|
July 23, 2005: Funny thing: I'm
taking a French class in Toulouse. In the class, I met two Americans who
vacation on their boat for two months every year. It is currently tied up
in Toulouse. He is retired from advertising, she is a school teacher who
will retire next year. They made a few remarks about the U.S. and creeping
fascism, so I decided to invite them down to the house for an afternoon
chat.
Well, of course, we gradually approached the subject of 9-11, but
right there they balked. Yes, they firmly believe that a bunch of Fundies
have taken over the government and they don't like it, but they just had a
lot of trouble "going there" when considering the idea that 9-11 was
designed to facilitate the Fundie take-over, and that the "Fundie"
position itself was probably a manipulation.
So, we lent them David Ray Griffen's book, The New Pearl
Harbor, to sort of "break it to them gently." After a few days, they
gave it back with a sort of stunned look in their eyes, and I gave them a
couple more: Thierry Meyssan's books. A day or so later, the fellow told
me: okay, I can accept that the government might be complicit in 9-11...
but if a 757 didn't hit the Pentagon, what happened to IT?
And that's where they got stuck.
They know all about Pearl Harbor and other similar events, they
understand that the U.S. government can, has and DOES engage in covert
operations in order to get the public to support whatever power mongering
urge they may have at the moment, but that was THEN and this is NOW. It
can't happen NOW! Even though they say "yeah, we agree that nothing about
the Pentagon makes a lick of sense, it sure does SEEM like there was no
757, but where is the 757, what happened to the people on it? How could so
many people keep quiet?"
Ah, the 64,000 Dollar Question.
I
recently had an exchange with Robin Ramsay, Editor of Lobster
magazine. The context of the exchange was related to his recent
"Konspiracy Korner" piece published in Fortean Times, one of my favorite
magazines (though I am now wondering just what is going on over there at
FT?)
After writing a rather long post that included a lot of chunks of
material from our research and the research of others, Mr. Ramsay
opined:
"Ultimately
it comes down to how you see the world. The kind of conspiracy you are
describing, or implying, is inconceivable to me: too big, too complex,
too likely to go wrong or be discovered, ever to be mounted. What you
are describing ... is vastly much bigger - and more complex and more
dangerous - than any known mind control/psy ops project. And there is no
evidence for it. [...]
Those -
like you - who argue for a U.S. state conspiracy are proposing a
massive, multi-agency conspiracy of a kind which has never been seen
before. All the U.S. state agencies hate each other and barely
co-operate, engage in endless turf wars. The kind of inter-agency
operation you are proposing simply has never existed in peace time. It
is inconceivable to me that such a group could be got together. And this
is probably the main reason that the official U.S. state organisations
and politicians have never taken the conspiracy theories seriously. They
know how the U.S. state operates and thus dismiss this idea at the
outset. (And the official inquiry into 9-11 is full of examples of the
hostility between state agencies.) In reality, when the planes hit the
towers a large slice of the U.S. military and intelligence bodies
immediately thought of Bin Laden. And they have never had a good reason
to change their minds - not least because Bin Laden and his various
cohorts have admitted - boasted of - doing it."
And there is the rub: undoubtedly, Robin Ramsay's remarks are "on
target" in many respects. And yet, there is the mountain of evidence -
much of it circumstantial but so compelling that it would be accepted in a
court of law - that there IS such a gigantic conspiracy, and that the
"power elite" - individuals who may be completely unknown to us since the
highest level politicians and bankers may only be their "pawns" - are
somehow, at the top of the heap, controlling everything beneath them
including the governments of various countries.
Boy, does that ever sound crazy! But before you reject such an idea
out of hand, let me quote a bit from an article I wrote shortly after the
Oklahoma City bombing:
"When I saw
the face of the alleged Oklahoma Bomber, Timothy McVeigh, I knew I had
seen that expression before. I couldn't quite place the memory until a
few days later when I read a newspaper account that reported McVeigh as
saying that the government had implanted a computer chip in his hip to
track him! The bells rang and the lightbulb lighted and I remembered
where I had seen that "face" before.
He was
young, about 26 or 27, blond, blue-eyed, clean- cut, powerfully built
and definitely suffering. His body- language said it all. The young man
sitting across from me in my hypnotherapy consulting room was
overwhelmed by terror. His eyes darted to the right and the left as
though expecting a blow from any quarter, and he was coiled as tightly
as an overwound clock spring. His story was not entirely unique, but the
level to which it had affected him was profound, possibly the worst I
had seen, and I knew he needed help NOW.
Several
months ago I was contacted by the owner of a large book store in a
nearby city. She frequently refers clients to me for hypnosis. Generally
they are the run-of-the-mill New Agers desiring past-life regressions
out of simple curiosity, but sometimes the situations are quite serious
and troubling. Luke's case, (a pseudonym) was one of the latter.
Maggie,
(pseudonym), the book store owner, sponsors and promotes many book
signings, seminars and classes that are held in the reading room of her
store and she had met Luke at one of these. She knew something was
troubling him, but it was some time before he confided in her. Now, he
was telling his story to me.
"The
government is experimenting on me," he revealed in embarrassed anguish.
"I don't know why or how, but there are a lot of people in on this and
they are trying to drive me crazy."
"What makes
you think the government is experimenting on you?" I asked.
"I KNOW
they are. They have my house bugged, my phone is tapped, they have some
kind of thing planted in me to control my thoughts, and they have people
everywhere watching me."
"What kind
of people are watching you, where are they, and how do you know this?"
"The people
who live around me are part of the project. They have them planted
everywhere -- at McDonalds, at the laundromat, in the stores, at the
restaurant, where I work. They put drugs into my food to knock me out
and then they come and take me and experiment on me. Then, when they put
me back, I can hear the people next door discussing me." He paused and
looked at me pleadingly. "I know you think I am crazy, but you have to
believe me. Something REAL is happening to me. It is not just in my mind
and I am not making it up. I sleep with a gun under my pillow because
someday they are going to make a mistake and I am not going to be
completely out when they come!"
And the
story goes on. Luke's anguish, paranoia and utter terror were real and
tangible. This kid really believed what he was saying. For a few moments
I toyed with the thought that he really ought to be hospitalized
immediately as a danger to himself and others, but, the thing is, I had
heard this sort of thing before to one extent or another. [Note: Because
of the nature of his problems and the possibility that he was, in fact,
manifesting schizophrenia, I DID refer him to a local psychological unit
for evaluation. Whether he went or not, I'll probably never know, but I
knew that a case as severe as his was simply out of my range of
expertise and ethical responsibility.]
Last year I
met a young woman at a local gathering for people interested in Eastern
Healing Techniques. She was a well-to-do stockbroker's wife, stylish and
vivacious. But, she took me aside and told me that her life was crashing
around her because she had gone out for a drink with one of her
husband's co-workers and he had taken her out to a remote area and she
couldn't remember what happened to her there. She was sure, from bits
and pieces she could pull together in her head, that this guy was a
government agent, he had been a Navy S.E.A.L., her phone was tapped,
they were watching her, and she was the subject of some kind of
government experiment. She was distraught to the point of being unable
to function. Her marriage was falling apart, her children were virtually
abandoned by her efforts to find out what was going on in her life, and
she was on the brittle edge of a breakdown.
