>From - Sat Mar 02 00:57:23 2024
X-Received: by 10.42.110.198 with SMTP id r6mr1647818icp.33.1392339792639;
Thu, 13 Feb 2014 17:03:12 -0800 (PST)
X-BeenThere: tscm-l2006_at_googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.140.81.209 with SMTP id f75ls3630962qgd.48.gmail; Thu, 13 Feb
2014 17:03:10 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.58.50.9 with SMTP id y9mr18807ven.41.1392339790863;
Thu, 13 Feb 2014 17:03:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.224.127.199 with SMTP id h7msqas;
Thu, 13 Feb 2014 14:51:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 10.236.128.243 with SMTP id f79mr1241122yhi.27.1392331902754;
Thu, 13 Feb 2014 14:51:42 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <d..._at_geer.org>
Received: from palinka.tinho.net (palinka.tinho.net. [166.84.6.13])
by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id y10si715471qcg.3.2014.02.13.14.51.42
for <tscm-..._at_googlegroups.com>;
Thu, 13 Feb 2014 14:51:42 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 166.84.6.13 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of d..._at_geer.org) client-ip=166.84.6.13;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com;
spf=neutral (google.com: 166.84.6.13 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of d..._at_geer.org) smtp.mail=d..._at_geer.org
Received: by palinka.tinho.net (Postfix, from userid 126)
id 8BBFE2280B7; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 17:51:42 -0500 (EST)
Received: from palinka.tinho.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by palinka.tinho.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A364228064
for <tscm-..._at_googlegroups.com>; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 17:51:42 -0500 (EST)
From: d..._at_geer.org
To: tscm-l2006_at_googlegroups.com
Subject: electrical privacy
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 17:51:42 -0500
Message-Id: <20140213225142.8BBFE2280B7_at_palinka.tinho.net>
Suppose that I do not want a smart electric meter but it is being
imposed. Suppose that my state(*) has priced my stubborness to
four digit accuracy. How might I defeat this kind of wire tapping?
The answer that comes first to mind is a motor-generator pair.
Noise generation is another. This list being what it is, I'm asking
for advice. If this is too off-topic, reply to me off-list.
--dan
(*)
http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2014-02-06/business/chi-comed-smart-meter-fee-20140206_1_comed-meters-energy-infrastructure-modernization-act
Received on Sat Mar 02 2024 - 00:57:23 CST