Unfair Criticisms: Mark Weber and the IHR
By Harvey Taylor
hataylor2003@
I have been shocked at the hysterical and unfair responses to Mark
Weber's recent piece titled "How Relevant is Holocaust Revisionism.
Mark Weber has the full support of the LSF/IHR Board of Directors.
Among the unfair and false things that are being said by some about him
is that he is getting $50,000 a year from the IHR. As a board member of
the IHR's parent corporation (LSF), I can set the record straight on
this. The LSF board has authorized for Weber an annual salary of
$50,000, he has never taken it. As the 990 tax return by the LSF shows,
his gross salary for the fiscal year May 2007 through April 2008 was
$43,999, which is not at all unreasonable for a person of his
responsibilities who lives in southern California. From this gross
salary, Weber tells me, he pays $12,348 annually in child support. Many
times over the years, he has taken pay cuts, or had his pay postponed.
IHR/LSF owes him thousands of dollars.
No one explained how Holocaust revisionism prevented the US Congress
from voting en masse for Israel's killing spree in Gaza. The Pope
recently bowed down to Zionists, and 50 US Catholic Congressmen
insisted that he defer to Jewish power. Art Butz's "Hoax of the
Twentieth Century" (1976) was derided by university presidents who
wouldn't even read it. The entire US press has been silent about the
extraordinary rendition of Ernst Zundel and Germar Rudolf. Bradley
Smith has worked effectively for years debunking the "gas chamber"
tales, and yet he has to beg for enough support to feed himself.
In fact, "the Holocaust" was destroyed years ago. Nevertheless it is
sustained in the public mind by a continuing hate propaganda campaign
and a corrupt political system, just as Mark Weber stated It is
supported by evangelical "Christians" who worship Jewish myths rather
than Christianity. It is supported by media prostitutes who sell their
souls for advertising revenue.It is supported by ignorant and corrupt
academics who are willing to betray honest academics.
IHR provides resource material to anyone and everyone who wishes to
access it. I personally find "The Holocaust" and Israel to be a putrid
albatross hanging around my neck. The world could be embroiled in a
conflagration if the "Holocaust' is allowed to continue to govern our
culture.You take your choice, just as Mark can take his choice and did.
So how do we get across to Joe Sixpac that HCN, six million, steam
chambers, should interest him? We don't. Did you see the Super Bowl
stadium last Sunday?
IHR will continue try to stimulate peoples thinking. We have ordered
100 copies of "Debating the Holocaust" which we will promote. If you
have concrete proposals for increasing our effectiveness please forward
them. We are not in the business of attacking CODOH or the
Zundelsite.We support them. We would also like to see Germany returned
to her people. Let us all pursue financing for CODOH and Ingrid
Zundel's work, for Faurisson and those imprisoned for thought/speak.
--
--
Debating the Holocaust: A New Look At Both Sides by Thomas Dalton, PhD
Publisher's
Note: This is a non-Revisionist title for Theses & Dissertations
Press. It will be the first book on the Holocaust, in publishing
history, that will not take a Traditionalist or a Revisionist point of
view. When you purchase this book, one-third of the proceeds will go to
Germar Rudolf and his family.
http://www.amazon.
Founded
in 2000 the publishing company Theses & Dissertations Press is at
the center of a worldwide network of scholars and activists who are
working -- often at great personal sacrifice -- to separate historical
fact from propaganda fiction. The founder of Theses & Dissertations
Press is Germar Rudolf. Who is currently serving prison time for his
published works and will be released on July 4, 2009.
As the
new director of Germar Rudolf's American publishing division, I wish to
express my outrage that the Holocaust, unlike any other historical
event, is not subject to critical revisionist investigation.
Furthermore I deplore the fact that many so-called democratic states
have laws that criminalize public doubting of the Holocaust. It is my
position that the veracity of Holocaust assertions should be determined
in the marketplace of scholarly discourse and not in our legislatures
bodies and courthouses.
Peace.
Michael Santomauro
Editorial Director
Call: 917-974-6367
ReporterNotebook@