Subject: Re: BG-101 Intel gathering options
Date: 95-01-12 03:08:33 EST
From: cntrspy@iapps.org (Executive Protection Associates)
Sender: owner-bodyguard-101-l@netcom.com
Reply-to: bodyguard-101-l@netcom.com
To: bodyguard-101-l@netcom.com

= = =  I always consider it a GOOD THING , but it is not always possible
or practical.  There are some celebs that don't want anything to do with
guns--- then there is the law.  In the US we have 50 separate and
different state laws re: firearms + territorial laws, and transportation
regulations.  Overseas the firearms laws are even more strict.

     Even though I have a CCW ( concealed weapons permit ) in 
several states, I can't take it with me when I vacation in lets say--
Hawaii, or New York, or Stratford on Avon, or  Washington D.C.- -

Chris

====================================================


>I would have thought that if an armed attack was possible then carrying is
>considered a GOOD THING (tm).  Unless (like me) you live in a country 
(England) 
>that does not allow carrying of firearms for protection (I seem to remember
>that there are exceptions, but I am not sure - Anyone know???)
>
>Yours 
>
>-- 
>Robert Agar-Hutton
>
>     +-------------------------------------------------------------------+
>     |             And they all lived happily ever after...              |
>     +--------------------robert@winghigh.demon.co-----------------------+
>     | Protectics Limited                                                |
>     | Corporate Lifestyle Training                                      |
>     |      Stress Management                                            |
>     |      Workplace Self Preservation          Tel: +44 (0)1582 400111 |
>     +-------------------------------------------------------------------+
>
>



----------------------- Headers --------------------------------
From owner-bodyguard-101-l@netcom.com Thu Jan 12 03:05:02 1995
Received: from netcom2.netcom.com by mail03.mail.aol.com with ESMTP
	(1.37.109.11/16.2) id AA060127902; Thu, 12 Jan 1995 03:05:02 -0500
Return-Path: <owner-bodyguard-101-l@netcom.com>
Received: by netcom2.netcom.com (8.6.9/Netcom)
	id UAA09967; Wed, 11 Jan 1995 20:07:15 -0800
Received: from shell1.best.com by netcom2.netcom.com (8.6.9/Netcom)
	id UAA09948; Wed, 11 Jan 1995 20:07:10 -0800
Received: from cntrspy.vip.best.com (cntrspy.vip.best.com [204.156.129.183])
by shell1.best.com (8.6.9/8.6.5) with SMTP id UAA10501 for
<bodyguard-101-l@netcom.com>; Wed, 11 Jan 1995 20:07:16 -0800
Message-Id: <199501120407.UAA10501@shell1.best.com>
X-Sender: cntrspy@best.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 1995 20:05:27 -0800
To: bodyguard-101-l@netcom.com
From: cntrspy@iapps.org (Executive Protection Associates)
Subject: Re: BG-101 Intel gathering options
X-Mailer: <PC Eudora Version 1.4>
Sender: owner-bodyguard-101-l@netcom.com
Precedence: list
Reply-To: bodyguard-101-l@netcom.com

