Dear Birdman,
I have thoroughly and repeatedly read through much of the information on your site and find that you are definitely a thoughful writer who confronts the critical issues of the day head-on, without all the politically correct garbage that dominates the discourse of the day. Like you, I despise liberalism and all the damage it has wrought on modern America.
I view you on the whole as a positive voice, although I do have some differences with you. But I believe that people with differences should openly debate their differences rather than resort to name-calling and trying to silence the other side. I agree with a great deal of what you say also.
There can be no question that Third World immigration is by far the greatest threat to Western civilization, because it is truly an existential question. The damage from other stupid liberal ideas can be reversed, although often with much difficulty. But these modern immigrants, especially in such huge numbers, will destroy North America, Europe, Australia, et cetera. And white nations are the only ones allowing it; no non-white nation would even dream of consenting to their voluntary displacement. And the actions of the ADL, HIAS, SWC, et cetera both apall me and yes, scare me. Third World immigration, as you point out, is a threat to Jews and Gentiles alike. I don't know how many Jews Hitler killed, and I don't feel qualified to speculate on that number. I can however say 2 things for certain: (1) it would not have been pleasant to be Jewish in Hitler's Germany and (2) people who work tirelessly to stifle discourse on a topic generally have something to hide. I said gererally, since I am unconvinced of either the truth or falsehood of the OJV. All sides of an issue should be allowed to be heard. You made a good point in saying that the actions of the Jewish establishment rightly enrage many good and decent Gentiles and I sometimes worry that people may associate me with these hustlers. Like the financial shakedowns of Germany for reparations. Even if the OJV is totally true, the loot from all this is not going to the victims, but to the rich Jewish elite. As you rightly point out, the actions of the Jewish Establishment anger many Gentiles at the Jews, most of whom are good citizens with high productivity, low criminality, and a good moral compass.
My primary difference with you is on the degree of Jewish influence. Not just you, but many others believe that Jewish influence and the Jewish lobby are almost omnipotent. On the surface, this is a reasonable conclusion. After all, Congress and every President of either party are universally and unwaveringly pro-Israel, and a politician who doesn't share this commitment probably won't do very well. If you look a little deeper, you will see that while Jewish influence is greater than our numbers, it is not as great as imagined. For example, on the Israel issue, fundamentalist Christians, who outnumber Jews 10 to 1 in America, are every bit as pro-Israel as Jewish people are. If you combine the fundamentalist Christians and Jews, you have about 30% of America which is strongly pro-Israel. And unlike other issues such as abortion, gun rights, school vouchers, there is not a serious opposition, so the pro-Israel side wins by default.
Regarding Third World immigration, the main advocates of the disasterous 1965 law had names like Kennedy and Johnson, although there is no question that Jewish support for it was high. I recently read about the Refugee Industry, and Catholic Charities has actually been bringing in more refugees than Jewish groups (who, it must be noted, are the silver metalists here). Regarding that Hmong fiasco in Minnesota and Wisconsin, it was Lutheran groups that sponsored them. So there are many, many Gentiles culpable in this.
While you seem to acknowledge this, you definitely seem to believe that Jews were necessary for this phenomenon. If so, then why is this scenario being duplicated in nearly judenfrei nations like Sweden, Holland, Germany et cetera? Some might counter that somehow the Jews are in control there too, but that is a totally untenable position, given Europe's pro-palestinian foreign policy. Jared Taylor noted that Jews have had almost no influence in creating the multicultural mess in northern Europe.
With regard to Communism and socialism, there is no question that Jews have participated in these movements in numbers greater than their portion of the population. But have non-Jews created Communist and socialist societies on their own? Yes. Look at China, North Korea, et cetera. How many Jews were involved in Communist revolutions there? And look at Western Europe, which is socialist. I spent several years in Europe, and most West Europeans hold strongly socialist views. American liberalism, even Jewish American liberalism, is mild in comparison. And very few of those leftists over there are Jewish. So while I acknowledge the Jewish involvement in disasterous liberal policies, the Jewish involvent, in most cases, was not a necessary element. White Gentiles still make up 80% of the US electorate (more than their share of the population because many recent immigrants cannot vote) and thus, ultimately call the shots. Yes, other groups do pressure you guys to enact certain policies, but they only happen with white Gentile consent. I hope that we anti-liberal Jews can join with anti-liberal Gentiles in fighting liberalism and Third World immigration.
