>From - Sat Mar 02 00:57:24 2024
Received: by 10.223.122.77 with SMTP id k13mr122913far.19.1249873542167;
Sun, 09 Aug 2009 20:05:42 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <SRS0=ND5JZkě=slcsecurity.com=ke..._at_srs.bis.na.blackberry.com>
Received: from smtp10.bis.na.blackberry.com (smtp10.bis.na.blackberry.com [216.9.248.57])
by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id 18si295983ywh.5.2009.08.09.20.05.41;
Sun, 09 Aug 2009 20:05:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of SRS0=ND5JZkě=slcsecurity.com=ke..._at_srs.bis.na.blackberry.com designates 216.9.248.57 as permitted sender) client-ip!6.9.248.57;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of SRS0=ND5JZkě=slcsecurity.com=ke..._at_srs.bis.na.blackberry.com designates 216.9.248.57 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=SRS0=ND5JZkě=slcsecurity.com=ke..._at_srs.bis.na.blackberry.com
Received: from bda691.bisx.prod.on.blackberry (bda691.bisx.prod.on.blackberry [172.20.218.236])
by srs.bis.na.blackberry.com (8.13.7 TEAMON/8.13.7) with ESMTP id n7A36m8u013638
for <TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com>; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 03:06:48 GMT
Received: from bda691.bisx.prod.on.blackberry (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by bda691.bisx.prod.on.blackberry (8.13.7 TEAMON/8.13.7) with ESMTP id n7A35cDS015446
for <TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com>; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 03:05:38 GMT
X-rim-org-msg-ref-id: 811303773
Return-Receipt-To: ke..._at_slcsecurity.com
Message-ID: <811303773-1249873538-cardhu_decombobulator_blackberry.rim.net-1177960285-_at_bxe1248.bisx.prod.on.blackberry>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Reply-To: ke..._at_slcsecurity.com
X-Priority: Normal
References: <aadbd07a-e805-49d3-96ff-60cf4bc8b18e_at_d23g2000vbm.googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <aadbd07a-e805-49d3-96ff-60cf4bc8b18e_at_d23g2000vbm.googlegroups.com>
Sensitivity: Normal
Importance: Normal
To: TSCM-L2006_at_googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [TSCM-L] {4092} TSCM Question
From: ke..._at_slcsecurity.com
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 03:05:23 +0000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>From - Sat Mar 02 00:57:24 2024
Received: by 10.114.159.17 with SMTP id h17mr1037993wae.13.1249950226731;
Mon, 10 Aug 2009 17:23:46 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <taylo..._at_yahoo.com>
Received: from web110207.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (web110207.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [67.195.8.183])
by gmr-mx.google.com with SMTP id m37si1962487waf.6.2009.08.10.17.23.45;
Mon, 10 Aug 2009 17:23:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of taylo..._at_yahoo.com designates 67.195.8.183 as permitted sender) client-ipg.195.8.183;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of taylo..._at_yahoo.com designates 67.195.8.183 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=taylo..._at_yahoo.com; dkim=pass (test mode) head..._at_yahoo.com
Received: (qmail 42738 invoked by uid 60001); 11 Aug 2009 00:23:45 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t49950225; bh JN3oGDHXjhSAQJ+OAC23rbsqexHChcERGIdxG4qsc=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Z8Hcj07PsjFan0LLsPDR+ZIHOnWFe/QiRP+PamsplE57qtnXAdEzdmhlprKa3qeD09Bw2PKY/hIseGMBcbJ/lhW/fY18Pqm3bd46jNwD8L24WGIAqf/5f0Wk3rvwM6iMb5itR/gNc92x7Q/O1a8mhIpVi0qbmaWM8lNOY53Zidc=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q