In recent
months I have talked to a dozen or more people who whisper to me about
"white vans, death camps," the "Protocols of the Elders of Zion" and the
institution of martial law. They seem to be roughly divided into two
groups: those who are involved in metaphysics and UFO phenomena and
those who are not. The former group tend to talk about conspiracy in
terms of "UFO cover-up" and captured "alien technology" which is going
to be used by the Industrial-Military Complex to control us and then
institute a One World Government. The latter group, resurrecting the
frightening specter of pre-Nazi thought and philosophy, interprets the
conspiracy as an event or series of historical events, leading up to
this moment in time wherein the groundwork is being laid for the dreaded
"New World Order." They blame it on the Jews, the Blacks, the Masons,
the Templars, and assorted other "secret societies" which have
infiltrated and control the government.
And now we
have the Oklahoma Bombing. What are we to make of all of this?
Well, FDR
was reported as having once said that "nothing in politics happens by
accident." If any event leads to a specific result, we have the right to
conjecture that that result was the desired objective and to ask: cui
bono? Who benefits?
So, what
did I find out from my various subjects who were being "persecuted by
the government?" In all cases, after one or more hypnosis sessions, the
scenario that played itself out was quite similar. All claimed to have
been repeatedly abducted by "aliens" since childhood and their abductors
were the ubiquitous Grays. All claimed to have been implanted with
control and measuring devices which both transmitted and received. All
claimed to have been given screen memories that the abductions were done
by humans in uniform. In several cases, I was able to demonstrate that
the so-called "Grey Aliens" were, in fact, a screen memory of HUMAN
abductions!
And, what
about Timothy McVeigh? Well, Dr. Jacques Vallee once proposed the idea
that one way to stop a train is to accelerate it to the point that it
jumps the track. I think this is what we are dealing with here.
Was Timothy
McVeigh abducted and implanted? Was he controlled and manipulated to do
what he did? We have only to look at the POLITICAL results to see what
the objective was. What is the rhetoric in the media? What institutional
actions are being taken? What public feeling is being engendered by this
event? Remember, nothing in politics happens by accident, from Pearl
Harbor, the assassination of JFK, to the Oklahoma Bombing. We are all
victims."
The late Jim Keith, one of the foremost writers and researchers on
political conspiracy in the wold in recent times wrote in his book,
Mass Control:
"Agents of
the world's elite have been long engaged in a war on the populace of
Earth. Greed is the motivation for this war, a greed so pervasive that
it encompasses the planet and all of the beings on it, but in recent
times a philosophy has been used to justify that greed. It is the
philosophy of mass control, that ultimately aims at dictating every
aspect of human life - even remolding man's perception of reality and
himself." [Jim Keith, Mass Control: Engineering Human
Consciousness]
There is a
little known fact about hypnosis that is illustrated by the following
story:
A subject
was told under hypnosis that when he was awakened he would be unable to
see a third man in the room who, it was suggested to him, would have
become invisible. All the "proper" suggestions to make this "true" were
given, such as "you will NOT see so- and-so" etc... When the subject was
awakened, lo and behold! the suggestions did NOT work.
Why? Because
they went against his belief system. He did NOT believe that a person
could become invisible.
So, another
trial was made. The subject was hypnotized again and was told that the
third man was leaving the room... that he had been called away on
urgent business, and the scene of him getting on his coat and hat was
described... the door was opened and shut to provide "sound effects," and
then the subject was brought out of the trance.
Guess what
happened?
He was
UNABLE TO SEE the Third Man.
Why? Because
his perceptions were modified according to his beliefs. Certain "censors"
in his brain were activated in a manner that was acceptable to his ego
survival instincts.
The ways and
means that we ensure survival of the ego are established pretty early in
life by our parental and societal programming. This conditioning
determines what IS or is NOT possible; what we are "allowed" to believe in
order to be accepted. We learn this first by learning what pleases our
parents and then later we modify our belief based on what pleases our
society - our peers - to believe.
Anyway, to
return to our story, the Third Man went about the room picking things up
and setting them down and doing all sorts of things to test the subject's
awareness of his presence, and the subject became utterly hysterical at
this "anomalous" activity! He could see objects moving through the air,
doors opening and closing, but he could NOT see the SOURCE because he did
not believe that there was another man in the room.
So, what are
the implications of this factor of human consciousness? (By the way, this
is also the reason why most therapy to stop bad habits does not work -
they attempt to operate against a "belief system" that is imprinted in the
subconscious that this or that habit is essential to survival.)
One of the
first things we might observe is that everyone has a different set of
beliefs based upon their social and familial conditioning, and that these
beliefs determine how much of the OBJECTIVE reality anyone is able to
access.
In the above
story, the objective reality IS WHAT IT IS, whether it is truly
objective, or only a consensus reality. In this story, there is clearly a
big part of that reality that is inaccessable to the subject due to a
perception censor which was activated by the suggestions of the
hypnotist. That is to say, the subject has a strong belief, based upon
his CHOICE as to who or what to believe - the hypnotist or his own,
unfettered observations of reality. In this case, he has chosen to believe
the hypnotist and not what he might be able to observe if he dispensed
with the perception censor put in place by the hypnotist who activated his
"belief center" - even if that activation was fraudulent.
And so it is
with nearly all human beings: we believe the hypnotist - the "official
culture" - and we are able, with preternatural cunning, to deny what is
often right in front of our faces. And in the case of the hypnosis
subject, he is entirely at the mercy of the "Invisible Man" because he
chooses not to see him.
Let's face
it: we are all taught to avoid uncomfortable realities. Human beings -
faced with unpleasant truths about themselves or their reality - react
like alcoholics who refuse to admit their condition, or the cuckolded
husband who is the "last to know," or the wife who does not notice that
her husband is abusing her daughter.
In States of Denial: Knowing about Atrocities and
Suffering, (Cambridge: Polity Press; Malden, MA: Blackwell
Publishers, 2001), Stanley Cohen discusses the subject of denial which may
shed some light on the subject.
Denial is a complex "unconscious defence
mechanism for coping with guilt, anxiety and other disturbing emotions
aroused by reality."
Denial can
be both deliberate and intentional, as well as completely subconscious. An
individual who is deliberately and intentionally denying something is
acting from an individual level of lying, concealment and deception. Among
the larger population of decent human beings, this is not our problem. It
is certainly the problem with those at the top, who then exert a
controlling influence on the masses of humanity, but when we talk about
ordinary people, what we are dealing with is denial that is subconscious
and therefore organized and "institutional." This implies propaganda,
misinformation, whitewash, manipulation, spin, disinformation, etc.
Believing
anything that comes down the pike is not the opposite of denial.
"Acknowledgement" of the probability of a high level of Truth about a
given matter is what should happen when people are actively aroused by
certain information. This information can be 1) factual or forensic
truth; that is to say, legal or scientific information which is factual,
accurate and objective; it is obtained by impartial procedures; 2)
personal and narrative truth including "witness testimonies." The
timeline to which these remarks serve as an introduction, attempts to
provide as many of these elements as possible.
I should add
here that skepticism and solipsistic arguments - including epistemological
relativism - about the existence of objective truth, are generally a
social construction and might be considered in the terms of the hypnotized
man who has been programmed to think that there "is no truth" so why
bother even looking for it?