Best Wishes,
Jeremy
[Birdman responds:]
Dear Jeremy:
Thanks for writing, and for your kind words.
On the matter of Jewish power, you will find posted in the Articles of Others section, subsection on Jews, an important collection of articles on this subject. They will perhaps give you a different perspective. It is located at:
There are of course many other relevant articles in the other subsections (Articles of Others/Jews)
You take the pro-Palestinian attitude of Europe as a measure of lack of Jewish influence. I am uncertain, however, as to how 'pro-Pal' Europe is, or how you would measure it. But it is not difficult to point to one important marker of JEWISH influence, namely, the anti-Holocaust denial laws, and the bedrock of these laws, the anti-hate and anti-racism laws. Beyond this, I would guess that the media in Europe, as that in America, is dominated by Jews, tho with the possible exception of Britain, I don't know this for certain.
I say the anti-hate and anti-racism laws are the bedrock of Holo denial laws because the principle of the former is required for the latter, viz, that expressing white racism or anti-minority hatred is wrong, tho of course it is not wrong to express MINORITY racism or hatred of WHITES. Thus in order for Jews to keep the Holohoax scam going (see Prof Finklestein's 'The Holocaust Industry') and keep money pouring into their coffers as a product of it (US and German foreign aid to Israel, shakedown of the Swiss, Germans, IBM, etc) the anti-H denial laws are an important tool, and a thousand times more important with the Internet. The Jewish establishment may not even NEED these laws, as it is only a matter of time before judges begin declaring H-denial an act of 'racism' or 'hate' or whatever. But the point is that all these laws are in the interest of the Jewish establishment, so it is not far to find who has laid out the money and influence to purchase them. And that is certainly not the white European majority. And of course these laws exist in virtually every country in Europe, plus Canada, Australia and New Zealand, ie, in every Western country save America, and that is probably not far off, what with 'hate crimes' laws, and then applied only against whites. But Jewish influence is a lot wider than that -- a popular magazine was suppressed in Japan because it dared to run a Holo-denial article; in Korea a restaurant gained international infamy by putting nazi decorations as its theme; and of course 'H-denier' David Irving has been banned from Australia, New Zealand, Canada and much of Europe for his supposed opinions, altho it is my view that Irving is a Jewish agent (see my posts in Net Losses).
One thing that really pisses me off is what I call the Jewish bait-and-switch: Jews whine incessantly about being victims and how intolerant everyone is, and then they move to the West and promote the veriest intolerance of anything they don't like, most notably H-denial and 'antisemitism'. Is it any wonder I'm a zionist? Let all these folks make alyah -- THIS year in Jeru-Salem!
Thanks again for writing.
-Birdman
[Jeremy replies:]
Dear Birdman,
However great Jewish influence is in the West, and I agree that it is considerable, the real problem is that white Gentiles, alone among all people in the world, don't look out for their interests. The Anglo-Saxon nations are the wealthiest and freest societies on earth, so it should come as no surprise that there are many people out there who wish to exploit them. Yet the Achilles Heel of the Anglo-Saxons is that you don't stick together enough. During the past elections, Jews openly considered Jewish interests, Mexicans Mexican interests, blacks black interests, et cetera. Yet you almost never hear anyone talking about white interests. This concerns me greatly because, as you point out, the destruction of Western Civilization would not be good for the Jews either.
As I understand it, white Gentiles are still the majority of the electorate in 49 states. You are 85 of 100 U.S. Senators (with 11 Jews, 1 mestizo, 1 black, and 2 Asians). Your numbers are even more dominant in Europe. Note: I am writing of enfranchised citizens, not the population as a whole. This tells me that no policies come to pass without white Gentile support here in the West. I understand that Jewish, Mexican, and other minority groups work tirelessly and often cajole the Anglos into going along with their agendas. But ultimately, white Gentiles have the last word. As President Truman said, "The buck stops here." It was white Gentiles who enacted the laws for Turd World immigration, multiculturalism, and criminalization of Holocaust denial. Even if Jews and other minorities pushed this stuff hard, it still REQUIRED the support of white Gentiles to go into effect.
