http://www.pogo.org/p/contracts/ca-030701-contract.html
Lockheed Martin
--Aeronautical Systems Defense $21,800,000 Pled Guilty, 1/27/1995
Allegations that ?Lockheed and its executives paid bribes to an
official of the Egyptian government to sell C-130 aircraft to
Egypt.? United States v Lockheed, Suliman A. Nassar and Allen R.
Love, Docket #94-CR-226-ALL, US DC ND GA (Criminal) Senator Harkin
and Representative DeFazio Press Release 06/07/00; Department of
Defense (DOD) Inspector General Report of Investigation 07/02/92
(FOIA); Court Docket; US Dept of Commerce Anti-bribery Provisions of
the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act
The company is a criminal enterprise (as defined by Federal Law) and
has engaged in criminal conduct in the past, the court records say
so, and in many cases they pled, or were found guilty (so they
actually confessed to being a criminal enterprise). Further there are
like 80 civil additional cases, convictions (or admissions of guilt)
for fraud, and related infractions. If a person, organizations, or
company has a criminal background, they are many times more likely to
commit criminal acts again in the future. If a company has a history
of bribery, or of undue influence, fraud, corruption, and deceit,
they are likely to try it again, and again, and again...
By legal definition because Lockheed has a criminal history, and they
(according to the government) practiced a long term course of conduct
and they qualify for the definition of "Organized Criminal
Enterprise" as defined by the FBI and U.S. law (Chapter 11, 19, 37,
and 15 of Title 18 of the United States
Code).
http://www.fbi.gov/hq/cid/orgcrime/glossary.htm
Notice that many of the following cases involves flat out fraud on
the part of Lockheed, lying in official documents, using defective
products, poor workmanship or services, bribery, blackmail, theft,
and on, and on ad naseum.
Lockheed Martin
--Lockheed Propulsion Company Environment $85,000,000 Settlement, 1/1/2001
"The corporation is responding to three administrative orders issued
by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board & in
connection with its former facilities in Redlands,
California." (Administrative) Lockheed Martin Fiscal Year 2001
Annual Report
Lockheed Martin Environment $67,000,000 Settlement, 8/1/1996
"The settlement ... resolved? claims of personal injury and property
damage asserted by the [1,300] residents [of Burbank, CA] and alleged
to be related to environmental contamination ...
." (Civil) Lockheed Martin SEC 10-K FY1996
Lockheed Martin Environment $50,000,000 Superfund Cleanup Costs, 1/1/2000
"The company has been responding to various consent decrees and
orders relating to soil and regional groundwater contamination in the
San Fernando Valley. & ." (Civil) Lockheed Martin Fiscal Year 2001
Annual Report
Lockheed Martin Financial $27,000,000 Settlement, 2/24/1994
"The jury found that Lockheed violated the federal securities laws by
making false and misleading public statements about Lockheed's
employee stock ownership plan." NL Industries v Lockheed, Docket
#90-CV-1950 RMT (Bx), US DC CD CA (Civil) NL Industries SEC 10-K
FY1993; Confirmed by Kirkland & Ellis Law Firm on 04/13/01
Lockheed Martin
--Aeronautical Systems Defense $21,800,000 Pled Guilty, 1/27/1995
Allegations that ?Lockheed and its executives paid bribes to an
official of the Egyptian government to sell C-130 aircraft to
Egypt.? United States v Lockheed, Suliman A. Nassar and Allen R.
Love, Docket #94-CR-226-ALL, US DC ND GA (Criminal) Senator Harkin
and Representative DeFazio Press Release 06/07/00; Department of
Defense (DOD) Inspector General Report of Investigation 07/02/92
(FOIA); Court Docket; US Dept of Commerce Anti-bribery Provisions of
the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act
Lockheed Martin
--Martin Marietta Labor $13,000,000 Settlement, 11/21/1996
"? claimed that Martin targeted its employees age 40 and over for a
series of massive layoffs and forced retirements over a five-year
period." (Civil) Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)
Press Release 11/21/96
Lockheed Martin Defense $13,000,000 Fine, 6/13/2000
Allegedly "the information transferred [to the Chinese Government]
was inappropriate ... and ... there was a serious problem here that
information had the potential to be used to be applied to missile
development." (Administrative) Consent Decree 06/13/00; State
Department Press Briefing 06/14/00
Lockheed Martin
--Federal Systems Other $12,800,000 Judgment Against Defendant, 11/27/2002
"The jury found defendants liable for breach of contract and for
substantial compensatory damages." Cable & Computer Technology Inc.
