Re: [TSCM-L] {4126} Re: OSCOR Blue TSCM Spectrum Analyzer

From: <ians..._at_googlemail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 12:42:56 +0000

>From - Sat Mar 02 00:57:28 2024
Received: by 10.224.66.39 with SMTP id l39mr109299qai.8.1250177417180;
        Thu, 13 Aug 2009 08:30:17 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <edmic..._at_comcast.net>
Received: from QMTA06.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta06.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [76.96.62.56])
        by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id 25si40470qyk.4.2009.08.13.08.30.17;
        Thu, 13 Aug 2009 08:30:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of edmic..._at_comcast.net designates 76.96.62.56 as permitted sender) client-ip=76.96.62.56;
Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of edmic..._at_comcast.net designates 76.96.62.56 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=edmic..._at_comcast.net
Received: from OMTA17.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.89])
        by QMTA06.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast
        id TnXg1c0041vXlb856rWJ8T; Thu, 13 Aug 2009 15:30:18 +0000
Received: from acer6e40e97492 ([69.253.229.242])
        by OMTA17.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast
        id TrZt1c00D5ESUaD3drZt9k; Thu, 13 Aug 2009 15:33:53 +0000
Message-ID: <03E703B0A7A747139826D53AAF8DC30D_at_acer6e40e97492>
Reply-To: "E. J. \"Ed\" Michaels" <edmic..._at_comcast.net>
From: "E. J. \"Ed\" Michaels" <edmic..._at_comcast.net>
To: <TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com>
References: <2CA506A5484B464A9629949377C4B2270851977C_at_sp049exc31>
Subject: Re: [TSCM-L] {4134} Re: OSCOR Blue TSCM Spectrum Analyzer
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2009 11:30:07 -0400
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5512
Disposition-Notification-To: "E. J. Ed Michaels" <edmic..._at_comcast.net>
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579

The question is where was covert defensive RF monitoring on the part of=20
management during the bankrupt Philadelphia Inquirer's union negotiations?

Oh, I am sorry, the vintage FET microphones purchased in 1992 at a now=20
defunct Bucks county PA spy shop by the newspaper "mailers" union local=20
require NLJD and physical search to locate and recover. I wonder if the=20
modified Panasonic audio cassette recorders are still in use?

----- Original Message -----=20
From: <Ed.St..._at_compucom.com>
To: <TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2009 10:05 AM
Subject: [TSCM-L] {4134} Re: OSCOR Blue TSCM Spectrum Analyzer



Ian, Food for thought.

The RF Hawk is a great analyzer. The real times spectrum analysis, signal=
=20
comparison software and automatic band selection for cellular up/down links=
=20
is very helpful. Yet the processor speed is no where near the sweep speed=
=20
of the Blue. In addition the OSCOR RF mapping, to identify digital signals=
=20
on multiple scans is invaluable. I share your reservations on cost, but I=
=20
have found that when you invest in top shelf gear, the phone keeps ringing=
.
Knock on wood, business is up 12% over last year.

Regards
Ed

-----Original Message-----
From: TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com [mailto:TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com] On=20
Behalf Of ians..._at_googlemail.com
Sent: Thursday, August 13, 2009 8:43 AM
To: TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com
Subject: [TSCM-L] {4132} Re: OSCOR Blue TSCM Spectrum Analyzer

I've been told by the uk dealer =A340,000 its a lot of money to pay in this=
=20
climate when work is very sparse its double the price of the hawk and other=
=20
competition I personally would love it for its speed especially with today'=
s=20
complicated devices who knows it would maybe see gsm eventually but I have=
=20
no chance of affording it Ian

Sent using BlackBerry=AE from Orange

________________________________

From: socalsweeps
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2009 21:21:58 -0700
To: <TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com>
Subject: [TSCM-L] {4126} Re: OSCOR Blue TSCM Spectrum Analyzer



On Aug 12, 2009, at 2:39:48 PM, urbanreef <urban..._at_googlemail.com> wrote:


I heard it will be very very expensive


The numbers I heard were $26,000 for 8 Ghz and $34,000 for 24 Ghz












Received on Sat Mar 02 2024 - 00:57:28 CST