s; c=nofws;
s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type;
bĽHrckIP9bAolldqd0gjC72xpUSTSM5Dug1a2GRFutPUS/sqLIGbNZaNkcFFKcPaJtTlyjAEVei6XD7h/J7TMoTKXfaXTlHIp/sgpZFgrL3UMtBvvu0wlbJ7Ar/ooyrPtXScb6B/jghe+13vkg0cr9woRg6QHSzHgyQszISiA48=;
Message-ID: <429692.42154.qm_at_web110207.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
X-YMail-OSG: Zod9g_gVM1kdoE3pNwnxzUEe6IDf8kVAALnoACSQtRxrgNl1cZkK7FmRqIWczQbdFNFOQsowcTQDOHuCoGoooJ9e1QAQae3Z4PuqbQ7oIsJT6haIkGLAxqPyRcG3PK9ojVDLNIQS5HI.2ttuiZWVAEuWnXl7tSD3DgHGHGzSv0RQI4A2Oxs903cwPtPBIJi8Cy0laD01FVls7dGhj6U_J4Nfg3q4ZUHUb13cxjPNTg3wfhWkMYftYBpe.PR.Fep8vyuo6E0PXrnDu6vhbW2b_hpj1XTawwuEQlHKvtrOq45Apkihv5_vBZ2A56X_bpxOJjvaDstU2e25t8eDeNjx4BG1HPquFPevCOrN_SM.Vt5aAsl_fz6QXI2Hz1J3ZGP85jgdyM4h8x8VIrAt
Received: from [173.109.35.50] by web110207.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 10 Aug 2009 17:23:44 PDT
X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/6.1.2 YahooMailWebService/0.7.338.1
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2009 17:23:44 -0700 (PDT)
From: "taylo..._at_yahoo.com" <taylo..._at_yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [TSCM-L] {4104} Re: TSCM Question
To: TSCM-L2006_at_googlegroups.com
In-Reply-To: <3D80E13CF43F4009904F5DD388A93C0B_at_jamesimeejdPC>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="0-2123787508-1249950224=:42154"
--0-2123787508-1249950224=:42154
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I should explain how I found the the 10.525 ghz bug,at the time I had with =
me avcom to 6ghz cpm-700 and all showed the usual,it was only a domestic =
right? until I backed the suburban into the garage to load up my equipment =
and my radar detector went nuts I went out front to see where the speed tra=
p was set up and drove around about 1/4 mile in all directions and nothing,=
back to the house and again it goes off went back to the office to pick up =
the tektronix 494ap and kaiser 2050 w/2050 log and in less than one minute =
there it was.since then every sweep gets the 12ghz treatment,don't overlook=
these do exist.
dan
taylor group
--- On Mon, 8/10/09, James R. King <James..._at_aeccp.com> wrote:
From: James R. King <James..._at_aeccp.com>
Subject: [TSCM-L] {4104} Re: TSCM Question
To: TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com
Date: Monday, August 10, 2009, 3:51 PM
I know these people use such items in that range:
http://www.boschsecurity.us/en-us/
----- Original Message -----
From: "Eric Schmiedl" <eric.s..._at_gmail.com>
To: <TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com>
Sent: Monday, August 10, 2009 3:41 PM
Subject: [TSCM-L] {4103} Re: TSCM Question
It sounds like just the opposite -- a very sophisticated bug found where
one would more expect a jerry-rigged baby monitor.
Its from Onion wrote:
> It all goes back to 'know your clients threats.' Yes, they are out the=
re
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Sub Rosa <mailto:subr..._at_gmail.com>
> *To:* TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com <mailto:TSCM-..._at_googlegroups=
.com>
> *Sent:* Monday, August 10, 2009 10:09 AM
> *Subject:* [TSCM-L] {4099} Re: TSCM Question
>
> Dan,
>
> Thanks for the info, now i know that at least sombody found a=
bug
> above 6Ghz!
>
> Scott
>
> On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 10:37 PM, taylo..._at_yahoo.com
> <mailto:taylo..._at_yahoo.com> <taylo..._at_yahoo.com
> <mailto:taylo..._at_yahoo.com>> wrote:
>
> scott,
>
> yes once in the 30 years a device at 10.525ghz xband =
it was
> during a domestic and no one was more surprised than =
me.
