Tom Metzger may have his heart in the right place,
tho that is highly doubtful, as he appears to be a spiteful
ignoramus. But even if his heart is in the right place, his brain
certainly isn't. He is exactly the kind of person we don't need
in the movement -- stupid, unsubtle, in your face, and a sitting
duck for opponents like the despicable Morris Dees, who won a
judgment against Terrible Tommy that should have been laughed out
of court.
The real problem here is that it is the people of the economic
underclass like Terrible Tommy who have to endure the whips and
scorns of the NWO/JWO racemixing and equalitarian schemes -- the
upper classes can just move to a better neighborhood. That's why
people like Terrible Tommy become 'haters' -- they have gone
toe-to-toe with the Beast and know whereof they speak. But
justified or not, Terrible Tommy is not going to win the Movement
any converts -- the lower class is already converted, but they
don't have any juice. It is upper class, and especially the
leaders of that class, whom we have to reach, and with people
like Terrible Tommy around, our job becomes ten times more
difficult.
[Tom Metzger writes to complain about Birdman's
posting of the allegation
that Metzger's PO box was accessed by Mo Dees and the SPLC as a
result of
the $12 million judgment Dees won against Metzger in the Seraw
murder case,
that addresses were culled, and that half the contributions were
taken by
SPLC for Seraw's family.]
>>>>On 2/24/04 at 9:45 PM Tom Metzger wrote:
>>>> >>>>>I am not familiar
with you but you challenged my exposure of James K.
>>>>>warner and others.
I can prove any of those comments. If you want to
>>>cover >>>>>each one I
will. >>>>>Instead of smearing me better check out
these pillars of
ethics.lol Tom >>>>Metzger
[Birdman replies:]
>>>>----- Original Message ----->>>>From:
"John Bryant"
<johnbryant@joimail.com> >>>>To: "Tom
Metzger" <warmetzger@sbcglobal.net>
>>>>Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2004 6:15 AM
>>>>Subject: Re: Terrible
tommy >>>> >>>> >>>>I never
mentioned you on my site that I can recall, and
I certainly have >>>>not >>>>challenged
your exposure of anyone. I have
never even HEARD of Warner, >>to >>>>my
knowledge. I have no beef with you,
nor any knowledge of you beyond >>>the
>>>>superficial.
[Metzer responds:]
>>>On 2/25/04 at 8:47 AM warmetzger@sbcglobal.net wrote:
>>> >>>>Tom
Metzger and the SPLC >>>>Thanks mf >>>>
>>>> >>>> >>>>
>>>>"Terrible Tommy"
Metzger is an idiot >>>> >>>>Tom Metzger,
who calls himself "Terrible
Tommy" nowadays, recently said >>>>some
>>>>defamatory things about Dr.
James Warner and others. This is because Dr.
>>>>Warner et al. told about
Metzger's "sweetheart deal" with attorney >Morris
>>>>Dees of the SPLC.
>>>> >>>>For those who aren't familiar
with Metzger, he's an obnoxious fool
who >>>>lives >>>>in California and
publishes an equally obnoxious paper
called "WAR" ->>>>"White
>>>>Aryan Resistance." Of course, the only thing
he truly resists is >>>>commonsense
>>>>and dignity. >>>> >>>>Ask
"Terrible
Tommy" about this: >>>> >>>>The
Southern Poverty Law Center Report, June
1995: >>>> >>>>[Picture of attorney with
black child and woman] "Attorney
James McElroy >>>>with Henok Seraw and his mother
Aynalem in Ethiopia. He
[McElroy] >>>presented >>>>him [Henok] with
a check for $100,000 taken from
mail sent to Metzger's >>>>post
>>>>office box. >>>>
>>>>"Henok's
grandfather will receive $20,000. The remaining $80,000 has
>been >>>>put
in a trust fund that will pay for Henok's care and education
until >he
>>>>reaches adulthood. At that point, funds will be
transferred to Henok.