v Lockheed Sanders; Lockheed Martin; and Lockheed Martin Federal
Systems, Docket #97-CV-05315, US DC CD CA (Civil)
Lockheed Martin
--Sanders Other $12,800,000 Judgment Against Defendant, 11/27/2002
"The jury found defendants liable for breach of contract and for
substantial compensatory damages." Cable & Computer Technology Inc.
v Lockheed Sanders; Lockheed Martin; and Lockheed Martin Federal
Systems, Docket #97-CV-05315, US DC CD CA (Civil) 52 Fed. Appx. 20;
2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 24501 [Lexis legal document]
Lockheed Martin Other $10,500,000 Settlement, 3/13/2001
"IBM's Federal Systems Division overcharged the FAA for rent on four
office buildings. & . Lockheed Martin (which acquired IBM's Federal
Systems Division) agreed to credit the FAA with $10,500,000, to be
offset through future billings." (Administrative) Department of
Transportation Inspector General Press Release 3/13/2001
Lockheed Martin
--Electromechanical Systems Defense $500,200 (Fine/Penalty)
$7,500,000 (Restitution) Judgment Against Defendant, 11/6/2000
Allegedly "since at least 1989, EMS and its employees have defrauded
the government by charging costs incurred on its commercial contracts
to its contracts with the Navy ... ." United States v Comsat, Docket
#96-CV-966, US DC MD FL (Civil) Department of Defense (DOD)
Inspector General Press Release 11/01/00 - 11/15/00; Department of
Justice (DOJ) Press Release 01/16/99; Court Docket
Lockheed Martin
--Control Systems Defense $7,870,177 Settlement, 1/12/1998
"Defective Pricing" (Civil) Senator Harkin and Representative
DeFazio Press Release 06/07/00
Lockheed Martin Defense $7,100,000 Settlement, 6/10/2003
"Allegations that payments made by NASA to Lockheed Engineering
Sciences Corporation were based upon false and fraudulent lease cost
claims." (Civil) U.S. Department of Justice U.S. Attorney's Office
Southern District of Texas News Release 06/10/2003
Lockheed Martin
--Martin Marietta Defense $6,700,000 Settlement, 10/6/1993
Allegedly "fraudulently overcharged the US on dozens of defense
procurement contracts from 1979 through 1988." (Civil) US
Attorney's Office District of MA Press Release 10/06/93
Lockheed Martin
--Support Systems Defense $6,693,000 Settlement, 3/30/1994
"The allegations include that LSSI [Lockheed Support Systems, Inc.]
underpaid its service contract employees . &
." (Administrative) Memorandum from the Department of the Navy
Office of General Counsel 11/21/1994
Lockheed Martin
--Lockheed Defense $6,284,796 Settlement, 12/14/1994
Alleged ?nondisclosure of information to the Air Force negotiators
regarding Lockheed?s realization factor for direct labor costs for
manufacturing ... .? (Civil) Department of Defense (DOD) Inspector
General Report of Investigation 01/11/96 (FOIA); Court Settlement
Agreement 12/14/94
Lockheed Martin
--Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory Labor $5,974,636 Judgment
Against Defendant, 2/13/2002
"Twenty-six plaintiffs, all over age forty, brought age
discrimination suit after their employment was terminated ...
