
|
“A Journey to Jewish Joy”; “Trembling Before G-d”
Now available in home video, the 2001 “Trembling Before G-d” The 2001
documentary by Sandi Simcha Dubowski dealt with gay and lesbian
members of the Orthodox and Chasidic communities struggling against
all odds to be accepted.
Mazursky’s documentary, which premieres tomorrow at Lincoln Center
as part of a May 4 - 10 film festival honoring the 77 year old actor
and director, follows him on a visit to the village of Uman in the
Ukraine, where thousands of Chasidic Jews make a pilgrimage each year
during the week of Rosh Hashanah in order to pray at the grave of
Rabbi Nachman, one of their most revered leaders who died at the age
of 38 in 1810. For the Chasidic sects, this is like Moslems going to
Mecca. As became more and more obvious to me when watching Mazursky’s
amusing documentary, this is not the only similarity between Jewish
and Islamic fundamentalism.
|
|
|
|
|
Paul Mazursky trying on Chasidic haberdashery
For fans of Larry David’s “Curb Your Enthusiasm,” Paul Mazursky will
be instantly recognizable as Mel Brooks’s partner in the episodes when
David becomes cast in the role of Max Bialystock. As a running gag,
the always frowning Mazursky keeps arguing unsuccessfully to Brooks
that Larry David would a disastrous choice. He doesn’t know at the
time that Brooks chose David because he was tired of being involved
with the show and expected David to ruin it, a reference of course to
the plot of “The Producers”.
|
 |
|
|

|
"Be There Or Be Square"
Mazursky’s film is little more than a home movie, costing only
$50,000 to make. However, it is extremely funny and engaging. Since I
am not sure it will ever make it into the theaters, I urge New Yorkers
to consider seeing it tomorrow especially if the “Jewish Question”
intrigues you, just as it did Karl Marx, Karl Kautsky and Abram Leon.
|
|
|
|
|
"It's A Thumbs Up"
Mazursky was persuaded to make the trip to Uman by his observant
Beverly Hills optometrist, who accompanies him there. Mazursky makes
it clear at the beginning and at the end of the film that he is
totally secular and unreligious. This does not prevent him from
enjoying the experience. He obviously feels little identification with
the religious Jews but tries to make the viewer and implicitly
himself, understand their beliefs. I once went through a similar
experience about ten years ago when I went to Bahai services in New
York. I never took the whole idea of worshipping God seriously, but I
found the Bahais engaging in their own way. I never got used to the
idea, however, of their belief that homosexuals were beyond
redemption–shared by the clergy in “Trembling Before G-d.”
|
 |
|
|

|
The Great Yiddish Comedians Are Dying Off
Mazursky’s generation is dying out now. These are the men and women
who came up in the Catskill resorts, Hollywood and Broadway musicals
and 1950s television variety shows. Virtually none of them were
religious, but their sensibility was quintessentially Jewish. This was
expressed most of all by their sense of humor. In one scene after
another, we see Mazursky cracking up a bunch of Chasidim with a
vintage joke.
|
|
|
Some Of The Greatest Jokes
Cohen meets Schwartz in New York’s old garment district and Cohen
says, “I heard about the fire.” Schwartz puts his fingers to his lips
and whispers, “Shhhh, tomorrow.”
For the benefit of non-Jews, the joke goes back to the Depression days
when businessmen facing bankruptcy set fire to their shops to collect
the insurance.
|
 |
|
|
 |
What Would Momma Say
By contrast, “Trembling Before G-d” is no laughing matter. It
profiles a number of deeply religious Jews who have been ostracized by
their community for the “sin” of homosexuality.
A number of the interviewees have their faces hidden since they
have not come out yet. Those with the courage to show themselves come
across as much more ethical than those who hold them in judgment. Two
women who live together are shown preparing a Friday night dinner,
which is a kind of ceremony in Jewish households. Neither woman’s
parents will have anything to do with them.
|
|
|
Will His Synagogue Forgive him?
A gay man from Los Angeles is seen in a discussion with a rabbi
that he holds in very high regard. He tries to explain to the rabbi
that his desire for other men is just as natural as his desire for his
wife. The rabbi can only respond that the only way that the man can
remain a Jew is if he represses his desires.
|
 |
As director Dubrowski put it in an interview with indieWire, the rabbis
tended to be Jewish versions of Jerry Falwell on such questions:
When you actually went to the Rabbis, how did you find the ones who would
talk on camera?
Dubowski: At one point, I took a trip to Israel specifically to talk with
Rabbis. It was a very difficult trip with about six weeks spent making as
many phone calls as possible and following up on as many contacts as
possible. I went to see the former chief Sephardic Rabbi of Israel. You
wake up at 4 AM and sign your name on a list and wait for seven hours
until finally you are in the doorway. There are all these people pushing
behind you. You get inside the chamber and you have two people on either
side of you and he is sitting above you with a crown on his head. I went
up to the Rabbi and said, “You know there are so many people I have met
over the past 7 years who are in pain.” I told him stories briefly of the
people in my movie and asked him, “Is there anything you can say to help
them?” He said to tell them two words: “animalistic and abomination.” I
pushed my way back and said to him: “You know these are Torah Jews. They
know the prohibition. What can you say to them to ease their pain?” And he
answered: “Say the first ten chapters of the Kabbal, aloud. It will be
eradicated.”
It should not come as any great surprise that gay and lesbian orthodox
Jews are using the anonymity of the Internet to make connections with each
other, just as dissidents in a dictatorship would. Websites such as
GayJews.org and The World Congress of Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, and
Transgender Jews are challenging homophobia in organized Jewry all over
the world, often using a deep understanding of scripture to buttress their
arguments. As is typical in a world steeped in Talmudic disputation, there
are often genuinely inspired interpretations. For example, at GayJews.org,
Kevin J. Saunders explains that gay sex might be acceptable if it is seen
in the same terms as the Hilchot Shabbat, where “Rav Noivert and the Tzitz
Eliezer specifically permit someone who is diabetic and insulin dependent
to regularly violate the Sabbath in order to puncture the skin and a vein
to inject the insulin.” So, if penetration can be life-saving, why can’t
it be fun as well?
When I watch ultra-orthodox Jews in such documentaries, I am reminded of
why difficult it is for me to romanticize political Islamic. Religions
that are so obsessed with sin and guilt are really not my cup of tea. When
I was a religion major at Bard College in the early 1960s, I found myself
much more interested in Bacchic rites than in the self-abnegating “sky
religions” with their stern father figures.
Of course, I never really felt right about such things until I put
religion behind me entirely.
Peter Grimm |