From:
SBeene [mailto:sandra.beene@opennet.com]
Sent: Tuesday, December 11,
2007 7:51 AM
To: Joe&Barb McCutchen; W.G.E.N. Jackie
Juntti
Subject: Defend Freedom: which
ones?
How can we
bring world peace? Learn about the Ron Paul Tea Party, De
Posted
by: "John Perna" savefreedom2005@yahoo.com
savefreedom2005
Mon Dec 10, 2007 12:40 pm (PST)
How can we bring world peace? Learn about the Ron Paul Tea
Party, Dec. 16, 2007
70% of the people oppose the war in Iraq, but
only one of the 11 candidates for President of the USA oppose the war. The rest
are even discussing expanding the war into Iran.
At first we
went to war because we said that Saddam had weapons mass destruction.
We did not find any
weapons of mass destruction.
Then they said that we had
to remove Saddam Hussein.
We removed Saddam
Hussein, but we are still in the war.
Then they said that we are
there to "defend freedom".
Are we
"defending freedom" in Iraq?
As we defend freedom in Iraq,
we might want to ask exactly WHICH
FREEDOMS are we
defending?
Are we defending
the right of habeas corpus?
Are we defending the freedom to
mention our religious ideals on any public property?
Are we
defending the freedom to travel without going through police
checkpoints?
Are we defending the freedom to criticize the
President, or other government officials, without being in violation of the
Patriot Act, and considered a possible terrorist?
Are we
defending the freedom to mention the Constitution in any district court without
being held in contempt?
Are we defending the freedom to
discipline children, if they get out of line,
without having them
kidnapped by the Department of Social Services,
and held hostage
until we receive approved psychological therapy, and are deemed
acceptable?
Are we defending our own borders against illegal
aliens?
Are we defending the freedom to talk about, or publicly
support, any candidate, an election is occurring in your locality within the
next 90 days?
Are we defending the freedom to demand a search
warrant
if an officer asks to search your vehicle at the "seat belt"
checks, in accordance with our fourth amendment rights?
Are we
defending the freedom to object when the searching officer will not help you
pick up your belongings that he has strewn all over the highway as he searched
our vehicle, without being charged with "obstructing justice"?
Are we defending the freedom to keep and bear arms, as provided
in the Second Amendment?
Are we defending the freedom to free
from warrantless searches at homes or businesses? If a government bureaucrat
shows up at your home, he will probably be flashing a badge at you. This makes
him look like a constitutional law enforcement officer. He may even be armed. Do
not ask to see a warrant, and then tell him to leave if he does not have one.
They will put a siege around your house. If you do not come out soon enough,
they may invade, with guns drawn, or even set your house on fire.
For more information, do a search using keywords like "Symbionese
Liberation Army", "Philadelphia MOVE group", "Gordon Kahl", "The Order", "Robert
Matthews", "Covenant of the Sword and Arm of the Lord", "Randy Weaver" , "Branch
Davidian", or "Elian Gonzalez".
If you are counting on you
congressman to protect you,
understand that the average congressman
is ALSO afraid to resist.
For more information, do a search using
keywords like
"George Hansen", "James Traficant" or "Larry
McDonald".
Are we defending the freedom to visit a mall without
being monitored by hundreds of surveillance cameras, watched by federal security
forces?
Are we defending the freedom to put "anti-government"
bumper stickers on our car; especially anything about the right to keep and bear
arms, without being stopped by police who have been trained by the FBI in
"bumper sticker profiling"? With regard to "bumper sticker profiling" we should
be especially aware of the fact that "They will get my gun, when they pry it
from my cold dead fingers" is no longer mere semantics. At WACO, and at RUBY
RIDGE,
we learned that they WILL kill us to take your
guns
Are we defending the right to have "unauthorized
THOUGHTS"?
There are now serious penalties for "thought
crime".
Be aware that "civil forfeiture" laws make it possible to
take anything that you own, by alleging that it was "intended" to be used for
the commission of a crime. This could include transporting, or storing, a gun.
If "civil forfeiture" proceedings are initiated against you,
then you will have the burden of proof, to show that your thoughts
were in compliance with government standards.
Are we defending
the right to be free from excessive taxes? The 50 per cent government
confiscation of your income at the threat of imprisonment or at the point of a
gun should not even cross your mind as you revel in your freedom. After all,
April 15th is a long way off.
Are we defending the right to a
jury trial?
If you have a few decades with nothing better to do,
study up on "administrative law". Laws are now made by the unelected
bureaucrats, in hundreds of "administrative agencies". If you are charged with
violating one of these "laws" you will not get a trial by a jury of your peers.
You will be tried by the agency that made the charge.
Are we
defending the right to communicate with each other
on the internet
without having surveillance and censoring of our messages?
Can
we demonstrate to Iraq how much better it would be to have a government that
does not torture?
Can we demonstrate to Iraq how much better it
would be to have a government that does not have secret prisons that operate
outside of law?
Or are we just defending Haliburton's right to
gain an Iraqi contract windfall?
I hope this message gets past
the Department of Homeland security approved internet
filter.
----------
HOMELAND SECURITY
ADVISORY
This transmission screened prior to receipt by addressee
pursuant to applicable sections of the USA PATRIOT Act.
AMERICA
IS SICK. CALL THE DOCTOR!
MAKE HISTORY!
Join The
Second American Revolution: Ron Paul Tea Party Dec. 16,
2007
Remember the Boston Tea Party on Dec. 16, 1776
On
December 16th, 1773, American colonists dumped tea into Boston Harbor to protest
an oppressive tax.
This December 16th 2007, American citizens will
gather to express their support for ending the oppressive and unconstitutional
inflation tax - which has enabled a flawed foreign policy, a costly war and the
sacrificing of our liberties here at home.
Participate in the
Ron Paul Tea Party on Dec. 16, 2007
Once in a while the little
people have to rise up, and take their country back from the corrupt elite.
Gandhi said:
"First they ignore you, then they
laugh at you, then they fight you, then
you
win."
Ron Paul has just graduated to the next level. Using
fraudulent polls to create the illusion that Ron Paul's support is low,
is a prelude for making a stolen election believable. MONEY TALKS EVEN LOUDER
THAN THE
POLLS!
__________
NOD32 2714 (20071210) Information __________
This message was checked by
NOD32 antivirus system.
http://www.eset.com