by Joseph Wallace
One of the statements of Adolf Hitler most often quoted by the Jewish media is the following from Mein Kampf, I:10:
"The great masses of people will more easily fall victims to a big lie than to a small one."
Of course, Hitler is quoted out of context in an attempt to portray this statement as Hitler's own, personal philosophy or strategy. But if we read this selection in context, we find that he is speaking of the Jews who had ruined his country, and he is trying to explain how the German people fell victim to Jewish lies. In fact, Herr Hitler even tells us what this great lie is that duped the German people into being controlled by the Jews. He continues:
"Those who know best this truth about the possibilities of the application of untruth and defamation, however, were at all times the Jews; for their entire existence is built on one single great lie, namely, that here one had to deal with a religious brotherhood, while in fact one has to deal with a race what a race! As such they have been nailed down forever, in an eternally correct sentence of fundamental truth, by one of the greatest minds of mankind; he called them 'the great masters of lying.' He who does not realize this or does not want to believe this will never be able to help truth to victory in this world."
Hitler here was referring to Arthur Schopenhauer, the eminent 19th century German philosopher who was outspoken regarding the true nature of Jews. We do not need to rely upon the opinions of German philosophers and political leaders regarding this character trait of the Jews, for Jesus Christ has said of the Jews,
"You are of your father the Diabolical One, and the lusts of your father you wish to do. That one was a murderer from the beginning, and he has not stood in the truth because there is no truth in him. When he speaks a lie, he speaks of his own, because he is a liar, and the father of it" (John 8:44 AST).
Furthermore, the New Testament warns us not to listen to "Judaizing myths" (Titus 1:14). But Jewish myths are exactly what destroyed Germany and what have destroyed America today. Herr Hitler may have been correct in what he felt was the greatest Jewish lie, but there are many, many more which have had a damning effect on the white race. One of the greatest is certainly the lie of the Hebrew Masoretic Text and the removal of the Greek Septuagint from the hands of white Christians, but each Jewish myth stings with the same poisonous venom. One of the great Jewish myths of the 20th century is Albert Einstein.
Albert Einstein is held up by the Jewish liars as a rare genius
who drastically changed the field of theoretical physics. As
such, he is made an idol to young people and his very name has
become synonymous with genius. The truth, however, is very
different. The reality is that Einstein was an inept, moronic Jew
who could not even tie his own shoelaces; he contributed nothing
original to the field of quantum mechanics or any other science,
but on the contrary he stole the ideas of other men and the
Jewish media made him a hero.
When we actually examine the life of Albert Einstein, we find
that his only brilliance lies in his ability to plagiarize and
steal other people's ideas, passing them off as his own.
Einstein's education, or lack thereof, is an important part of
this story. The Encyclopedia Britannica says of Einstein's early
education that he "showed little scholastic ability."
It also says that at the age of 15, "with poor grades in
history, geography, and languages, he left school with no
diploma." Einstein himself wrote in a school paper of his
"lack of imagination and practical ability." In 1895,
Einstein failed a simple entrance exam to an engineering school
in Zurich. This exam consisted mainly of mathematical problems,
and Einstein showed himself to be mathematically inept in this
exam. He then entered a lesser school hoping to use it as a
stepping stone to the engineering school he could not get into,
but after graduating in 1900, he still could not get a position
at the engineering school! Unable to go to the school as he had
wanted, he got a job (with the help of a friend) at the patent
office in Bern. He was to be a technical expert third class,
which meant that he was too incompetent for a higher qualified
position. Even after publishing his so-called groundbreaking
papers of 1905 and after working in the patent office for six
years, he was only elevated to a second class standing. Remember,
the work he was doing at the patent office, for which he was only
rated third class, was not quantum mechanics or theoretical
physics, but was reviewing technical documents for patents of
every day things; yet he was barely qualified.
He would work at the patent office until 1909, all the while
continuously trying to get a position at a university, but
without success. All of these facts are true, but now begins the
Jewish myth. Supposedly, while working a full time job, without
the aid of university colleagues, a staff of graduate students, a
laboratory, or any of the things normally associated with an
academic setting, Einstein in his spare time wrote four
ground-breaking essays in the field of theoretical physics and
quantum mechanics that were published in 1905. Many people have
recognized the impossibility of such a feat, including Einstein
himself, and therefore Einstein has led people to believe that
many of these ideas came to him in his sleep, out of the blue,
because indeed that is the only logical explanation of how an
admittedly inept moron could have written such documents at the
age of 26 without any real education. However, a simpler
explanation exists: he stole the ideas and plagiarized the
papers.