." Meacham v Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory, Docket #97-CV-12, US DC
ND NY; Quinn v Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory, Docket #97-CV-45, US
DC ND NY (Civil) The Times Union (Albany, NY) 10/13/00; Court
Docket; West Federal Supplement (185 F.Supp.2d 193); Confirmed by US
DC ND NY clerk on 05/16/01
Lockheed Martin Defense $5,300,000 Settlement, 12/23/1996
Settled "allegations it overcharged the DOD by deliberately bidding
low to win a contract and then made up the shortfall by boosting
research and development costs ... ." United States v Martin
Marietta, Docket #L91-1853, US DC MD (Civil) Settlement Agreement
12/20/96; Department of Justice (DOJ) Press Release 12/23/96;
Taxpayers Against Fraud (TAF) Quarterly Review Volume 8 January 1997
Lockheed Martin Environment $5,000,000 Settlement, 10/2/2000
"... more than 300 Burbank residents ... claimed they suffered
illness due to toxic pollution." Abel v Lockheed Martin, Docket
#EC021023, CA Superior Court (Los Angeles) (Civil) Mealey's
Pollution Liability Reporter November 2000
Lockheed Martin
--Sanders Defense $5,000,000 Settlement, 5/1/2000
"... case involving the defective pricing on US Navy contracts ...
[which] appears to be a pattern of activity ... ." (Civil) Naval
Criminal Investigative Service Press Release 01/15/00 - 06/15/00;
Taxpayers Against Fraud (TAF) Quarterly Review Volume 19 July 2000
Lockheed Martin Defense $5,000,000 Fine, 9/1/1998
?A qui tam complaint alleged that Lockheed Martin Corporation
mischarged the Government by directing costs incurred in a commercial
venture to the Government.? (Administrative) Department of Defense
(DOD) Inspector General Semiannual Report to Congress 04/01/98 - 09/30/98
Lockheed Martin
--Naval Electronics & Surveillance Systems - Akron Defense
$4,250,000 Settlement, 5/1/2000
"Foreign Military Sales (FMS) funds were improperly used while
performing on a FMS contract ... ." (Civil) Department of Defense
(DOD) Inspector General Press Release 05/01/00 - 05/15/00
Lockheed Martin Environment $3,700,000 Settlement, 10/5/1999
(Civil) Redlands City Council Minutes 10/05/99
Lockheed Martin Environment $3,500,000 Superfund Cleanup Costs, 3/14/2000
"... proposed decree provides for a cash payment of $3.5 million over
10 years from LMC to the USAF and clean up services for LMC [for
contamination in] ... Jefferson Co., Colorado site." United States v
Lockheed Martin, Docket #00-S-562, US DC CO; Docket #97-CV-4214, US
DC CD CA (Civil) Department of Justice (DOJ) Press Release 04/13/00;
Court Docket; Confirmed by DOJ Environmental Natural Resource
Division (ENRD) on 06/26/01
Lockheed Martin
--Martin Marietta Defense $3,100,000 Settlement, 9/18/2002
"The government alleged that from 1987 through 1994, GE and Martin
Marietta manufactured and delivered for installation in Hornet
aircraft more than 1,300 Accelerometer Sensor Assemblies that did not
comply with electromagnetic interference contractual
requirements." United States v General Electric, 97-CV-255, US DC SD
OH (Civil) Department of Justice Press Release 9/18/2002
Lockheed Martin Defense $3,000,000 Judgment Against Defendant, 1/27/1995
Allegations that ?Lockheed and its executives paid bribes to an
official of the Egyptian government to sell C-130 aircraft to
Egypt.? United States v Lockheed, Suliman A. Nassar and Allen R.
Love, Docket #94-CR-226-ALL, US DC ND GA (Civil) Senator Harkin and
Representative DeFazio Press Release 06/07/00; Department of Defense
(DOD) Inspector General Report of Investigation 07/02/92 (FOIA);
Court Docket; US Dept of Commerce Anti-bribery Provisions of the
Foreign Corrupt Practices Act
Lockheed Martin
--Martin Marietta Defense $2,252,501 Settlement, 12/20/1996
"Procurement Fraud" (Civil) Senator Harkin and Representative
DeFazio Press Release 06/07/00
Lockheed Martin
--Tactical Systems Division Defense $2,122,603 Settlement, 8/1/2002
"Allegations that the company submitted or caused to be submitted
certain claims to the Navy that were false and fraudulent &
" (Civil) Department of Justice Press Release 8/1/2002
Lockheed Martin
--Loral Electronics Systems Defense $1,550,000 Settlement, 1/10/1995
"Defective Pricing" (Civil) Senator Harkin and Representative
DeFazio Press Release 06/07/00
Lockheed Martin Defense $1,500,000 Settlement, 7/27/1998
Allegedly "mischarged in excess of $22 million ... by intentionally
misclassifying leasehold improvements as rent in order that the ...