Denial
occurs for a variety of reasons. There are truths that are "clearly
known," but for many reasons - personal or political, justifiable or
unjustifiable - are concealed, or it is agreed that they will not be
acknowledged "out loud." There are "unpleasant truths" and there are
truths that make us tired because if we acknowledge them - if we do more
than give them a tacit nod - we may find it necessary to make changes in
our lives.
Cohen points
out that "All counter-claims about the denied reality are themselves only
manoeuvres in endless truth-games. And truth, as we know, is
inseparable from power." Denial of truth is, effectively, giving
away your power.
Now, let's
take a brief look at science which is one of the mainstays of Official
Culture.
As Ark has written, science seems to be controlled by
money. Scientists, for the most part, HAVE to work on those things that
get funding. There is nothing terribly unusual about that since that is a
general rule for everyone. If you don't get money for your work, you
starve and then you don't do any work at all. Yes, that's somewhat
simplistic, but still relevant to the subject here.
Those who
read our Timeline of secret and not-so-secret scientific projects - and
those involved in them - may like to close their eyes to this evidence
that science has most definitely been used in a very detrimental way in
our world. After all, such ideas - when they are brought to public
attention - are generally dismissed as "conspiracy theory" and are thus
deemed unworthy of attention.
So please,
bear with me a moment here and let's apply a little logic to the problem.
The first
thing we want to think about is the fact that the word "conspiracy" evokes
such a strong reaction in all of us: nobody wants to be branded as a
"conspiracy theorist." It just isn't "acceptable." It's "un-scientific" or
it's evidence of mental instability. Right? That's what you are thinking,
isn't it?
In fact, I
bet that the very reading of the word even produces certain physiological
reactions: a slight acceleration of the heartbeat, and perhaps a quick
glance around to make sure that no one was watching while you simply read
the word silently.
Have you
ever asked yourself WHY the word evokes such an instantaneous emotional
reaction? Have you ever wondered why it stimulates such a strong "recoil?"
After all, it is only a word. It only describes the idea of people in
"high places" thinking about things and doing things that manipulate other
people to produce benefits for themselves.
Richard M.
Dolan studied at Alfred University and Oxford University before
completing his graduate work in history at the University of Rochester,
where he was a finalist for a Rhodes scholarship. Dolan studied U.S. Cold
War strategy, Soviet history and culture, and international diplomacy. He
has written about "conspiracy" in the following way:
"The very label [conspiracy] serves as an automatic dismissal,
as though no one ever acts in secret. Let us bring some perspective and
common sense to this issue.
The United States comprises large organizations - corporations,
bureaucracies, "interest groups," and the like - which are
conspiratorial by nature. That is, they are hierarchical, their
important decisions are made in secret by a few key decision-makers, and
they are not above lying about their activities. Such is the nature of
organizational behavior. "Conspiracy," in this key sense, is a way of
life around the globe.
Within the world's military and intelligence apparatuses, this
tendency is magnified to the greatest extreme. During the 1940s, [...]
the military and its scientists developed the world's most awesome
weapons in complete secrecy... [...]
Anyone who has lived in a repressive society knows that official
manipulation of the truth occurs daily. But societies have their many
and their few. In all times and all places, it is the few who rule, and
the few who exert dominant influence over what we may call official
culture. - All elites take care to manipulate public information to
maintain existing structures of power. It's an old game.
America is nominally a republic and free society, but in reality
an empire and oligarchy, vaguely aware of its own oppression, within and
without. I have used the term "national security state" to describe its
structures of power. It is a convenient way to express the military and
intelligence communities, as well as the worlds that feed upon them,
such as defense contractors and other underground, nebulous entities.
Its fundamental traits are secrecy, wealth, independence, power, and
duplicity.
Nearly everything of significance undertaken by America's
military and intelligence community in the past half-century has occured
in secrecy. The undertaking to build an atomic weapon, better known as
the Manhattan Project, remains the great model for all subsequent
activities. For more than two years, not a single member of Congress
even knew about it although its final cost exceeded two billion dollars.
During and after the Second World War, other important projects,
such as the development of biological weapons, the importation of Nazi
scientists, terminal mind-control experiments, nationwide interception
of mail and cable transmissions of an unwitting populace, infiltration
of the media and universities, secret coups, secret wars, and
assassinations all took place far removed not only from the American
public, but from most members of Congress and a few presidents. Indeed,
several of the most powerful intelligence agencies were themselves
established in secrecy, unknown by the public or Congress for many
years.
Since the 1940s, the U.S. Defense and Intelligence establishment
has had more money at its disposal than most nations. In addition to
official dollars, much of the money is undocumented. From its beginning,
the C.I.A. was engaged in a variety of off-the-record "business"
activities that generated large sums of cash. The connections of the
C.I.A. with global organized crime (and thus de facto with the
international narcotics trade) has been well established and documented
for many years. - Much of the original money to run the American
intelligence community came from very wealthy and established American
families, who have long maintained an interest in funding national
security operations important to their interests.
In theory, civilian oversight exists over the US national
security establishment. The president is the military
commander-in-chief. Congress has official oversight over the C.I.A.. The
F.B.I. must answer to the Justice Department. In practice, little of
this applies. One reason has to do with secrecy. [...]
A chilling example of such independence occurred during the
1950s, when President Eisenhower effectively lost control of the U.S.
nuclear arsenal. The situation deteriorated so much that during his
final two years in office, Eisenhower asked repeatedly for an audience
with the head of Strategic Air Command to learn what America's nuclear
retaliatory plan was. What he finally learned in 1960, his final year in
office, horrified him: half of the Northern Hemisphere would be
obliterated.
If a revered military hero such as Eisenhower could not control
America's nuclear arsenal, nor get a straight answer from the Pentagon,
how on earth could Presidents Truman, Kennedy, Johnson, or Nixon
regarding comparable matters?
Secrecy, wealth and independence add up to power. Through the
years, the national security state has gained access to the wrorld's
most sophisticated technology sealed off millions of acres of land from
public access or scrutiny, acquired unlimited snooping ability within
U.S. borders and beyond, conducted overt or clandestine actions against
other nations, and prosecuted wars without serious media scrutiny.
Domestically, it maintains influence over elected officials and
communities hoping for some of the billions of defense dollars.
[including scientists, universities, etc.]
Deception is the key element of warfare, and when winning is all
that matters, the conventional morality held by ordinary people becomes
an impediment. When taken together, the examples of official duplicity
form a nearly single totality. They include such choice morsels as the
phony war crisis of 1948, the fabricated missile gap claimed by the air
force during the 1950s, the carefully managed events leading to the Gulf
of Tonkin resolution... [...]
The secrecy stems from a pervasive and fundamental element of
life in our world, that those who are at the top of the heap will always
take whatever steps are necessary to maintain the status quo.
[S]keptics often ask, "Do you really think the government could
hide [anything] for so long?" The question itself reflects ignorance of
the reality that secrecy is a way of life in the National Security
State. Actually though, the answer is yes, and no.
Yes, in that cover-ups are standard operating procedure,
frequently unknown to the public for decades, becoming public knowledge
by a mere roll of the dice. But also no, in that ... information has
leaked out from the very beginning. It is impossible to shut the lid
completely. The key lies in neutralizing and discrediting unwelcomed
information, sometimes through official denial, other times through
proxies in the media.