Therefore, we will look at each of these ideas and discover the
source of each. It should be remembered that these ideas are
presented by Einstein's worshippers as totally new and completely
different, each of which would change the landscape of science.
These four papers dealt with the following four ideas,
respectively:
1) The foundation of the photon theory of light;
2) The equivalence of energy and mass;
3) The explanation of Brownian motion in liquids;
4) The special theory of relativity.
Let us first look at the last of these theories, the theory of
relativity. This is perhaps the most famous idea falsely
attributed to Einstein. Specifically, this 1905 paper dealt with
what Einstein called the Special Theory of Relativity (the
General Theory would come in 1915). This theory contradicted the
traditional Newtonian mechanics and was based upon two premises:
1) in the absence of acceleration, the laws of nature are the
same for all observers; and 2) since the speed of light is
independent of the motion of its source, then the time interval
between two events is longer for an observer in whose frame of
reference the events occur at different places than for an
observer in whose frame of reference the events occur in the same
place. This is basically the idea that time passes more slowly as
one's velocity approaches the speed of light, relative to slower
velocities where time would pass faster.
This theory has been validated by modern experiments and is the
basis for modern physics. But these two premises are far from
being originally Einstein's. First of all, the idea that the
speed of light was a constant and was independent of the motion
of its source was not Einstein's at all, but was proposed by the
Scottish scientist James Maxwell. Maxwell studied the phenomenon
of light extensively and first proposed that it was
electromagnetic in nature. He wrote an article to this effect for
the 1878 edition of the Encyclopedia Britannica. His ideas
prompted much debate, and by 1887, as a result of his work and
the ensuing debate, the scientific community, particularly
Lorentz, Michelson, and Morley reached the conclusion that the
velocity of light was independent of the velocity of the
observer. Thus, this piece of the Special Theory of Relativity
was known 27 years before Einstein wrote his paper.
This debate over the nature of light also led Michelson and
Morley to conduct an important experiment, the results of which
could not be explained by Newtonian mechanics. They observed a
phenomenon caused by relativity but they did not understand
relativity. They had attempted to detect the motion of the earth
through ether, which was a medium thought to be necessary for the
propagation of light.
In response to this problem, in 1889, the Irish physicist George
FitzGerald, who had also first proposed a mechanism for producing
radio waves, wrote a paper which stated that the results of the
Michelson-Morley experiment could be explained if,
"... the length of material bodies changes, according as they are moving through the ether or across it, by an amount depending on the square of the ratio of their velocities to that of light."
This is the theory of relativity, 13 years before Einstein's paper!
Furthermore, in 1892, Hendrik Lorentz, from The Netherlands,
proposed the same solution and began to greatly expand the idea.
All throughout the 1890's, both Lorentz and FitzGerald worked on
these ideas and wrote articles strangely similar to Einstein's
Special Theory detailing what is now known as the
Lorentz-FitzGerald Contraction. In 1898, the Irishman Joseph
Larmor wrote down equations explaining the Lorentz-FitzGerald
contraction and its relativistic consequences, 7 years before
Einstein's paper. By 1904, Lorentz transformations, the series of
equations explaining relativity, were published by Lorentz. They
describe the increase of mass, the shortening of length, and the
time dilation of a body moving at speeds close to the velocity of
light. In short, by 1904, everything in Einstein's paper
regarding the Special Theory of Relativity had already been
published.
The Frenchman Poincaré had, in 1898, written a paper unifying
many of these ideas. He stated seven years before Einstein's
paper that,
"... we have no direct intuition about the equality of two time intervals. The simultaneity of two events or the order of their succession, as well as the equality of two time intervals, must be defined in such a way that the statements of the natural laws be as simple as possible."
