Giuliani’s Closet

|
A Naughty Naughty Boy
Rudy Giuliani’s closet is filled to overflowing, and its contents
are dropping out all over just as he ratchets up his presidential
bid. And there’s a lot more than bones in those dark recesses:
go here for the full (450 pages!)
story, but I’ll give you the short (and spicy) version:
|
|
|
Marries His Cousin
It’s all about the “weirdness factor,” as
a secret study done by the Giuliani
election team and leaked to the “Smoking Gun” website puts it.
There’s the matter of his first marriage, to his cousin,
Regina Peruggi: Rudy claims that
for 14 years he didn’t know that she was a twig on his very own
family tree, but if you
buy that, you’re no doubt
still waiting for those “weapons of
mass destruction” to be unearthed in Iraq any day now.
|
 |
|
|

|
Second Wife
Although he doesn’t say exactly when he took the trouble to
investigate his family genealogy more closely, Rudy started seeing
Donna Hanover in 1982: his marriage
to Peruggi wasn’t annulled by the Church until the tail end of ’83.
This particular corner of
Giuliani’s closet is a particularly dank and cobwebby realm, best
not looked at too closely. As the secret study put it, the matter of
his first marriage “has been raised in the media as an extremely
bizarre event.” And we’re talking about his home town media: just
wait until the evangelicals in the outbacks get the lowdown on what
has charitably been described as Rudy’s “chaotic” personal life,
which is racy even for cosmopolitan New York: this was reportedly
the real reason he backed down from challenging Hillary Clinton in
the Senate race. The Giuliani dossier goes on to bluntly assess the
candidate’s vulnerabilities:
|
|
|
Neocons Are Used To Intermarriage
“In reviewing the news stories describing this event and others
in his private life, there are numerous inconsistencies and
questionable circumstances about how long the two were married,
whether Giuliani knew he was marrying his second cousin, whether he
dated other women while still married.”
None of this matters, of course, to the neocons who seem to have
united around Giuliani: indeed,
they rather prefer it, I think, because it underscores their
elitism, their sense of themselves as philosopher-kings exempt from
the myths that dominate the lives of ordinary men and women. There
is one truth for the elites, and
another one for the masses. If you’re a
Straussian, this isn’t monstrous
hypocrisy: it’s the natural order of things.
|
 |
|
|

