Initial News Report Said It Was An Ammo Dump

The first reporting made it sound like an ammo dump, guarded by six soldiers at a gate. Now it turns out it was a large base of at least 3,000. Reports from people at the base itself said 275 were injured and maybe 80 dead. The attack was a mortar round that hit an ammo dump, and that makes no sense.

Building a ammunition dump inside a base

If you build a base just south of Baghdad, it better be super secure. And if you house a major ammunition dump there, next to 3000 soldiers, that better be bullet proof. Logic says the munitions had to be in a underground facility. You just don't leave thousands of tank and artillery shells in the middle of a fort, where a single mortar round could set it off.

A Logical Conclusion

The way this is being cover up, it points to sabotage. When you store this stuff it is categorized and isolated so one shell doesn't set off the other 10,000. A source of the ignition was a fire, so the best guess is napalm, or phosphorous. You had a specially designed explosive delivered into that ammo dump.

It wasn't an CIA, American, Shiite, or Sunni operation, but it was an Israeli.