U.S. Army Officers Say: 'Mossad May Blame Arabs'
Sometimes "the most likely suspect" in an act of terrorism is
actually a "false flag" working for-or otherwise "framed" by- those who are
responsible.
Exclusive To American Free Press
By Michael
Collins Piper
Top U.S. Army analysts believe Israel's intelligence
agency, the Mossad, is "ruthless and cunning," "a wildcard" that "has [the]
capability to target U.S. forces and make it look like a Palestinian/Arab
act."
This eye-opening assertion about America's supposed closest
ally was reported in a front page story in The Washington Times on September
10-just one day before the terrorist attacks in America that are being blamed on
"Arabs."
The Times reported that this serious charge by U.S. Army
officers against the Israelis appeared in a 68-page paper prepared by 60
officers at the U.S. Army's School for Advanced Military Studies, a training
ground for up-and-coming Army officers. [PLEASE SEE END OF ARTICLE FOR
THIS TIMES ARTICLE.]
Then, just hours after the terrorist tra gedies, a
well-known pro-Israel analyst, George Friedman, proclaimed Israel as the primary
beneficiary.
"The big winner today, intended or not, is the state of
Israel," wrote Fried man, who said on his Internet website at stratfor.com that
"There is no question … that the Israeli leadership is feeling relief" in the
wake of the terrorist attack on America as a result of the benefits that Israel
will glean.
Considering the U.S. Army's questions about possible
provocations by Israel, coupled with this noted intelligence analyst's
suggestion that Israel was indeed "the big winner" on Sept. 11, a previous
report in the Aug. 3, 1993 issue of The Village Voice that Israel's Mossad was
perhaps involved in (or had foreknowledge of) the previous "Arab terrorist"
attack on the World Trade Center, takes on new dimensions.
The events of
Sept. 11 do require careful attention in light of the fact that Israel has had a
long and proven record in planting "false flags"-orchestrated assassinations and
acts of terrorism for its own purposes and pinning those atrocities on innocent
parties.
Perhaps the best-known instance in which Israel used a "false
flag" to cover its own trail was in the infamous Lavon Affair. It was in 1954
that several Israeli-orchestrated acts of terrorism against British targets in
Egypt were carried out. Blame for the attacks was placed on the Muslim
Brotherhood, which opposed the regime of Egyptian President Gamul Abdul-Nasser.
However, the truth about the wave of terror is found in a once-secret cable from
Col. Benjamin Givli, the head of Israel's military intelligence, who outlined
the intended purpose behind the wave of terror:
[Our goal] is to
break the West's confidence in the existing [Egyptian] regime. The actions
should cause arrests, demonstrations, and expressions of revenge. The Israeli
origin should be totally covered while attention should be shifted to any other
possible factor. The purpose is to prevent economic and military aid from the
West to Egypt.
Ultimately the truth about Israel's involvement became
public and Israel was rocked internally in the wake of the scandal. Competing
political elements within Israel used the scandal as a bludgeon against their
opponents. But the truth about Israel's use of a "false flag" had come to
international attention and demonstrated how Israel was willing to endanger
innocent lives as part of its grand political strategy to expand its influence
in the Middle East.
BLAMING 'RIGHT WING' EXTREMISTS
A shadowy
"right wing" group known as "Direct Action" was accused of the attack on
Goldenberg's Deli in Paris on Aug. 9, 1982. Six people died and 22 were injured.
The leader of "Direct Action" was Jean-Marc Rouillan who had been operating in
the Mediterranean under the cover name of "Sebas" and had been repeatedly linked
to the Mossad. All references to Rouillan's Mossad links were deleted from the
official reports issued at the time.
However, the Algerian national news
service, which has ties to French intelligence, blamed the Mossad for Rouillan's
activities. Angry French intelligence officers were believed to have leaked this
information. Several top French security officials quit in protest over the
cover-up of Mossad complicity in Rouillan's crimes. However, other Mossad false
flag operations also took place on French soil.
FALSE CLUES
On
Oct. 3, 1980, a synagogue on Co pernicus Street was bombed in Paris. Four
bystanders were killed. Nine were injured. The media frenzy which followed the
incident was worldwide. Reports held that "right wing extremists" were
responsible. Yet, of all the "right wing extremists" held for questioning, none
was arrested. In fact, all were released. In the upper echelons of French
intelligence, however, the finger of suspicion was pointed at the Mossad.
