THE SOURCE OF THE PROBLEM IN THE MID EAST: Part II
WHY
JUDEO-CHRISTIANS SUPPORT WAR
C. E. Carlson
The French author, Alexis de Tocqueville, wrote Democracy in America when
he traveled here in the first third of the 19th Century. In ringing tones
he sang the praises of America's invulnerable strength and spirit. He
attributed its greatness to its citizens' sense of morality... even with the
abundant church attendances he observed in America. De Tocqueville wrote
in French and is credited with this familiar quote: AMERICA IS GREAT
BECAUSE SHE IS GOOD, AND IF AMERICA EVER CEASES TO BE GOOD, SHE WILL CEASE TO BE
GREAT.
De Tocqueville could see the power of America, but he could not have known
in 1830 that she was soon to be under an attack aimed at its churches and the
very sense of morality that he extolled.
First, there was a War Between the States, which scarred the powerful young
nation in its strapping youth. A worse attack on America was to commence
near the turn of the 20th century. This was the onset of an attack on
American Christianity that continues unabated against the traditional,
Christ-following church. This attack, which author Gordon Ginn calls "The
final Apostasy," began with a small very wealthy and determined European
political movement. It had a dream, and the American churches stood in its
way.
The World Zionist movement, as its Jewish founders called themselves, had
plans to acquire a homeland for all Jews worldwide, even though most were far
from homeless, and many did not want another home. Not any land would
do. World Zionists wanted a specific property that American Christians
called "the Holy Land." But if these Zionists read "Democracy in America"
or any of the journals of any of America's churches, which no doubt they did,
they could not help but know that Jerusalem was not theirs to have. As
self-proclaimed Jews, they were, according to the Christian New Testament, the
persecutors of Christ and most of his early followers, and the engineers of his
crucifixion. America's traditional churches in the 19th Century would never
stand for a Jewish occupation of Jesus' homeland.
World Zionist leaders initiated a program to change America and its
religious orientation. One of the tools used to accomplish this goal
was an obscure and malleable Civil War veteran named Cyrus I. Schofield. A
much larger tool was a venerable, world respected European book publisher--The
Oxford University Press.
The scheme was to alter the Christian view of Zionism by creating and
promoting a pro-Zionist subculture within Christianity. Scofield's role
was to re-write the King James Version of the Bible by inserting
Zionist-friendly notes in the margins, between verses and chapters, and on the
bottoms of the pages. The Oxford University Press used Scofield, a pastor
by then, as the Editor, probably because it needed such as man for a
front. The revised bible was called the Scofield Reference Bible, and with
limitless advertising and promotion, it became a best-selling "bible" in America
and has remained so for 90 years.
The Scofield Reference Bible was not to be just another translation,
subverting minor passages a little at a time. No, Scofield produced a
revolutionary book that radically changed the context of the King James
Version. It was designed to create a subculture around a new worship icon,
the modern State of Israel, a state that did not yet exist, but which was
already on the drawing boards of the committed, well-funded authors of World
Zionism.
Scofield's support came from a movement that took root around the turn of
the century, supposedly motivated by disillusionment over what it
considered the stagnation of the mainline American churches. Some of these
"reformers" were later to serve on Scofield's Editorial Committee.
Scofield imitated a chain of past heretics and rapturists, most of whose
credibility fizzled over their faulty end times prophesies. His mentor was
one John Nelson Darby from Scotland, who was associated with the Plymouth
Brethren and who made no less than six evangelical trips to the US selling what
is today called "Darbyism." It is from Darby that Scofield is thought to
have learned his Christian Zionist theology, which he later planted in the
footnotes of the Scofield Reference Bible. It is possible that Scofield's
interest in Darbyism was shared by Oxford University Press, for Darby was known
to Oxford University. A History of The Plymouth Brethern By William Blair
Neatby, M.A.
The Oxford University Press owned "The Scofield Reference Bible" from the
beginning, as indicated by its copyright, and Scofield stated he received
handsome royalties from Oxford. Oxford's advertisers and promoters
succeeded in making Scofield's bible, with its Christian Zionist footnotes, a
standard for interpreting scripture in Judeo-Christian churches, seminaries, and
Bible study groups. It has been published in at least four editions since
its introduction in 1908 and remains one of the largest selling Bibles
ever.
