"Are Andrew Anglin Articles Banned?" (SF thread)

#11

They have a rule no criticism of women, and if you criticize feminism your post gets deleted. Total cucks.

They're like marxist SJWs with their censorship of truth.

#12

lame that they have rules

Surely you know that sounds silly. Stormfront has been around longer than many of us have been alive, keeping the fire lit on white nationalism. I think it is fair to say they may have some wisdom that could be tapped, some lessons learned. That doesnt mean we can't disagree on various items. But lets not disrespect our elders with stupid insults (like this SF is cucked shit).

#13

I am a lifetime member of SF. Like someone said above, people like Don Black are a link in the chain of those patriots who kept the movement alive. A lot of people who are now active outside SF got their start right there. When we used to speak up about anti-white racism we were told our views belonged on Storm Front. So we got over there quickly to check out what the fuss was about! We learned a lot.

That thread has been going 5 months and only has 166 posts as of the time I'm posting this. That isn't a big deal for Storm front.

People get fatigue battling the kikes and the stupids. People go away from SF with what they learned and start doing things locally or join the Daily Stormer, and the alti right, to do what is effective. It is not critical to hammer the kikes and the stupids who post on SF any more because (like someone said) that site is no longer the cutting edge. So please don't take the fact that idiots are able to ramble on over there to mean that SF is anti-DS or anti-AA. Those idiots in that thread are mostly posting to themselves.

How to deal with women is something WNs are working out now. Old guys are with more mild old women who grew up in a better society. I get David Duke and the like being alarmed that women are being blamed for their bad actions. But young guys can't be told to rely on the views of young women who are now totally fucked up. We need slut shaming, fat shaming, and stupid bitch shaming to get Pandora back into her box.

#14

It's disappointing, of course, but this is an ongoing thing with that forum and boomers generally.

The baby-boomer context is necessary in order to understand the problem these people have with me. They are an utterly self-absorbed generation, who gleefully destroyed our entire history and culture, throwing their children into a void of no identity and no future.

All in the name of feeling good.

(Obviously, not every boomer fits this profile, but those in that SF thread absolutely do. I also want to say that I don't think that thread reflects the larger SF community, and certainly doesn't reflect Don Black, who has always been courteous with me. That said, SF has for a long time had a moderation crisis.)

These boomers are bitter and angry at the fact that young people actually want to do something, actually want to fix something, as this involves tearing down their sacred beliefs in political correctness and feminism, a return to traditional norms. I represent this push.

As such, they want to destroy me, just as they've destroyed everything else. To feel good in their fantasy world of feminist equality.

Just objectively, by the statistics, I have woken up more people to White racial consciousness than probably anyone alive right now. I would definitely be in the top three. If we were talking about waking up people under 25, I would be number one, hands-down.

And yet nameless people on the internet - who claim to share the goal of waking people up to White racial consciousness - want to try and destroy me because they are triggered by my alleged sexual history?

What are they saying?

It is all feminine gossip-mongering. I would never in a million years gossip like that about anyone, even in private. What man would do that? Gossip like a woman about people's alleged sexual history? I can't even begin to imagine formulating such a line of reasoning in order to attack a perceived political enemy.

"Andrew had sex with Asian girls, he's a race-mixing race traitor"

Again - grown men trying to shame another man over his sex life is the peak of feminine faggotry. But it comes natural to these people.

I grew up without any sense of racial identity, like all of us did (at least in the anglosphere), so never did I really think anything of hanging around Asian girls. The pictures that people show were from when I was 20-24ish, when I was living in Asia, surrounded by Asian people. I worked both in China and the Philippines, first as an English teacher then managing English language schools. In between jobs, I backpacked across Asia and Europe. As far as women went during that period, I spent more time with White women than Asian women, because of the backpacking scene, as well as various Europeans working in China (in the Philippines, the schools I worked at were for Koreans, and most of the teachers were Filipino; there are very few White people there).

I was not a "sex tourist," and the idea that these SF boomers come up with that tells you where their thinking is.

I had a wonderful time in Asia, and I don't think there is a better way I could have spent that formative part of my life. Given the present situation in the West, I was able to develop as a person free from the nightmare that the Jews created, around people that were open outsider-types (I mean the White people - you can't ever actually have a real human relationship with an Asian, but ex-pats/backpackers in Asia are interesting folks).

If I had remained in America, I probably would have ended up addicted to heroin, like most of my (upper-middle class) friends ended up. Instead, I'm not a production-machine, running the biggest (and I believe best) pro-White website in the world, in the media constantly, with traffic more than doubling every year.