White nationalists often denounce Jews and other minorities for sticking together and looking out for their interests, but I think this criticism is unfair. The real problem is that you Anglo-Saxons don't.
Right now, the whites in South Africa and Zimbabwe are being exterminated by those black savages there, and the American and European leadership doesn't say a word. Do you think anyone else, whether Chinese, Mexican, Arab, or Jewish would be silent while their people are being murdered? We both know the answer.
Concerning Turd World immigration, I don't blame them for wanting to come here. I blame the people who are letting them in. And if the Anglo-Saxon majority and their leaders clamored to stop it, they have the means to do it. Martin Luther King may have agitated for "civil rights" but it was a white President and Congress who enacted them. So these disasters are the result of a lack of white ethnic consciousness. Until the Anglo-Americans develop that consciousness and solidarity, they will be exploited by people who don't have their interests in mind. Even if the Jewish influence was muted in one way or another, these problems would still persist.
Best Wishes,
Jeremy
[Birdman replies:}
Dear Jeremy:
Nothing you say is false, tho it does not necessarily have to be considered true (Hey, I've found an exception to the Law of the Excluded Middle!) What I mean is that if A and B are in a conflict, then it is always possible to blame EITHER. You could blame A for throwing the first punch, or you could blame B for inciting him. In Jews vs Gentiles, you can blame whites for their religious persecution, or Jews for plotting and being unforgiving. Or you can blame whites (as you do) for not looking out for their own interest, and you can blame Jews for whatever -- parasitism, plotting, stupidity, being too intelligent, etc. For me, I take your side mostly, both from a moral standpoint (we shouldn't blame others when we can blame ourselves) and a practical side (we probably aren't going to change Jews -- tho there's hope -- so we've got to change ourselves.) That reasoning, however, suggests that YOU should take MY side, and are we in a loop, or what? (Martha! Get me my SMELLING SALTS!)
If you don't mind, I will post our correspondence in the Diversity section and in an upcoming Weekly Letter. -j
[Jeremy responds:]
Dear Birdman,
I would be honored to have you post our correspondence. Obviously, we have some agreements and some disagreements. Nevertheless, the reason I find your writings so intellectually stimulating is that you fill a vital gap in the whole Jewish-Gentile debate. Other than religious differences, which, as you point out, are less important today than before, there are primarily two common explanations offered for the often hostile relationship between Jews and Gentiles (though, of course there are verying extremes of each):
1. The Neo-Nazi, KKK, position that Jews are all, or almost all, totally and uniquely evil.
2. The Jews are the only totally noble and virtuous group on earth and the Gentiles unjustly have persecuted them.
Neither explanation seems to hold water. As for explanation 1, many Jews have made enormous contributions to Western civilization. Furthermore, the majority of Jews are good citizens and nice folks. Explanation 1 is an unjust indictment of all Jews. As for explanation 2, I can definitely see how good, rational Gentiles are very enraged by the actions of the Jewish elite; I myself am enraged at the actions of the ADL, SWC, and other elements of organized Jewry past and present (Bolsheviks, ACLU, Freud, Boas, et cetera). Your genius seems to be in bridging that gap, in explaining the conflict in terms not universally and unfairly critical of either side, while providing honest and rational explanations.
Sincerely,
Jeremy
[End of correspondence]
Freedom
isn't free! To insure the
continuation of this website and the survival of its creator in
these financially-troubled times, please send donations directly to the Birdman at
PO Box 66683, St Pete Beach FL 33736-6683
"The smallest good deed is worth the grandest intention."
Please
contribute today - buy our books - and spread the word to all
your friends!
Remember: Your donation = our survival!
* * * Back to the Home Page of John "Birdman" Bryant, the World's Most Controversial Author * * *