According to one report: "On April 6, 1979, the same Mossad terror unit
now suspected of the Copernicus carnage blew up the heavily guarded plant of
CNIM industries at La Seyne-sur-Mer, near Toulon, in southeast France, where a
consortium of French firms was building a nuclear reactor for Iraq.
"The
Mossad salted the site of the CNIM bomb blast with 'clues' followed up with
anonymous phone calls to police-suggesting that the sabotage was the work of a
'conservative' environmentalist group-'the most pacific and harmless people on
earth' as one source put it."
MORE OF THE SAME
o On June 28, 1978,
Israeli agents exploded a bomb under a small passenger car in the Rue Saint Anne
in Paris, killing Mohammed Boudia, an organizer for the Palestine Liberation
Organization (PLO). Immediately afterward, Paris police received anonymous phone
calls accusing Boudia of involvement in narcotics deals and attributing his
murder to the Corsican Mafia. A thorough investigation subsequently established
that Mossad special-action agents were responsible for the terrorist
killing.
o In October 1976 the same Mossad unit kidnapped two West German
students named Brigette Schulz and Thomas Reuter from their Paris hotel. Planted
"clues" and anonymous phone calls made it appear that a Bavarian "neo-nazi"
formation had executed the abduction. French intelligence established that the
two German youths had been secretly flown to Israel, drugged, tortured, coerced
into a false "confession of complicity" in PLO activities, and then anonymously
incarcerated in one of the Israeli government's notorious political
prisons.
o In February 1977 a German-born, naturalized U.S. citizen named
William Jahnke arrived in Paris for some secretive business meetings. He soon
vanished, leaving no trace. Paris police were anonymously informed that Jahnke
had been involved in a high-level South Korean bribery affair and "eliminated"
when the deal went sour. A special team of investigators from SDECE, the leading
French intelligence agency, eventually determined that Jahnke had been
"terminated" by the Mossad, which suspected him of selling secret information to
the Libyans. Along with other details of this sordid case, the SDECE learned
that Jahnke had been "fingered" to the Mossad by his own former employer, the
CIA.
BLAMING THE LIBYANS
One of Israel's most outrageous "false
flag" operations involved a wild propaganda story aimed at discrediting Libyan
leader Muamar Qaddafi. In the early months of the administration of President
Ronald Reagan, the U.S. media began promoting a story that a "Libyan hit squad"
was in the United States to assassinate the president. This inflamed public
sentiment against Libya.
Suddenly, however, the "hit squad" stories
vanished. Ultimately it was discovered that the source of the story was Manucher
Ghorbanifar, a former Iranian SAVAK (secret police) agent with close ties to the
Mossad. Even the liberal Washington Post acknowledged that the CIA itself
believed that Ghorbanifar was a liar who "had made up the hit-squad story in
order to cause problems for one of Is rael's enemies."
The Los Angeles
Times had already blown the whistle on Israel's scare stories. "Israeli
intelligence, not the Reagan administration," reported the Times, "was a major
source of some of the most dramatic published reports about a Libyan
assassination team allegedly sent to kill President Reagan and other top U.S.
officials . . . Israel, which informed sources said has 'wanted an excuse to go
in and bash Libya for a longtime,' may be trying to build American public
support for a strike against [Qaddafi]."
In other words, Israel had been
promoting the former SAVAK agent, Ghorbanifar, to official Washing ton as a
reliable source. In fact, he was a Mossad disinformation operative waving a
"false flag"-yet another Israeli scheme to blame Libya for its own misdeeds,
using one "false flag" (Iran's SAVAK) to lay blame on another "false flag"
(Libya).
The Mossad was almost certainly responsible for the bombing of
the La Belle discotheque in West Berlin on April 5, 1986. However, claims were
made that there was "irrefutable" evidence that the Libyans were responsible. A
U.S. serviceman was killed. President Ronald Reagan responded with an attack on
Libya.
