Victors writing history?
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 5:01 PM
Subject: Take No Prisoners
A great deal has
been written about Japanese maltreatment of its POW captives but such treatment
wasn’t universal at all. In many cases prisoners were treated humanely. For all
the diversity of books wallowing in Japanese behaviour towards its prisoners
little if anything is published on the allied treatment of Japanese POWs. There
is a good reason for this oversight. The allies didn’t have a policy of taking
prisoners. No prisoners – no POW camps – no story - end of story.
ALLIED TREATMENT
OF THE JAPANESE
Not surprisingly
much has been said and written about Japanese atrocities. Unsurprising very
little is said about allied atrocities which invariably exceeded those of the
Japanese. Indeed, there was little more than lip service paid to the taking of
prisoners. The Ghurkha Regiments wouldn’t countenance such limp-wrist
squeamishness.
Their captives
had their throats slit or were bayoneted where they stood. It was then common
practice to dissemble the victim’s physique to a condition in which it could
neatly be buried in a bucket-sized hole in the ground. A blind eye was turned
when Ghurkha troops carried out disgusting ritual practices on the bodies of
dead enemy soldiers.
In both world
wars the British armed forces used primitive tribesmen and openly condoned
native cannibalism. The Cambridge
University magazine ‘Cam’ revealed their use; “These tribes had the resulting
ritual practice of severing parts of their murdered prisoners, cooking and then
eating them.
Beri Beri and
the trots in a Japanese POW camp, building a railway with at least some chance
of survival, might by some be considered a reasonable alternative.
As a matter of
policy American ships sank all Japanese ships on sight, irrespective of whether
they were carrying passengers or war materials. Such was their enthusiasm that
when they sank a freighter filled with American POWs there was no change in
policy.
With shades of
Iraq and Afghanistan official communiqués laid
claim that only military objectives in Japanese cities were bombed ‘with
pinpoint accuracy.’ In fact the fire raid bombings, as on Germany, were wholly indiscriminate and caused
more casualties than did the dropping of the atom bombs on Japan’s only two Christian cities, Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
Over 250,000
lost their lives during the fire raids on Tokyo, and eight million were made homeless.
One raid alone on March 10 1945 killed 140,000 people and left 1 million
homeless.
NO JAPANESE
MOVIE CALLED ‘THE GREAT ESCAPE’
The west has
never been slow to make a fast buck out of recounting tales of Japanese
atrocities but the Japanese themselves, for cultural reasons, have never spoken
of their ordeal at the hands of the allies. They see such account as a national
humiliation. Even when during a POW riot at a camp in Australia, 221 Japanese
prisoners-of-war were either gunned down or took their own lives, no mention was
made of it. For the Japanese there are no films entitled ‘The Great
Escape.’
If you thought
the American treatment of enemy combatants in Afghanistan, Iraq or Guantanomo Bay was bad just see what the Americans
were capable of doing in the war against the Japanese. The bridge builders over
the River Kwai and the inmates of Singapore’s Changi Prison might well
consider themselves fortunate by comparison.
These double
standards of war are best illustrated by Colonel Charles Lindbergh’s
observations made whilst serving in the battle zones of the American Japanese
war. He questioned the American policy of not taking prisoners. “I felt it was a
mistake not to accept surrender whenever it could be obtained; that by doing so,
our advance would be more rapid and many American lives would be saved. If the
Japanese think they will be killed anyway when they surrender, they, naturally,
are going to hold on and fight to the last – and kill American troops they
capture whenever they get the chance.
BOUNTIES FOR
LIVE POWs
Take the
41st, for example; they just don’t take prisoners. The men boast
about it. The officers wanted some prisoners to question but they couldn’t get
any until they were offered two weeks leave in Sydney for each one turned in. Then the got
more than they could handle. But when they cut out giving leave, the prisoners
stopped coming in. The boys just said they couldn’t catch
any.
“The Aussies are
still worse. You remember the time they had to take these prisoners south by
plane? One of the pilots told me they just pushed them out over the mountains
and reported that the Japs committed hara-kiri on the
way.”
He recounted how
‘our troops captured that Japanese hospital? There wasn’t anyone alive in it
when they got through.”’
