>From - Sat Mar 02 00:57:28 2024
Received: by 10.90.94.3 with SMTP id r3mr630597agb.10.1224791875088;
Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:57:55 -0700 (PDT)
Return-Path: <areda..._at_msn.com>
Received: from blu0-omc2-s18.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc2-s18.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.111.93])
by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 22si16043532yxr.1.2008.10.23.12.57.54;
Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:57:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of areda..._at_msn.com designates 65.55.111.93 as permitted sender) client-ipe.55.111.93;
Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of areda..._at_msn.com designates 65.55.111.93 as permitted sender) smtp.mail
eda..._at_msn.com
Received: from BLU149-DS9 ([65.55.111.71]) by blu0-omc2-s18.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959);
Thu, 23 Oct 2008 12:57:54 -0700
X-Originating-IP: [68.113.113.179]
X-Originating-Email: [areda..._at_msn.com]
Message-ID: <BLU149-DS9AFCF9D1F25670BAFC78EBC280_at_phx.gbl>
Return-Path: areda..._at_msn.com
From: "Its from Onion" <areda..._at_msn.com>
To: <TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com>
References: <f7ecaba1-d589-48eb-9131-18dec2dce1bd_at_p49g2000hsd.googlegroups.com> <20081023150834.GC683_at_koltblut.setec.org>
Subject: Re: [TSCM-L] {2982} Re: Radio Jammers
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 14:57:57 -0500
In-Reply-To: <f7ecaba1-d589-48eb-9131-18dec2dce1bd_at_p49g2000hsd.googlegroups.com> <20081023150834.GC683_at_koltblut.setec.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0429_01C9351F.BC503080"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: MSN 9
X-MimeOLE: Produced By MSN MimeOLE V9.60.0053.2200
Seal-Send-Time: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 14:57:57 -0500
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Oct 2008 19:57:54.0980 (UTC) FILETIME=[A3905640:01C93549]
------=_NextPart_000_0429_01C9351F.BC503080
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Izaac...Izaac... The fine print, "AUTHORIZED USE ONLY".
The government can do anything with the pretence of 'protecting' you.
Fine example is Homeland Security and the Patriot Act in America.
----- Original Message -----
From: Izaac<mailto:iz..._at_setec.org>
To: TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com<mailto:TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2008 10:08 AM
Subject: [TSCM-L] {2982} Re: Radio Jammers
On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 07:36:42AM -0700, reginal..._at_hotmail.com<mailto:r=
eginal..._at_hotmail.com> wrote:
> There was a meeting last week in Quebec City, Quebec, Canada of some
> international leaders. The following blurb relates to a security
> measure. Two things come to mind: 1) why did it have to be approved by
> the Prime Minister of Canada and the federal cabinet, and 2) why is it
> even a subject of comment? I have always assumed that these measures
> are taken as a matter of course.
Simply put: Because jamming is illegal and governments are not above
the rule of law.
If you are asking why jamming is illegal, simply put: Because Canada
sold spectrum to a user and it would be wrong to deprive that user of
access to his spectrum.
--
. ___ ___ . . ___
. \ / |\ |\ \
. _\_ /__ |-\ |-\ \__
------=_NextPart_000_0429_01C9351F.BC503080
Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html;charset=iso-8859-1>
<STYLE></STYLE>
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.16735" name=GENERATOR></HEAD>
<BODY id=MailContainerBody
style="PADDING-LEFT: 10px; FONT-WEIGHT: normal; FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: #=
000000; BORDER-TOP-STYLE: none; PADDING-TOP: 15px; FONT-STYLE: normal; FONT=
-FAMILY: Verdana; BORDER-RIGHT-STYLE: none; BORDER-LEFT-STYLE: none; TEXT-D=
ECORATION: none; BORDER-BOTTOM-STYLE: none"
leftMargin=0 topMargin=0 acc_role="text" CanvasTabStop="true"
name="Compose message area"><!--[gte IE 5]><?xml:namespace prefix="v" /=
><?xml:namespace prefix="o" /><![endif]-->
<DIV>
<DIV>Izaac...Izaac... The fine print, "AUTHORIZED USE ONLY".</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>The government can do anything with the pretence of 'protecting' you.<=
/DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Fine example is Homeland Security and the Patriot Act in America.</DIV=
>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LE=
FT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial">----- Original Message ----- </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>From:</B> <A title=mailto:iz..._at_sete=
c.org
href="mailto:iz..._at_setec.org">Izaac</A> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>To:</B> <A
title=mailto:TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com
href="mailto:TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com">TSCM-..._at_googlegroups.com</A>=
</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Sent:</B> Thursday, October 23, 2008 1=
0:08
AM</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt arial"><B>Subject:</B> [TSCM-L] {2982} Re: Radio=
Jammers</DIV>
<DIV><BR></DIV><BR>On Thu, Oct 23, 2008 at 07:36:42AM -0700, <A
title=mailto:reginal..._at_hotmail.com
href="mailto:reginal..._at_hotmail.com">reginal..._at_hotmail.com</A>
wrote:<BR>> There was a meeting last week in Quebec City, Quebec, Cana=
da of
some<BR>> international leaders. The following blurb relates to a
security<BR>> measure. Two things come to mind: 1) why did it have to =
be
approved by<BR>> the Prime Minister of Canada and the federal cabinet,=
and
2) why is it<BR>> even a subject of comment? I have always assumed tha=
t
these measures<BR>> are taken as a matter of course.<BR><BR>Simply put=
:
Because jamming is illegal and governments are not above<BR>the rule of=
law.<BR><BR>If you are asking why jamming is illegal, simply put: Because=
Canada<BR>sold spectrum to a user and it would be wrong to deprive that u=
ser
of<BR>access to his spectrum.<BR><BR>-- <BR>. ___ ___ . =
. ___<BR>. \ / |\ |\ \<BR>.&nbs=
p;
_\_ /__ |-\ |-\
\__<BR><BR>
------=_NextPart_000_0429_01C9351F.BC503080--
Received on Sat Mar 02 2024 - 00:57:28 CST