 German Patriot Defence Lawyer Sylvia Stolz was sentenced to 3 and-a-half years in
prison and disbarred for 5 years.
Below Sylvia's comments to the court.
She says the Court is perverting and repressing the truth with the
cudgel of "Holocaust," making a mockery of justice. Her trial has made
clear the criminal absurdity of prosecuting "Holocaust Denial." How can
one deny something that never existed? She says these entire proceedings
began as a show trial in a kangaroo court and never progressed beyond that
point. The main proceedings were projected with smoke and mirrors and the
official fairy tale of "Holocaust" was enforced by undisguised force. She
observes that the political intent of the Court is the ultimate
eradication of the German Nation and its replacement by a mongrelized and
deculturated population of mindless consumers.
Sylvia says she is confident that she has
succeeded in exposing this Court to the whole world as an agent that is
hostile to the German Nation. By openly and flagrantly violating the law,
this Court flees before the truth. Incessantly, like turning a prayer
wheel, it has rejected her every evidentiary motion with the cynical
pretext of "abuse of courtprocedure." ..... She has hope and faith that
the German Nation will someday bring this treacherous Court to justice.
Sylvia describes how the Defense was
forced to accept the contents of the indictment, and this caused the
Court's desired verdict to be the inevitable consequence. In the absence
of material evidence, the Court relied on its infantile rulings that
"Abuse of Procedure = Criminal Act." Thanks to this judicial sleight of
hand, there was no assumption of innocence and the Court did not have to
prove guilt.
Sylvia asks: to what is Grossmann
referring when he mentions "domestic and foreign" court verdicts? Could he
be referring to the Nuremberg show trials? The Allied Military Tribunal
was nothing but a postwar Talmudic Inquisition conducted by Germany's
enemies. It featured witnesses with "built-in credibility" and Jewish
testimony that could never be questioned or authenticated.
She asks: what would people like Grossmann do without the official
obligatory fairy tale of "Holocaust?" Her trial has again demonstrated
that world political powers are players in the "Holocaust" game (or
"Holocaust Industry" as Prof. Norman Finkelstein calls it, he should know,
since both of his parents were interned at Auschwitz during the War.) This
explains why objective historical research is still suppressed,
sixty-three years after the end of the War. As an example of ongoing
intellectual repression in Germany Sylvia
refers to the "Hermann Case" in which a popular commentator was fired for
referring to such positive aspects of National Socialism as its family
policy and the construction of Autobahns.
Sylvia demonstrates that the Court's
procedural system is very, very simple. It consists of disallowing all
evidentiary motions as "abuse of Court procedure," which is a criminal
act. She says that the District Attorney's closing tirade was beneath all
legal criticism, nothing but purest slander and abuse.....Then Sylvia shows how powerful interests profit greatly by
inculcating a negative self-image into German society, with their
incessant propaganda and brainwashing. If Germans were as evil as
Grossmann depicts them, they would long ago have skinned him alive.
She points out that under the present Talmudic Inquisition, anyone who
calls attention to the destructive nature of Judaism can be punished.
Glenz tells the Court Reporter to write that remark down as well. Sylvia observes that today, no one is allowed to
say anything the least bit derogatory about Jews, and yet the necessary
first step toward changing and improving conditions in Germany is
recognizing the cause of our malaise. She says that Horst Mahler's
writings provide the proof for this, and she will stand by this assertion.
Glenz orders the Reporter: "Put that in too!"
Sylvia continues and remarks that Germany
now stands under the yoke of world Judaism. Glenz threatens: "We are
going to cut off your final address if..." But Sylvia ignores him and says that following World War II,
the real criminals took over the world. Glenz growls "I'm warning
you!" but Sylvia again urges the public
to consider the causes of Germany's plight and continue gathering and
considering the material evidence. She tells the Court that National
Socialism is not dead, regardless of how much Grossmann and his ilk wish
it were dead. She says that National Socialism represents what is good and
enduring in the German spirit. Idealism and patriotism are rigidly
suppressed at this time but they cannot be suppressed forever.
Turning toward Grossmann and the Court, she asks:
"Is he German? Or is he perhaps related to that Moshe Grossmann
who for four years following the end of World War II continued torturing
and murdering German slaves in the East, as the Jewish author John Sack
reports in his book An Eye for an Eye?"
Then she turns to the Bench and asks:
"What about you — are you Germans?" "German" stands for honor and
steadfastness! Think of Deutsche Treue! Nobody can call what is going on
in this court as "honorable." In this court, the only "justice" is
inspired by the Talmud!"
Sylvia expresses her faith that history
will take its inevitable course and "the truth will win out." She says
that since the trial began she has been prepared for her preordained
conviction — she told them at the beginning that she knew her verdict was
handed down, even before her indictment. To the Bench she says
"And you, my high-and-mighty judges, will never again experience
inner peace... Your depiction of National Socialism as a criminal system
will see to that. You are willing accomplices to the brainwashing and
degradation of the German people.... Adolf Hitler accurately recognized
the Jewish problem, the malevolent power of the Jews in certain
respects... Yes, I share the values of National Socialism!"
Sylvia replies,
"If my actions bring a little more light into this dark hour for
Germany, then I will gladly go to prison! It does not bother me that I
am officially ridiculed and insulted by this despicable court and
atrocious government... My high and mighty judges, you are convicting
yourselves, not me."
Source:
http://twincities.indymedia.org/newswire/display/32751/index.php | 