Note: Birdman recently posted a piece from Mr Hagmann's website, for which he was rewarded with a letter from Hagmann full of legal threats, arrogance, ignorance, lies, attitude problems and other unpleasantries. Here is the letter Birdman wrote back to Hagmann, whose letter is not included because the essence of what he said is clear enuf from Birdman's letter.
To: Douglas J. Hagmann, Director, Northeast Intelligence Network,
Editor, HQ INTEL-ALERT, director@homelandsecurityus.com,
www.HomelandSecurityUS.com <dhagmann@adelphia.net>
From: John
'Birdman' Bryant (wwww.thebirdman.org)
Re: Birdman Posting of
http://www.thebirdman.org/Index/Temp/Temp-ImminentNuclearThreat-ButDon'tCoun
tOnIt-BobFromMI.htm
Contents:
Opinion
OK, Jack. Here's the deal.
* I will remove the
article as you request. You can rest assured that I am sorry to have posted it,
because it was an article of very marginal quality -- so marginal, in fact, that
I actually warned my readers to be skeptical of it.
* You will get no
benefit from my removing the article, whereas if the article stays, you would
have something that would direct people to your website. Now you will have
nothing. Are you stupid or what?
* I will get no benefit from this --
rather I will have to take my good time to satisfy your inflated ego because it
is 'your' article. I mean, why don't you get out on the street and jump up and
down and yell "Mine! Mine! Mine!" Then everyone will know how REALLY STUPID you
are.
* For your information, I prefer to link rather than post on my site
-- it's quicker (no loading) and I don't have to deal with cretinous copyright
holders like you. But when people don't send me a link, I can't do that (Most of
the things I post are things people send me, your article being one). So, as in
your case, I post.
* People like you who ask to have their articles
removed are invariably filled with the notion that they have written something
of IMMENSE importance. But 99 and 44/100ths percent of the time, what they have
written is of immense UNIMPORTANCE, and the fact that they are so possessive of
it merely shows their judgement is right down there in the toilet with their
article or other creation.
* You should be honored that you got posted.
My site is one of the most popular on the web. But I don't hear any thank-yous.
Just fuck-yous. So allow me to return the favor. FUCK YOU, JACK.
Are you
happy now?
-Birdman
PS: Now that I have taken a look at your
website, I am even happier to remove your article. Altho your website is so
poorly done -- the page does not fit into the browser window, and many of your
links don't operate -- meaning that I cannot be certain of your basic position,
it seems that you take the Official Government Line that some middle-east
cave-dweller perpetrated 911. Besides this being completely fatuous, it is
simply not in accord with the facts -- facts which you apparently find offensive
because they are Politically Incorrect, and in particular show that the
perpetrators of 911 were operatives of Israel and our own government. So not
only are you putting out opinions based on ignorance or deliberate fabrication,
but you yourself, by misleading people, are part of the problem that you are
purportedly helping to solve.
In reference to the following statement
from your letter:
>The material referenced was posted with the
copyright notice attached,
>suggesting that your actions were done with
full knowledge of the potential
>legal ramifications of the penalties
cited under USC Title 17, Chapter 5,
>§501-513. In addition to this
blatant violation of our legal rights, our
>document was subsequently
associated with anti-Semitic, racist and
>objectionable material. By your
actions, you have sullied our reputation
>and
>caused discernible
damage to our income and revenue stream from our
>fee-based, subscriber’s
only newsletter.
In case you don't realize it -- and there is apparently
very little that you realize -- your above statement shows you to be a blatant
liar. That's because you claim damage from my posting that (1) you can't prove,
(2) couldn't have happened in the few days since my post, even if you could
prove it. Or rather, if you really do believe that my posting the article has
negatively affected your reputation and income stream, then that can only be
because you believe your article is such a congeries of nonsense that people who
read it would be reluctant to go to your website. But on the other hand, if you
believe it is a great article, as you apparently do, then it follows that you
believe that people should be ATTRACTED to your website, which should POSITIVELY
AFFECT your reputation and income stream, and that I have actually done you a
favor by posting your article.
There's a lesson here, Jack. When people
lie -- and especially when they are arrogant ignorant people like you -- then
they get caught in their own web of words. You were trying to scare me with all
your legal bullshit, but instead you ended up being hoist by your own petard.
That's great news, especially for someone who has been a professional snoop for
the last 18 years.
Have an ice day, Jack.
PPS: Ask not whether I
am racist or antisemitic -- ask only whether I am RIGHT. (Hint: I
am.)
YOUR DONATION = OUR SURVIVAL!
Please contribute today - buy our books - and spread the word to all your friends!
* * * Back to the Home Page of John "Birdman" Bryant, the World's Most Controversial Author * * *