This is my assumption. I don't know if the cause of death will be released as I don't imagine any investigation at all into this event. Looking at the footage of the fat woman, I did not see any blood. While she could have died from blunt trauma to the head, my guess is that it was a heart attack. Stormers are devote advocates of healthy living and have produced many articles praising healthy weight. But Antifa encourages anything goes and anything that doesn't is an infringement on their "rights". Fat shaming might have saved her. Not knowing that your heart can't handle this kind of intensity and that your body is too heavy to move swiftly out of the way also didn't help. Also can't seem to see a helicopter in that other pic, but that's another topic.
Assumption: Fat Woman "Killed" by Challenger died of Heart Attack
Just because an auto-pedestrian victim (I use the term 'victim' in the lightest possible way) doesn't have visible deformities, contusions, abrasions, lacerations or swelling visible in a photo only showing the front of her torso and the front of her thunder thighs doesn't mean that the posterior portion of her torso and head is injury-free and that she isn't bleeding into her torso and/or that she doesn't have a closed head injury.
Wait for the medical examiners report before coming to any conclusions. It's doubtful that a local ME's office would be corrupted.
Understood, assumptions are not conclusions. They were performing CPR on her. It's unlikely that the crash velocity would have caused those internal injuries with the amount of cushion her body supplied. There would have been indicators of a head injury.
She probably died from the blunt force trauma Her boyfriend Tyrone gave her when he beat her the night before.
That simply isn't true though.
Even the fat layer of an extremely obese individual (and I'm talking like orca, shed-a-bed fat here where they're 500+ pounds) isn't going to be able to withstand the ft-lbs of force produced of being crushed between two cars.
People still get injured today when they're the occupants of two different cars and they're seatbelt restrained drivers with airbags, a steel cage and crumple zones. An auto-ped victim has none of that to absorb the impact. The fat would just slop out of the way and the bumpers would be on their way to the ribs, spine and thoracic organs.
What simply isn't true? I am factoring in the speed of the car. Also, from what I believe is footage of the victim, the body was not crushed between two cars. I am simply inquiring and had presented a possibly outcome, which I stated was an assumption. I have reviewed new footage and there is a case for head trauma causing death However, I don't feel like you are making a good argument. Yes, I agree people get injured today. I am not saying that injury would not occur. This is a fatality from a 30 mph crash. My point is that this information does not appear to be sought out by our board, nor in the media. If it was a heart attack that would be a significant change in the narrative. That's all I am saying.
^This
[redacted]
I'm not saying that she didn't die of a heart attack (because I'm not the medical examiner doing the autopsy, I'm not a physician who's examined her and I simply don't know), I'm just saying that it's extremely unlikely that she croaked from an MI.
She got crushed between two cars. Common sense doesn't say heart attack, it says internal bleeding from being crushed equals D.E.A.D.
Ok. Point made. Thanks for the education. The footage I saw did not show a crush, but maybe we are thinking / seeing different things. I did say in my last post that upon review it looked like she took hard trauma to the head, and so my mind is changing. I just don't like that it seems like no one cares how she died and is just running with the Challenger did good theme.
Hasn't the media spent the past day talking about how it was premeditated, and therefore would be first-degree murder?