>From - Sat Mar 02 00:57:25 2024
X-BeenThere: tscm-l2006_at_googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.141.187.19 with SMTP id o19ls878416rvp.0.p; Sun, 24 Jan 2010
17:32:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.140.83.37 with SMTP id g37mr1036022rvb.16.1264383130387;
Sun, 24 Jan 2010 17:32:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.115.80.10 with SMTP id h10mr1020149wal.7.1264282154192;
Sat, 23 Jan 2010 13:29:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.115.80.10 with SMTP id h10mr1020148wal.7.1264282154164;
Sat, 23 Jan 2010 13:29:14 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <sol..._at_gmail.com>
Received: from mail-pz0-f180.google.com (mail-pz0-f180.google.com [209.85.222.180])
by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id 23si2443685pxi.4.2010.01.23.13.29.13;
Sat, 23 Jan 2010 13:29:13 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of sol..._at_gmail.com designates 209.85.222.180 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.222.180;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of sol..._at_gmail.com designates 209.85.222.180 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=sol..._at_gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) head..._at_gmail.com
Received: by pzk10 with SMTP id 10so1689175pzk.19
for <tscm-..._at_googlegroups.com>; Sat, 23 Jan 2010 13:29:13 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
bh=18r8M614Ynq2lPlmjvogslZcmrw76XfhqFgaeCZJvEc=;
b=aymZAF95NB2oa6GIEEJ6ZN860t2FYePzihlGNUSr7GbvPA/7r2DgD6dzV0AXODbNEo
brSS4+SiVAnGY1CxWVsI7oKdl6KAeP5cLoKBwwgPnRZxeZTI7DO0BZwNyDxr63GgdaLg
SdipDBxVyDpcw1K1wxhlvDdnbaBp9WwWSe0mE=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type;
b=m1eFqQF+QKmtAzzLfKmToi4R+ht/VTr0JSi0L01NQE/DDEuHTWzAdoPqMC9HVJdjG2
5HMNSTtRBY6M8PmqbY+qO4G8BSByuJL6kLmmUH/0FzMQ4PJdwLhdG8mdmH4iefzEFcua
8EEy2dlIh1QMix7h63A78MnUvTrdvifIZJMmI=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.114.249.19 with SMTP id w19mr3172484wah.107.1264282152890;
Sat, 23 Jan 2010 13:29:12 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20100123145426.169923bllw21mj9c_at_webmail.uslec.net>
References: <F962412CD9A0404EAC61A89AD817F5A9_at_pcnicolas>
<005201ca9b80$b23976b0$16ac6410$_at_com.mx>
<978CAA7E685B473AA1A782DF04F9C476_at_pcnicolas>
<20100123145426.169923bllw21mj9c_at_webmail.uslec.net>
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 13:29:12 -0800
Message-ID: <bc77f6b21001231329je02225fxbfe5db4fc42340ad_at_mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [TSCM-L] {4572} Solution for Secure Land Line?
From: Sol Weil <sol..._at_gmail.com>
To: tscm-l2006_at_googlegroups.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Interesting links. I wonder if there is a linux livecd option for this
kind of program. There would be less risk of keys and other sensitive
info being saved in swap files and whatnot.
On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 11:54 AM, ed <ber..._at_netaxs.com> wrote:
> http://www.cryptophone.de/products/CP-WIN/index.html
> http://www.cryptophone.de/products/CPPSTN1/index.html
Received on Sat Mar 02 2024 - 00:57:25 CST