----- Original Message -----
From: galen
To: 9-11 Truth ; 9-11 NeXuS ; Scholars for Truth
Cc: galen
Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2007 5:01 PM
Subject: My letter to a Professor about 9-11...

Attached is the text of my letter to a professor about 9-11...

Hi Cathy, i've been wanting to send you a note but have been so busy i'm
only now finding the time.

I enjoyed seeing you recently.  You're a charming and intelligent woman.

Since you are a smart gal, i find myself with a severe case of cognitive
dissonance when it comes to your views about 9-11.  Usually, i'd quote
Jonathan Swift in such cases, "It is useless to attempt to reason a man
out of a thing he was never reasoned into"; however, you clearly seem to
have reasons that make sense to you why you believe the fantastic and
physically impossible Official Conspiracy Theory (OCT) of 9-11.  Your
most recent is that you saw the History Channel expose on 9-11 and were
convinced that an outfit as reliable as the History Channel would never
steer you wrong.  I found this very ironic because you mentioned that
you were trying to teach your MBA students about just such tactics.

Cathy, the bottom line is very simple, for the following reasons which
you may or may not understand, WTC 1, 2, and 7 were all controlled
demolitions:

* all three fell at virtually free fall speed (something falls at free
fall ONLY if it is in free fall);
* all three fell in on themselves, the path of greatest resistance
(electricity, water, air, and solid material all follow the path of
LEAST resistance);
* all three fell in perfect symmetry even though the claimed causes of
the collapses were asymmetric;
* all the concrete in WTC 1 and 2 was pulverized to dust in mid-air
(this requires massive amounts of energy);
* massive steel beams from WTC 1 and 2 weighing several tons each were
hurled hundreds of feet horizontally (gravity works only in the
vertical, only EXPLOSIVES could have thrown these beams the way they were);
* jet fuel in air burns at only half the temperature required to melt
steel, yet there was molten steel observed at the foundations of all
three buildings (WTC 7 wasn't even hit by a plane);
* the steel infrastructure of all three buildings would have conducted
the heat away from the limited areas that were exposed to the
low-temperature, fuel-starved, hydrocarbon fires;
* people were photographed standing right in the opening made by the
plane (more proof that the fires were not raging infernos);
* the Towers were designed to be hit by not one, but two, 707s, planes
virtually the same size as the planes that hit the Towers;
* the Towers were designed not to create a chimney effect in the event
they ever were struck by a plane;
* Larry Silverstein, one of the WTC leaseholders, received several
billion dollars on his insurance claim after investing only several
million just a few weeks before the attacks;
* Silverstein admitted on PBS that WTC 7 was "pulled";
* there was a countdown for the collapse of WTC 7;
* the BBC reported WTC 7 fell twenty minutes before it actually fell; and
* numerous eyewitnesses reported hearing multiple explosions prior to
and during the collapses of all three buildings.

Cathy, everything i've sited here can only be explained by controlled
demolition, not by two planes flying into two buildings.  If you finally
see that i'm right and you're forced to admit that WTC 1, 2, and 7 were
all controlled demolitions, then you are also forced to admit that 9-11
was not the work of Osama bin Laden and 19 Arab hijackers.

I know you just can't seem to wrap your mind around this, so take a look
at the attached video and see if you finally understand how you've been
hoodwinked: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GxBroBF-uKI

Hope all is well for you in DC, the syndicated crime capital of the
entire world.

Blessings -- Dennis "galen" Mitrzyk
www.whodidit.org