The Scofield Reference Bible and its several clones is all but worshiped in
the ranks of celebrity Christians, beginning with the first media icon,
evangelist Billy Graham. Of particular importance to the Zionist
penetration of American Christian churches has been the fast growth of national
bible study organizations, such as Bible Study Fellowship and Precept
Ministries. These draw millions of students from not only evangelical
fundamentalist churches, but also from Catholic and mainline Protestant churches
and non-church contacts. These invariably teach forms of
"dispensationalism," which draw their theory, to various degrees, from the notes
in the Oxford Bible.
Among more traditional churches that encourage, and in some cases
recommend, the use of the Scofield Reference Bible is the huge Southern Baptist
Convention of America, whose capture is World Zionism's crowning
achievement. Our report on Southern Baptist Zionism, entitled "The Cause
of the Conflict: Fixing Blame.
Scofield, whose work is largely believed to be the product of Darby and
others, wisely chose not to change the text of the King James Edition.
Instead, he added hundreds of easy-to-read footnotes at the bottom of about half
of the pages, and as the Old English grammar of the KJE becomes increasingly
difficult for progressive generations of readers, students become increasingly
dependent on the modern language footnotes.
Scofield's notes weave parts of the Old and New Testaments together as
though all were written at the same time by the same people. This is a
favorite device of modern dispensationalists who essentially weigh all scripture
against the unspoken and preposterous theory that the older it is, the more
authoritative. In many cases the Oxford references prove to be puzzling
rabbit trails leading nowhere, simply diversions. Scofield's
borrowed ideas were later popularized under the labels and definitions that have
evolved into common usage today--"pre-millennialism," "dispensationalism,"
"Judeo-Christianity," and most recently the highly political movement openly
called "Christian Zionism."
Thanks to the work of a few dedicated researchers, much of the questionable
personal history of Cyrus I. Scofield is available. It reveals he was not
a Bible scholar as one might expect, but a political animal with the charm and
talent for self-promotion of a Bill Clinton. Scofield's background reveals
a criminal history, a deserted wife, a wrecked family, and a penchant for
self-serving lies. He was exactly the sort of man the World Zionists might
hire to bend Christian thought--a controllable man and one capable of carrying
the secret to his grave. (See The Incredible Scofield and His Book by
Joseph M. Canfield).
Other researchers have examined Scofield's eschatology and exposed his
original work as apostate and heretic to traditional Christian views.
Among these is a massive work by Stephen Sizer entitled Christian Zionism, Its
History, Theology and Politics, Christ Church Vicarage, Virginia Water, GU25
4LD, England
We Hold These Truths is grateful to these dedicated researchers. Our
own examination of the Oxford Bible has gone in another direction, focusing not
on what Scofield wrote, but on some of the many additions and deletions The
Oxford University Press has continued to make to Scofield Reference Bible since
his death in 1921. These alterations have further radicalized the Scofield
Bible into a manual for the Christian worship of the State of Israel beyond what
Schofield would have dreamed of. This un-Christian anti-Arab theology has
permitted the theft of Palestine and 54 years of death and destruction against
the Palestinians, with hardly a complaint from the Judeo-Christian mass media
evangelists or most other American church leaders. We thank God for the
exceptions.
It is no exaggeration to say that the 1967 Oxford 4th Edition
deifies--makes a God of--the State of Israel, a state that did not even exist
when Scofield wrote the original footnotes in 1908. This writer believes
that, had it not been for misguided anti-Arab race hatred promoted by Christian
Zionist leaders in America, neither the Gulf War nor the Israeli war against the
Palestinians would have occurred, and a million or more people who have perished
would be alive today.
What proof does WHTT have to incriminate World Zionism in a scheme to
control Christianity? For proof we offer the words themselves that were
planted in the 1967 Edition, 20 years after the State of Israel was created in
1947, and 46 years after Scofield's death. The words tell us that those
who control the Oxford Press recreated a bible to misguide Christians and sell
flaming Zionism in the churches of America.