However, intelligence insiders believed that Israel's Mossad had
concocted the phony "evidence" to "prove" Libyan responsibility. West Berlin
police director Manfred Ganschow, who took charge of the investigation, cleared
the Libyans, saying, "This is a highly political case. Some of the evidence
cited in Washington may not be evidence at all, merely assumptions supplied for
political reasons."
BLAMING THE SYRIANS
On April 18, 1986, Nezar
Hindawi, a 32-year-old Jordanian man was arrested in London after security
guards found that one of the passengers boarding an Israeli plane bound for
Jerusalem, Ann Murphy, 22, was carrying a square, flat sheet of plastic
explosive in the double bottom of her carry-on bag.
Miss Murphy told
security men that the detonator (disguised as a calculator) had been given to
her by her fiancee, Hindawi. He was charged with attempted sabotage and
attempted murder.
Word was leaked that Hindawi had confessed and claimed
that he had been hired by Gen. Mohammed Al-Khouli, the intelligence director of
the Syrian air force. Also implicated were others including the Syrian
ambassador in London. The French authorities warned the British prime minister
that there was more to the case than met the eye-that is, Israeli involvement.
This was later confirmed in reports in the Western press.
BLAMING THE
PLO
In 1970, King Hussein of Jordan was provided incriminating
intelligence that suggested the Palestine Liberation Organization was plotting
to murder him and seize power. Infuriated, Hussein mobilized his forces for what
has become known as the "Black September" purge of the PLO. Thousands of
Palestinians living in Jordan were rounded up, some of the leaders were
tortured, and in the end, masses of refugees were driven from Jordan to
Lebanon.
New data, coming to light after the murder of two leading Mossad
operatives in Larnaka, Cyprus, suggested that the entire operation had been a
Mossad covert action, led by one of its key operatives, Sylvia Roxburgh. She
contrived an affair with King Hussein and served as the linchpin for a major
Mossad coup designed to destabilize the Arabs.
In 1982, just when the PLO
had abandoned the use of terrorism, the Mossad spread disinformation about
"terror attacks" on Israeli settlements along the northern border in order to
justify a full-scale military invasion of Lebanon. Years later, even leading
Israeli spokesmen, such as former Foreign Minister Abba Eban, admitted that the
reports of "PLO terrorism" had been contrived by the Mossad.
It is also
worth noting that the attempted assassination in London of Israeli ambassador
Shlomo Argov was initially blamed on the PLO. The attempted assassination was
cited by Israel as one excuse for its 1982 incursion into Lebanon. In fact, the
diplomat was one of Israel's "doves" and inclined toward a friendly disposition
of Israel's conflict with the PLO and an unlikely target of PLO wrath.
It
appears that the assassination attempt was carried out by the Mossad-under yet
another "false flag"-for two purposes: (a) elimination of a domestic "peacenik"
friendly toward the Palestinians; and (b) pinning yet another crime on the PLO.
H
![]() |
The Washington TimesU.S. troops would enforce peace under Army studySeptember 10, 2001Section: A Edition: 2 Page: A1 Rowan ScarboroughTHE WASHINGTON TIMES An elite U.S. Army study center has devised a plan for enforcing a major Israeli-Palestinian peace accord that would require about 20,000 well-armed troops stationed throughout Israel and a newly created Palestinian state. |
There are no plans by the Bush administration to put American soldiers into the Middle East to police an agreement forged by the longtime warring parties. In fact, Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld is searching for ways to reduce U.S. peacekeeping efforts abroad, rather than increasing such missions. But a 68-page paper by the Army School of Advanced Military Studies (SAMS) does provide a look at the daunting task any international peacekeeping force would face if the United Nations authorized it, and Israel and the Palestinians ever reached a peace agreement. Located at Fort Leavenworth, Kan., the School for Advanced Military Studies is both a training ground and a think tank for some of the Army's brightest officers. Officials say the Army chief of staff, and sometimes the Joint Chiefs of Staff, ask SAMS to develop contingency plans for future military operations. During the 1991 Persian Gulf war, SAMS personnel helped plan the coalition ground attack that avoided a strike up the middle of Iraqi positions and instead executed a "left hook" that routed the enemy in 100 hours. The cover page for the recent SAMS project said it was done for the Joint Chiefs of Staff. But Maj. Chris Garver, a Fort Leavenworth spokesman, said the study was not requested by Washington. "This was just an academic exercise," said Maj. Garver. "They were trying to take a current situation and get some