>>>> >>>>"McElroy, the 'Unsung Hero'
>>>> >>>>"Dees has called McElroy
the
'unsung hero' of the case. >>>>
>>>>"McElroy received the Civil Rights
Achievement Award from the >>>>Anti-Defamation League
for his work on the
case, including his >innovative >>>>fashioning of
a court order that
required Metzger to relinquish the keys >>>to
>>>>his WAR post office box
where supporters continue to send money. The
>>>>contents of the box are
collected by a court-appointed receiver, and a
>>>>portion of the funds are
added to Henok's account." >>>>
>>>>------>>>> >>>>All money
sent to
Metzger is taken from his post office box. Of that
>>>money, >>>>50 percent
of the funds are then mailed to Metzger, and 50 percent are
>>>kept >>>>by
Dees and his associates. Dees, McElroy, et al. then use some of
this
>>>>money for their expenses, and another portion of
the money is sent to
>the >>>>Ethiopian. >>>>
>>>>It might be added that all correspondence to
Metzger's post office box >is >>>>copied and
forwarded to Dees too. I pity
anyone stupid enough to send >Mr. >>>>Metzger
anything confidential. >>>>
>>>>If you want to get a message to Mr. Metzger
quicker, please mail him at
>>>the >>>>following address
->>>> >>>>Tom Metzger c/o Morris Dees The
Southern Poverty Law Center 400 >>Washington
>>>>St. Montgomery, AL 36104
[Birdman replies:]
>>>I remember now. Someone sent me the piece. A friend
of yours, Donald E
>>>Pauly, said he would contact you for a rebuttal, but
he never got back
to >>>me. If you have a rebuttal, send it and I will
post.
[Metzger responds:]
>>On 2/25/04 at 1:27 PM warmetzger@sbcglobal.net wrote:
>> >>>I learned
long ago that after you rebutt a couple of times it becomes a
>>>futile
effort no matter what you say. i am surprised that Pauley sent
>that >>>he
has represented himself to be a friend. You never know. If he did
it I
>>>guess he is living up to his name trojan horse. I
have been at my post
>for >>>over 30 years so I guess I can handle a few
more years. if you want
to >>>continue leaving that smear up its your business
but I assure you it
can >>be >>>rebutted.. >>>Not to be crude
but its like this. I heard you
performed oral sex last >>>night on your buddy. Prove
you didnt.lol >>>
thanks. TM
[Birdman replies:]
>>From: "John Bryant"
<johnbryant@joimail.com> >>To: "Metzger
Tom"
<warmetzger@sbcglobal.net> >>Sent: Wednesday,
February 25, 2004 3:26 PM
>>Subject: Re: Terrible tommy This is it Friends dont
spread shit >> >>
>>Out of fairness, it is my stated policy to allow anyone
the opportunity
to >>rebut anything on my page. If you wish to reject the
opportunity with
>some >>kind of look-down-your-nose pose, that is up to
you. In my view,
the best >>response to bad speech is not your way --
censorship -- but my
way -- more >>speech. That's what my whole page is about --
free speech --
and if it >>isn't good enuf for you, then you and Abe
Foxman should make
aliyah. As >>Donald would say, THIS year in Jerusalem.
[Metzger responds:]
>On 2/25/04 at 5:02 PM warmetzger@sbcglobal.net wrote: >
>>How is it fair
to have a free smear policy of which I would have no
>>knowledge if another
had not advised me. Its sort of like I said accusing
>>someone of being a
cock sucker on the square in New York City and >murmuring
>>he can rebut
the charge from brazil. >> if he ever gets the word. Ben
Franklin had a
title for that. it was >>called >>the law of the
Cudgel. Come to think of
it you can take all that right >wing >>chicken shit and
ram it up your ass.