costs could be reimbursed by the Government ...
." (Civil) Department of Defense (DOD) Inspector General Report of
Investigation 11/12/98 (FOIA)
Lockheed Martin Defense $1,407,834 Settlement, 1/23/2003
"The lawsuit alleges that Loral wrongfully inflated estimated costs
it was required to disclose during contract negotiations, resulting
in an inflated contract price and false claims for payment under the
contracts." United States v Lockheed Martin, 97-CV-767, US DC SD OH
(Civil) Department of Justice Press Release 01/23/03
Lockheed Martin Environment $1,300,000 Fine, 5/2/2002
"The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency today penalized Lockheed
Martin & for failing to operate its pump and treat groundwater
cleanup system at the Burbank area of the San Fernando Valley
Superfund site at full capacity." (Administrative) Environmental
Protection Agency Region 9 News Release 5/2/2002
Lockheed Martin
--Martin Marietta Electronic Systems Defense
$1,172,062 Settlement, 4/9/1996
"Defective Pricing" (Civil) Senator Harkin and Representative
DeFazio Press Release 06/07/00
Lockheed Martin Labor $1,045,000 Fine, 8/28/2000
Accused of "... multiple violations of nuclear safety requirements
... ." (Administrative) Department of Energy (DOE) Press Release
08/28/00; Confirmed by DOE on 04/23/01
Lockheed Martin Defense $1,042,144 Settlement, 8/4/1992
"Procurement Fraud" (Civil) Defense Contracting: Contractor Claims
for Legal Costs Associated with Stockholder Lawsuits, GAO/NSIAD-95-66
(July 1995)
Lockheed Martin
--Comsat (Electromechanical Systems) Defense
$1,000,000 Settlement, 8/27/2001
"Electromechanical Systems, Inc., & have agreed to pay the United
States $1 million to settle allegations related to contract
fraud." United States v Comsat Corp., Docket #96-CV-966, US DC MD FL
(Civil) Court Docket; Department of Justice Press Release 8/27/2001
Lockheed Martin
--Martin Marietta Defense $752,000 Settlement, 4/22/1992
"Procurement Fraud" (Civil) Defense Contracting: Contractor Claims
for Legal Costs Associated with Stockholder Lawsuits, GAO/NSIAD-95-66
(July 1995)
Lockheed Martin Defense $639,641 Settlement, 4/30/1993
"Procurement Fraud" (Civil) Defense Contracting: Contractor Claims
for Legal Costs Associated with Stockholder Lawsuits, GAO/NSIAD-95-66
(July 1995)
Lockheed Martin Defense $530,000 Settlement, 4/22/2002
"An investigation revealed that approximately 23 Lockheed employees
working on the contract did not meet the minimum qualifications for
their positions. Consequently, Lockheed charged and billed & a higher
hourly rate for these employees than was
allowed." (Administrative) Department of Defense Criminal
Investigative Service Press Release 4/22/2002
Lockheed Martin
--Randtron Systems Defense $500,000 Settlement, 10/18/1996
Settled claims that ?it didn?t give the government relevant
information that would have lowered the price of military contracts
for radar antennas...? (Civil) Department of Justice (DOJ) Press
Release 10/18/96
Lockheed Martin
--Michoud Space Systems Defense $450,000 Settlement, 10/1/2000
"An investigation revealed LMMSS failed to fully report its use of
Government-furnished equipment and facilities for commercial
production of thermal protective products ... ." (Civil) Department
of Defense (DOD) Inspector General Press Release 10/01/00 - 10/15/00
Lockheed Martin Labor $250,000 Judgment Against Defendant, 10/17/2000
Job Discrimination (Sex) Case Davey v Lockheed Martin, Docket
#96-CV-2076, US DC CO; On Appeal 10th Circuit, Docket #00-1373
(Civil) Court Docket; General Docket US Court of Appeals 10th Circuit
Lockheed Martin