Anyone who has read Einstein's 1905 paper will immediately recognize the similarity and the lack of originality on the part of Einstein. Thus we see that the only thing original about the paper was the term 'Special Theory of Relativity.' Everything else was plagiarized. Over the next few years, Poincaré became one of the most important lecturers and writers regarding relativity, but he never, in any of his papers or speeches, mentioned Albert Einstein. Thus, while Poincaré was busy bringing the rest of the academic world up to speed regarding relativity, Einstein was still working in the patent office in Bern and no one in the academic community thought it necessary to give much credence or mention to Einstein's work. Most of these early physicists knew that he was a fraud.
This brings us to the explanation of Brownian motion, the subject
of another of Einstein's 1905 papers. Brownian motion describes
the irregular motion of a body arising from the thermal energy of
the molecules of the material in which the body is immersed. The
movement had first been observed by the Scottish botanist Robert
Brown in 1827. The explanation of this phenomenon has to do with
the Kinetic Theory of Matter, and it was the American Josiah
Gibbs and the Austrian Ludwig Boltzmann who first explained this
occurrence, not Albert Einstein. In fact, the mathematical
equation describing the motion contains the famous Boltzmann
constant, k. Between these two men, they had explained by the
1890s everything in Einstein's 1905 paper regarding Brownian
motion.
The subject of the equivalence of mass and energy was contained
in a third paper published by Einstein in 1905. This concept is
expressed by the famous equation E=mc2.
Einstein's biographers categorize this as "his most famous
and most spectacular conclusion." Even though this idea is
an obvious conclusion of Einstein's earlier relativity paper, it
was not included in that paper but was published as an
afterthought later in the year. Still, the idea of energy-mass
equivalence was not original with Einstein.
That there was an equivalence between mass and energy had been
shown in the laboratory in the 1890s by both J.J. Thomsom of
Cambridge and by W. Kaufmann in Göttingen. In 1900, Poincaré
had shown that there was a mass relationship for all forms of
energy, not just electromagnetic energy. Yet, the most probable
source of Einstein's plagiarism was Friedrich Hasenöhrl, one of
the most brilliant, yet unappreciated physicists of the era.
Hasenöhrl was the teacher of many of the German scientists who
would later become famous for a variety of topics. He had worked
on the idea of the equivalence of mass and energy for many years
and had published a paper on the topic in 1904 in the very same
journal which Einstein would publish his plagiarized version in
1905. For his brilliant work in this area, Hasenörhl had
received in 1904 a prize from the prestigious Vienna Academy of
Sciences.
Furthermore, the mathematical relationship of mass and energy was
a simple deduction from the already well-known equations of
Scottish physicist James Maxwell. Scientists long understood that
the mathematical relationship expressed by the equation E=mc2 was
the logical result of Maxwell's work, they just did not believe
it. Thus, the experiments of Thomson, Kaufmann, and finally, and
most importantly, Hasenörhl, confirmed Maxwell's work. It is
ludicrous to believe that Einstein developed this postulate,
particularly in light of the fact that Einstein did not have the
laboratory necessary to conduct the appropriate experiments.
In this same plagiarized article of Einstein's, he suggested to
the scientific community, "Perhaps it will prove possible to
test this theory using bodies whose energy content is variable to
a high degree (e.g., salts of radium)." This remark
demonstrates how little Einstein understood about science, for
this was truly an outlandish remark. By saying this, Einstein
showed that he really did not understand basic scientific
principles and that he was writing about a topic that he did not
understand. In fact, in response to this article, J. Precht
remarked that such an experiment "lies beyond the realm of
possible experience."
The last subject dealt with in Einstein's 1905 papers was the
foundation of the photon theory of light. Einstein wrote about
the photoelectric effect. The photoelectric effect is the release
of electrons from certain metals or semiconductors by the action
of light. This area of research is particularly important to the
Einstein myth because it was for this topic that he unjustly
received his 1922 Nobel Prize.
But again, it is not Einstein, but Wilhelm Wien and Max Planck
who deserve the credit. The main point of Einstein's paper, and
the point for which he is given credit, is that light is emitted
and absorbed in finite packets called quanta. This was the
explanation for the photoelectric effect. The photoelectric
effect had been explained by Heinrich Hertz in 1888. Hertz and
others, including Philipp Lenard, worked on understanding this
phenomenon. Lenard was the first to show that the energy of the
electrons released in the photoelectric effect was not governed
by the intensity of the light but by the frequency of the light.
This was an important breakthrough.