There is little reason to believe that Scofield knew or cared much about
the Zionist movement, but at some point, he became involved in a close and
secret relationship with Samuel Untermeyer, a New York lawyer whose firm still
exists today and one of the wealthiest and most powerful World Zionists in
America. Untermeyer controlled the unbreakable thread that connected him
with Scofield. They shared a password and a common watering hole--and it
appears that Untermeyer may have been the one who provided the money that
Scofield himself lacked. Scofield's success as an international bible
editor without portfolio and his lavish living in Europe could only have been
accomplished with financial aid and international influence.
This connection might have remained hidden, were it not for the work of
Joseph M. Canfield, the author and researcher who discovered clues to the thread
in Scofield family papers. But even had the threads connecting Scofield to
Untermeyer and Zionism never been exposed, it would still be obvious that that
connection was there. It is significant that Oxford, not Scofield, owned
the book, and that after Scofield's death, Oxford accelerated changes to
it. Since the death of its original author and namesake, The Scofield
Reference Bible has gone through several editions. Massive pro-Zionist
notes were added to the 1967 edition, and some of Scofield's most significant
notes from the original editions were removed where they apparently failed to
further Zionist aims fast enough. Yet this edition retains the title, "The
New Scofield Reference Bible, Holy Bible, Editor C.I. Scofield." It's
anti-Arab, Christian subculture theology has made an ! enormous contribution to
war, turning!
Christians into participants in genocide against Arabs in
the latter half of the 20th century.
The most convincing evidence of the unseen Zionist hand that wrote the
Scofield notes to the venerable King James Bible is the content of the notes
themselves, for only Zionists could have written them. These notes are the
subject of this paper.
Oxford edited the former 1945 Edition of SRB in 1967, at the time of the
Six Day War when Israel occupied Palestine. The new footnotes to the King
James Bible presumptuously granted the rights to the Palestinians' land to the
State of Israel and specifically denied the Arab Palestinians any such rights at
all. One of the most brazen and outrageous of these NEWLY INSERTED
footnotes states:
"FOR A NATION TO COMMIT THE SIN OF ANTI-SEMITISM BRINGS INEVITABLE
JUDGMENT." (page 19-20, footnote (3) to Genesis 12:3.) (our emphasis
added)
This statement sounds like something from Ariel Sharon, or the Chief Rabbi
in Tel Aviv, or Theodore Herzl, the founder of Modern Zionism. But these
exact words are found between the covers of the 1967 Edition of the Oxford Bible
that is followed by millions of American churchgoers and students and is used by
their leaders as a source for their preaching and teaching.
There is no word for "anti-Semitism" in the New Testament, nor is it found
among the Ten Commandments. "Sin," this writer was taught, is a personal
concept. It is something done by individuals in conflict with God's words,
not by "nations." Even Sodom did not sin--its people did. The word
"judgment" in the Bible always refers to God's action. In the Christian
New Testament, Jesus promises both judgment and salvation for believing
individuals, not for "nations."
There was also no "State of Israel" when Scofield wrote his original notes
in his concocted Scofield Reference Bible in 1908. All references to
Israel as a state were added AFTER 1947, when Israel was granted statehood by
edict of the United Nations. The Oxford University Press simply
rewrote its version of the Christian Bible in 1967 to make antipathy toward the
"State of Israel" a "sin." Israel is made a god to be worshiped, not
merely a "state." David Ben-Gurion could not have written it better.
Perhaps he did write it!
The Oxford 1967 Edition continues on page
19:
"(2) GOD MADE AN UNCONDITIONAL PROMISE OF BLESSINGS THROUGH ABRAM'S SEED
(a) TO THE NATION OF ISRAEL TO INHERIT A SPECIFIC TERRITORY FOREVER"
"(3) THERE IS A PROMISE OF BLESSING UPON THOSE INDIVIDUALS AND NATIONS WHO
BLESS ABRAM'S DESCENDANTS, AND A CURSE LAID UPON THOSE WHO PERSECUTE THE JEWS."