Lindbergh also
described his concern over ‘our lack of respect for even the admirable
characteristics of our enemy – for courage, for suffering, for death, for his
willingness to die for his beliefs, for his companies and squadrons which go
forth, one after another, to annihilation. What is courage for us is fanaticism
for him. We hold his examples of atrocity screamingly to the heavens while we
cover up our own.
DOUBLE
STANDARDS
“A Japanese
soldier who cuts off an American’s head is an Oriental barbarian. An American,
who slits a Japanese throat, ‘did it only because he knew that the Japs had done
it to his buddies.’
On another
occasion he described his feelings when, “I stand looking at that patch of
scorched jungle, in the dark spots in the cliffs where the Japanese troops had
taken cover. In that burned area, hidden under the surface of the ground, is the
utmost suffering – hunger, despair, men dead and dying of wounds, carrying on
for a country they love and for a cause in which they believe, not daring to
surrender even if they wished to, because they know only too well that our
soldiers will shoot them on sight even if they came out with the hands above
their heads.
“But I would
have more respect for the character of our people if we would give them a decent
burial instead of kicking in the teeth of their corpses, and pushing their
bodies into hollows in the ground, scooped out and covered by
bulldozers.”
“I am shocked by
the attitude of our American troops. They have no respect for death, the courage
of an enemy soldier, or many of the ordinary decencies of life. They think
nothing whatever of robbing the body of a dead Jap and calling him a ‘son of a
bitch’ while they do so.
AMERICAN TORTURE
AND EXECUTIONS
I said during a
discussion that regardless of what the Japs did, I did not see how we could gain
anything or claim that we represented a civilised stare if we killed them by
torture.
“Well, some of
our boys do kick their teeth in, but they usually kill them first,” one of the
officers said in half apology.
“It was freely
admitted that some of our soldiers tortured Jap prisoners and were as cruel and
barbaric at times as the Japs themselves. Our men think nothing of shooting a
Jap prisoner or a soldier attempting to surrender. They treat the Jap with less
respect than they would an animal, and these acts are condoned by almost
everyone.
We claim to be
fighting for civilisation, but the more I see of the war in the Pacific the less
right I think we have to claim to be civilised. In fact, I am not sure that our
record in this respect stands so very much higher than the
Japs.”
Lindbergh also
described how Japanese bodies were bulldozed over as ‘a number of our Marines
went in among them, searching through the pockets and prodding around in their
mouths for gold-filled teeth. Some of the Marines had a sack in which they
collected teeth with gold fillings.
SLICING OFF BODY
PARTS
An officer said
he had seen a number of Japanese bodies from which an ear or a nose had been cut
off. “Our boys cut them off to show their friends for fun, or to dry to take
back to the States. We found one Marine with a Japanese head. He was trying to
get the ants to clean the flesh off the skull, but the odour got so bad we had
to take it away from him.”
Pretty rich
behaviour and double standards coming from a nation which, like Britain, made
sixty years of propaganda out of the untrue story that Germans had boiled bodies
to make soap, and used skin to make light shades.
CAPTIVITY COULD
BE SUCH FUN
When at the end
of the war evidence was produced that not all allied POWs suffered abuse, this
was ignored. Much to his credit Britain’s General Percival, captured in
Singapore, wrote in 1949 an objective
account of his experiences and that of fellow officers, during their
internment.
He recalled
sharing a bottle of whisky with the camp commandment, travelled in the First
Officer’s cabin on the ship bound for Japan, because he wasn’t feeling
well. He had received Red Cross stores on arrival at the camp where they were
taken, and in 1943 was moved to a camp near the capital of Formosa.
Not quite the
Raffles Hotel and tea dances were a rarity but each officer did have a room to
himself, a library of English and American books, table tennis to keep them
amused, and a gramophone with a good supply of records which they could buy
locally.
The prisoners
received letters though they did take rather a long time in transit, and were
allowed to write one letter a month. For a period at least they received a
choice of two English language newspapers, and each had their own radio set.
When they were moved to Manchuria they were
given extra warm clothing and were housed believe it or not in centrally heated
barracks.
Excerpts from
soon to be published ‘The Battle for Europe’ –
Michael Walsh.
Hate storage limits? Get Yahoo!
Mail with unlimited storage.
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.15.1/1079 - Release Date: 19/10/2007
05:10