In America's court system, we rely on the assumption that all parties, are telling the truth. Without the truth, justice would be impossible to obtain. Imagine that someone taking an oath to, "tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help me God," had previously taken another oath nullifying all of his oaths! Bizarre concept? Read on.

Should you ever be involved in a court action, to insure justice,there may be some additional questions you might want to add to your discovery or deposition for the judge, attorney, parties to the action, or members of your potential jury!

This article is not intended to be prejudicial to either the Masons or the Jewish people, the vast majority of whom are good God-fearing people. it is merely a comment on those of any race or religion who could be duped into taking such a ridiculous, un-American and dangerous oath.

The following is based upon information from Robert Walker, P.O. Box 301, East Berlin, Pennsylvania, an authority on the subject, who has used this information to obtain the resignation of seven judges and public officials, who did not want this made a matter of public record.

According to the American Heritage Dictionary of the American Language, "the Kol Nidre, is the opening prayer recited on the eve of Yom Kippur, containing a declaration of the annulment of all personal vows and oaths." It is based on the following declaration from the Talmud;

"He who wishes that his vows and oaths shall no value shall stand up at the beginning of the year and say: 'all vows which I shall make during the year shall be of no value. "'

The prayer of "KOL NIDRE" is found in Vol. 8, page 539 of the Jewish Encyclopedia. It states:

"All vows, obligations, oaths, anthems, whether called Konan, konas, or by any other name, by which we may be bound, from this day of atonement unto the next... we do repent. May they be deemed absolved, forgiven, annulled and void, and made of no effect. They shall not bind us nor have any power over us. The vows shall not be reckoned vows; the obligations shall not be obligatory, nor the oaths be oaths."

This same prayer may also be found almost word for word in the volume of "REVISED FESTIVAL PRAYERS," published in 1919 by the Hebrew Publishing Company, New York.

The Mason's have a similar absurd dishonor for oaths. Page 183 of the Masonic Handbook states: Whenever you see any of our signs made by a brother Mason, and especially the grand hailing sign of distress, you must always be sure to obey them, even at the risk of your life. If you're on a jury, and the defendant is a Mason and makes the grand hailing sign, you must obey it; you must disagree with your brother jurors, if necessary, but you must be sure not to bring the Mason guilty, for that would bring disgrace upon our order. You must conceal all crimes of your brother Masons except murder and treason, and these at your own option, and should you be summoned as a witness against a brother Mason, be always sure to shield him. Prevaricate, don't tell the truth in this case, keep his secrets, forget the important points. It may be perjury to do this true, but you are keeping your obligations."

In October of 1983, Roger Rush of Portland, Maine was sued by Zane's Department Store through its assignee, the G.E. Credit Corp. Rush, who had been researching the oaths that Mason's take, knew the judge and attorney were Masons and utilized the information in his defense. In the deposition for the Equity Discovery Proceeding, Rush presented a copy of the previously cited page of the Mason's Handbook and presented.the following questions to be answered under oath:

1. Are you, Robert Cohen, a Mason?

2. Is the judge hearing this matter a Mason?

3. Is/are the owner or owners of 'G.E. Corp.' Mason's?

4. Has anyone involved in this matter taken an oath of "Kol Nidre?"

Within a few days, Mr. Rush received a terse, two sentence letter from attorney Cohen stating, 'We have decided not to enter the complaint brought you in regard to Zane's Department Store. There will be no court record."

Editor comment: Can you see the advantage of using this information? Especially in the nature of 'Judicial Notice,' with a 'Motion,' supported by an Affidavit. A partial 'sample text' for a Judicial Notice might be:

"COMES NOW THE ACCUSED, in Special Appearance and without counsel, herein submits this JUDICIAL NOTICE to this Court Tribunal to appraise the same, that this Accused has the 'expectation of all afforded Rights and to Due Process of Law, to mean a FAIR TRIAL.' A fair trial, in the understanding of this Accused, is a trial where there are NO SECRETS NO SURPRISES, NO PREJUDICE, and NO BIAS, which would have been established by any 'secret oaths' taken by any 'officer of the court' including the judge. Such oath(s) to include the 'Kol Nidre' (Jewish) or the Masonic Oath.

Such 'secret oaths' would work great harm to the Accused and his Rights by design and such 'oath(s)' are evidence and a 'device' to deny this Accused a fair trial. See attached Memorandum of Law.

This Accused will not condone nor tolerate any such 'oath(s)' to work against Accused's secured and protected rights, including a fair trial

This Accused expects 'all officers of the court' to be truthful as any 'oath(s) and disclosure of same pursuant to said court officer's fiduciary responsibility (Bruun v. Hansen, 103 F2d 685 (1939).

In the event that any court officers have taken said oath(s) and this matter proceeds to trial, this accused will move to dismiss and reserves the right to bring action for fraud and or in the interest of justice, this Court or prosecution (State) may dismiss on its own motion." (Date and signature line)

The memorandum is based upon the 'article,' and motion and order are self explanatory. Have fun!