Chris Rock Testifies in wiretapping case ( no joke) from TSCM/SO Group on 2008-04-04 (file.mbox)

From: TSCM/SO Group <Mit..._at_tscmusa.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 17:41:07 -0500

>From - Sat Mar 02 00:57:27 2024
Received: by 10.114.60.19 with SMTP id i19mr3000335waa.10.1204934819843;
 Fri, 07 Mar 2008 16:06:59 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <pe..._at_detectiveservices.com>
Received: from smtprelay.hostedemail.com (smtprelay0117.hostedemail.com [216.40.44.117])
 by mx.google.com with ESMTP id k36si15358898waf.1.2008.03.07.16.06.57;
 Fri, 07 Mar 2008 16:06:59 -0800 (PST)
Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 216.40.44.117 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of pe..._at_detectiveservices.com) client-ip!6.40.44.117;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 216.40.44.117 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of pe..._at_detectiveservices.com) smtp.mail=pe..._at_detectiveservices.com
Received: from emd2-omf02.hostedemail.com (ff-bigip1 [10.5.19.254])
 by smtprelay03.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AED252DB6
 for <TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com>; Sat, 8 Mar 2008 00:06:55 +0000 (UTC)
X-SpamScore: 10
X-Spamcatcher-Summary: 10,1,0,85c1d45167f2f4e7,929e1bbe941cdfb1,pe..._at_detectiveservices.com,-,RULES_HIT:1:2:10:37:69:355:379:476:481:599:601:946:960:962:967:973:980:983:988:989:1189:1208:1212:1221:1260:1261:1313:1314:1345:1359:1431:1437:1515:1516:1517:1521:1575:1588:1589:1594:1606:1730:1776:1792:2068:2069:2194:2199:2377:2380:2525:2551:2552:2553:2568:2627:2682:2685:2691:2714:2829:2857:2859:2894:2900:2915:2933:2937:2939:2942:2945:2947:2951:2954:3022:3027:3355:3521:3522:3523:3622:
 3636:3865:3866:3867:3868:3869:3870:3871:3872:3873:3874:3934:3936:3938:3941:3944:4250:4321:4362:4647:5007:6117:6119:6120:6238:6300:7081:7208:7576:7652:7679:7861:7862:7875,0,RBL:none,CacheIP:none,Bayesian:0.5,0.5,0.5,Netcheck:none,DomainCache:0,MSF:not bulk,SPF:,MSBL:none,DNSBL:none
X-Spamcatcher-Explanation: (100%) BODY: contains text similar to "rx in domain";
Received: from [10.0.20.52] (unknown [74.222.48.26])
 (Authenticated sender: pe..._at_detectiveservices.com)
 by emd2-omf02.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
 for <TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com>; Sat, 8 Mar 2008 00:06:55 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.3.3.061214
Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2008 18:06:54 -0600
Subject: Re: [TSCM-L] {2494} Re: GPS Jammers
From: "Perry Myers, CFE" <pe..._at_detectiveservices.com>
To: <TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com>
Message-ID: <C3F734BE.227A5%perry_at_detectiveservices.com>
Thread-Topic: [TSCM-L] {2494} Re: GPS Jammers
Thread-Index: Ach/uEp1iP9CduurEdyQPQAX8tM/ZgAwiKXgAA1493c=
In-Reply-To: <00d301c880ad$3a171d30$6501a8c0_at_oem>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="B_3287758014_21884516"

--B_3287758014_21884516
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Thanks Mitch,

My suspicion too is that they are illegal. These devices only claim to bloc=
k
a 10 foot area. So it would likely not effect other vehicles. What would
matter is how they work. If they block radio signals, we know they are
illegal. If they do some other action that disrupts the GPS, then it may b=
e
sliding under the laws for now. I¹ll contact some vendors and try to fin=
d
out how they work and email back.