--Idaho Technologies Labor $220,000 Fine, 8/20/1999
"The $220,000 penalty to Lockheed Martin Idaho Technologies Company
(LMITCO) covers problems with nuclear waste storage containers in
addition to a number of other violations that took place over a
period from 1995 to 1998." (Administrative) Department of Energy
(DOE) News Release 08/20/99
Lockheed Martin
--Aeronautical Systems Defense $202,500 Settlement, 7/14/1997
"Lockheed facilities manager was [allegedly] involved in a scheme
with ... an independent real estate appraiser ... to over-appraise
the value of Lockheed executives? homes during a ... relocation
buyback program.? (Civil) Senator Harkin and Representative DeFazio
Press Release 06/07/00; Department of Defense (DOD) Inspector General
Report of Investigation 12/09/97 (FOIA)
Lockheed Martin
--Federal Systems Defense $200,000 Settlement, 8/22/1996
"... alleged failure ... of Lockheed ... to properly inspect, test,
or remove residual salts from dip-brazed [aircraft-computer] parts
... ." United States v IBM, Docket #93-CV-1408 TJM/DNH, US DC ND NY
(Civil) Settlement Agreement 08/22/96; Senator Harkin and
Representative DeFazio Press Release 06/07/00
Lockheed Martin
--Aeronautical Systems Defense $146,000 Settlement, 11/21/1995
"Contractor Kickbacks" United States v Lockheed, Docket #93-CV-2167,
US DC ND GA (Civil) Senator Harkin and Representative DeFazio Press
Release 06/07/00; Court Docket; Confirmed by Department of Justice
(DOJ) Public Affairs Office on 07/20/01
Lockheed Martin
--Idaho Technologies Environment $130,175 Fine, 10/29/2001
Allegedly "violating federal asbestos and chlorofluorocarbons (CFC)
emissions laws." (Administrative) Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) Region 10 News Release 10/29/01
Lockheed Martin
--Idaho Technologies Labor $125,000 Fine, 6/8/1998
"The Department of Energy (DOE) has fined two contractors at the
Idaho National Engineering and Environmental Laboratory (INEEL) for
violations of nuclear safety rules that led to low-level radiation
exposures to six workers in September
1997." (Administrative) Department of Energy (DOE) News Release 06/08/99
Lockheed Martin
--Idaho Technologies Other $55,000 Fine, 9/24/1998
"In October 1997, two reactor operators at the Advanced Test Reactor
Critical Facility in Idaho falsified records to indicate that the
required testing of reactor safety systems had been performed, when
in fact it had not." (Administrative) Department of Energy (DOE)
News Release 09/24/98
Lockheed Martin Environment $45,000 Fine, 4/21/1997
Toxic Substances Control Act case. (Civil) Environmental Protection
Agency Freedom of Information Act document
Lockheed Martin
--Martin Marietta Other $45,000 Fine, 9/30/1997
"Allegations that Martin Marietta exported graphic/epoxy prepreg
material from the United States to South Korea, without obtaining the
required validated export licenses." (Administrative) Department of
Commerce News Release 9/30/1997; Settlement Agreement
Lockheed Martin
--Energy Systems Environment $43,000 Fine, 4/21/1997
Toxic Substances Control Act case. (Civil) Environmental Protection
Agency Freedom of Information Act document
Lockheed Martin
--Energy Systems Environment $22,500 Fine, 10/24/1996
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act case. (Civil) Environmental
Protection Agency Freedom of Information Act document
Lockheed Martin
--Loral Federal Systems Defense $17,272 Settlement, 9/18/1996
"Cost/Labor Mischarge" (Civil) Senator Harkin and Representative
DeFazio Press Release 06/07/00
Lockheed Martin
--Knolls Atomic Power Laboratory Environment $12,750 Fine, 7/2/1998