[E]vidence [of conspiracy] derived from a grass roots level is
unlikely to survive its inevitable conflict with official culture. And
acknowledgement about the reality of [conspiracies] will only occur when
the official culture deems it worthwhile or necessary to make it. Don't
hold your breath.
This is a widespread phenomenon affecting many people,
generating high levels of interest, taking place in near-complete
secrecy, for purposes unknown, by agencies unknown, with access to
incredible resources and technology. A sobering thought and cause for
reflection." [Richard Dolan]
Consider
this: even if Dolan is writing specifically about America, in a world
dominated by the United States, it must be considered that pressures are
applied elsewhere from within this "national security state" to comply
with the demands of the U.S..
Now, think
about the word "conspiracy" one more time and allow me to emphasize the
key point: From a historical point of view, the ONLY reality is that of
conspiracy. Secrecy, wealth and independence add up to power.
...Deception is the key element of warfare, (the tool of power elites),
and when winning is all that matters, the conventional morality held by
ordinary people becomes an impediment. Secrecy stems from a pervasive and
fundamental element of life in our world, that those
who are at the top of the heap will always take whatever steps are
necessary to maintain the status quo.
And
maintaining the "status quo" in science HAS to be one of the main
objectives of the Power Elite.
And how do
they do that? By "Official Culture."
And official
culture, understood this way, from the perspective of elite groups wishing
to maintain the status quo of their power, means only one thing:
COINTELPRO. And here we do not mean the specific F.B.I. program, but the
concept of the program, and the likelihood that this has been the mode of
controlling human beings for possibly millennia. Certainly, Machiavelli
outlined the principles a very long time ago and little has changed since.
The fact is,
I like to call it "Cosmic COINTELPRO" to suggest that it is almost a
mechanical system that operates based on the psychological nature of
human beings, most of whom LIKE to live in denial. After all, "if
ignorance is bliss, 'tis folly to be wise." This is most especially true
when we consider the survival instinct of the ego. If the official culture
says that there is no Third Man in the room, and if it works through the
inculcated belief systems, there is little possibility that the "subject"
will be able to see the source of the phenomena in our world. It will
always be an "invisible Third Man."
Usually,
when we think of COINTELPRO, we think of the most well known and typical
activities which include sending anonymous or fictitious letters - which
are sometimes later withdrawn with an "apology" after they have already
accomplished the goal of destruction; publishing false defamatory or
threatening information; forging signatures on fake documents; introducing
disruptive and subversive members into organizations to destroy them from
within, and so on. Blackmailing insiders in any group to force them to
spread false rumors, or to foment factionalism is also common.
What a lot
of people don't keep in mind is the fact that COINTELPRO also concentrated
on creating bogus organizations and promoting bogus ideas.
In the
scientific community, this can work in any number of ways, the most common
being "proprietary organizations" that fund research that leads nowhere in
order to keep someone with promising ideas busy. It is not stretching
things to consider that "exciting new ideas" or areas of research might be
promoted for the express purpose of vectoring scientists into following
false and time-wasting research so as to prevent them making significant
breakthroughs. COINTELPRO was also famous for instigation of hostile
actions through third parties. According to investigators, these F.B.I.
programs were noteworthy because all documents relating to them were
stamped "do not file." This meant that they were never filed in the
system, and for all intents and purposes, did not exist. This cover was
blown after activists broke into an F.B.I. office in Media, Pennsylvania
in 1971. What we do not know is how far and wide the practice extends,
though we can certainly guess.
There exists in our world today a powerful and
dangerous secret cult.
So wrote
Victor Marchetti, a former high-ranking C.I.A. official, in his book
The CIA and the Cult of
Intelligence. This is the first
book the U.S. Government ever went to court to censor before publication.
In this book, Marchetti tells us that there IS a "Cabal" that rules the
world and that its holy men are the clandestine professionals of the
Central Intelligence Agency.
In our
opinion, the C.I.A. is but one "arm" of the cult, just as Benedictines
were but one order of the Catholic Church. To borrow from, and
paraphrasing, Marchetti:
"This cult
is patronized and protected by the highest level government officials in
the world. It's membership is composed of those in the power centers of
government, industry, commerce, finance, and labor. It manipulates individuals in areas of important public
influence - including the academic world and the mass
media. The Secret Cult is a global fraternity of a
political aristocracy whose purpose is to further the political policies
of persons or agencies unknown. It acts covertly and illegally."
Jim Keith,
wrote in his book, Mass Control:
"Although
the lust for control can be discerned since the beginning of recorded
history, a nexus of particular importance arose in Germany in the latter
half of the 19th century. As the country increased in military and
industrial might, becoming the strongest power in Europe, a revolution
simultaneously took place in German philosophic and scientific thought
that paradoxically would spread through the world to create positive
technological change as well as to birth innumerable toxic children.
According to one source:
The
spread of materialistic philosophy of life was world-wide in this age,
and the idolatry of power was not confinced to Germany, but its
corrosive effect was particularly strong in a country that was not
inured to power. [Germany, History Since 1850, Encyclopedia
Americana, New York: Americana Corporation,
1963]
One aspect
of this transformation, this "idolatry of power," was a negative
transformation of the psychological sciences. In the late 19th
century, earlier more humanistic approaches to understanding mankind
were replaced by a scientific philosophy that would be employed less as
a measure for the understanding of man than as a justification for a
new feudalism and a mechanism of pure control.
The
materialist overhauling of psychology was in great part ushered in by
the work of the German psychologist Wilhelm
Maximilian Wundt. Wundt was a professor of philosophy at the
University of Leipzig, and in 1875 established the worlds first
psychological laboratory there, a move that would eventually turn the
world of more humanistic-oriented psychology on its head. Interesting,
but Wundt's grandfather is documented as having been a member of the
Illuminati secret society, making it not unreasonable to imagine
that herr professor may also have been a member of that
group.
Wundt, in
reflection of a powerful materialistic groundswell in German thought
that began with Schopenhauer at the
beginning of the 19th century and that was to be later epitomized by
Karl Marx, rejected in cavalier
fashion the notion that man might have a soul or deeper significance
than the merely physical, that he was in fact anything more than an
animal. Following this line of reasoning, an approach that came to be
known in psychology as Structuralism, Wundt insisted that all
psychological studies should depend entirely on the study of body
reactions. The truth of man, Wundt insisted, could be determined solely
through mechanistic means: measurement, analysis, and dissection of
bodies. After Wundt had thoroughly infused the psychological sciences
with his materialist approach, many scientists - and the members of the
ruling class that employed them - believed that they were justified in
treating human beings as if they were pieces of meat, and as an overall
plan of action, proceeded to do so.
The
materialist psychological doctrine spread rapidly with at least
twenty-four laboratories established by Wundt's students between the
years 1883 and 1893, with more of the German's acolytes
fanning out to infiltrate related fields, such as education.
Wundt's materialistic approach would infect the thinking of most of the
influential psycholgists, psychiatrists, educators, and social planners
who would follow in the 20th century.