(Page 19, 1967 Edition Genesis 12:1-3)
This bequeath is joined to an Oxford prophesy that never occurs in the
Bible itself:
"IT HAS INVARIABLY FARED ILL WITH THE PEOPLE WHO HAVE PERSECUTED THE JEW,
WELL WITH THOSE WHO HAVE PROTECTED HIM." and "THE FUTURE WILL STILL MORE
REMARKABLY PROVE THIS PRINCIPLE"(footnote (3) bottom of page19-20Genesis
12:3)
None of these notes appeared in the original Scofield Reference Bible or in
the 1917 or 1945 editions. The state of Israel DID NOT EXIST in 1945, and
according to the best dictionaries of the time, the word "Israel" only referred
to a particular man and an ancient tribe, which is consistent with the Bible
text. See "Israel," Webster's New International Dictionary 2nd (1950)
Edition.
All of this language, including the prophecy about the future being really
bad for those who "persecute the Jews," reflects and furthers the goals of the
Anti-Defamation League, which has a stated goal of creating an environment where
opposing the State of Israel is considered "anti-Semitism," and "anti-Semitism"
is a "hate crime" punishable by law. This dream has become a reality in
the Christian Zionist churches of America. Only someone with these goals
could have written this footnote.
The State of Israel's legal claims to Arab lands are based on the United
Nations Partitioning Agreement of 1947, which gave the Jews only a fraction of
the land they have since occupied by force. But when this author went to
Israel and asked various Israelis where they got the right to occupy Palestine,
each invariably said words to the effect that "God gave it to us." This
interpretation of Hebrew scripture stems from the book of Genesis and is called
the "Abrahamic Covenant". It is repeated several times and begins with
God's promise to a man called Abraham who was eventually to become the
grandfather of a man called "Israel:"
"[2] AND I WILL MAKE OF THEE A GREAT NATION, AND I WILL BLESS THEE, AND
MAKE THY NAME GREAT; AND THOU SHALL BE A BLESSING:"
"[3] AND I WILL BLESS THEM THAT BLESS THEE, AND CURSE HIM THAT CURSETH
THEE: AND IN THEE SHALL ALL FAMILIES OF THE EARTH BE BLESSED." Genesis 12:3,
King James Edition.
It is upon this promise to a single person that modern Israeli Zionists
base their claims to what amounts to the entire Mid-East. Its logic is
roughly the equivalent of someone claiming to be the heir to the John Paul Getty
estate because the great man had once sent a letter to someone's cousin seven
times removed containing the salutation "wishing you my very best." In
"Sherry's War," We Hold These Truths provides a common sense discussion of the
Abrahamic Covenant and how millions of Christians are taught to misunderstand
it.
It is tempting to engage in academic arguments to show readers the lack of
logic in Scofield's theology, which has led followers of Christ so far
astray. It seems all too easy to refute the various Bible references given
in support of Scofield's strange writings. But we will resist the
temptation to do this, because others have already done it quite well, and more
importantly because it leads us off our course.
It is also inviting to dig into Scofield's sordid past as Canfield has
done, revealing him to be a convicted felon and probable pathological liar, but
we leave that to others, because our interest is not in Scofield's life, but in
saving the lives of millions of innocent people who are threatened by the
continuing Zionist push for perpetual war.
Instead, we will examine the words on their face. The words in these
1967 footnotes are Zionist propaganda that has been tacked onto the text of a
Christian Bible. Most of them make no sense, except to support the Zionist
State of Israel in its war against the Palestinians and any other wars it may
enter into. In this purpose, Zionism has completely succeeded.
American Judeo-Christians, more recently labeled "Christian Zionists," have
remained mute during wars upon Israel's enemies in Palestine, Iraq, Afghanistan,
Bosnia and elsewhere. It is past time to stop the spilling of more blood,
some of it Christian blood.