I have no regrets. I sure as hell won't apologize to some whining feminist faggots, posting namelessly on a web forum. I won't apologize to anyone else either (but for whatever reason, it is only nameless people on forums who think I should apologize).

It's also worth noting that I've always been completely open about this stuff, and wrote about it on several old blogs, as well as invited people who knew me from back when to come to this site. These people have not discovered some dark secret. I have always been up-front.

"Andrew is 5'2", manlet"

Someone in the thread posted my real height, and they just said it was a lie.

I am 5'7". I had no idea people were taking seriously the photoshopped picture of my ID. Seems to be part of the whole thing going on there. They're taking ED/chan trolling, which is done in good fun and which I don't mind, and acting like it's real (although the ED article isn't funny, which I do mind; maybe I should re-write it for them - "yellow fever sex tourist nazi diet guru midget" should really write itself, one would think - but ED has been crap since weev and everyone else that mattered left).

Here's the original, hi-res.

Andre1.jpg1600x1200 251 KB

Here's the fake one they're using and pretending they don't know it's fake.

andrew_anglin faked ID picture.jpg800x600 107 KB

(Also, this is from 2011 and I weigh 152 lbs now, with 5% body fat. And it was a temporary license because I hadn't been in the country in over a year and my license expired - that part is pretty funny.)

The average White male height in the US is 5'10", probably a bit more for people my age.

HeightDistribution.jpg772x389 61.2 KB

I'm actually about 5'7 1/2".

This is relatively and noticeably short, sure.

In America, if I'm in a room with five White guys, I'm probably the shortest guy in the room. If I'm in a room with ten White guys, there's probably a guy who's my height or shorter.

But seriously - why is my height the subject of over a dozen pages of discussion on Stormfront?

Well, because these people are fags who gossip like old women.

***"Andrew is a big meanie who says mean things about Aryan Princesses"**

They have taken my political positions on feminism, and skewed it into some sort of personal problem. A very feminine thing, as it saves them the trouble of trying to debate something where they are obviously objectively wrong.

They say I "hate White women."

This is nonsensical gibberish.

I have never been anything but a gentleman towards women in my personal life, as my mother, grandmother, sister and any GF I've ever had can attest.

My position on women and feminism has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with my personal life.

My position on women and feminism - as I've explained six million times - is not radical (yes, I do often use hyperbole, but it is always obvious to non-autists). It is the same position that every man in history held before the Jewish feminist revolutions following the second World War. These are boomers who are unwilling to let go of their destructive revolutionary nonsense - they will defend feminism to their last breath. They will defend the idea that before the social revolutions, all men in history were evil misogynist abusers, including their own fathers.

Actually, they won't defend it. They'll just take a hysterical, nagging woman's approach and instead say that if you don't agree with them you have a personal problem, and there is no need to discuss it on any level because everything you say is the result of said personal problem.

I have never abused or been disrespectful to a woman, and consider myself an upstanding gentleman.

For the record, I currently have a Slav GF. She's about the same height as me (half an inch shorter), but that's cool because I'm 12 years older. I'm not going to post her pics here, for obvious privacy reasons (maybe if we get married I will, because then there's no backing out anyway as it's public record), but she's a solid 8. She is very well taken care of, and I believe, happy. I don't talk to her about politics or race, save to make some jokes about Jews or Blacks, and this is exactly how I want the situation to be.

The idea of "finding your soulmate" who agrees with your political views and thus confirms your value as a man is something I find disgusting and pathetic. Women should look nice and be pleasant to be around. They should do helpful things like cook and clean. They should make you laugh. They should not be there to deal with your political views or confirm your value as a man. This is not a natural role for her, and any woman who pretends to want that role presumably has serious emotional/mental problems.

This "soulmate" nonsense is just more Jew gibberish pushed by Jew Hollywood in all these retard romantic comedies where a man is looking for a woman who "truly understands him." It's gay and it isn't real life. Get over it.

"Andrew is ugly, looks like a nigger"

This is the gayest part of all. Men sitting around and critiquing my face. It's almost too much.

I have never critiqued my own face, as I would feel personally ashamed before God and my ancestors as soon as such a thought entered my mind. I have always done pretty well with women (especially given the above-mentioned short stature - height is the number one thing women respond to). So I don't sit around thinking "how handsome am I?" and would take serious issue with any man who does that.

