As welfare cuts are getting worse in England

#1

I don't see anyone blaming the corrupt government bringing in more shitskins to England which fucks the benefits system more! This is done deliberately by the corrupt regime!

http://www.barkinganddagenhampost.co.uk/news/politics/feature_barking_and_dagenham_third_worst_affected_in_uk_by_welfare_cuts_1_4484384

:rage:

#2

Maybe they will go back to shitskin land.

#3

I bloody do hope so!

#4

the reason why eastern europe will stay in tact is there is nothing to take. no gibs

game theory at its best.

even if kebabs get housed there they will just run away to the west.

#5

The sooner the global welfare state fails the better. We are better off poor than enriched by third world excrement coming to get our handouts.
The church and volunteer organizations used to help the poor, now its been "democratized" so we all have no choice about who we help and how much. I would gladly help White children and young people financially but I hate getting my pocket picked to support dysgenic breeding of greasy muds.

#6

no wonder shitskins are poor because of their genetics

they can starve and hunt another shitskin for food for all i fucking care!

#7

That poor fat Jewish fuck, he might starve on only 26 euros a month. piece of shit Jew

#8

I agree. Sometimes I feel quite heartless, but I will not donate my money to any organizations anymore. most of them don't do what they say, are Jew based, and end up supporting anti-whites or Jews.

#9

I wouldn't be holding my breath. Parasites only leave when the host is dead.

#10

I keep hearing that it is now illegal for South African charities to restrict their charitable work to "whites only". That they are required to do a certain percentage of their work for blacks as well as whites. But I can't verify these reports.

For example, in speaking of South Africa, Dan Roodt, American Renaissance, November 9, 2012 says the following :

Will the US Follow South Africa Down the Path of White Decline?

The latest proposal is for all charities, such as orphanages or soup kitchens, to lose their non-profit status if they serve any whites at all. It would mean that charitable organizations could serve only blacks, and that whites would not be allowed to help each other in any organized way, even to alleviate poverty or care for orphaned children.

I'm afraid that's what it will come to in England, and in the US eventually.

#11

What? How do they even pretend to justify that? You'd think they say "any organization that exclusively helps whites". But saying any organization that helps whites loses its tax exempt status is insane.