>From - Sat Mar 02 00:57:24 2024
Received: by 10.87.38.12 with SMTP id q12mr280316fgj.8.1271197002304;
Tue, 13 Apr 2010 15:16:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.213.37.146 with SMTP id x18mr85742ebd.8.1270866156805;
Fri, 09 Apr 2010 19:22:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.213.37.146 with SMTP id x18mr85741ebd.8.1270866156778;
Fri, 09 Apr 2010 19:22:36 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <de..._at_iki.fi>
Received: from mail.kapsi.fi (mail.kapsi.fi [217.30.184.167])
by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id 11si114153ewy.9.2010.04.09.19.22.36;
Fri, 09 Apr 2010 19:22:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 217.30.184.167 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of de..._at_iki.fi) client-ip=217.30.184.167;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 217.30.184.167 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of de..._at_iki.fi) smtp.mail=de..._at_iki.fi
Received: from kapsi.fi ([217.30.184.161] helo=lakka.kapsi.fi)
by mail.kapsi.fi with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
(Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from <de..._at_iki.fi>)
id 1O0QLE-0007dH-D6
for tscm-..._at_googlegroups.com; Sat, 10 Apr 2010 05:22:36 +0300
Received: from decoy (helo=localhost)
by lakka.kapsi.fi with local-esmtp (Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from <de..._at_iki.fi>)
id 1O0QL4-0006TL-Ae
for tscm-..._at_googlegroups.com; Sat, 10 Apr 2010 05:22:26 +0300
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2010 05:22:26 +0300 (EEST)
From: Sampo Syreeni <de..._at_iki.fi>
Sender: decoy_at_lakka.kapsi
To: TSCM-list <tscm-..._at_googlegroups.com>
Subject: fractal antennas
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1004100512590.30901_at_lakka.kapsi>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 217.30.184.161
X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: de..._at_iki.fi
X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on mail.kapsi.fi); SAEximRunCond expanded to false
Once again as an amateur, does the TSCM community at large utilize or
have some experience with fractal layout antennas in RF reception and/or
projectivity? They aren't terrific radiators or receivers because they
aren't much tuned/resonant (low Q value) but they can be very wide range
regardless of size. I would imagine the bandwidth would be of interest
in RF/TSCM detection work.
The smallest standalone spectrum analyzers with their smallest antennas
might just be using something like that for wideband reception. If so,
the same principle equally goes for wideband emission from bugs. Does
anybody actively track these sorts of antenna technologies? I would be
very interested to hear. Only as a hobbyist, but still.
--
Sampo Syreeni, aka decoy - de..._at_iki.fi, http://decoy.iki.fi/front
+358-50-5756111, 025E D175 ABE5 027C 9494 EEB0 E090 8BA9 0509 85C2
Received on Sat Mar 02 2024 - 00:57:24 CST