All over the internet you will find claims that the average Jewish IQ is 115. Because kinfolk are repeating that lie to each other, I decided it is important enough to make an effort to rebut. I began to understand how it is part of the effort to demoralize our Folk; it is like the way they tell us we are Africans. They claim we are so dumb the Jews 'deserve' to rule over us because we stand in the same relation to them as blacks to whites. Here is the basic rebuttal:
According to Professor Richard Lynn, writing in Personality and Individual Differences on April 2d, 2003, the average verbal IQ of American Jews is about 108.
Note this is only the VERBAL component of IQ, not the balanced, average IQ to which it would normally be compared. Kevin MacDonald has written about the social 'eugenics' that have led to a higher verbal component of IQ among Jews. This quotation of a VERBAL component only, gives disproportionate weight to a 'glib' type: think of anti-white con-artists like Tim Wise, or sleazy lawyers like Morris Dees. To the gullible religious they say "G_d chose us to rule over you", and to the gullible secularists they say, "We deserve to rule over you because we are so brilliant.". They control the academic journals just like they control the mass media, so who is to critique them? You wont be published, and even if you do get your message out, you are branded as 'anti-semitic', and you know what happens to anti-semites in academia, or American society as a whole!
I don't pretend to know enough about the samples or procedures to deconstruct what is wrong with the studies that make this claim for an exalted Jewish IQ, but I have shown by 'back of an envelope' calculations that an assertion of an average 115 Jewish IQ fails the common-sense test.
Then there is the claim that Jews, at 115 IQ, are "one standard deviation higher than whites, which is the same as the difference between whites and blacks". This is a double lie: 115 is a lie, and it is only a standard deviation above 100 points, which is the American AVERAGE. The average BALANCED white IQ must be at LEAST 105 (in order to make the American average 100) because about a third of the population is black, mestizo, Amerind, or south-asian, etc.... That third of the population has an IQ that averages below 90, and only the remnant whites are numerous enough to pull the overall average up to 100: thus the white average must be around 105.
Other psychometricians have found that Jews do NOT have a higher IQ than whites, let alone a 115 'average'. For instance, Nesbit found the NORTHERN European IQ of non-Jewish whites higher than that of Jews.
The whole purpose of this propaganda about Jewish IQ is an attempt to justify the way they occupy most of the positions of power and economic advantage. They are adding insult to injury by saying that they rule over us because they are as much smarter than us as we are the blacks. But that is a false assertion (even if the premise of their 115 IQ WERE true) because they are such a small % of the population that there would be MORE whites in any IQ cohort just because we are so much more numerous than Jews. Just to show that EVEN IF they did have an IQ of 115, it would STILL not justify their over-representation in positions of power, here are the percentages of Jews, non-Jewish whites, NE-Asians and Blacks in the 130 IQ cohort (ASSUMING 115 IQ for Jews at 3% of the total population) Jews: 17%, non-Jewish whites 77%, NE-Asians 5%, and blacks, only 1/2 of 1%. A lot of people would say Jews are only 2% of the population: that would cut them down to 12%, raise the white share to 82% and leave the Asians and blacks essentially unchanged. Those figures were also based on a white IQ of only 103, which can't be correct, because that wouldn't pull the national average up to 100. But it is interesting to see that, even using figures that inflate the Jewish IQ and denigrate the whites, it STILL shows that there would be MANY more white people than Jews at ANY IQ, so there is NO truth in the propaganda that they 'deserve' to be so over-represented in positions of power because they are so smart. They are dominating our society by using a social strategy, rather than by virtue of their IQ, EVEN if it were as high as they claim, which it is NOT.
Another aspect of this strategy to make us believe they deserve to rule over us is the way they give each other prizes. They have, through their social strategy, achieved such over-representation, in so many fields, that they control who is even considered for awards, let alone who GETS them. Consider just one example: Judith Miller is a reporter at the NY Times. She was a conduit for the lies and deception put out by an Iraqi named Chalabi, who the neo-cons are trying to install as our sock-puppet in Iraq. 'They' awarded Miller a Pulitzer Prize for promulgating all those lies that led 'us' into a war for Israel. They have a strangle-hold on all academic journals, and even on most internet boards and lists.
Since this is a private e-mail and I don't have to worry about offending Jews on the list, who, after all, are NOT the ones causing the problem, I'd like to make another point. They are using their power to commit a genocide of our Folk. Some might say that proves their superiority: if they can destroy us, they must be superior. I say it may be a colossal mistake on their part: they 'had it made' as our welcome guests, and killing the host is not such a great strategy for parasites. They may have been, as the British say, "too clever by half".
[Birdman comments:]
Dear RAF:
You made some good points is your essay. I have made many of them myself. In fact, I would like to post your letter permanently on my site, along with my comments.
The 115 IQ is cited, so I have heard, in The Bell Curve. That gives it some authority. I also believe it, because it accords with my personal experience. But the point -- which you make -- is that it really in some sense doesn't matter, because there are so many more whites with equivalent IQs.
One point you fail to mention is that Jews and whites are 'differently abled', which impacts significantly on the discussion. In particular, socialistic Jews have made an economic mess of everything they have influenced -- from Soviet Russia to Israel -- in spite of their talent as individual capitalists, while whites have created vibrant economic structures. Likewise, whites have created advanced social systems focusing on individual freedom, while Jews retain a propensity for oriental despotism. Thus even if Jews are smarter than whites in some sense, we have to remember that 'Smart is as smart does'; and with Jews so far behind whites in creating viable social and economic structures, their tendency toward 'parasitism', and their dysfunctionality in the sense of continually arousing the population against them for their activities, they just don't come out looking that smart. No one has ever said IQ was a perfect measure of that elusive thing called 'intelligence', and with Jews, we have a good example of how deficient that measure can be.
[RAF responds:]
"One point you fail to mention is that Jews and whites are 'differently abled', ..." Yes, I did fail to extend a characterization of their asymmetric potential beyond the fact that their verbal fluency is much higher than their averaged IQ. One might well think of them as a tribe of shyster lawyers and con-men. Even their over-estimated contributions in science have borne little or no fruit because they invent 'clever' theories that are not really congruent with reality, then use their social dominance strategy to establish that as the paradigm and suppress all attempts to move forward. Look at the way Feldman uses his control of a genetics lab to obfuscate human origins; consider Einstein's Ptolemaic theory that doesn't explain gravity but is established as a dogma, or the way Freud's foolishness dominated psychology for so long; Marx's socio-economics, Feynman's "contributions" to quantum theory, and on and on.
YOUR DONATION = OUR SURVIVAL!
Please contribute today - buy our books - and spread the word to all your friends!
* * * Back to the Home Page of John "Birdman" Bryant, the World's Most Controversial Author * * *