>
> dan
> taylor group
> --- On *Sun, 8/9/09, subrosa /<subr..._at_gmail.com
> <mailto:subr..._at_gmail.com>>/* wrote:
>
>
> From: subrosa <subr..._at_gmail.com
> <mailto:subr..._at_gmail.com>>
> Subject: [TSCM-L] {4092} TSCM Question
> To: "TSCM-L Professionals List" <TSCM-..._at_goo=
glegroups.com
> <mailto:TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com>>
> Date: Sunday, August 9, 2009, 7:25 AM
>
>
> Greetings List Members,
>
> I have only been following this list for abou=
t a month now,
> but I
> would like to ask a question that may have al=
ready been
> answered, that
> I may have missed;
>
> Has anyone on this list ever experienced an e=
lectronic
> surveillance
> threat "find" above 6 Ghz ???
>
> Just wondering because I don't believe I have=
ever read or
> spoken with
> anyone who has.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Scott
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >
--0-2123787508-1249950224=:42154
Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0" ><tr><td valign="=
top" style="font: inherit;"><DIV>I should explain how I found the the 10.=
525 ghz bug,at the time I had with me avcom to 6ghz cpm-700 and all showed =
the usual,it was only a domestic right? until I backed the suburban in=
to the garage to load up my equipment and my radar detector went nuts I wen=
t out front to see where the speed trap was set up and drove around about 1=
/4 mile in all directions and nothing,back to the house and again it goes o=
ff went back to the office to pick up the tektronix 494ap and kaiser 2050 w=
/2050 log and in less than one minute there it was.since then every sweep g=
ets the 12ghz treatment,don't overlook these do exist.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>dan</DIV>
<DIV>taylor group<BR>--- On <B>Mon, 8/10/09, James R. King <I><Jame..._at_a=
eccp.com></I></B> wrote:<BR></DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="BORDER-LEFT: rgb(16,16,255) 2px solid; PADDING-LEFT: 5=
px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px"><BR>From: James R. King <Jame..._at_aeccp.com><BR>=
Subject: [TSCM-L] {4104} Re: TSCM Question<BR>To: TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com=
<BR>Date: Monday, August 10, 2009, 3:51 PM<BR><BR>
<DIV class=plainMail><BR>I know these people use such items in that range=
: <BR><A href="
http://www.boschsecurity.us/en-us/" target=_blank>http:/=
/www.boschsecurity.us/en-us/</A><BR>----- Original Message ----- <BR>From: =
"Eric Schmiedl" <<A href="
http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?t=
o=eric.schmiedl_at_gmail.com" ymailto="mailto:eric.s..._at_gmail.com">eric.s.=
.._at_gmail.com</A>><BR>To: <<A href="
http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/=
mc/compose?to=TSCM-L2006_at_googlegroups.com" ymailto="mailto:TSCM-..._at_goo=
glegroups.com">TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com</A>><BR>Sent: Monday, August 10=
, 2009 3:41 PM<BR>Subject: [TSCM-L] {4103} Re: TSCM Question<BR><BR><BR><BR=
>It sounds like just the opposite -- a very sophisticated bug found where<B=
R>one would more expect a jerry-rigged baby monitor.<BR><BR>Its from Onion =
wrote:<BR>> It all goes back to 'know your clients threats.' Yes, =
they are out there<BR>><BR>><BR>><BR>>
----- Original Message -----<BR>> &=
nbsp;*From:* Sub Rosa <mailto:<A href="
http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com=
/mc/compose?to=subrosa4u_at_gmail.com" ymailto="mailto:subr..._at_gmail.com">=
subr..._at_gmail.com</A>><BR>> *To:* <A href="=
http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=TSCM-L2006_at_googlegroups.com=
