Memo
from Judicial
Out of the fifty
rebels out there, Toben is one of the few 'Real'
historian/revisionist/academics there is.
Memo
from Fredrick Töben, Adelaide, 5 March 2007
The pending
action in the Federal Court of Australia -FCA- will be a costly matter.
I am fortunate in that I am on a disability pension, which enables me to
participate in this court action without having to pay for direct court
costs, such as filing documents. Any government instrumentalities that
charge fees will waive or discount such for pensioners. The mad rush
into privatisation will, of course, put a stop to all this, and thereby
will have a chilling effect on the individual without money to seek
justice.
The truism of
the following maxim is illustrated by this matter before the FCA: that
there are two ways of killing a person: by direct killing or by taking
someone through a court system – legal persecution – where an individual
loses job, home, family because of the horrendous legal costs involved.
The list of victims of this legal persecution is long and legendary. In
other words history teaches us that it is nothing new. All >>battle of
the wills<< issues throughout recorded history have, if not by direct
murder, been settled through legal means where the result may then also
have been judicial murder, as was the infamous 1945-46 Nuremberg War
Crimes Tribunal’s findings against the Germans.
Mr John Bennett,
president of the Australian Civil Liberties Union has, again, agreed to
handle the financial side of this legal action.
It is again
collecting for the cause. Please, again, be generous in your
contribution.
Please send
your Cash or Cheque to:
Töben Defence Fund
P O Box 1137
Carlton - 3053
Australia
________________________________________________
Clarification:
In anticipation I thank the
many supporters world-wide who, by contributing to this fund, will do
their bit in upholding the principle of free expression. This Appeal in
the FCA is a test-case that will define our free expression parameters,
and by implication will signal how strong Jewish-Zionist influence is in
Australia's judiciary where the current battle rages between Common Law
and Talmudic Law.