One man who
marched to Wundt's dirge was the Russian, Ivan
Petrovich Pavlov. Pavlov conducted a wide-ranging research
into techniques of control, primarily using dogs for his
experimentation. In the now-famous experiment, Pavlov fed his dogs,
stimulating salivation, while at the same time ringing a bell. After
doing this many times, Pavlov was able to stimulate salivation in
reaction to the sound of the bell alone. Other of Pavlov's experiments
involved rewarding dogs with petting, or punishing them with pain. Using
these kinds of approaches, Pavlov developed his theory of the
conditioned reflex, demonstrating that animals are motivated by
patterns of conditioned response, and that conditioning can be
artificially induced. The results of Pavlov's experiments did not
escape the social planners of his day, nor those who would follow." [Jim
Keith, Mass Control: Engineering Human Consciousness]
In recorded
history, we find that the Elite, in their drive for power, have developed
many means of controlling the minds of the masses. The earliest recorded
such event was the appearance of Yahweh/Jehovah on the World Stage, and
things went downhill (or became easier, depending on your point of view)
from there. In the Eleventh Century, a fellow named Hasan bin Sabah took
the idea to an all new level of direct mind control rather than just
general social contros such as those effected by religion and tribal norms
and taboos.
Hasan was
said to have been a Persian of noble birth who fled Persia after becoming
embroiled in a financial scandal at the Imperial Court. After finding
sanctuary in Egypt, he is reported to have studied the teachings and
organizational structure of an underground cult known as the Dar ul
Hikmat.
During this
same time frame, he is also said to have mastered the Dark Arts of
Kaballah.This event was to have far reaching results. In actual fact, we
here approach a very mysterious thing: a conjunction of Freemasonry and a
Secret Cult of Judaism.
These
fanatical groups, exercised from their inaccessible strongholds an
influence out of all proportion to their size. On August 8, 1164, the
Persian Nizariyya from their seat of Alamut, the 'Eagles Nest',
proclaimed the 'Great Resurrection', the Paradise on Earth which no
longer recognizes any law. This, seems to be the source of a much cited
legend about the 'Assassinis'; the leaders secured the loyalty of their
followers by intoxicating them with hashish so that they experienced the
joys of paradise as described in the Koran. Translated back into the
every-day world they awaited with the greatest impatience the death
which would take them once more to the bliss which they had had a
foretaste. [Sons of the Serpent Tribe]
Formally
known as the Shiah Ismai, this infamous sect claimed to hold secret
truths, and it can be noted, by the careful researcher, there there may
have been Gnostic tendencies among the so-called Assassini, who very well
may have been vilified after the fact, as is so often the case with any
group that seeks to propagate knowledge. The general view of the Assassini
today is that it was a terrorist organization that sought to impose its
will upon the Islamic World by systematically assassinating political
figures that opposed its ends. I am still trying to find the evidence for
these claims, but so far, it is all hearsay and the only thing we know for
sure is that the Assissini were crushed by the Mongols in 1250. It is said
that the Assassini shook the Moslem world to it's foundations, but we
wonder if that might not have been for a different reason, perhaps the
same reason that the Cathars were, at the same time, shaking the
foundations of the Catholic world?
In any event,
according to the legends, Hasan created a virtual paradise in a valley
beneath his mountain citadel to recruit and train initiates. That sounds a
lot like the great underground enclave that Osama bin Laden was said to
have created in Tora Bora which later proved to be only a series of
primitive caves, little more than horizontal fox holes.
Hasan is said
to have dispatched his followers to the public houses of the area, where
they would drug and kidnap young men, and transport them to the valley.
There they would awaken from their stupor to find themselves in luxurious
surroundings, tended to by scores of beautiful young women. Having been
informed by the maidens that they had been transported to Paradise by
angels, the hapless victims would spend their days gorging upon wine, sex
and mind-altering drugs. Then they would mysteriously re-awaken in their
former surroundings, alone and bereft. Months might pass without incident
as they resumed their ordinary and miserable lives; but then suddenly and
mysteriously, they would reawaken in what they credulously believed to be
the Muslim Heaven. After three or four such experiences, most became
willing slaves to Hasan and his murderous schemes. Persuaded that Hasan
was Allah made manifest upon the Earth, they killed their assigned targets
without pity or remorse; and then went willingly to their deaths, certain
of their place in Paradise.
That sounds a
bit like what is happening nowadays in the U.S. among the so-called
"abductee" and "contactee" populations.
Returning to
our timeline, it seems that the methods of terrorism attributed to the
Assassini were actually being practiced by the Catholic Church in it's
crusade against the Cathars.
After years
of brutal massacres, of destruction of the land, of some of the most
horrible events ever to bear witness of man’s inhumanity to man, Pope
Gregory IX decided that it was only results that counted. He intended to
wipe Catharism from the face of the earth. He must have sat up at night
to create the bizarre system that was put into place to deal with
heresy.
First, he
created special papal legates who were granted wide powers of
prosecution similar to what we have today in the Homeland Security
nonsense, and sent them out all over Europe. The men chosen for this
task were clearly psychopaths, and their mission was to spread terror
all over Europe.
Gregory
staffed the episcopal palaces of the South of France with psychopathic
bishops who offered a cash bounty to anyone who betrayed a heretic. The
inducements to betray one's neighbor were surely tempting in the best of
times. But in a time when starvation and destruction was everywhere
after more than 20 years of the rampaging of the Crusading armies, it
was well-nigh impossible to resist. The terms were that the property
confiscated from the heretic was divided between the informer, the
church and the crown. Naturally, in a land that was financially
devastated, where people were displaced and starving after years of
being battered by this same church and crown, there were a lot of
individuals offering up their neighbors for blood money.
Robert le
Bourgre, which means "the bugger", suggesting the contempt in which he
was held by the peopele, terrorized formerly peaceful northern France.
Another legate, Conrad of Marburg found unsuspected heretics everywhere
in the Rhineland. Thousands were sent to the stake, often on the same
day that they were accused. Again, sure sounds like Bush and his private
torture chamber at Guantanamo. Conrad rode about on his mule with two
assistants, bringing terror to every village and town they approached.
Apparently, even the regular clergy saw through this nonsense and
finally decided to do something about it. On July 30, 1233, a Franciscan
friar, driven to act in the name of justice, intercepted Conrad and
murdered him.
The pope
had had enough. He turned to the Dominicans. In the spring of 1233,
papal inquisitors were appointed in Toulouse, Albi, and Carcassonne.
These inquisitors were succeeded in an unbroken line for 600 years.
Hundreds of
people were summoned to testify before inquisitors. The questions were
repetitive, designed to plant doubt in the mind of the person being
interrogated as to what, exactly, the inquisitor knew, and who had told
him. Hmmm... Sounds like "Total Information Awareness," doesn't
it?
A person
suspected of Cathar sympathies was not always informed of the charges
hanging over his head; if apprised of the danger, he had no right to
know who his accusers were; and if he dared to seek legal help, his
lawyer could be charged with abetting heresy.
Sounding
more and more like George and his War on Terrorism ....
Whatever
the verdict of the inquisitor - who was prosecutor, judge and jury - no
appeal was allowed. Anyone could be held indefinitely in prison for
further questioning without cause of explanation.
Yes. Enemy
Combatants, no doubt.
The
inquisition destroyed the bonds of trust that hold societies together.
Informing on one’s neighbor became not only a duty, but a necessary
survival strategy. And so it is becoming in America today.
For 100
years, the inquisition was a fact on the ground of life in the
Languedoc. The arrival of an inquisitor in a town was the occasion for
demeaning displays of moral collapse just as the arrival of George W.