> Perry Myers, CFE
> President
> MSI Detective Services
> 2406 W Fullerton Ave
> Chicago, IL 60647
> pe..._at_detectiveservices.com
> WWW.DETECTIVESERVICES.COM
(773) 404-7400 x 200

On 3/7/08 5:44 PM, "TSCM/SO Group" <Mit..._at_tscmusa.com> wrote:

> If the device disrupts gsm service its reasonable to believe that it woul=
d
> fall under the cell jammer catregory- illegal
> If the device jams a gps receiver and its not fcc approved its probably
> illegal
> Whats interesting is Ive spent hours searching for the same answer, using
> specific language gps transmitter,,and nothing is etched in stone regardi=
ng
> the legalities of a ³ GPS Jammer²
> Interesting topic though
>
>
> Mitch Davis
> TSCM/Special Operations Group
> 20 Music Square West,Suite 208
> Nashville,TN 37203 USA
> 615 251 0441
> Fax 615 523 0300
> mit..._at_tscmusa.com
> www.tscmusa.com <http://www.tscmusa.com>
> "maintaining a higher degree of excellence"
> ******************************
> Tools for investigators at www.covertworx.com <http://www.covertworx.com/=
>
>
>
> From: TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com [mailto:TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com] On
> Behalf Of Perry Myers, CFE
> Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2008 12:31 PM
> To: TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com
> Subject: [TSCM-L] {2488} GPS Scramblers
>
> I am assuming that GPS scramblers that are appearing in various blogs are
> illegal just as any radio scrambler is. Can anyone verify this? Thanks
>
>
>
>
> >
>
>

Perry Myers, CFE
President
MSI Detective Services
2406 W Fullerton Ave
Chicago, IL 60647
pe..._at_detectiveservices.com
WWW.DETECTIVESERVICES.COM
(773) 404-7400 x 200

--B_3287758014_21884516
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>Re: [TSCM-L] {2494} Re: GPS Jammers</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
T=
hanks Mitch, 
 
My suspicion too is that they are illegal. These devices only claim to bloc=
k a 10 foot area.  So it would likely not effect other vehicles. &nbsp=
;What would matter is how they work.  If they block radio signals, we =
know they are illegal.  If they do some other action that disrupts the=
GPS, then it may be sliding under the laws for now.  I’ll conta=
ct some vendors and try to find out how they work and email back. 
 
 
<BLOCKQUOTE>Perry Myers, CFE 
President 
MSI Detective Services 
2406 W Fullerton Ave 
Chicago, IL 60647 
pe..._at_detectiveservices.com 
WWW.DETECTIVESERVICES.COM 
</BLOCKQUOTE>(773) 404-7400 x 200 
 
 
On 3/7/08 5:44 PM, "TSCM/SO Group" <M..._at_tscmusa.com> wrote=
: 
 
<BLOCKQUOTE>If the device disrupts gsm se=
rvice its reasonable to believe that it would fall under the cell jammer ca=
tregory- illegal 
If the device jams a gps receiver and its not fcc approved its probably ill=
egal 
Whats interesting is Ive spent hours searching for the same answer, using s=
pecific language gps transmitter,,and nothing is etched in stone regarding =
the legalities of a “ GPS Jammer” 
Interesting topic though 
  
 
Mitch Davis 
TSCM/Special Operations Group 
20 Music Square West,Suite 208 
Nashville,TN 37203 USA 
615 251 0441 
Fax 615 523 0300 
mit..._at_tscmusa.com 
www.tscmusa.com <a href="http://www.tscmusa.com"><http://www.tscmusa.c=
om></a> 
"maintaining a higher degree of excellence" 
************************=
****** 
Tools for investigators at www.covertworx.com <a href="http:=
//www.covertworx.com/"><http://www.covertworx.com/></a> 



<HR ALIGN=CENTER SIZE="2" WIDTH="100%">

=
From: TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com [<a href="mailto:TSCM-..._at_googlegroup=
s.com]">mailto:TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com]</a> On Behalf Of Perry Mye=
rs, CFE 
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2008 12:31 PM 
To: TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com 
Subject: [TSCM-L] {2488} GPS Scramblers 
 
I am assuming that GPS scramblers that are appearing =
in various blogs are illegal just as any radio scrambler is.  Can anyo=
ne verify this?  Thanks 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
</BLOCKQUOTE> 
 
Perry Myers, CFE 
President 
MSI Detective Services 
2406 W Fullerton Ave 
Chicago, IL 60647 
pe..._at_detectiveservices.com 
WWW.DETECTIVESERVICES.COM 
(773) 404-7400 x 200 
 

</BODY>
</HTML>

--B_3287758014_21884516--
Received on Sat Mar 02 2024 - 00:57:27 CST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Mar 02 2024 - 01:11:46 CST