Wien and Planck were colleagues and they were the fathers of
modern day quantum theory. By 1900, Max Planck, based upon his
and Wien's work, had shown that radiated energy was absorbed and
emitted in finite units called quanta. The only difference in his
work of 1900 and Einstein's work of 1905 was that Einstein
limited himself to talking about one particular type of energy
light energy. But the principles and equations governing the
process in general had been deduced by Planck in 1900. Einstein
himself admitted that the obvious conclusion of Planck's work was
that light also existed in discrete packets of energy. Thus,
nothing in this paper of Einstein's was original.
After the 1905 papers of Einstein were published, the scientific
community took little notice and Einstein continued his job at
the patent office until 1909 when it was arranged for him to take
a position at a school by World Jewry. Still, it was not until a
1919 newspaper headline that he gained any notoriety.
With Einstein's academic appointment in 1909, he was placed in a
position where he could begin to use other people's work as his
own more openly. He engaged many of his students to look for ways
to prove the theories he had supposedly developed, or ways to
apply those theories, and then he could present the research as
his own or at least take partial credit. In this vein, in 1912,
he began to try and express his gravitational research in terms
of a new, recently developed calculus, which was conducive to
understanding relativity. This was the beginning of his General
Theory of Relativity, which he would publish in 1915. But the
mathematical work was not done by Einstein he was incapable of
it. Instead, it was performed by the mathematician Marcel
Grossmann, who in turn used the mathematical principles developed
by Berhard Riemann, who was the first to develop a sound
non-Euclidean geometry, which is the basis of all mathematics
used to describe relativity.
The General Theory of Relativity applied the principles of
relativity to the universe; that is, to the gravitational pull of
planets and their orbits, and the general principle that light
rays bend as they pass by a massive object. Einstein published an
initial paper in 1913 based upon the work which Grossmann did,
adapting the math of Riemann to Relativity. But this paper was
filled with errors and the conclusions were incorrect. It appears
that Grossmann was not smart enough to figure it out for
Einstein. So Einstein was forced to look elsewhere to plagiarize
his General Theory. Einstein published his correct General Theory
of Relativity in 1915, and said prior to its publication that he,
"completely succeeded in convincing Hilbert and Klein."
He is referring to David Hilbert, perhaps the most brilliant
mathematician of the 20th century, and Felix Klein, another
mathematician who had been instrumental in the development of the
area of calculus that Grossmann had used to develop the General
Theory of Relativity for Einstein.
Einstein's statement regarding the two men would lead the reader
to believe that Einstein had changed Hilbert's and Klein's
opinions regarding General Relativity, and that he had influenced
them in their thinking. However, the exact opposite is true.
Einstein stole the majority of his General Relativity work from
these two men, the rest being taken from Grossmann. Hilbert
submitted for publication, a week before Einstein completed his
work, a paper which contained the correct field equations of
General Relativity. What this means is that Hilbert wrote
basically the exact same paper, with the same conclusions, before
Einstein did. Einstein would have had an opportunity to know of
Hilbert's work all along, because there were Jewish friends of
his working for Hilbert. Yet, even this was not necessary, for
Einstein had seen Hilbert's paper in advance of publishing his
own. Both of these papers were, before being printed, delivered
in the form of a lecture.
Einstein presented his paper on November 25, 1915 in Berlin and
Hilbert had presented his paper on November 20 in Göttingen. On
November 18, Hilbert received a letter from Einstein thanking him
for sending him a draft of the treatise Hilbert was to deliver on
the 20th. So, in fact, Hilbert had sent a copy of his work at
least two weeks in advance to Einstein before either of the two
men delivered their lectures, but Einstein did not send Hilbert
an advance copy of his. Therefore, this serves as
incontrovertible proof that Einstein quickly plagiarized the work
and then presented it, hoping to beat Hilbert to the punch. Also,
at the same time, Einstein publicly began to belittle Hilbert,
even though in the previous summer he had praised him in an
effort to get Hilbert to share his work with him. Hilbert made
the mistake of sending Einstein this draft copy, but still he
delivered his work first.
Not only did Hilbert publish his work first, but it was of much
higher quality than Einstein's. It is known today that there are
many problems with assumptions made in Einstein's General Theory
paper. We know today that Hilbert was much closer to the truth.
