Myahudi Monsters Maul Madrid
"He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby
become a monster. And
if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into
you." Friedrich
Nietzsche
Copyright Joe Vialls, 15
March 2004
These three
photographs of the Madrid bombsites provide critical clues to the class of
explosives used, where they were placed, and therefore how and from where the
terrorist operation was launched. Before reading the text of this report, see if
you can work out visually what these clues are, and how to interpret
them.
Within seconds of the first deadly explosions inside and outside Madrid's Atocha
station, you could sense that the culprits to be blamed for this crime would be
Osama Bin Laden and the fictional 'al Qaeda', but there was no point in writing
about it then. The first three days immediately following the ten synchronized
military explosions were pure unashamed George Orwell time, with Christian and
Judaic media alike completely immersing the general public in their predictable
mind games.
First it was claimed the perpetrators were members of Euskadi Ta Askatasuna
[ETA] which means "Basque Homeland and Freedom," and a gratifying roar of
spontaneous anger could instantly be heard all over the country. Relatives of
the dead and injured badly needed somebody to hate, and the homespun terrorists
from the northern Basque region of Spain would suffice in the first instance.
This distraction served to focus public attention several hundred miles away
from the four primary crime scenes, where closer inspection would surely have
generated some very awkward questions for the Spanish authorities.
Then only a few hours later in what appeared to be a chilling and apparently
stupid rerun of 9-11, police officers were tipped off by media about a
suspicious white van parked near Alcala de Henares railway station, which was
then found to contain a handful of detonators, and several Muslim religious
tracts on a cassette tape. So the 'al Qaeda' fix was already in, though the
media deliberately played it down at this early stage. As we will shortly
discover, the western media already knew that the platform surveillance
videotapes at Alcala de Henares showed no trace of any "Muslim Terrorists"
boarding any of the four bombed trains, but did not wish local police to
discover this glaring omission.
After a suitable delay during which the crimes scenes grew cold, and critical
evidence was removed, the London-based Arabic newspaper, al-Quds al-Arabi,
suddenly announced that it had received a letter from the Brigade of Abu Hafs
al-Masri, claiming the bombings for al-Qaeda. This was the signal for global
media networks to convert millions of sheeple all around the world, from their
existing belief that Catholic Basques were responsible for the atrocity, to the
newly-generated fiction that dangerous Muslim 'terrorists' had somehow slipped
into Spain under the radar, and blown up four trains. This stunning religious
conversion was reinforced when police found a planted unexploded haversack bomb
in one of the train wrecks, which contained copper rather than aluminum
detonators traditionally used by the Basques.
Unfortunately, since minute zero on day one, western media outlets had made a
deliberate omission so inexplicable and so gross that it proved their own direct
involvement or complicity in the mass murder of more than 200 Spanish
civilians. Despite the fact that every media outlet taking its lead from
the omnipotent New York Times reported that between eight and ten explosive
devices had been detonated on board Spanish trains during the rush hour, not one
of them mentioned suicide bombers. This is an impossible omission, because
we all know that every car, or bus or plane or train blown up anywhere by
'Muslim Terrorists', is invariably attacked by 'suicide bombers'. How do we know
this? Because the New York Times always tells us so, that is how. No matter
whether it is a truck in Baghdad, a bus in Tel Aviv, a car in Moscow or a train
in Chechnya, the American media villain of the piece is always the ubiquitous
Muslim suicide bomber.
The only people capable of knowing in the early stages that suicide bombers were
not used in Madrid, and that 'suicide bombers' could therefore not be mentioned
by media at all, for fear of alerting local police to those damning video
surveillance tapes at Alcala de Henares, were members of the terrorist group
responsible for executing the attack. In turn, the only terrorist group capable
of controlling the editorial content of the New York Times is N.O.S. [Novus Ordo
Seclorum], which draws its funding from Wall Street, its intelligence from B'nai
B'rith, and its depraved Special Forces muscle from Tel Aviv.
Before moving on later in the report to prove this beyond doubt, by explaining
exactly how the terrorist attack was conducted on the morning of Thursday 11
March 2004, we first need to examine the motive, because most people spend an
enormous part of their time asking the age-old question "Why?" Forget all artful
media attempts to drive you towards a World Trade Center lookalike strike, based
largely on the indisputable fact that the attack on Madrid took place exactly
911 days after the New York strike on 9-11. Rest assured the attack date was
arranged in advance by N.O.S., in order to assist its media collaborators with
the propaganda to follow.