?... failing to notify the EPA promptly of releases of
PCBs.? (Administrative) Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Press
Release 07/02/98
Lockheed Martin
--Lockheed Environment $6,000 Fine, 8/18/1994
Clean Water Act case. (Administrative) Environmental Protection
Agency Freedom of Information Act document
Lockheed Martin Environment $5,000 Fine, 11/2/2000
Emergency Planning and Community Right to Know Act
case. (Civil) Environmental Protection Agency Freedom of
Information Act document
Lockheed Martin Environment $500 Fine, 3/13/1997
Toxic Substances Control Act case. (Administrative) Environmental
Protection Agency Freedom of Information Act document
Lockheed Martin Environment Part of $37,250,000 Superfund Cleanup
Costs, 5/25/2000
Lockheed will pay ?for drinking water aquifer restoration costs in
the San Fernando Valley - one of the largest contaminated groundwater
sites in California.? (Administrative) Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) Region 9 Press Release 05/25/00
Lockheed Martin Labor Pending, 5/10/2000
"... African-American employees charge that Lockheed harassed black
workers [and] denied them deserved promotions or wages ... ." Reid v
Lockheed Martin; Yarbrough v Lockheed Martin, Docket #00-CV-1182 &
Docket #00-CV-1183, US DC ND GA (Civil) Court Docket; Equal
Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) Press Release 12/05/00
Lockheed Martin Environment Pending, 6/28/2000
"The [class action] suit alleges the companies didn't run the
[Hanford Nuclear Reservation] plant safely and failed to inform the
public of the health risks." Lumpkin v EI Dupont, Docket
#00-CT-5052, US DC ED WA (Civil) Pittsburgh Post Gazette 07/12/00;
Confirmed by Short, Cressman & Burgess Law Firm on 04/23/01
Lockheed Martin
--Missions Systems Labor Pending, 7/13/2001
Two employees were "allegedly subjected to sexual harassment and sex
discrimination at Lockheed's facility in Albuquerque, New
Mexico." (Civil) Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)
Press Release 07/13/01; Court Complaint
Lockheed Martin Environment Part of $2,292,954 Superfund Cleanup
Costs, 10/6/2000
"... the United States sought recovery of the past costs it incurred
with addressing the release ... of contaminants at the Vandale
Junkyard Superfund Site in ... Ohio." United States v BF Goodrich,
Docket #C2-97-366, US DC SD OH (Civil) Department of Justice (DOJ)
Press Release 10/06/00; Consent Decree 07/17/00; Confirmed by DOJ on 06/27/01
Lockheed Martin
--Space Systems Defense Pending, 4/5/2001
Lockheed is allegedly "selling several buildings and associated land
... in effect considering the buildings to be worthless [but]
proposals to charge government contracts with over $95 million in
losses for the supposedly worthless
buildings." (Administrative) Letter from Senator Tom Harkin to
Diedra Hall, Director of Defense Procurement 04/05/01; Confirmed by
Defense Contract Management Office on 06/28/01; Pending status
confirmed by Senator Harkin's Office on 03/19/02
Lockheed Martin Environment Part of $12,145,000 Superfund Cleanup
Costs, 11/23/1999
Regarding "cleanup of the Pine Street Canal Superfund Site in
Burlington, Vermont." United States v Green Mountain Power, Docket
#99-CV-366, US DC VT (Civil) EPA Press Release 11/23/99; Confirmed
by Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region 2 on 05/02/01
Lockheed Martin
--Loral Defense Pending, 8/13/1996
False Claims Act Lawsuit United States v Loral, Docket #96-CV-5554,
US DC CD CA (Civil) Court Docket
Lockheed Martin
--Tactical Systems Defense Pending, 5/5/1999
"Ultimately, the contract was awarded to the winning bidder.