Hilbert's paper is the forerunner of the unified field theory of
gravitation and electromagnetism and of the work of Erwin
Schrödinger, whose work is the basis of all modern day quantum
mechanics.
That the group of men discussed so far were the actual
originators of the ideas claimed by Einstein was known by the
scientific community all along. In 1940, a group of German
physicists meeting in Austria declared that "before
Einstein, Aryan scientists like Lorentz, Hasenöhrl, Poincaré,
etc., had created the foundations of the theory of
relativity." However, the Jewish media did not promote the
work of these men. The Jewish media did not promote the work of
David Hilbert, but instead they promoted the work of the Jew
Albert Einstein. As we mentioned earlier, this General Theory, as
postulated by Hilbert first and in plagiarized form by Einstein
second, stated that light rays should bend when they pass by a
massive object. In 1919, during the eclipse of the Sun, light
from distant stars passing close to the Sun was observed to bend
according to the theory. This evidence supported the General
Theory of Relativity, and the Jewish-controlled media immediately
seized upon the opportunity to prop up Einstein as a hero, at the
expense of the true genius, David Hilbert.
On November 7th, 1919, the London Times ran an article, the
headline of which proclaimed, "Revolution in science - New
theory of the Universe - Newtonian ideas overthrown." This
was the beginning of the force-feeding of the Einstein myth to
the masses. In the following years, Einstein's earlier 1905
papers were propagandized and Einstein was heralded as the
originator of all the ideas he had stolen. Because of this push
by the Jewish media, in 1922, Einstein received the Nobel Prize
for the work he had stolen in 1905 regarding the photoelectric
effect.
The establishment of the Einstein farce between 1919 and 1922 was
an important coup for world Zionism and Jewry. As soon as
Einstein had been established as an idol to the popular masses of
England and America, his image was promoted as the rare genius
that he is erroneously believed to be today. As such, he
immediately began his work as a tool for World Zionism. The
masses bought into the idea that if someone was so brilliant as
to change our fundamental understanding of the universe, then
certainly we ought to listen to his opinions regarding political
and social issues. This is exactly what World Jewry wanted to
establish in its ongoing effort of social engineering. They
certainly did not want someone like David Hilbert to be
recognized as rare genius. After all, this physicist had come
from a strong German, Christian background. His grandfather's two
middle names were 'Fürchtegott Leberecht' or 'Fear God, Live
Right.' In August of 1934, the day before a vote was to be taken
regarding installing Adolf Hitler as President of the Reich,
Hilbert signed a proclamation in support of Adolf Hitler, along
with other leading German scientists, that was published in the
German newspapers. So the Jews certainly did not want David
Hilbert receiving the credit he deserved.
The Jews did not want Max Planck receiving the credit he deserved
either. This German's grandfather and great-grandfather had been
important German theologians, and during World War II he would
stay in Germany throughout the war, supporting his fatherland the
best he could.
The Jews certainly did not want the up-and-coming Erwin
Schrödinger to be heralded as a genius to the masses. This
Austrian physicist would go on to teach at Adolf Hitler
University in Austria, and he wrote a public letter expressing
his support for the Third Reich. This Austrian's work on the
unified field theory was a forerunner of modern physics, even
though it had been criticized by Einstein, who apparently could
not understand it.
The Jews did not want to have Werner Heisenberg promoted as a
rare genius, even though he would go on to solidify quantum
theory and contribute to it greatly, as well as develop his
famous uncertainty principle, in addition to describing the
modern atom and nucleus and the binding energies that are
essential to modern chemistry. No, the Jews did not want
Heisenberg promoted as a genius because he would go on to head
the German atomic bomb project and serve prison time after the
war for his involvement with the Third Reich.