Bush is the occasion for legislators and journalists to take off their
shirts and display the wide yellow streaks down their backs.
In theory,
of course, no one could be punished if no one talked because the
inquisitor could not act without a writ of denunciation, but in
practice, no community possessed the cohesion needed to combat the power
of a secret tribunal.
The same is
true in America today. Everyone has been adequately conditioned by
watching "reality TV" and "Survivor," and they know the rules: Do unto
others before they do unto you. And so it was in the Languedoc, the
historical model for what is happening in the United States today, and
for what happened in Germany under Hitler.
Upon his
arrival in a town, the inquisitor consulted with the local clergy. All
males over the age of 14, and females over the age of 12, were required
to make a profession of faith in the Catholic church. Those who didn’t
were the first to be questioned. Then, the inquisitor would give a
speech in which he invited the people to spend some days thinking very,
very hard about their activities past, present and future, and to come
forward in the following week to give confidential depositions.
After a
seven day grace period, those who had not denounced themselves would be
issued a summons. The punishments ranged from loss of property , to loss
of life. Aside from the capital crime of being a Cathar, punishable
offenses included sheltering a Cathar, or even failing to report any
instance of heresy. The real proof of genuine piety toward the Catholic
Church was defined as the number of people the sinner was willing to
betray!
It only
took ten years for the Inquisition - the work of a few psychopathic
fanatics - to become the proficient bureaucracy that lasted for 600
years. It employed hundreds of individuals who interrogated thousands of
people with such monotonous regularity that a regular "glossary" was
established for the "workers".
Armed with
a list of proposed offenses to be considered "heretical" or "supporting
heretics," which included just knowing that a heretic had crossed one's
property and failing to report it, the Inquisition proceeded to
intimidate the population of Europe on a scale that was impossible to
imagine. The sheer numbers of people called to testify, and re-called to
testify again and again, was staggering. In a strange twist of
historical irony, the Cathars - who believed that the material world was
evil and irrelevant - inspired the codification of the Police State.
A
cross-referenced compendium of the confessions extracted from tens of
thousands of people was compiled, creating a map of the mental landscape
of the Languedoc. The more than 5 thousand transcripts of interrogations
that survive represent only a small fraction of the work of the
Inquisition.
Inquisitors
manuals were created to serve as guides for the growing number of Papal
courts in Europe. These manuals reminded the inquisitors that they were
in the business of saving souls, but I think that the distinction was
lost on those whose lives were lost or ruined by the judgments of the
Inquisition.
Languedoc
was, essentially, the laboratory for repression.
The
reputation of the Inquisition was enhanced by the talented Inquisitor of
Toulouse, Bernard Gui, who was the villain in Umberto Eco's "The Name of
the Rose." The Inquisitors persuaded a handful of captured Cathars to
convert and sell their testimony. Sicard of Lunel of Albi gave the
friars an exhaustive list of Cathar sympathizers, even fingering his own
parents! Anyone who had ever helped him in his life as a Cathar, whether
they had just given him a bed for the night, a bit of food, or even a
jar of honey, were hauled in to be punished - just on his word. He and
several others like him were lodged thereafter in a castle outside of
Toulouse in the medieval version of the "witness protection program."
Sicard was well paid for his perfidy and lived to a ripe old age. One
wonders how peaceful it was.
The use of
torture was delicately referred to as "putting the question." In the
Languedoc, successive waves of highly trained inquisitors, aided by
informers and torturers, fired by the totalitarian creed of the Catholic
church, with detailed manuals and expanding registers of "intelligence,"
slowly but surely ground Catharism into oblivion.
Thousands
of dramas of conscience ended in the dungeons or in fires quenched with
blood. By the end of the century, only the truly heroic dared to say
that this world was evil... It was not a legal system; it was a system
designed to create fear. And so is the War on Terror in America today.
[George Bush's Inquisition]
The
Inquisition brought the French Monarchy and the Catholic Church into
positions of absolute power. But, paradoxically, the brutal way in which
the genocide of the Cathars was carried out carried the seeds of the
destruction of both the Church's power, and the power of the Monarchy.
Both were so secretly and thoroughly hated and distrusted by a great many
people, that the Protestant Reformation and the French Revolution grew and
festered in the hearts of the masses. "Apres moi, le deluge..." and a
deluge of blood it was, only it was not controllable. The Elite who wish
to rule the world are good students. They noticed that brutalizing people
or leaving them to starve tends to make the masses a bit
cranky.
With the
above mentioned development of Structuralism, "many scientists - and the
members of the ruling class that employed them - believed that they were
justified in treating human beings as if they were pieces of meat, and as
an overall plan of action, proceeded to do so." These ideas were taken up
by the Nazis in their great experiment in trying to take over the world.
After observing Nazi Germany, it seems that the Soviet Union, Great
Britain, and the United States mounted their own
large-scale research programs designed to develop techniques for
psychological control of the masses. It has been suggested that the U.S.
was a latecomer to this activity, but our Timeline suggests that this is, in fact, not true.
Convinced
that German scientists could help America's postwar efforts, President
Harry Truman agreed in September 1946 to authorize "Project Paperclip," a
program to bring selected German scientists to work on America's behalf
during the "Cold War". However, Truman expressly excluded anyone found "to
have been a member of the Nazi party and more than a nominal participant
in its activities, or an active supporter of Nazism or militarism."
The War
Department's Joint Intelligence Objectives Agency (J.I.O.A.) conducted
background investigations of the scientists. In February 1947, J.I.O.A.
Director Bosquet Wev submitted the first set of scientists' dossiers to
the State and Justice Departments for review. The Dossiers were damning.
Samuel Klaus, the State Departments representative on the J.I.O.A. board,
claimed that all the scientists in this first batch were "ardent Nazis."
Their visa requests were denied.
A memo was
written saying that "the best interests of the United States have been
subjugated to the efforts expended in 'beating a dead Nazi horse.'" Nazi
Intelligence leader Reinhard Gehlen met with the C.I.A. director Allen
Dulles. Gehlen was a master spy for the Nazis and had infiltrated Russia
with his vast Nazi Intelligence network. Dulles promised Gehlen that his
Intelligence unit was safe in the C.I.A.. Dulles had the scientists
dossier's re-written to eliminate incriminating evidence. And so, Allen
Dulles delivered the Nazi Intelligence unit to the C.I.A., which later
opened many umbrella projects stemming from Nazi research. (MK-ULTRA /
ARTICHOKE, OPERATION MIDNIGHT CLIMAX).
By 1955, more
than 760 German scientists had been granted citizenship in the U.S. and
given prominent positions in the American scientific community. Many had
been longtime members of the Nazi party and the Gestapo, had conducted
experiments on humans at concentration camps, had used slave labor, and
had committed other war crimes. In a 1985 expose in the Bulletin of the
Atomic Scientists Linda Hunt wrote that she had examined more than 130
reports on Project Paperclip subjects--and every one "had been
changed to eliminate the security threat classification."
President
Truman, who had explicitly ordered no committed Nazis to be admitted under
Project Paperclip, was evidently never aware that his directive had been
violated.