ETA car bombs
in Spain circa 2001. Note that because of the low-order explosives [combined
with incendiaries] always used by these homespun Basque terrorists, an
inevitable side effect of weapon detonation is fire. In direct contrast, the
high-order explosives used by N.O.S. in the Madrid attack, did not generate
enough flame to light even a single cigarette at any of the ten individual sites
where the weapons were detonated.
For the precise motive behind Madrid, we need to move back briefly in time to
mid-2002, when Australian Prime Minister John Howard was having enormous
problems convincing Australian citizens to go 'All The Way With the USA' in the
latter's blatant religious crusade against Islam, also known as the 'War on
Terror'. Though very few Americans are aware of it, two years ago more than 90%
of all Australians were opposed to Howard's slavish obedience to the White
House, and said so in no uncertain terms. Countless Aussies pointed out
correctly that although thousands died every year in road traffic accidents and
domestic muggings, no one had ever been killed in Australia by a terrorist.
Clearly 'ordinary' citizens had to be taught a sharp lesson that Muslim
terrorists were real, and that all Australians should therefore allow John
Howard and his lesser Zionist lackeys to impose whatever Draconian restrictions
they wished on the populace, and further allow Australian servicemen to die
overseas for George W. Bush. By early October 2002 the sharp lesson was ready,
and a sophisticated multi-pronged N.O.S. terrorist operation was launched
against Australian tourists on the popular holiday Island of Bali. More than 200
died and over 1,000 were seriously injured. Are these precise numbers starting
to ring any alarm bells anywhere about the Madrid operation?
While Bali did very little in terms of altering the cynical Australian view of
'Terror', it did have the effect of embarrassing many citizens into silence, in
other words Howard and his lackeys were then able to dispatch servicemen
overseas to die for George W. Bush and his Zionist masters, without being
continually mobbed by crowds of angry Australians. A handful of semi-literate
Indonesia Muslims were later picked up and injected with scopolamine until they
made ridiculous and impossible confessions about the sophisticated bombings in
Bali, and that was the end of that, at least so far as Australia was
concerned.
Over the next eighteen months in Spain things got even worse than they had been
in Australia. Where 90% of all Australians had opposed military intervention in
the Middle East, the figure in Spain rose as high as 96% , until at one point it
seemed as though the only Spaniard determined to sacrifice Spanish servicemen in
Iraq for George W. Bush and his Zionist masters, was Prime Minister Jose Maria
Aznar. Because of his truculent defiance of the wishes of the Spanish people,
Aznar was sure to be voted out at the next general election, which made the
timing of the N.O.S. attack in Madrid a masterstroke.
When Aznar was finally thrown out at the general elections [which happened just
a few hours ago], the media would be able to claim that Spaniards were angry
with him for not doing enough in the 'War on Terror' to prevent the Madrid
attack, when in reality Aznar had already done so much in terms of supporting
George W. Bush and his cronies, that he had managed to alienate more than 90% of
the entire Spanish population.
The Madrid attack also served to badly frighten the Spanish people in general,
and to warn the new incoming Socialist Prime Minister that he has better toe New
York's line, or more N.O.S. attacks would be sure to follow. Certainly Spain
will be allowed to withdraw her troops from Iraq, because that particular crazed
neocon invasion is already a lost cause, but future cooperation in the ongoing
religious crusade against Islam generally is not negotiable.
One of the biggest illusions of the Madrid operation, lay in convincing you the
public that a large crowd of nimble terrorists just hopped on board all four
trains as they were 'passing through' Alcala de Henares railway station on the
down platform towards Atocha.
Now think about this carefully. In my personal view each of the ten blasts would
have required between 40 and 50 pounds of high-order military explosive in the
C4/Semtex-H category. Such explosives have a very low specific gravity, meaning
they are exceptionally bulky for their given weight. Therefore, this would have
required ten [strong] terrorists on the down platform at the same time, each
lugging a huge haversack in the middle of the rush hour. Strange then that no
eyewitness at Alcala de Henares remembers seeing any of them, for these bulky
gentlemen would most certainly have stood out in the crowd, and caused
considerable suspicion among the commuters.
As mentioned earlier, this was the reason why the creative N.O.S. directed the
western media to send the Spanish police off in various different directions for
a while immediately after the attack, which kept them so occupied that they
forgot to check the surveillance cameras at Alcala de Henares railway station.
Had police done so, or should they do so now if the tapes still exist, they will
see only Spanish commuters on their way to work.
So exactly where did N.O.S. bomb-up the four different trains, how did they do
it, and how could they be sure each train would be in the right place when they
pressed the remote detonation triggers? For the answer to that, take a look at
the railway map below, which shows the procedure to be relatively simple,
provided of course that you have unrestricted access to the trains themselves,
and unrestricted access to the secure Spanish Rail system computers.