But I have masculine facial features. These men are clearly cuckolds, and have in their minds the idea that "masculine=ugly=nigger."

It's embarrassing. I am embarrassed for them. But of course, they can't be embarrassed, as they are just nameless internet people trying to destroy anyone who is actually trying to fix anything.

One last kick in the face from the boomers before they die-out. Make sure the kids have no chance to come back.

Just to repeat

This isn't an attack on SF, which is an institution. It is simply a response to the bizarre attacks that have been coming from a certain portion of that forum for a very long time now, and which I have always just blown off because I've no desire to be involved in some gay-ass bitch-fight with a bunch of creepy internet weirdos who sit around making up fantasies about my sex life.

But as the whole point of this little operation is to try and dissuade my own people from believing in me, I have presented a full response here for the sake of my own people.

Plus, reading that "he's 5'2"" part kinda pushed me over the edge.

Anyway. Hate talking about myself, because this site isn't about me. This site is about my agenda, which has nothing to do with me as an individual, but relates only to me as a member of a group. It should always be a red flag when anyone seeks to make any of this stuff about individuals rather than the agenda.

Because it doesn't matter who we are.

What matters is our plan.

But now I suppose everyone who reads this will know me a bit better, and maybe there's some value in that.

#15

I'm slightly taller than you ! HAH !

#16

I'm a woman and I think 99.9% of the time you are spot on about women. I have seen some serious b.s. attacks on you and your family and I think it's totally queer. Your site is the very best news site around!!!! Thank You !!!

#17

The site keeps on getting better, Andrew. You are doing a fantastic job.

Also, when you deal with these attacks comprehensively and dispassionately it makes people with intelligence ashamed to side with the shill panties-in-a-bunch opposition.:slight_smile:

#18

I got chased off of SF for saying 'There are no good jews' in response to a Kapner video. Whether those with a high post count represent the best of that community as they tend to elsewhere is up to debate. I also have a savant friend who is incapable of lying(however is still very much capable of being incorrect) who swears to me he traced the site to a server owned by a banker jew(way back when, before people used proper privacy.)

I'm glad the site was there when I woke to the JQ and began searching to see if I was alone or not. Forgoing social media all I discovered was SF and Varg Vikernes, the later had no community at the time. Now however the newest generation has superior hangouts.

#19

Yeah bro. Always felt tall in Romania, where I am exactly average.

A good place for me, generally. Hope they leave the EU.

#20

Thank you. Most non-feminist women agree with me.

#21

This shit is why I left Stormfront a couple of months after getting redpilled, and haven't been back. Been with you over a year now Andrew, and this site just keeps getting better and better. Who gives a fuck what a bunch of old cat ladies in their 60s and JIDF trolls are saying on a website stuck in a time warp from 2002? You shouldn't!

#22

Stormfront is basically half cuck. I used to post there, and I would get into debates with libertarians and Jew lovers all the time, as well as feminists (I'm female). Being in favor of eugenics is considered taboo there, and so is being National Socialist to a degree. I prefer this site, and I can actually say nigger.

#23

Stormfront is full of cucks and trolls.

#24

What about VNNForum?

#25

Actually I shouldn't have said that. I don't know if they are "fading" or not.

The only thing I know about them is I joined there about 2 years ago, made one thread in which no-one posted, and forgot about it.

I've checked VNN a little bit, but honestly, what's the point in shopping around if you've already found the best?

#26

I'm glad for everything Stormfront has done to spread the word, but better websites exist now, it's time to move on.

#27

I agree, most of the old garde is useless, they are ego-driven, have a chip on their shoulder, looking for conflict (in a negative way), strongly dislike the young generation, can't relate to us, want to be part of a special group of people (or be a one man group) and worst of all, they lack any sense of humour.

We should strive to be a community with the occasional meanspirited banter, not some cult of the individual.

#28

Yeah.

It is bizarre to me that anyone would attack me while claiming to be pro-White.

Especially while I have never attacked anyone in the pro-White movement, and a thread like this one on Stormfront would be immediately deleted on this forum, as I don't allow drama.

It is very easy to determine who actually cares and who just wants to jerk-off and feel good about themselves. Most of the people who actually care are younger people.

#29

Yes, mostly because we are a different type of people from the average person on Stormfront or the average person from an older generation. Not sure different in what way exactly.

Less punk and neofolk and more metal and classical.

If that makes sense.

#30

They became WNs because they agreed with the ideology.

We became WNs because the world is burning.