So it was
that the Office of Strategic Services - forerunner to the Central
Intelligence Agency - enlisted the Nazi Scientists for "specialized
problem solving." Foremost among these was solving the problem of agent
recruitment. That is to say, getting agents that were not only not on the
payroll, but who were literally impervious to being "broken." A second
problem they wanted to solve immediately was gathering intelligence from
the agents of other governments who, they already suspected, had been made
"impervious" to detection, as well as making sure their own recruits had
not been compromised. That is to say, they wanted a "truth serum." Senior
O.S.S. officers turned to the behavioralists for a scientific solutions.
The story we
are told about this goes as follows:
"Despite
frantic efforts, the O.S.S. failed to find an effective interrogative
drug. Yet the lure was so enormous that even after the war the newly
created C.I.A. continued the effort undeterred. But it was not until the
1949 trial of Cardinal Josef Mindszentry by the Soviet-installed
Hungarian communist regime that the C.I.A. realized that drugs held
other promises as well. In the course of Mindszentry's trial, his
deportment, demeanor and speech led C.I.A. analysts to the conclusion
that he had been successfully subjected to an extraordinary form of
psychological manipulation. Although the technique was unknown to C.I.A.
psychologists, it was clearly of such efficacy and power as to cause him
to confess to crimes he did not commit and could not have committed; and
they were quite certain that drugs were somehow involved. The Soviets
had clearly mastered a new form of totalitarian control; and discovering
its secrets became an urgent intelligence priority. On April 20, 1950,
C.I.A. Director Roscoe Hillenkoetter approved the United States'
government's first research and development program expressly designed
to develop techniques for the control of the human mind. It was known
through successive incarnations as Projects BLUEBIRD, ARTICHOKE, MKULTRA
and MKSEARCH; and eventually came to encompass 149 distinct behavioral
science research programs and 33 related non-behavioral projects over
the course of twenty-three years.
The
open-ended research program that Hillenkoetter approved was given sudden
impetus by two dramatic developments. The first was the outbreak of war
in Korea sixty-six days later; the second was the public breakdown of
the U. S. ambassador to the Soviet Union some two years thereafter.
During the Korean conflict American forces often performed poorly in the
field against enemy armies that had no prior experience in mechanized
warfare; and in one particularly shameful incident, an entire U.S. army
division fled the field.
Moreover,
the conduct of American servicemen in captivity was shocking. Fifteen
per cent of American prisoners of war held by the Chinese Communists
actively collaborated with their captors, and a full seventy per cent
signed fraudulent confessions to war crimes or written denunciations of
the United States government. More alarming still, large numbers of
those that signed confessions or denunciations refused to recant after
their repatriation. Many were suspected of having returned to the United
States as willing spies for the enemy; and some were later proven to be.
Of similar concern was the bizarre behavior of Ambassador George F.
Kennan at Templehof airport while en route to London from Moscow. There
Kennan exploded in anger at a naïve question posed by an inexperienced
reporter; and as a result of his ill-advised response was declared
persona non grata by the Soviet regime. Such were the times that many
senior American officials were convinced that this incident provided
strong evidence that Kennan had fallen victim to Soviet mind
control.
The general
outline of the C.I.A.'s behavioral science research program - commonly,
but incorrectly referred to as MKULTRA - was inadvertently revealed by
the Rockefeller Commission in 1975. Established by President Ford to
investigate allegations of C.I.A. illegality, the Commission's Final
Report contained a one-line reference to a federal employee who had
killed himself after having been unwittingly drugged by a C.I.A. officer
as part of an MKULTRA experiment. This sparked a press furor that
eventually resulted in more extensive congressional investigations
chaired by Sen. Edward F. Kennedy. Not surprisingly, both the press and
the Sen. Kennedy focused their investigations upon the more lurid
aspects of MKULTRA, which included the kidnapping, drugging and
torturing of American citizens on American soil for research purposes
and the effort to develop "programmed assassins." Overlooked in the
process were the C.I.A.'s efforts to determine the effects of
electromagnetism upon the psyche, electromechanical stimulation of the
brain, a form of technologically-based E.S.P., remote viewing,
precognition, psychokinesis and, especially, nonaural voice
communications with radio and microwave transmissions. This was
unfortunate, for their researchers made gains in most of these areas and
scored dramatic breakthroughs in others.
According
to declassified financial records and the testimony of retired C.I.A.
officers, the C.I.A. had by 1961 developed implant devices for dogs,
making it possible for their handlers to guide them through various
courses by remote control. During this same time frame they also
developed techniques for disrupting bodily functions with radio waves.
By the mid-1960's they had successfully developed and field-tested
nonaural voice communications with both radio and micro waves; and by
1977 they had developed and field-tested a rudimentary form of
electromechanical "mind reading." But despite overwhelming evidence to
the contrary, they have steadfastly maintained that they failed entirely
in their quest to control the human mind.
There are
perhaps three reasons for the C.I.A.'s implausible denials. The first is
legal responsibility. For as the Kennedy hearings established, C.I.A.
officers wildly exceeded their authority in the course of MKULTRA.
Innocent citizens were kidnapped off the streets and drugged, hypnotized
and subjected to physical torture. These actions were and remain
felonous; and had the criminal justice system taken its proper course,
scores of C.I.A. officers would have faced capital charges. The second
reason is the explosive nature of the data they developed in the course
of their experiments. For contrary to common belief, the human psyche
lacks systemic integrity. Rather than the tightly integrated system that
has been historically assumed, it is in fact a loosely related collage
of drives, inhibitions, orientations, functions, desires and beliefs -
all of which are subject to external manipulation. The third and final
reason is the extraordinary ease of reengineering the human mind. With
the ARTICHOKE technique, a psyche may be broken apart, restructured and
reassembled almost to specification in approximately four hours - all
without the victim's consent, or even his conscious awareness.
As
declassified C.I.A. documents make clear, a principal objective of
MKULTRA was to develop techniques that would allow the Agency to exert
control over an individual to such an extent that he would do their
bidding "against his will and even against such fundamental laws of
nature such as self-preservation." Technically, they failed; but only
because a parallel project run by the Department of Defense achieved
success first. The C.I.A. research and development program was
reportedly shut down in 1973, and the ARTICHOKE techniques perfected by
the military were adopted wholesale." [MKULTRA and the weaponization
of the human psyche by Charles S. Viar]
Now, the
question is: have the C.I.A. or the U.S. military - and their chief ally,
Israel, operationalized ARTICHOKE?
On 6 April
1994, a 19-year-old Palestinian driving a stolen vehicle packed with
explosives pulled up to a crowded bus stop in the northern Israeli town of
Afula. Before the vehicle could come to a complete stop, it exploded with
enormous force, killing the driver and eight Israelis and wounding 50
more. Although few Western analysts have made the connection, the Afula
attack was a turning point in the Middle East conflict. For it was the
first time that so-called Islamic terrorists - clearly victims of
operation ARTICHOKE - were used to mount suicide attacks as False Flag
operations. Since then, it is clear that project ARTICHOKE - or its
successor - has been behind almost a hundred additional suicide attacks
against Israel, and the United States, and now, Great Britain.
The results
have been devastating to Arabs, Islamics, the Palestinians, and VERY good
for the business of Israel and the United States. In Israel, suicide
bombers have killed approximately 1000 Israelis and wounded almost five
times as many. However, for each Israeli killed by suicide bombers, Israel
has been able to kill three Palestinians and to further effect its plan of
genocide of the Palestiinian people.
Furthermore,
the results of the so-called suicide bomber attacks have served only to
make Arabs and Muslims targets of xenophobia around the globe.