" ymailto="mailto:TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com">TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com</A=
> <mailto:<A href="http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=TSC=
M-L2006_at_googlegroups.com" ymailto="mailto:TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com">TSCM=
-..._at_googlegroups.com</A>><BR>> *Sent:* Monda=
y, August 10, 2009 10:09 AM<BR>> *Subject:* [TSC=
M-L] {4099} Re: TSCM Question<BR>><BR>> Dan,<=
BR>><BR>> Thanks for the info, now i know tha=
t at least sombody found a bug<BR>> above
6Ghz!<BR>><BR>> Scott<BR>><BR>> =
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 10:37 PM, <A href="
http://us.mc1=
102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=taylortscm_at_yahoo.com" ymailto="mailto:=
taylo..._at_yahoo.com">taylo..._at_yahoo.com</A><BR>> =
<mailto:<A href="
http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=taylo=
rtscm_at_yahoo.com" ymailto="mailto:taylo..._at_yahoo.com">taylo..._at_yahoo.com</=
A>> <<A href="
http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=taylo=
rtscm_at_yahoo.com" ymailto="mailto:taylo..._at_yahoo.com">taylo..._at_yahoo.com</=
A><BR>> <mailto:<A href="
http://us.mc1102.m=
ail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=taylortscm_at_yahoo.com" ymailto="mailto:taylo=
..._at_yahoo.com">taylo..._at_yahoo.com</A>>> wrote:<BR>><BR>> =
scott,<BR>><BR>> =
yes once in the 30 years a device at 10.525ghz xband it
was<BR>> during a domestic and no=
one was more surprised than me.<BR>><BR>> =
dan<BR>> taylor group<=
BR>> --- On *Sun, 8/9/09, subrosa =
/<<A href="
http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=subrosa4u_at_g=
mail.com" ymailto="mailto:subr..._at_gmail.com">subr..._at_gmail.com</A><BR>>=
; <mailto:<A href="
http://us.mc1=
102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=subrosa4u_at_gmail.com" ymailto="mailto:s=
ubr..._at_gmail.com">subr..._at_gmail.com</A>>>/* wrote:<BR>><BR>><BR=
>> From: subrosa <=
;<A href="
http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=subrosa4u_at_gmail=
.com" ymailto="mailto:subr..._at_gmail.com">subr..._at_gmail.com</A> <BR>> &=
lt;mailto:<A
href="
http://us.mc1102.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=subrosa4u_at_gmail.co=
m" ymailto="mailto:subr..._at_gmail.com">subr..._at_gmail.com</A>>><BR>&g=
t; Subject: [TSCM-L] {4=
092} TSCM Question<BR>> &n=
bsp;To: "TSCM-L Professionals List" <<A href="
http://us.mc1102.mail.ya=
hoo.com/mc/compose?to=TSCM-L2006_at_googlegroups.com" ymailto="mailto:TSCM=
-..._at_googlegroups.com">TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com</A><BR>> &=
nbsp; <mailto:<A href="
http://us.mc110=
2.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=TSCM-L2006_at_googlegroups.com" ymailto="ma=
ilto:TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com">TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com</A>>><BR>&g=
t; Date: Sunday, August=
9, 2009, 7:25 AM<BR>><BR>><BR>> =
Greetings List Members,<BR>><BR>>
I have only been following this lis=
t for about a month now,<BR>> &n=
bsp; but I<BR>>  =
;would like to ask a question that may have already been<BR>> &nbs=
p; answered, that<BR>> &nbs=
p; I may have missed;<BR>><BR>>=
; Has anyone on this li=
st ever experienced an electronic<BR>> =
surveillance<BR>> &=
nbsp; threat "find" above 6 Ghz ???<BR>><BR>> =
Just wondering because I don't beli=
eve I have ever read or<BR>> &nb=
sp; spoken with<BR>>
anyone who has.<BR>><BR>> &nbs=
p; Thanks!<BR>><BR>> &nb=
sp; Scott<BR>><BR>><BR>><BR>><BR>><=
BR>><BR>><BR>><BR>> ><BR><BR><BR><BR=
><BR><BR></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></td></tr></table>
--0-2123787508-1249950224=:42154--
Received on Sat Mar 02 2024 - 00:57:24 CST