Now, for evidence of the intent of the Zionists deception of Christians,
let us examine some Scofield's notes THAT HAVE BEEN ALTERED OR REMOVED by
Oxford after his death. In 1908 Scofield wrote in 1908:
"THE CONTRAST, 'I KNOW THAT YE ARE ABRAHAM'S SEED' - 'IF YE WERE ABRAHAM'S
CHILDREN' IS THAT BETWEEN THE NATURAL AND THE SPIRITUAL POSTERITY OF
ABRAHAM. THE ISRAELITISH PEOPLE AND ISHMAELITISH PEOPLE ARE THE FORMER;
ALL WHO ARE 'OF THE PRECIOUS FAITH WITH ABRAHAM,' WHETHER JEWS OR GENTILES, ARE
THE LATTER (ROM 9, 6-8; GAL, 4-14. SEE 'ABRAHAMIC COVENANT' GEN 15, 18,
NOTE)." ( Scofield's 1945 page 1127, note to John 8:39)
Compare that with the Oxford note substituted in the 1967 Edition:
"8:37 ALL JEWS ARE NATURAL DESCENDANTS OF ABRAHAM, BUT ARE NOT NECESSARILY
HIS SPIRITUAL POSTERITY, CP Rom 9-6-8, Gal 3: 6-14" (Note (1) P1136, Oxford 1967
Edition, note to Jn 8:37.)
How, pray tell, can "all Jews" be "natural descendants of Abraham," a
Chaldean who lived some 3000 years ago? Persons of all races are Jews and
new Jews are being converted every day from every race. One might as well
say all Lutherans are the natural descendants of Martin Luther; or that all
Baptists come from the loins of John the Baptist. This note could only
have been written by an Israeli patriot, for no one else would have a vested
interest in promoting this genetic nonsense. Shame on those who accept
this racism; it is apostate Christianity.
The original Scofield note was far out of line with traditional
Christianity in 1908 and should have been treated as heresy then. Yet
Scofield had failed to go far enough for the Zionists. Scofield clearly
recognized what the book of Genesis states, that the sons of Ishmael are
co-heirs to Abraham's ancient promise. Did not Scofield say "the
Israelitish people and Ishmaelitish people are...the natural posterity of
Abraham"? The Oxford Press simply waited for Scofield to die and changed
it as they wished.
And what is it that Scofield said that did not satisfy the Zionists who
rewrote the Oxford 1967 Edition?
The answer is an easy one. Most Arab and Islamic scholars consider
Arabs in general and the Prophet Mohamed in particular to be direct descendants
of Ishmael, Abraham's first son and older half-brother of Isaac, whose son Jacob
was later to become known as "Israel." Many Arabs believe that through
Ishmael they are co-heirs of to Abraham's promise, and they correctly believe
that present-day Israelis have no Biblical right to steal their land.
Jewish Talmudic folklore also speaks of Ishmael, so the Zionists apparently felt
they had to alter how Christians viewed the two half brothers in order to
prevent Christians from siding with the Arabs over the land theft.
The Zionists solved this dilemma by inserting a senseless footnote in the
1967 (Oxford) Scofield Reference Bible which, in effect, substitutes the word
"Jews" for the words "The Israelitish people and Ishmaelitish people," as
Scofield originally wrote it. The Israelitish and Ishmaelitish people
lived 3000 years ago, but the Zionists want to claim the Arabs' part of the
presumed birthright right now! Read it again; "all Jews are natural
descendants of Abraham, but are not necessarily his spiritual posterity."
And there is more of such boondogglery in the Oxford bible. On the
same page 1137 we find yet another brand new Zionist-friendly note referring to
the New Testament book of John 8:37.
"(2) 8:44 THAT THIS SATANIC FATHERHOOD CANNOT BE LIMITED TO THE PHARISEES
IS MADE CLEAR IN 1Jn3:8-10" (note SRB 1967 Edition, P1137 to John 8:44)
Let us look at the verse Oxford is trying to soften, wherein Jesus is
speaking directly to the Pharisees, who were the Jewish leaders of his day, and
to no one else:
"YE ARE OF YOUR FATHER THE DEVIL, AND THE LUST OF YOUR FATHER YE WILL
DO. HE WAS A MURDERER FROM THE BEGINNING, AND ABODE NOT IN THE TRUTH,
BECAUSE THERE IS NO TRUTH IN HIM. WHEN HE SPEAKEST A LIE, HE SPEAKEST OF
HIS OWN; FOR HE IS A LIAR, AND THE FATHER OF IT." John 8:44 King James
Ed.)