No, the Jews did not want to give credit to any of a number of
white Germans, Austrians, Irishmen, Frenchmen, Scotsmen,
Englishmen, and even Americans who had contributed to the body of
knowledge and evidence from which Einstein plagiarized and stole
his work. Instead, they needed to erect Einstein as their golden
calf, even though he repeatedly and often embarrassed himself
with his nonfactual or nearsighted comments regarding the work he
had supposedly done. For example, in 1934, the Pittsburgh
Post-Gazette ran a front page article in which Einstein gave an
"emphatic denial" regarding the idea of practical
applications for the "energy of the atom." The article
says,
"But the 'energy of the atom' is something else again. If you believe that man will someday be able to harness this boundless energyto drive a great steamship across the ocean on a pint of water, for instancethen, according to Einstein, you are wrong"
Again, Einstein clearly did not understand the branch of physics he had supposedly founded, though elsewhere in the world at the time theoretical research was underway that would lead to the atomic bomb and nuclear energy. But after Einstein was promoted as a god in 1919, he made no real attempts to plagiarize any other work. Rather, he began his real purpose evangelizing for the cause of Zionism and World Jewry. Though he did publish other articles after this time, all of them were co-authored by at least one other person, and in each instance, Einstein had little if anything to do with the research that led to the articles; he was merely recruited by the co-authors in order to lend credence to their work. Thus freed of the pretense of academia, Einstein began his assault for World Zionism.
In 1921, Einstein made his first visit to the United States on a
fund-raising tour for the Hebrew University in Jerusalem and to
promote Zionism. In April of 1922, Einstein used his status to
gain membership in a Commission of the League of Nations. In
February of 1923, Einstein visits Tel Aviv and Jerusalem. In June
of 1923, he becomes a founding member of the Association of
Friends of the New Russia. In 1926, Einstein took a break from
his Communist and Zionistic activities to again embarrass himself
scientifically by criticizing the work of Schrödinger and
Heisenberg. Following a brief illness, he resumes his Zionistic
agenda, wanting an independent Israel and at the same time a
World Government.
In the 1930s he actively campaigns against all forms of war,
although he would reverse this position during World War II when
he advocated war against Germany and the creation of the atomic
bomb, which he thought was impossible to build. In 1939 and 1940,
Einstein, at the request of other Jews, wrote two letters to
Roosevelt urging an American program to develop an atomic bomb to
be used on Germany not Japan. Einstein would have no part in
the actual construction of the bomb, theoretical or practical,
because he lacked the skills for either.
In December of 1946, Einstein rekindles his efforts for a World
Government, with Israel apparently being the only autonomous
nation. This push continues through the rest of the 1940s. In
1952, Einstein, who had been instrumental in the creation of the
State of Israel, both politically and economically, is offered
the presidency of Israel. He declines. In 1953, he spends his
time attacking the McCarthy Committee, and he supports Communists
such as J. Robert Oppenheimer. He encourages civil disobedience
in response to the McCarthy trials. Finally, on April 18, 1955,
this filthy Jewish demagogue dies.
Dead, the Jews no longer had to worry about Einstein making
stupid statements. His death was just the beginning of his usage
and exploitation by World Jewry. The Jewish-controlled media
continued to promote the myth of this Super-Jew long after his
death, and as more and more of the men who knew better died off,
the Jews were more and more able to aggrandize his myth and lie
more boldly. This brazen lying has culminated in the
Jew-controlled Time magazine naming Einstein "The Person of
the Century" at the close of 1999. It may be demonstrated
that the Jewish lies have become more bold with the passage of
time because Einstein was never named "Man of the Year"
while he was alive, but now, over forty years after his death, he
is named "Person of the Century."
Einstein was given this title in spite of the clear-cut choice
for the "Person of the Century," Adolf Hitler. Hitler
was indeed named "Man of the Year" while he was still
living by Time magazine, and according to a December 27, 1999,
article in the USA Today, Einstein was chosen over Adolf Hitler
because of the perceived "nasty public relations
fallout" that would accompany that choice; yet in internet
polling by Time, Hitler finished third and was the top serious
candidate. Still the issue of Time magazine dedicated to
Einstein, which has articles by men with names like Isaacson,
Golden, Stein, Rudenstine, and Rosenblatt, is interesting to
read. For one, they found it necessary to include an article
rationalizing why they did not pick the obvious choice, Adolf
Hitler. But more interesting is the article by Stephen Hawking
which purports to be a history of the theory of relativity. In
it, Hawking admits many of the things in this article, such as
the fact that Hilbert published the General Theory of Relativity
before Einstein and that FitzGerald and Lorentz deduced the
concept of relativity long before Einstein. Hawking also writes,
"Einstein was deeply disturbed by the work of Werner Heisenberg in Copenhagen, Paul Dirac in Cambridge and Erwin Schrödinger in Zurich, who developed a new picture of reality called quantum mechanics. Einstein was horrified by this Most scientists, however, accepted the validity of the new quantum laws because they showed excellent agreement with observations They are the basis of modern developments in chemistry, molecular biology and electronics and the foundation of the technology that has transformed the world in the past half-century."