Now we can take another look at the pictures at the top of this page. Obviously
by now you have found the first clue, i.e. that there was no fire at any of the
ten blast sites, proving in turn that high-order military explosives were used
in considerable quantities. Smuggling anything up to 500 pounds of very low
specific gravity C4 into Spain would be extremely difficult nowadays, unless of
course you already owned or controlled discrete facilities not normally
inspected by Spanish Customs or the Police. It seems likely that even the most
cynical of readers will be prepared to admit that ten big bearded Muslims,
trying to lug giant haversacks of explosives into the country, would be
instantly detected by even the most intellectually-challenged of customs
officers.
The second clue relates to the pattern of the blast. If you look very carefully,
you will note that some of the fragments buried in the shredded roof panels, are
in fact shrapnel from the floor of the carriage itself. Without going into too
much technical detail [there is plenty of that for reference in the Bali report
linked below], it is impossible for bits of the floor to become embedded in the
roof, unless the charges were fixed BELOW the floor before detonation. This is
borne out by the fact that the train disabled outside Atocha station had its
back completely broken in two different places. Once again, haversack charges
casually placed on top of the internal floor, would be completely incapable of
shattering the strong steel longitudinal support girders running the entire
length of the chassis of each carriage.
Because it is impossible to attach sophisticated explosive charges on the
underside of moving trains, obviously they were placed on the rolling stock
under cover of darkness, while the trains were stationary during the night. This
brings us to the next major illusion, uncovered by me after a series of very
expensive calls from unlisted mobile phones. Though the western media
deliberately led you to believe that these trains were 'just passing through' on
continual services, that is not the case. Every one of the four trains were
'first service', i.e. each was making its first run of the day from its
respective overnight depot, after being serviced and cleaned.
More pictures
from the scene, with that on the left providing more visual
evidence
that the
charges were placed below the floors of the railway carriages.
So now we know where the charges were placed, but how was it managed? Night
depots are traditionally well-lit and well guarded, meaning that the bombers
must have looked credible, or bribed their way into the depots, or were actually
carry convincing Spanish Rail identity cards, real or forged. Because relying on
chance credibility or handfuls of hard cash at the gates would be considered
crude unacceptable risks for an operation of this importance, it is beyond
reasonable doubt that Spanish Rail identity cards were used.
Nor does it stop there. Just picking any old train to bomb-up would be
hopelessly inadequate, because there would be no guarantee that the random
bombed-up train would even be put into service in the morning, much less be in
exactly the correct position at the right time, for the planned maximum media
impact. To do this the bombers needed access to rolling stock allocation for the
following morning, which means they had direct access to the secure Spanish Rail
computer system. We are not talking homespun Basques or 'al Qaeda' desert
Muslims here, now are we? This was a highly professional operation, organized on
sovereign Spanish territory by 'sleepers' who knew the lay of the land, and in
all probability had lived in Madrid most or even all of their
lives.
These organizers facilitated entry for the professional Special Forces team
selected for the job, and here we come down to a choice of only one state.
Though I am aware there are dozens of paranoids out there who believe that
American, British, French and other western Special Forces delight in killing
innocent civilians, you can take it from me that this is simply not the
case. In a perceived 'war zone' like Iraq it is certainly true that all
soldiers kill civilians from time to time, either by accident or out of fear for
their own lives, but targeting hundreds of unarmed civilians on their way to
work in an essentially neutral country, requires a cold-blooded mentality quite
beyond the reach of organizations such as Delta Force or the Special Air
Service, to name but two examples.
The only people with sufficient field experience for a job like this, and the
total disregard for human life needed to carry it off successfully, are the
direct descendents of the Myahudi monsters who raped and shot their way through
the Muslim Sabra and Shatilla refugee camps in Lebanon all those years ago,
which is why N.O.S. still uses them exclusively for its international wet
work. It is beyond any doubt that false flag operations like Madrid will
continue unabated, until the red tide finally overwhelms the Jewish State, and
forces its occupants back into the primordial slime from whence they first
emerged.
Quite apart
from being a pensioner living on woefully inadequate disability support, the
author incurred particularly heavy overheads researching this report, primarily
due to the massive cost of extended international calls from unlisted mobile
phones. If anyone out there has any cash to spare, please do not hesitate to
click on the button below and make a contribution towards costs. It is only
because of people like you that I manage to stay on the Internet at all. Thank
you for caring.