Those are plain words. No wonder the Zionists wanted to dilute what
Jesus said. Not only did Oxford add a new footnote in 1967, but they
inserted no less than four reference cues into the King James sacred text,
directing readers to their specious, apostate footnotes. It seems the
Zionists cannot deny what Jesus said about Pharisees, but they do not want to
bear the burden of being "sons of Satan" all by themselves. Now here's the
text of the verse to which Oxford refers in order to try to solve this
problem:
"HE THAT COMMITETH SIN IS OF THE DEVIL; FOR THE DEVIL SINNETH FROM THE
BEGINNING. FOR THIS PURPOSE THE SON OF GOD WAS MANIFESTED, THAT HE MIGHT DESTROY
THE WORK OF THE DEVIL." (1Jn3:8.King James Edition)
Fine, but this verse, spoken by Jesus to His followers in a speech about
avoiding sin, in no way supports Oxford's argument that Jesus was not talking
directly to and about the Pharisee leaders when he called them "Sons of Satan"
in John 8:44. It is a different book written at a different time to a
different audience. This is typical Christian Zionist
diversion.
To find out to whom Jesus is speaking you must read the
rest of John 8, not something from another book. Furthermore, John 8:44 is
only one of some 77 verses where Jesus confronted the Pharisees by name and in
many cases addressed them as "satanic" and as "vipers." Oxford simply
ignores most of these denunciations by Jesus, adding no notes at all, and the
Christian Zionists go along without question.
These are a few examples of Zionist perversions of scripture that have
shaped the doctrine of America's most politically powerful religious subculture,
the "Christian Zionists" as Ariel Sharon calls them, or the dispensationalists,
as intellectual followers call themselves, or the Judeo-Christians as our
politically-correct politicians describe themselves. Today's Mid-East wars
are not caused by the predisposition of the peoples, who are no more warlike
than any human tribes. Without the pandering to Jewish and Zionist
interests that is carried out by this subculture--the most vocal being the
celebrity Christian evangelists--there would be no such wars, for there is not
enough support for war outside of organized Zionist Christianity.
Reverend Stephen Sizer of Christ Church,Christ Church Vicarage, Virginia
Water, GU25 4LD, England
is perhaps the most dedicated new scholar
writing about the Scofield Bible craze, popularly known as Christian
Zionism. He has quipped, "Judging Christianity by looking at the American
Evangelists is kind of like judging the British by watching Benny Hill."
Reverend Sizer's remark brings to mind another Benny; his name is Benny
Hinn, not a British comic, but an American evangelist spouting inflammatory
hate-filled words aimed at Muslims everywhere. Hinn was speaking to the
applause of an aroused crowd of thousands in the American Airline Center in
Dallas when he shocked two Ft. Worth Star Telegram religious reporters covering
the July 3d event by announcing, "We are on God's side," speaking of
Palestine. He shouted, "This is not a war between Jews and Arabs..
It is a war between God and the Devil." Lest there be any doubt about it,
Hinn was talking about a blood war in which the Israelis are "God" and the
Palestinians are "the Devil."
Benny Hinn is one of hundreds of acknowledged Christian Zionists who have
no problem spouting outright race hatred and who join in unconditional support
for Israel without regard for which or how many of Israel's enemies are killed
or crippled. His boldness stems from his knowledge that the vast majority
of professing Christians from whom he seeks his lavish support-the
Judeo-Christians, or Christian Zionists--do not shrink at his words, because
they have been conditioned to accept them, just as Roman citizens learned to
accept Christian persecution, even burning alive, under Nero.
Several evangelists in attendance affirmed their agreement with Hinn - "the line
between Christians and Muslims is the difference between good and evil."
