Edward Snowden Video Interview from Roger at Bugsweeps on 2013-06-10 (file.mbox)

From: Roger at Bugsweeps <bugs..._at_earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 22:23:30 -0600

>From - Sat Mar 02 00:57:22 2024
X-Received: by 10.224.42.141 with SMTP id s13mr11393998qae.3.1370975014337;
 Tue, 11 Jun 2013 11:23:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: tscm-l2006_at_googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.49.0.236 with SMTP id 12ls3373175qeh.97.gmail; Tue, 11 Jun
2013 11:23:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.224.205.138 with SMTP id fq10mr11467652qab.1.1370975005414;
 Tue, 11 Jun 2013 11:23:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.224.181.75 with SMTP id bx11msqab;
 Tue, 11 Jun 2013 05:54:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.224.86.200 with SMTP id t8mr9568262qal.0.1370955272882;
 Tue, 11 Jun 2013 05:54:32 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <b..._at_charter.net>
Received: from mta11.charter.net (mta11.charter.net. [216.33.127.80])
 by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id u10si1318904qco.0.2013.06.11.05.54.32
 for <tscm-..._at_googlegroups.com>;
 Tue, 11 Jun 2013 05:54:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of b..._at_charter.net designates 216.33.127.80 as permitted sender) client-ip=216.33.127.80;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com;
 spf=pass (google.com: domain of b..._at_charter.net designates 216.33.127.80 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=b..._at_charter.net
Received: from imp11 ([10.20.200.11]) by mta11.charter.net
 (InterMail vM.8.01.05.09 201-2260-151-124-20120717) with ESMTP
 id <20130611125432.XPUQ6169.mta11.charter.net_at_imp11>
 for <tscm-..._at_googlegroups.com>;
 Tue, 11 Jun 2013 08:54:32 -0400
Received: from [192.168.1.223] ([68.117.102.147])
 by imp11 with smtp.charter.net
 id n0uY1l0083Aouqk050uYyP; Tue, 11 Jun 2013 08:54:32 -0400
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=dIr+A5lb c=1 sm=1
a=IVPwABz+tgLBEFEAAjrivg==:17 a=BD7rGaJlxbwA:10 a=p_S2nrAt8KUA:10
a=yUnIBFQkZM0A:10 a=hOpmn2quAAAA:8 a=4LcLNuAqrTEA:10 a=Hcd3YmTLAAAA:8
a=5Up8faWwAAAA:8 a=8YYuB1XPAAAA:8 a=USLugrHBm79sHDfMi4wA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10
a=PlUVn5HoKa0A:10 a=5x6IYSYu-A8A:10 a=hUswqBWy9Q8A:10 a=v6MMM96S_sUA:10
a=nFUbJkbDI2i8UqBn:21 a=_3tQJS0MzC6DRw55:21 a=2mVv0loeJQDbdBO97l0A:9
a=_W_S_7VecoQA:10 a=7xUd00T-Ls0_5GHo:21 a=hfHjZ_ysDPQ2LTzz:21
a=QG7ruU1CE-edf0Yj:21 a=IVPwABz+tgLBEFEAAjrivg==:117
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.1.6.040913.0
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2013 07:54:30 -0500
Subject: Re: [TSCM-L] {6423} Edward Snowden Video Interview
From: bts <b..._at_charter.net>
To: <tscm-..._at_googlegroups.com>
Message-ID: <CDDC8836.17A8A%bts_at_charter.net>
In-Reply-To: <036101ce665b$72dce7a0$5896b6e0$_at_earthlink.net>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="B_3453782071_19630350"

--B_3453782071_19630350
Content-type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable

When I hear of people who decide by themselves that they have the right to
expose secrets, I think they should be investigated.

Snowden and all the reporters who made the decision, should be prosecuted.

Going back to Chaney and others blowing the cover of an agent for personal
and political gain.

No one is =B3monitoring=B2 all communications. You would have to hire the =
same
number of people having the conversation, to monitor the flow.

There are no names being recorded. In Prism, there isn=B9t even the
conversation being recorded. Look at the header info on an email or the or
the in and out listing on a phone bill, (not the names at the top), or the
data dump from a cell site. There are no names.

It takes a second step of being part of something that floats to the top.
then go to the user name or address cross reference to a name of the poi.
That is the door that has to be opened by the courts.

Can it be found without?..of course. But that would be an unauthorized
expose=B9 of secrets and should be prosecuted.

Those who think that there should not be any secrets protected should
probably not be in the business of protecting secrets.
--=20
James Greenwold
Bureau of Technical Services
P.O. Box 191
Chippewa Falls, WI54729

715-726-1400
http://www.tacticalsurveillance.com
b..._at_charter.net

On 6/10/13 11:23 PM, "Roger at Bugsweeps" <bugs..._at_earthlink.net> wrote:

> http://tv.naturalnews.com/v.asp?v=3D9988C0C07C1CF71E9ADE598760F70DA2
> =20
> =20

--B_3453782071_19630350
Content-type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable

<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>Re: [TSCM-L] {6423} Edward Snowden Video Interview</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
When I hear of people=
who decide by themselves that they have the right to expose secrets, I thi=
nk they should be investigated.   
 
Snowden and all the reporters who made the decision, should be prosecuted.<=
BR>
 
Going back to Chaney and others blowing the cover of an agent for personal =
and political gain. 
 
No one is “monitoring” all communications.  You would have=
to hire the same number of people having the conversation, to monitor the =
flow. 
 
There are no names being recorded.  In Prism, there isn’t even t=
he conversation being recorded.  Look at the header info on an email o=
r the or the in and out listing on a phone bill, (not the names at the top)=
, or the data dump from a cell site.  There are no names.   
 
It takes a second step of  being part of something that floats to the =
top.   then go to the user name or address cross reference to a n=
ame of the poi.  That is the door that has to be opened by the courts.=
 
 
Can it be found without?..of course.  But that would be an unauthorize=
d expose’ of secrets and should be prosecuted. 
 
Those who think that there should not be any secrets protected should proba=
bly not be in the business of protecting secrets. 
-- 
James Greenwold 
Bureau of Technical Services 
P.O. Box 191 
Chippewa Falls, WI54729 
 
715-726-1400 
<a href=3D"http://www.tacticalsurveillance.com">http://www.tacticalsurveill=
ance.com</a> 
b..._at_charter.net 
 
 
On 6/10/13 11:23 PM, "Roger at Bugsweeps" <bug..._at_earthlink.ne=
t> wrote: 
 
<BLOCKQUOTE><a href=3D"http://tv.naturalnews.com/v.asp?v=3D9988C0C07C1CF71E9ADE598=
760F70DA2">http://tv.naturalnews.com/v.asp?v=3D9988C0C07C1CF71E9ADE598760F7=
0DA2</a> 
  
  
</BLOCKQUOTE> 

</BODY>
</HTML>

--B_3453782071_19630350--
Received on Sat Mar 02 2024 - 00:57:22 CST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Mar 02 2024 - 01:11:45 CST