Its a toss up whether I hate guys >>loike >>you worse
than Foxman. At least
he is standing for is people and thier >>games. While you
guys cant wait to
spread any little piece of bullshit >>theat >>comes
along. The time is
right for you and Pauly to run over tho Frisco >and
>>get married. What a
couple.Fuck your brand of free speech. Tom Metzger
[Birdman replies:]
>Tell me, Tommie -- how, exactly and precisely is it that I am
supposed to
>know you are telling the truth? Why the fact is, I CAN'T
know. Nor can I
>know that the 'smear' is true. Therefore the best I can do --
ie, the
>closest I can come to getting at the truth -- is to post BOTH
SIDES. >
>Now from all your profanity and other uncivilized exudations,
it is clear
>that your thinking about truth and other such matters is
about as subtle
as >a Russian battleship. You will also note that I do not
respond in
unkind, >in keeping with my wish uphold white civilization,
namely, good
manners. >To >this I will add that your behavior is exactly
the kind we do
not need in >the >pro-white movement -- it's just what the
Self-Chosen can
point to in order >to make us look like brutes. I might also
remark that
insult is the last >refuge of the out-argued.
[Metzger responds:]
On 2/26/04 at 9:17 AM warmetzger@sbcglobal.net wrote:
>I wish we were a bunch of white brutes. Instead of a bunch of
right -left
>pussies. If we were the brutes we may be called we would
still own Western
>Civilization. >On the other hand if you were in the know
you would know
that smear has >been >in the system ever since the trial
and anyone that
has been anybody that's >been around for a while has seen this
debate and
my rebuttal time after >time. suffice that its all been said a
hundred
times before and I am not >going through it again for some
Johnny come
lately that I don't even know. >I doubt you are a supporter
and I doubt you
are a contributor and I doubt >you are a revolutionist but I
can see you
are a typical right wing >conservative. You are living in
another world
from me. So why debate it? I >am sorry that someone I
considered a friend
saw fit to send that smear to >you. He has has heard my
rebuttal many times
so it is obvious it was sent >to >damage me. These smears
have been around
for years and I am still operating >more strong than before
the trial. As
far as a brute I will admit if the >people who wish to smear
me would do it
to my face I would show them what a >White Brute can do but
alas they hide
in there little rooms with their >computers in fear of their
own wives. I
think I have exhausted my patience >on the subject ,unlike the
muck rakers
I have serious work to attend to. TM
[Birdman replies:]
It is nice to see a letter from you that my great aunt Fostina
McMakin
could read without cracking her glass eye. Thank you.
Now let us observe for all men in these presents that you have
dressed
yourself in the uniform of the Great Aryan Excuse Machine in
attempting to
explain -- or rather 'explain' -- the charges against you. You
have argued
ad meum ignorantum "If I were in the know, I would know';
you have argued
ad repetum ("I have said it all before"); you have
argued ad victimum ("My
former colleague is screwing me") and probably a dozen and
twenty other
similar arguments -- or rather 'arguments' -- but in spite of
forests
felled and tankers of ink spilled in making all these arguments,
you have
not supplied us with even the tiniest reason why we should
believe the
charges false. Indeed, the very numbers of forests and tankers of
ink
suggests that you are doing everything in your power to AVOID
answering the
charges, because if you did, your ass would be gas. Now mind you,
I am not
saying they are true. But I can smell a rat, and until someone
makes me a
very good argument that I am really nose-deep in a bouquet of
fresh
flowers, I am going to bet my money on the rat.
Let me put it slightly differently. If these charges have been
circulating
ever since your trial, what is to keep you from posting a
complete
explanation on your website, and then simply referring your post
to anyone
who inquires? Tres simple, Nescafe? So why haven't you done it?
One
explanation is that you are a bit slow on the uptake; but since I
am a Kind
Person, I would never suggest any such thing. Instead, I suggest
that it is
because you are afraid to -- perhaps you don't want your
explanation
examined too closely. Or perhaps it is because the charges are
true or
partly true, and you don't want to get caught in a lie. All of
which leads
to the same conclusion -- your credibility here is not the altus
ultimus.
In short, therefore, if you want to be believed, BE BELIEVABLE.
So far, you
are approximately 7 leagues and a country mile from that
particular
desideratum.
Now while we're restin', let's take up one other small matter.