An amazing number of professing Christians are in agreement with the
fanatical likes of Hinn, including Gary Bauer, Ralph Reed, James Dobson and
hundreds more. Yet Hinn's profit-seeking fanaticism is not as shocking as
that of men like Richard Land of the Southern Baptist Convention who occupy the
highest positions in the area of conservative religious thought. Land may
have stopped short of branding all Muslims as devils, but he attacked their
leader and Prophet and stated that, according to Baptist Bible interpretation,
the Palestinian people have no legal rights to property in
Palestine. See our discussion of Southern Baptists entitled
"The Cause of the Conflict: Fixing Blame."
The more politically conservative and libertarian the speaker expressing
hatred for Islam, the more shocking the statement sounds. One example is
Samuel Blumenfeld, a veteran textbook author and advocate of home
education. His attack on Islam in a story entitled "Religion and Satanism"
in the April 2002 conservative, Calvinist Chalcedon Report leaves little room
for civil liberties and freedom of thought. He writes, "Islam is a
religion ruled by Satan," and asks, "Can anyone under the influence of Satan be
trusted?" Blumenfeld shows poor judgment and a lack of morality when he
allows phrases such as "willing agents of Satan," "another manifestation of
Satanism" and "the willingness of Muslims to believe blatant lies," to spill
from his pen.
How can anyone interpret these words by Land, Hinn, Blumenfeld, and yes,
our own President, as anything less than race hatred? Who would make such
generalized and transparently false statements against any other minority except
Muslims?
About 100 million American Christians need to recover their true faith in
Christ Jesus, who never denounced any individual on account of his group.
Jesus even tried to save the Pharisees, and only denounced them when they showed
themselves to be deceivers. There is not a word in the New Testament
that urges any follower of Jesus to murder one child in Iraq or condemn
Palestine to death. Race hatred is a Zionist, not a Christian,
strategy.
Christian Zionism may be the most bloodthirsty apostasy in the entire
history of Christianity or any other religion. Shame on its leaders:
they have already brought the blood of untold numbers innocent people down upon
the spires and prayer benches of America's churches.
WHTT asks every Christian to share this article with pastors and church
leaders, especially lay leaders. We ask every Muslim and Jew who reads it
to do the same. You might wish to suspend giving money to any
organizations that preach Zionist race hatred in any form, especially under the
cover Jesus Christ. And lastly, We Hold These Truths invites your informed
comments and questions.
Listen to: Kulture Klash II, How Oxford University Press and CI
Scofield stole the Christian Bible, WHTT "Internet Talk Radio" - also available
on tape.
Copyright 2002, may be reproduced in full with permission.
We Hold These Truths (WHTT)
P.O. Box 14491
Scottsdale, AZ 85267
480-947-3329
To subscribe, please type "Subscribe" in the SUBJECT LINE.
To withdraw,
please type "Remove" in the SUBJECT LINE.
Resources:
The Incredible Scofield and His Book, Joseph M. Canfield, hard cover,
$30.00 ppd. (limited availability).
Listen to: Kulture Klash I and II, Audio tape set, How Oxford
University Press and CI Scofield stole the Christian Bible. CE Carlson and
WHTT Advisors: $15.00 ppd
Sherry's War: Twenty page research paper plus 1 hour audiotape by C. E.
Carlson, - How Judeo-Christians mix and match scripture verses and use of extra
text out of context to promote the Pop Church's "chosen people" and end times
scenario. Sherry and many other well-meaning, professed Christians have
justified war against Arab people without a scrap of scriptural support and with
little knowledge of the conflict. "Sherry's War" offers insight into current
Christian sub-culture and why many have justified or ignored the brutal
assassinations of Islamic peoples simply because they are not Israelis or
Christian. An introduction to WHTT's classic 20-page study by the same name; see
Right To The Point Journal. Both $15.00 ppd.
The Final Apostasy - by Gordon Ginn Ph.D. Is your church apostate,
would you know it if it were? A book that reveals the untold
historical and documented ex-post facto changes made in the Hebrew text of the
Old Testament...after Christ. These changes have affected what all of us
believe, from the Reformation to Day911. Ginn sheds light on the turmoil
in the Middle East and reveals the results of some Christians' tragic errors in
accepting the "Final Apostasy". 218 pages $20.ppd.