Subsequently, it was revealed that the winning bidder offered bribes
and sexual favors to key Korean officials. The losing bidder filed an
action asserting claims under California's unfair competition law.
... ." Korea Supply Company v Lockheed Martin, Court of Appeal of
California, Second Appellate District, Division Four. Los Angeles
County. B136410. No. BC 20893 (Civil) Supreme Court of California 29
Cal. 4th 1134; 63 P.3d 937; 131 Cal. Rptr. 2d 29; 2003 Cal. LEXIS
1301; 2003 Cal. Daily Op. Service 1825; 2003 Daily Journal DAR 2291
(Lexis legal document)
Lockheed Martin
--Energy Systems Environment Pending, 6/1/1999
"Alleges that Energy Systems submitted false claims for millions of
dollars while failing to store properly and dispose of radioactive
and hazardous wastes." United States v. Lockheed Martin, Docket
#5:99-CV-00170-M, US DC WD KY (Civil) Department of Justice Press
Release 05/30/2003
Lockheed Martin
--Sanders Environment Part of $626,000 Superfund Cleanup Costs, 7/11/2002
"Administrative settlement for recovery of past response costs
concerning the Angelillo Property Superfund site in Southington,
Connecticut with the settling parties." (Civil) Federal Register
7/11/2002 (Vol.67,No.133) p.45978-45980
Lockheed Martin
--Lockheed Missiles and Space Company Defense Pending, 1/8/1988
Allegedly, "filed false claims for payments under several contracts
with the federal government." United States v Lockheed Missiles and
Space, Docket #88-CV-20009, US DC ND CA (Civil) Government Contract
Litigation Reporter 03/23/00; Court Docket; Federal Contracts Report
03/29/99; Taxpayers Against Fraud (TAF) Quarterly Report Volume 11
October 1997, Volume 16 April 1999; Appeals Court Docket Summary
Lockheed Martin Defense Sealed Case Settlement, 9/19/2000
"A C-130 Hercules was on a routine training mission ... when its four
Allison T-56 turboprop engines failed, causing the aircraft to crash.
The lawsuit alleged that Lockheed Martin was liable for the crash ...
that took the lives of ten Air Force Reservists." Wellnitz v
Lockheed Martin, Docket #97-CV-1648, US DC OR (Civil) Armed Forces
Newswire Service 11/24/97; Court Docket; Confirmed by Tichenor &
Dziuba Law Firm on 04/19/02
Lockheed Martin Labor Sealed Case Settlement, 3/1/1993
?Three former employees of Lockheed Corp ... claimed they had been
dismissed after revealing faults in Lockheed?s C5B cargo
plane.? Benecke v Lockheed, Docket #621967, Superior Court (Los
Angeles County) (Civil) The National Law Journal 01/17/94
Lockheed Martin
--Martin Marietta Defense Part of $5,874,000 Settlement, 12/23/1994
Allegations of "wrongdoing associated with foreign military sales of
radar systems to Egypt ... ." (Civil) Taxpayers Against Fraud (TAF)
Press Release 12/23/94
Lockheed Martin Environment Pending, 8/14/1996
"Residents and property owners [in Burbank, CA] seeking to recover
damages for nuisance arising from environmental remediation efforts
at the site of massive toxic contamination ... ." Hook v Lockheed
Martin, Docket #96-CV-5584, US DC CD CA (Western Division)
(Civil) Gancedo & Nieves Law Firm case description, downloaded
07/20/01; Court Docket
Lockheed Martin Defense Pending, 12/14/1995
"? accusing Lockheed Martin Corp. of deliberately inflating the cost
of equipment it sold to the US Air Force." United States v Lockheed
Martin, Docket #95-CV-1287, US DC MD FL (Civil) Reuters 09/29/01;
Court Docket
Lockheed Martin
--Martin Marietta Environment Part of $12,145,000 Superfund
Cleanup Costs, 11/23/1999
Regarding "cleanup of the Pine Street Canal Superfund Site in
Burlington, Vermont." United States v Green Mountain Power, Docket
#99-CV-366, US DC VT (Civil) EPA Press Release 11/23/99; Confirmed
by Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Region 2 on 05/02/01
Lockheed Martin Environment Pending, 8/1/1997
"... groundwater contamination class complaint ... ." Carillo v
Lockheed Martin, Docket #RCV31496, Superior Court (Court of Appeal,
4th District, Division Two, California) (Civil) Mass Tort Litigation
Reporter August 1997; Court Docket; Confirmed by Engstrom, Lipscomb &
Lack Law Firm on 05/01/01;
Lockheed Martin Defense Part of $3,150,000 Settlement, 3/26/1998
Allegations "that Unisys sold spare parts at inflated prices for the
NEXRAD Doppler Radar System. Lockheed Martin succeeded Unisys on the
contract ... ." (Civil) Department of Justice (DOJ) Press Release 03/26/98
Lockheed Martin Labor Sealed Case Settlement, 5/7/1998
"Workers in an Alabama foundry incurred a potentially deadly lung
disease because manufacturers of a mask used to trap dust particles
[allegedly] did not properly test the device ... ." (Civil) Houston
Chronicle 05/08/98; Confirmed by Watts & Heard Law Firm on 04/12/01
Lockheed Martin
--Energy Systems Environment Pending, 6/23/1998
"Plaintiffs who own property near the ... complex ... [are] alleging
that radioactive and chemical wastes are being discharged into the
environment due to the negligence of the defendants." Adkins v
Divested Atomic, Docket #98-CV-595, US DC SD OH (Civil) Hazardous
Waste Litigation Reporter 07/28/98; Court Docket; Confirmed by Waite,
Schneider, Bayless & Chesley Law Firm on 06/22/01
Lockheed Martin Financial Pending, 1/14/1999
Allegedly "inflated the company?s stock price by making false and
misleading statements about Lockheed?s operations and
earnings." Yousefi v Lockheed Martin, Docket #99-CV-372, US DC CD CA
(Civil) Court Docket; Stull, Stull & Brody Law Firm Press Release 06/18/99
Lockheed Martin Financial Pending, 2/11/1999
"The Complaint alleges that Lockheed violated the securities laws by
misrepresenting how the Company had reached its 3rd Quarter 1998 EPS
targets ... by utilizing a secret accounting adjustment ...
." Kretchmeyer v Lockheed Martin, Docket #99-CV-1476, US DC CD CA
(Civil) Court Docket; Wolf, Haldenstein, Adler, Freeman & Herz Press
Release 02/11/99; Confirmed by Wolf, Haldenstein Law Firm on 05/11/01
Lockheed Martin Financial Pending, 7/15/1999
"The Complaint alleges that ... Lockheed?s insiders reinitiated a ...
[misleading] publicity campaign ... to boost its stock price
throughout 1999." Kensington Cap v Lockheed Martin, Docket
#99-CV-7249, US DC WD CA (Civil) Court Docket; Wolf, Haldenstein Law
Firm Press Release 07/15/99; Confirmed by Wolf, Haldenstein Law Firm
on 05/11/01
Lockheed Martin Defense Pending, 5/30/1995
"? alleged ? that Lockheed Martin program management purposely hid
$40 million reserve? in order to create additional profit which could
be used to offset overruns on another ? contract." United States v
Lockheed Martin, Docket #95-CV-549 & Docket #95-CV-1287, US DC MD FL
(Civil) Department of Justice (DOJ) Press Release 09/28/01; Court Docket
-jma
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
World Class, Professional, Ethical, and Competent Bug Sweeps, and
Wiretap Detection using Sophisticated Laboratory Grade Test Equipment.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
James M. Atkinson Phone: (978) 546-3803
Granite Island Group Fax: (978) 546-9467
127 Eastern Avenue #291 Web:
http://www.tscm.com/
Gloucester, MA 01931-8008 E-mail: mailto:jm..._at_tscm.com
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We perform bug sweeps like it's a full contact sport, we take no prisoners,
and we give no quarter. Our goal is to simply, and completely stop the spy.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Sat Mar 02 2024 - 00:57:24 CST