The problem
with the pro-white movement is that it is infected by a bunch of
no-goods,
and that doesn't even count the double-agents, of whom there are
plenty, I
am sure. Certainly the premier example of this is David Irving,
whose
thieving, lying and other excursions into the Pit have been
detailed at
length on my website, www.thebirdman.org (see the Net Losses
section).
Others who have been publicly outed include a few familiar faces
from the
Politbureau over at NatVan, and privately I have heard a few
things which
may yet be employed in beauty shops to curl hair. I would like to
believe
that you are not infected with the virus of grasping and lying
that is so
readly attributed to the Foreskinner contingent, but which seems
to reside
mostly in the folks who make accusations against them. However,
when I see
you behaving like the Great Aryan Excuse Machine, and also when I
see you
attacking one of the finest and most upstanding members of our
team --
Donald -- I have to wonder if I didn't make a wrong turn
somewhere and end
up on the Road to Hell.
Your move, Tommie.
[Metzger replies:]
If you had ever sent me a check or accompanied me to the post
office or
bank you would see who endorses the checks and handles all mail.
Well I
will leave you at that make the worst of it but all this crap has
floated
around since the early nineties and I am still here. I suggest
you ask
Morris for a check considering you and Harold Covington's hard
work to keep
the smears going. You might read 100 little Hitler's for more
information.
Suffice that my family fought Dees all the way with no help from
the right
wing. He was damaged in the eyes of the liberals all over the
country. When
you are ready to walk away from your family home and business and
lose a
wife fighting Dees then give me a call. No one else ever stood up
to him.
Realize this I was offered the opportunity to keep my family home
and
business if I left the movement. I refused and have paid the
price. Both
you and the rest of the great warriors don't seem to realize that
if I did
want to work with the enemy I could write my own check to betray
while
working for the SPLC and the ADL. I know that's a bit difficult
for you to
figure out. Mr. Birdman I am out of here and will not communicate
again. In
closing as I said before .I heard from a guy you are a cocksucker
please
defend yourself and post your denial on your website or send it
to me . I
will post it headlined BIRDMAN DENIES HE IS A COCKSUCKER. I will
let the
stupidity and arrogance of the right do the rest. lol Tom Metzger
[Metzger writes again to Birdman and others:]
I could blow this whole nonsense out of the water but I wont at
this time
because it keeps the phony's of the right wing away from me. Just
remember
the devil is in the details. At the end of the judgment period I
will tell
all and possibly before but I will let you lame brains stew in
this rumor
mill crap. It will make a great movie. lol Communications
terminated
Terrible Tommy
[Donald writes to Birdman re Metzger:]
>It appears that Terrible Tommie didn't learn anything from
the Portland
>trial. While he has done a lot of good work for White
Nationalism, he
>continues to batter down walls with his head. >
[Birdman writes to Donald Pauly:]
What I can't understand is why he would make a big deal about
denying the
PO box thing, when he is obviously still paying the $12 million
judgment.
It is clear that the Dad Gummit is keeping watch over his
finances and
taking a cut, and this cut is coming out of contributors'
sendings, at
least partly.
[End of correspondence]
Birdman postscript: Tom Metzger is exactly the type of person we
don't need
in the movement. Cross-burning foul-mouthed hakencreutzers will
do nothing
but turn people off and provide film footage for Mo Dees. The
battle for
white rights and Western civ must be fought with words, not
fists, whips
and guns. It is a battle for the mind, not a battle for the
streets. When
it is time for street-fighting, Metzger may come into his own.
Till then,
he is a liability and an embarrassment, and makes the whole
movement look
like the parody that the mass media so assiduously cultivates --
a motley
assortment of hillbillies, rednecks, ignoramuses and 'haters'.
Metzger
might think he's working for whites, but he is actually working
for the
Dark Side. Let the Force be with us, and the coarse be with him.
And while you are at it, if you are contributing to Metzger, why
not
redirect those contributions to the Birdman and get twice the
bang for your
buck?
YOUR DONATION = OUR SURVIVAL!
Please contribute today - buy our books - and spread the word to all your friends!
* * * Back to the Home Page of John "Birdman" Bryant, the World's Most Controversial Author * * *