All of the above items at one time $70.00 (call or mail for now,
please.)
We Hold These Truths
P.O. Box 14491
Scottsdale, AZ 85267
480-947-3329
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2002 9:53 PM
Subject: [ChristianPatriot] The Milleniam - 4 (Last One)
Scofield's reference Bible has been credited for popularizing this Jewish
concept into Christian Doctrine. Nord Davis states:
"You will learn how he defrauded his mother-in-law out of her life savings.
How he was convicted of forgery and, in another case, was sent off to
prison...he openly carried on with other women, abandoned his wife and family,
and never sent them a dime of support.
"When his wife finally divorced him, he married the woman with whom he was
living. All the time he was writing the now infamous notes to the Scofield
reference Bible. As a 'Christian' he was a disgrace. As a man he lacked ordinary
chivalry of a gentleman. He called himself 'Dr.' yet he never went to any
college which could convey that degree. His life as a minister makes the recent
escapades of some modern ministers pales into insignificance.
"His financial support for the reference Bible came from Zionist and
conspiratorial groups out of Boston Massachusetts. Chiefly known as the Secret
Six..." (Nord Davis, Cyrus I. Scofield: The Pope of Prophecy Perversion)
For a more detailed study on C.I. Scofield we recommend the book, "The
Incredible Scofield and His Book," by Joseph M. Canfield. So what did Scofield
teach in his reference notes? Quoting from page 1227, note 6:
"Upon His return, the King will restore the Davidic monarchy in His own
person, regather dispersed Israel, establish His power over all the earth, and
reign one thousand years.
"The dispensation of the kingdom begins with the return of Christ to the
earth, runs through the 'thousand years' of His earth-rule, and ends when he has
delivered up the kingdom to the Father...
"The gospel of the kingdom. This is the good news that God purposes to set
up on the earth, in fulfillment of the Davidic covenant, a kingdom, political,
spiritual, Israelitish (i.e. Jewish), universal, over which God's son, David's
heir, shall be king, and which shall be for one thousand years, the
manifestation of the righteousness of God in human affairs...
"Two resurrections are yet future, which are inclusive of 'all that are in
the graves.' These are distinguished as 'of life' and 'of judgment.' They are
separated by a period of one thousand years." (Scofield Bible, pp. 1227, note 6;
1228, note 4; 1341, note 1; 1343)
All these ideas are pulled out of context from other places in Scripture
and cut and pasted together into the theology called "dispensationalism" to
promote a Jewish doctrine that put the reality of Christ's victory and the power
of His New Covenant into the future!
The end result is an expectation for Christ to come again a second time,
which would be in violation of God's Word, and would bring about His judgment,
just as Moses did when he struck the rock the second time. Today this theology
is popularly known as "Judeo-Christianity" and for good reason because it is
first and foremost Jewish in origin, character, and reality.
Pastor V.S. Herrell summed it up:
"To this day, the Jews continue to teach their Christ-hatred from their
Talmud, to teach their children that Jesus Christ was an impostor and not the
Son of God and not the true Christ. So the Jews began to teach the doctrine that
Christ was yet to come and they began to tell the Christians that when Christ
was to come to set up the materialistic, futuristic, plutocratic kingdom they
claimed they, the Jews, were all going to repent and because they are such
special God-chosen people, even though Christ described them as being living,
breathing devils of their father the devil, they were all going to get to reign
with Christ over the white goyim from Jerusalem for a full thousand years.
Moreover, their Talmudic, Zionistic materialism of their real bible the Talmud,
which they hold to have more authority than the Pentateuch as it is supposedly
based upon the traditions of the elders which is yet another Jewish lie, and
teaches the Jew that all that he can victimize and st! eal from the stupid goyim
in this life will once again be his in the millennium when he is resurrected or
reincarnated in his Jewish world order. They are also taught to never tell the
stupid goyim as to what they really believe of think." (Pastor V.S. Herrel,
Christian Separatist Epiphanological and Eschatological Teachings, p. 26)