In recent
times, Israel has pointed to the economic damages it has suffered as
"proof" that Israel is NOT running "false flag," or "ARTICHOKE"
operations. They cite the facts that, in Israel, economic growth has
ground to a standstill and that Israel is now suffering a net population
loss from emigration, as young Israelis leave for Europe and America in
search of employment and, perhaps, security. You can bet that there will
be a new wave of "anti-Semitism" launched in order to drive the Jews back
to Israel.
The 9-11
attacks against New York and Washington are prime examples of ARTICHOKE
technologies. We are constantly reminded that "19 Arab terrorists dunnit,"
and the mainstream press has failed to adequately address the issue that
many of the “hijackers” named by the F.B.I. are alive and well. Saudi
Arabia's Foreign Minister Prince Saud Al-Faisal told the Arabic Press
after meeting with President George W. Bush on Sept. 20: "It was proved
that five of the names included in the F.B.I. list had nothing to do with
what happened."
But
certainly, SOMEBODY did.
"As of this
writing, there has been no public discussion of ARTICHOKE-assisted
suicide bombings. Indeed, all official discussions of suicide attacks
have carefully omitted any reference to ARTICHOKE as an element of the
suicide attack strategy. They have instead focused upon the supposed
religious fanaticism of the bombers. [...]
[R]eligious
fanaticism fails to explain the remarkably low failure rate of suicide
bombings. To date, not a single recruit is known to have defected to
either Israel or the United States; and only one is known to have
refused to carry out his assigned mission. On the basis of current
public source reports, the failure rate of suicide bombers appears to be
about 1 in 80; and such an extraordinary figure is only attributable to
scientific technique." [...] [MKULTRA and the weaponization of the
human psyche by Charles S. Viar]
The modern
intell view of the problem of suicide bombers goes as follows:
"For more
than a century and a half, Hasan bin Sabah and his followers terrorized
the Muslim world by systematically murdering anyone who stood in their
way. In this, their principal weapon was the programmed assassin,
psychologically weaponized with a technique strikingly similar to
ARTICHOKE. In terms of strategy, tactics and technique, the Assassini
were the historical predecessors of today's suicide bombers; and for
that reason they are instructive. The Medieval Islamic elite failed to
devise an effective strategy against suicide assassins, and for that
they paid a fearsome price.
It was not
until the Mongol Conquest that the Assassini were finally suppressed,
and then only by sheer brutality. Lacking modern sensibilities, the
Mongols laid waste their strongholds and surrounding areas; and all
known, suspected, and potential supporters of the Assassini were
summarily put to the sword. The number of people killed by the Mongol's
in their campaign against the Assassini has been lost to history, but it
was surely in the hundreds of thousands and it may have numbered in the
millions.
Contemporary suicide bombers pose an almost identical challenge
to the political structures of the contemporary world." [...]
[MKULTRA and the weaponization of the human psyche by Charles S.
Viar]
Re-read the
last two paragraphs above: We see in this the justification for nuclear
war being brought forward, a war that can "lay waste" the lands of the
Muslims, as well as "all known, suspected, and potential supporters..."
Remember:
those who are at the top of the heap will always take
whatever steps are necessary to maintain the status quo. It is obvious
that they cannot completely control the propagation of the information.
So, how do they "keep secrets?" They don't. Everything is right out there
in the public domain. Anybody who wants to can do the research we have
done and come to the realizations we have in this process. BUT, not
everyone is able to withstand the OTHER weapon of Mass Control: the fear
of being labeled a "suspected or potential supporter" in a world where the
Grand Inquisitor has total control over life and death.
Here is
where we come back to the context. If we take it as an operating
hypothesis that there does exist a powerful elite whose interests are
served by science, who are they?
"The main
threat to Democracy comes not from the extreme left but from the extreme
right, which is able to buy huge sections of the press and radio, and
wages a constant campaign to smear and discredit every progressive and
humanitarian measure." - George Seldes
"There
exists a shadowy Government with its own Air Force, its own Navy, its
own fundraising mechanism, and the ability to pursue its own ideas of
national interest, free from all checks and balances, and free from the
law itself." Daniel K. Inouye U.S. Senator
But who is
behind it all? Ah! that is the question! I don't think we can just lay it
at the doorstep of the "Government." We have to remember that the
government is composed of people just like us. And that is where it gets
scary. If my two clients, (among many), could be abducted and manipulated
to believe what they believed, might it not be possible that this is
happening in the Hallowed Halls of Statesmanship? Just imagine George Bush
and Dick Cheney in the hands Project ARTICHOKE! Scary, huh?
And so we find, with this brief review, that those individuals who
simply can't grasp what the governments of the planet are doing - that
they are servicing the agenda of those who want absolute power - simply
don't understand the nature of belief, of hypnosis, of mind control, of
propaganda, of being fooled, and how easy it is for a small core group to
do all of the above.
One certainly wonders, of course, if all the information about
Gitmo and Abu Ghraib was allowed to come out just to terrify anybody who
might think about speaking out. I can assure you that the fear of being
detained and tortured sure puts a damper on speaking up for the average
person!
People are becoming more and more frightened by the twists and
turns things are taking. THEY control the media, the money, the
resources... Whenever we make a good manoeuver in the direction of truth,
they bring all that formidable array of disinfo to bear on us: witness the
Washington Post, Popular Mechanics and Scientific American responses to
the hundreds of millions of people sharing the Pentagon Strike video.
Witness the sudden popularization of the Peak Oil business, even including
promotion in major media. And then, as Downing Street and Rove-gate began
to make some waves, the recent so- called "suicide bombing" attacks.
Watching what everyone is doing does not give me much hope because we see
again and again that the control of the media is the biggest barrier and
we know who controls THAT. Already, we can see that the direction things
are moving is going to lead to total suppression of even our few voices -
perhaps even elimination of US!
The day may come, and rather soon it seems, when our voice will be
silenced, other voices will be silenced, and then who will speak for the
TRUTH?
The greatest fear of the "Powers That Be" is a global cry for
justice.
The owners and
publishers of these pages wish to state that the material presented here
is the product of our research and experimentation in Superluminal
Communication. We invite the reader to share in our seeking of Truth by
reading with an Open, but skeptical mind. We do not encourage "devotee-ism" nor "True
Belief." We DO encourage the seeking of Knowledge and Awareness in all
fields of endeavor as the best way to be able to discern lies from truth.
The one thing we can tell the reader is this: we work very hard, many
hours a day, and have done so for many years, to discover the "bottom
line" of our existence on Earth. It is our vocation, our quest, our job.
We constantly seek to validate and/or refine what we understand to be
either possible or probable or both. We do this in the sincere hope that
all of mankind will benefit, if not now, then at some point in one of our
probable futures.
Contact Webmaster at
cassiopaea.com
Copyright © 1997-2004 Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk. All
rights reserved. "Cassiopaea, Cassiopaean, Cassiopaeans," is a registered
trademark of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk.
Letters
addressed to Cassiopaea, Quantum Future School, Ark or Laura, become the
property of Arkadiusz Jadczyk and Laura Knight-Jadczyk
Republication and re-dissemination of the contents of
this screen or any portion of this website in any manner is expressly
prohibited without prior written consent.
You are visitor number 768 since July 23, 2005.
| 