training out of it." The exercise was done by 60 officers dubbed "Jedi Knights," as all second-year SAMS students are nicknamed. The SAMS paper attempts to predict events in the first year of a peace-enforcement operation, and sees possible dangers for U.S. troops from both sides. It calls Israel's armed forces a "500-pound gorilla in Israel. Well armed and trained. Operates in both Gaza [and the West Bank]. Known to disregard international law to accomplish mission. Very unlikely to fire on American forces. Fratricide a concern especially in air space management." Of the Mossad, the Israeli intelligence service, the SAMS officers say: "Wildcard. Ruthless and cunning. Has capability to target U.S. forces and make it look like a Palestinian/Arab act." On the Palestinian side, the paper describes their youth as "loose cannons; under no control, sometimes violent." The study lists five Arab terrorist groups that could target American troops for assassination and hostage-taking. The study recommends "neutrality in word and deed" as one way to protect U.S. soldiers from any attack. It also says Syria, Egypt and Jordan must be warned "we will act decisively in response to external attack." It is unlikely either of the three would mount an attack. Of Syria's military, the report says: "Syrian army quantitatively larger than Israeli Defense Forces, but largely seen as qualitatively inferior. More likely, however, Syrians would provide financial and political support to the Palestinians, as well as increase covert support to terrorism acts through Lebanon." Of Egypt's military, the paper says, "Egyptians also maintain a large army but have little to gain by attacking Israel." The plan does not specify a full order of battle. An Army source who reviewed the SAMS work said each of a possible three brigades would require about 100 Bradley fighting vehicles, 25 tanks, 12 self-propelled howitzers, Apache attack helicopters, Kiowa Warrior reconnaissance helicopters and Predator spy drones. The report predicts that nonlethal weapons would be used to quell unrest. U.S. European Command, which is headed by NATO`s supreme allied commander, would oversee the peacekeeping operation. Commanders would maintain areas of operation, or AOs, around Nablus, Jerusalem, Hebron and the Gaza strip. The study sets out a list of goals for U.S. troops to accomplish in the first 30 days. They include: "create conditions for development of Palestinian State and security of [Israel]"; ensure "equal distribution of contract value or equivalent aid" . .. . that would help legitimize the peacekeeping force and stimulate economic growth; "promote U.S. investment in Palestine"; "encourage reconciliation between entities based on acceptance of new national identities"; and "build lasting relationship based on new legal borders and not religious-territorial claims." Maj. Garver said the officers who completed the exercise will hold major planning jobs once they graduate. "There is an application process" for students, he said. "They screen their records, and there are several tests they go through before they are accepted by the program. The bright planners of the future come out of this program." James Phillips, a Middle East analyst at the Heritage Foundation, said it would be a mistake to put peacekeepers in Israel, given the "poor record of previous monitors." "In general, the Bush administration policy is to discourage a large American presence," he said. "But it has been rumored that one of the possibilities might be an expanded CIA role." "It would be a very different environment than Bosnia," said Mr. Phillips, referring to America's six-year peacekeeping role in Bosnia-Herzegovina. "The Palestinian Authority is pushing for this as part of its strategy to internationalize the conflict. Bring in the Europeans and Russia and China. But such monitors or peacekeeping forces are not going to be able to bring peace. Only a decision by the Palestinians to stop the violence and restart talks could possibly do that." |
All content © 2001-, by News World Communications, Inc.; 3600 New York Avenue, NE; Washington, DC 20002 and may not be republished without permission.
All archives are stored on a SAVE (tm) newspaper library system from MediaStream Inc., a Knight-Ridder Inc. company. |
U.S. troops would enforce peace under Army
study
An elite U.S. Army study center has
devised a plan for enforcing a major Israeli-Palestinian peace accord that would
require about 20,000 well-armed troops stationed throughout Israel and a newly
created Palestinian state.There are no plans by the Bush administration to put
American soldiers into the Middle East to police an agreement forged by the
longtime warring parties. In fact, Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld is
searching for ways to reduce U.S. peacekeeping efforts
Complete Article, 978 words ( )
http://asp.washtimes.com/printarticle.asp?action=print&ArticleID=20020405-13268800