Attached is the text of my letter to a professor about
9-11...
Hi Cathy, i've been wanting to send you a note but have been so
busy i'm only now finding the time.
I enjoyed seeing you
recently. You're a charming and intelligent woman.
Since you are a
smart gal, i find myself with a severe case of cognitive dissonance when it
comes to your views about 9-11. Usually, i'd quote Jonathan Swift in
such cases, "It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was
never reasoned into"; however, you clearly seem to have reasons that make
sense to you why you believe the fantastic and physically impossible
Official Conspiracy Theory (OCT) of 9-11. Your most recent is that you
saw the History Channel expose on 9-11 and were convinced that an outfit as
reliable as the History Channel would never steer you wrong. I found
this very ironic because you mentioned that you were trying to teach your
MBA students about just such tactics.
Cathy, the bottom line is very
simple, for the following reasons which you may or may not understand, WTC
1, 2, and 7 were all controlled demolitions:
* all three fell at
virtually free fall speed (something falls at free fall ONLY if it is in
free fall); * all three fell in on themselves, the path of greatest
resistance (electricity, water, air, and solid material all follow the path
of LEAST resistance); * all three fell in perfect symmetry even though
the claimed causes of the collapses were asymmetric; * all the concrete
in WTC 1 and 2 was pulverized to dust in mid-air (this requires massive
amounts of energy); * massive steel beams from WTC 1 and 2 weighing several
tons each were hurled hundreds of feet horizontally (gravity works only in
the vertical, only EXPLOSIVES could have thrown these beams the way they
were); * jet fuel in air burns at only half the temperature required to melt
steel, yet there was molten steel observed at the foundations of all
three buildings (WTC 7 wasn't even hit by a plane); * the steel
infrastructure of all three buildings would have conducted the heat away
from the limited areas that were exposed to the low-temperature,
fuel-starved, hydrocarbon fires; * people were photographed standing right in
the opening made by the plane (more proof that the fires were not raging
infernos); * the Towers were designed to be hit by not one, but two, 707s,
planes virtually the same size as the planes that hit the Towers; * the
Towers were designed not to create a chimney effect in the event they ever
were struck by a plane; * Larry Silverstein, one of the WTC leaseholders,
received several billion dollars on his insurance claim after investing only
several million just a few weeks before the attacks; * Silverstein
admitted on PBS that WTC 7 was "pulled"; * there was a countdown for the
collapse of WTC 7; * the BBC reported WTC 7 fell twenty minutes before it
actually fell; and * numerous eyewitnesses reported hearing multiple
explosions prior to and during the collapses of all three
buildings.
Cathy, everything i've sited here can only be explained by
controlled demolition, not by two planes flying into two buildings. If
you finally see that i'm right and you're forced to admit that WTC 1, 2, and
7 were all controlled demolitions, then you are also forced to admit that
9-11 was not the work of Osama bin Laden and 19 Arab hijackers.
I
know you just can't seem to wrap your mind around this, so take a look at
the attached video and see if you finally understand how you've been
hoodwinked: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GxBroBF-uKI
Hope
all is well for you in DC, the syndicated crime capital of the entire
world.