-
Key West, Florida, Friday, April 2, 2004
-
Dear Laurence,
BBCtv reconstruction of
Auschwitz.
I was most interest to read
in The Guardian of the BBC project to make a film about
Auschwitz. Are you willing to hear also critical voices on this
historical sensitive issue? I am prepared to bet a large sum that
one of your sources will be Prof Robert Jan van
Pelt who wrote the first excellent book on the subject. You
may not know that in his severe Judgment* at
the end of my unsuccessful libel action
against Lipstadt & Penguin Books, at which Pelt was a star
witness, even Mr Justice Gray remarked that he found the
evidence on Auschwitz to be of astonishingly thin quality: here are
his words (which you may not have seen reported in the press at the
time):
I have to confess that, in common I suspect with most
other people, I had supposed that the evidence of mass
extermination of Jews in the gas chambers at Auschwitz was
compelling. I have, however, set aside this preconception when
assessing the evidence adduced by the parties in these
proceedings.
And: Vulnerable though the individual categories of evidence
may be to criticisms of the kind mentioned in the preceding
paragraphs, it appears to me that the cumulative effect of the
documentary evidence for the genocidal operation of gas chambers
at Auschwitz is considerable.
And: [Irving] is right to point out that the contemporaneous
documents, such as drawings, plans, correspondence with
contractors and the like, yield little clear evidence of the
existence of gas chambers designed to kill humans. Such isolated
references to the use of gas as are to be found amongst these
documents can be explained by the need to fumigate clothes so as
to reduce the incidence of diseases such as typhus. The quantities
of Zyklon-B delivered to the camp may arguably be explained by the
need to fumigate clothes and other objects.
-- I.e., hardly the kind of evidence that would hang a man even
in the good old days. The best evidence in my view is, in this
order,
- The Bletchley Park intercepts;
- The (unamended) aerial photos; and
- The evidence of Kurt
Aumeier, who was commandant of Auschwitz for a while. I
discovered this evidence in the Public Record Office in June 1992,
you might like to note, and have posted it in its entirety on my
website, both the handwritten originals and transcriptions which I
commissioned.
In my view there were limited-scale gassings in the two "Bunkers"
(converted farmhouses) outside the perimeter fence, but not at the
huge underground crematory facilities of which Pelt waffles. (Look
at his
difficulties over whether there were holes in the roof -- to
insert the cyanide -- or not).
I am, as you may know, a great fan of your projects so far [...].
Your experts might like to keep my huge dossier on the
Auschwitz facilities under review. Do not fall for the
over-simplified computer reconstruction of "Krema II" which Pelt
introduced in court in the Lipstadt libel action. It is full of
errors. The building, like most other such structures in Germany and
Poland, was being readied for use as an emergency air raid shelter
(with the usual gastight doors used in such shelters). It is
important that the BBC produces a film on which Mr Justice Gray
would not be able to pass such equivocating comments as those cited
above!
Yours sincerely,
- David Irving
* You can find our printed and illustrated version of Gray J's
Judgment (with facsimiles and photos in pdf form, far
better than the printed Penguin version. You may also wish to use
the corrected
version of the transcripts [on our website].
|