|
The Crusader
Ah, but don’t worry, the anointed one will be able to bamboozle
the bourgeoisie on account of his ascension into the mythic
iconography of 9/11, and his reputation as America’s Mayor and his
hardline neoconservative foreign policy views: according to
CBS News, Rudy “perhaps more than
any other candidate comes closest to holding neoconservative views
on foreign policy.” Rudy will come packaged as the uber-Bush, a more
decisive and even ruthless leader who will complete the
neoconservative revolution by launching simultaneous invasions of
all Muslim countries, and with
Russia thrown into the bargain for
good
measure. This is to be followed
very shortly by the ditching of the Constitution, and, presumably,
the
End of History.
Or, at least,
the end of our old republic, and
the beginning of the age of the American Caesars. Let a descendant
of the ancient Romans reclaim the imperial purple – yes, life is
full of little ironies, and mostly they are unpleasant surprises.
|
|
|
The neocon conception of American foreign policy as seeking out “benevolent
global hegemony” is perfectly suited to Rudy’s imperial
persona. His supposed strengths as the “national security” candidate
are what, one supposes, the neocons regard as their trump card:
i.e., a continuation of our crazed foreign policy which is opposed
by
more than two thirds of the
American people.
This, however, is what counts to the ghoulish coalition
that currently controls the GOP: Upper West Side neocons, and
born-again backwoods folk quite
inured to the idea of kissin’
cousins. Add to this the rising generation of
Ann Coulter fans who are ready for
a new Lider Maximo, and we have Bushism without Bush, a dissolute
prince of the city whose inner
demons are to be enacted on the world stage.
|
 |
|
|
 |
American Caligula
If we are going to compare American Presidents to Roman emperors
– a practice, I fear, bound to become customary in the annals of
future history tomes – a President Giuliani would probably turn into
an American Caligula, who, in a gesture of contempt for the
surviving institutions of the old Roman republic, appointed his
horse proconsul.
Bernard Kerik, Rudy’s former close
associate and
his pick for Homeland Security
chief, is probably comparable to that, although I wouldn’t want to
insult horses, but you get the idea if you
follow the
links.
|
|
|
Bernie Kerik
What interests me about Kerik, however, isn’t the alleged
organized crime connections, or even his typically New Yawkish
grabbiness and gaudiness, his
persona as a “character” – the “Mayhem
Magnet” --but his briefly held position as
“interim” minister of the interior
in newly-conquered Iraq. Here we had just subjugated the country,
and the first wave of neocon-connected appointees were flown over
there, including Kerik – who, as unofficial head of the
thuggery department, set up the
Iraqi national police. Here’s
a clip from his interview with the
Lehr News Hour that gives us the flavor of his methods and practices
“If you pick the right leaders and you place them in the right
positions, let them do their job and that's sort of what's going on
in the police now. We appointed a senior deputy minister, we
appointed the chiefs in Baghdad throughout the rest of the country.
We have to make sure that we keep track of them, monitor them, but
let them do their job, let them pick the right people; then the job
gets done.”
|
 |
|
|
 |
Kerik Trainees
These “police”
are now functioning as
death squads, executing and
ethnically cleansing Sunnis from Baghdad and environs: they have
already accomplished this in the largely Shi’ite south. The job is
indeed getting done.
If and when Rudy takes the oath of office, and swears to uphold
the Constitution, there will be many more Keriks to come. Believe
you me, it isn’t going to be pretty. About as pretty as
Rudy in
drag.
|
|
|
Not that there’s anything wrong with drag queens, provided they’re
either
entertaining or
convincing. I once saw a group of them
standing on a
Jalan Sultan Ismail in Kuala Lumpur, on
Christmas eve: they seemed like young
and very girlish elves, so small and willowy were they, calling out in
their singsong voices. More feminine than your average American woman,
in any case: exclaiming on their beauty, I was corrected by my young,
uh,
guide, who assured me that these were “lady-boys.”
(Another of life’s little ironies: there are more lady-boys on Jalan
Sultan Ismail, a busy thoroughfare in a supposedly Islamic country, than
there ever were on San Francisco’s Castro Street. )
I don’t care one whit about Giuliani’s private life, although I have
a hard time believing the evangelicals are quite ready for the rutting
Rudy. He is, after all, an Italian male, with certain impulses wired
into his brain, particularly that part of it that rules the
sexual imagination. I say, more power
to him in that department – life, as the Italians know, is to be
enjoyed, rather than endured. But what we shouldn’t have to endure is a
Giuliani presidency, which would be a disaster in both the foreign
policy and civil liberties departments. As far as the latter is
concerned, if he treats the Constitution like he treated the New York
City Charter, we are in for a hard time. Regarding the latter, I’ll just
cite his
stated views:
“We've got to start getting beyond Iraq. We've got to be thinking
about Iran. We have to think about Syria. We have to be thinking about
Pakistan and Afghanistan and making sure that the transition in
Afghanistan goes correctly. We have to be ready for the fact that,
whatever happens in Iraq, success or failure — success will help us in
the War on Terror. Failure will hurt us. But the war is still going to
go on. They're still going to want to come here and kill us.”
It wasn’t Iraqis who attacked us on 9/11, and yet Giuliani insists on
seeing everything through the prism of 9/11 – and so, in his world, we
don’t need to inquire too closely into who “they” are. In this Orwellian
age, the enemy is bound to change, anyway, at any particular moment:
you’ll recall that, yesterday, the enemy was the Ba’athist “dead-enders,”
and their Sunni supporters. Today it is renegade Shi’ites, like
the Mahdi Army, and the very “police” force-death squads that
Giuliani’s buddy Kerik set up. A more classic example of “blowback,”
as the CIA types call it, would be hard to imagine. And we’ll be getting
plenty of blowback from the foreign policy of the Giuliani
administration, promising to be even more reckless (if that’s
imaginable) than Bush’s – and that’s my real objection to the first
drag queen in the White House.
|