This is all very true, yet the same magazine credits Einstein with all of the modern developments that Hawking names, even through Einstein was so stupid as to be vehemently against the most important idea of modern science, just as he opposed Schrödinger's work in unified field theory which was far ahead of its time. The same magazine admits that "success eluded" Einstein in the field of explaining the contradictions between relativity and quantum mechanics. Today, these contradictions are explained by the unified field theory, but Einstein, who proves himself to be one of the least intelligent of 20th century scientists, refused to believe in either quantum theory or the unified field theory.
To name Einstein as "The Person of the Century" is one
of the most ludicrous and absurd lies of all time, yet it has
been successfully pulled off by Isaacson, Golden, Stein,
Rudenstine, and Rosenblatt and the Jewish owners of Time
magazine. If the Jews at Time wanted to give the title to an
inventor or scientist, then the most obvious choice would have
been men like Hilbert, Planck, or Heisenberg. If they wanted to
give it to the scientist who most fundamentally changed the
landscape of 20th century science, then the obvious choice would
be William Shockley. This Nobel prize winning scientist invented
the transistor, which is the basis of all modern electronic
devices and computers, everything from modern cars and
telephones, VCRs and watches, to the amazing computers which have
allowed incomprehensible advances in all fields of science.
Without the transistor, all forms of science today would be
basically in the same place that they were in the late 1940s.
However, the Jews cannot allow the due credit to go to William
Shockley because he spent the majority of his scientific career
demonstrating the genetic and mental inferiority of non-whites
and arguing for their sterilization. His scientific, genetic
views led the Jews to financially destroy Shockley who founded
the first company in the Silicon Valley, his hometown, to develop
computer chips. The Jews hired away his entire staff and used
them to start Fairchild semiconductor, the company that today is
known as Intel.
No the Jews could not let any of the truly great geniuses of our
time be recognized, not the anti-Semite Henry Ford, not the great
German scientists who helped the National Socialists in Germany,
not Charles Lindbergh, who was sympathetic to National Socialist
causes, and certainly not William Shockley, one of the most
brilliant physicists and geneticists of our time. Instead, the
Jews propped up the Zionist, Communist Albert Einstein who hated
everything white.
After World War II, Einstein demonstrated his hatred of the White
Race and of the Germans in particular in the following
statements. He was asked what he thought about Germany and about
re-educating the Germans after the war and said,
"The nation has been on the decline mentally and morally since 1870Behind the Nazi party stands the German people, who elected Hitler after he had in his book and in his speeches made his shameful intentions clear beyond the possibility of misunderstanding. The Germans can be killed or constrained after the war, but they cannot be re-educated to a democratic way of thinking and acting"
Einstein here is advocating the murder of Germans, because he feels that this is the only way that they can be kept in check. He is right about one thing, the Germans did knowingly support the cause of National Socialism, but what Einstein is attacking is Christianity, because it was Christianity that led the German people to overwhelmingly support National Socialism. It was the German Christian Faith Movement and the Christian Social Party of men like Karl Lueger that led the German people to their understanding of Jews. The Jew Daniel Goldhagen has recently shown the Christian basis of National Socialism in his book, Hitler's Willing Executioners: Ordinary Germans and the Holocaust, and the book Why The Jews? by Prager and Telushkin similarly proves the Christian origins of what the Jews call 'anti-Semitism.' Einstein understood this and Einstein, like all Jews, hated Christianity. So what Einstein was really advocating was the killing and constraining of all true Christians, not just German Christians. This is the true purpose and intent of Zionism and the demagogue Einstein was merely a tool of World Zionism and Jewry towards this end.
Zionistic Jews understand that true, primitive Christianity is
the mortal enemy of mongrel Judaism. This is why the Jews, like
Einstein, hated Nazi Germany so much, for National Socialist
Germany advocated primitive, positive Christianity in the 24th
point of its Party Platform.
(Article used by permission of and © CSCS,
POB 188, Kodak, TN 37764).
* * * Back to the Home Page of John "Birdman" Bryant, the World's Most Controversial Author * * *