>From - Sat Mar 02 00:57:25 2024
Received: by 10.50.171.102 with SMTP id at6mr2240247igc.1.1348960542278;
Sat, 29 Sep 2012 16:15:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-BeenThere: tscm-l2006_at_googlegroups.com
Received: by 10.50.157.164 with SMTP id wn4ls5097954igb.0.canary; Sat, 29 Sep
2012 16:15:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.42.32.8 with SMTP id b8mr6663262icd.12.1348960538923;
Sat, 29 Sep 2012 16:15:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.50.57.75 with SMTP id g11msigq;
Fri, 21 Sep 2012 13:34:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.66.85.37 with SMTP id e5mr1074489paz.31.1348259683179;
Fri, 21 Sep 2012 13:34:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.66.85.37 with SMTP id e5mr1074488paz.31.1348259683167;
Fri, 21 Sep 2012 13:34:43 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <kb3..._at_gmail.com>
Received: from mail-pb0-f54.google.com (mail-pb0-f54.google.com [209.85.160.54])
by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j3si1722431paz.2.2012.09.21.13.34.43
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER);
Fri, 21 Sep 2012 13:34:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of kb3..._at_gmail.com designates 209.85.160.54 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.160.54;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of kb3..._at_gmail.com designates 209.85.160.54 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=kb3..._at_gmail.com; dkim=pass head..._at_gmail.com
Received: by pbbrp2 with SMTP id rp2so9189829pbb.13
for <tscm-..._at_googlegroups.com>; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 13:34:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=NS+YEt6jE1VJ/+C0aFaPQHpyGWPBQODJn325ERhSsq0=;
b=qJFaCiCLJbAsL9dly0yT8eyl/PjV1zou4BwxfLDCtG87ozjxMU93ap8iTdZUnYafqj
2oiFEP+MchheTM9P3uwORB8Gt6sYUz/Pl5sNicrcZ1JH3p3c5a5fXJHdZ02ILveaBNbr
Rbl9cYUlcsl0d1qyxCMBuRyTW6M9dVeaFq7JO90d2dxGTpk6VmN5Im8OmQ/cPLTzzjHk
XIR1cMqSRGe1xYAD73A67K8c2B5s5whKMxKQ6KmMiF/XNyD8L8NH+ieWIHGPLXqFKg0R
YUHEW1LEeigGoYOKD739qLlmpQZkQde9T81xhtCyC4oin4qREj3vGg07UAaBIlKFGUJX
nUzQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.68.216.104 with SMTP id op8mr18299237pbc.65.1348259683036;
Fri, 21 Sep 2012 13:34:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.68.196.167 with HTTP; Fri, 21 Sep 2012 13:34:42 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <SNT107-W7746AEB4B5A2FA1AB7C17BCAC0_at_phx.gbl>
References: <SNT107-W7746AEB4B5A2FA1AB7C17BCAC0_at_phx.gbl>
Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2012 13:34:42 -0700
Message-ID: <CAJh3nzh0ohHH=R32OKtHkGuTSaaDMs6BW8A_PtV1Y_2k7Qn4fA_at_mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [TSCM-L] {6236} Medical records at risk also
From: George Imburgia <kb3..._at_gmail.com>
To: tscm-l2006_at_googlegroups.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
It's possible that they're both (mostly) telling the truth.
If that data was stolen from the company's machine, and the FBI was
investigating the hack, that the FBI investigator had copies of the
stolen data from the victim or a site run by the attackers, and the
Anons stole the copy from the FBI's box, without knowing the context.
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Its from Onion <areda..._at_msn.com> wrote:
> They are getting smarter, just so you know.
>
>
> A small Florida publishing company says the million-record database of Ap=
ple
> gadget identifiers released last week by the hacker group Anonymous was
> stolen from its servers two weeks ago. The admission, delivered by the
> company=92s CEO exclusively to NBC News, contradicts Anonymous' claim tha=
t the
> hacker group stole the data from an FBI agent's laptop in March.
>
>
> Anonymous=92 accusations garnered attention because they suggested that t=
he
> FBI was using the unique gadget identifiers -- called UDIDs -- to engage =
in
> high-level spying on American citizens via their iPhones, iPads, and iPod
> Touch devices. The FBI denied the claim, last week, and when asked to
> comment for this story, referred to last week=92s denial.
>
>
> http://redtape.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/09/10/13781440-exclusive-the-real-s=
ource-of-apple-device-ids-leaked-by-anonymous-last-week?lite
>
>
> "Why exposing this personal data? ... We have learnt it seems quite clear
> nobody pays attention if you just come and say 'hey, FBI is using your
> device details and info and who the knows what the hell are they
> experimenting with that', well sorry, but nobody will care," says the
> Anonymous writer, in typical broken English. "So without even being sure =
if
> the current choice will guarantee that people will pay attention to this
> shouted 'FBI IS USING YOUR DEVICE INFO FOR A TRACKING PEOPLE PROJECT ..."
Received on Sat Mar 02 2024 - 00:57:25 CST