff.org/wp/defending-privacy-us-border-guide-travelers-carrying=
-digital-devices
On Mon, 9 Jan 2012, Its from Onion wrote:
>=20
> They didn=92t have a search warrant. They didn=92t charge him with a crim=
e. And there was nothing House could do about it.House, 24, ran into what c=
ivil liberties advocates call the =93Constitution-free zone=92=92 at US por=
ts of entry, where courts have carved out broad exceptions to the Fourth Am=
endment=92s protection against unreasonable searches and seizures.=20
> As long as they don=92t use invasive techniques such as strip searches, g=
overnment agents don=92t need reasonable suspicion or probable cause to sei=
ze what they want - including laptops, a 2008 appeals court ruling held.
> http://www.bostonglobe.com/business/2012/01/08/laptop-seizures-customs-ca=
use-thorny-legal-dispute/dnbJ2nTqirLOnsVRIBRwjP/story.html
> =09=09 =09 =09=09 =20
--655872-784680247-1326257634=:18654--
Received on Sat Mar 02 2024 - 00:57:22 CST