Rev: April 6/99
Here is a list of recommended tactics which can be
used when dealing with skeptics or psychiatrists and
other mental health officials:
=========================================================
From: raven1@nas.net
Subject: The right words
BCC to: @ALLVIC.PML
Date sent: Fri, 5 Mar 1999 07:45:52
Part of our credibility problem is that, almost
without exception, we FIRST approached the
authorities with a very fragmented story, describing
extremely unusual occurrences, which seemed to the
listener as the ravings of a lunatic.
In most cases we ourselves had no idea there was a
spook organization, then or ever.
I'm in the long process of moving, to follow my job
to a new city. The need is apparent to have ready
a new, very much shorter "story" for the new faces
I will encounter. Doctor, lawyer, maybe police,
maybe neighbours.
The goal is a short, portable "story" that takes
only a minute to tell, and most importantly leaves
the listener with no way to INTELLIGENTLY
shoot down the story.
Here's what I've come up with so far:
--------------------------------------------------
LISTENER: What's the problem?
TARGET: I am an MKULTRA victim. MKULTRA is an
international program of psychological experimentation
which has been conducted since the 1950s. MKULTRA
uses involuntary test subjects, sometimes incarcerated,
sometimes in the victim's home and community.
[Second paragraph where needed]
The in-home experiments use advanced technology to
apply stress and then to observe through walls, using
through-the-wall radar technology. This is accompanied
by street harassment and home/work break-ins.
LISTENER: A-a-a-a-hhh ... MKULTRA ended twenty
years ago.
TARGET: Oh? On what DATE did MKULTRA end?
The Mafia has been exposed too. Did the Mafia
end when it was first exposed? If MKULTRA ended,
what agency caused it to end?
(The target can be certain of this stand - no
MKULTRA perp has ever served a day in jail.)
--------------------------------------------------
What this short dialogue does is quote ONLY
FACTUAL DOCUMENTED INFORMATION, which cannot be
impeached.
The ONLY way the listener can exit without accepting
the factual information is to use a completely
idiotic response like "A-a-a-a-hhh ... you're nuts".
In such a dialogue, it is wisest to AVOID the many
advanced effects, just staying with generalities.
It would be OK to elaborate on the break-and-enter
damage, though - that is physical and factual.
By AVOIDING the technical stuff and amazing details,
you don't give your listener the chance to "explain"
away one incident at the time, which is invalid of
course, as an argument. One-at-a-time arguments are used
frequently, so avoid them by keeping your experiences
packaged as "MKULTRA", which, by the Mafia analogy,
is absolutely true. MKULTRA NEVER ENDED.
That is a fact, even though the program code name
may have ended. Like "Cosa Nostra" vs. the original
"Mafia".
Eleanor
=========================================================
------- first words to "no evidence" challenge ----------
From: Self
To: raven1@nas.net
Subject: New "first words" for response to nay-sayers
Hi -
Some of you may know about the concept of "verbal Judo".
This is taught to police, and is not at all what you might
expect. It is NOT about forcefully barking orders like
"Do it NOW!".
Instead, it is UNEXPECTEDLY using very carefully
chosen words spoken in, say, a standoff situation, in
which the suspect's options and the consequences are
carefully listed. This has been demonstrated on TV.
It is the UNEXPECTEDNESS that is the key to making
it work - the suspect is expecting a shouting match but
is disarmed by this novel, authoritative, low-key method
of verbal tactics.
I just had a "go around" with someone claiming to be
our supporter but who constantly harps on the fact
that we "have no evidence." We all know this is the
number one verbal shot fired at us when we try to get
the authorities, media, or doctors to help.
We need a short "first words" answer which they do
not expect and which will disarm that barrier.
I'd like to suggest this first-words response to those
who say we have no evidence:
"YOU ARE RIGHT. THERE IS NO EVIDENCE.
"THE ELECTRONIC DEVICES INHERENTLY
LEAVE NO EVIDENCE. IT IS A BUILT-IN
FEATURE.
"SO HOW IS YOUR AGENCY GOING TO COPE
WITH NEW ELECTRONIC CRIMES WHERE
THERE IS NO EVIDENCE?"
You can assert that this aspect must be coped with -
to ignore it licenses crimes performed using neuro-
influence technology.
You can also state that the task of legislative, legal,
and law enforcment personnel is to find ways to
cope, not to label targetted people as crazy.
In the past I've said such things, but with far too much
wordy stuff first. I recommend that for maximum
"verbal Judo" effect, the words in capital letters above
should be the very first things said in response.
Eleanor
============= now the tactics list =====================
1. Never allow the skeptics to require YOU to explain
the motives of your harassers. If you are held up
in a situation where there are no witnesses, you
are not asked to explain the sick personality of
the robber. NOR are you told that "because there
is NO TANGIBLE EVIDENCE, there has been no crime".
You might reply: "Easy question. My harassers
are the same folks who started in this line of
work under the MKULTRA programs, and their motives
haven't changed a bit."
Or, maybe this: "National security is so important
that sacrificing the well-being of a few individuals
for the good of the many is justified."
2. Never let them start picking away at harassment
occurrences in isolation from the others, because
any single occurrence could be coincidence. Force
them to "explain away" ALL the occurrences TAKEN
TOGETHER, OR NOT AT ALL.
Here is a bulletin offering a way to handle this:
One of our more difficult challenges is
overcoming the natural tendency of nay sayers
who feel they can "explain" our troubles by
looking at each different harassment type and
offering alternate theories. A day ago I had
another "it-is-just-poltergeists" explanation
come to me, triggered by my description of the
frequent remote physical manipulation effects.
I'd like to offer here a common sense analogy
which we can use when dealing with this very
flawed approach. We can answer:
"It's just like a computer image, made up of
thousands of pixels.
"If an observer sets up a microscope in front
of his screen, and looks at every single pixel,
one at a time, he will not have the slightest
idea what the image is about.
"If he finds, say, that 19,221 pixels are
flesh-coloured, he could declare that the image
is of a belly dancer, when in fact, it is a
portrait of George Washington.
"THAT is how absurd explanations taken out of
the full context are."
3. Microwave weapons WERE MADE PUBLIC BY THE MEDIA
IN THE MID-1960s. Microwave weapons were being
used by the Soviets to attack the U.S. embassy
in Moscow. After that, there has been a total
media blackout from government sources to this
very day.
Given the scientific progress over the last thirty
years, there is absolutely no way any responsible
health official, government official, media reporter,
or skeptic can possibly argue that they existed in
the mid-60s but not now. No way.
4. Remind your listener/reader that microwave anti-
personnel weapons canNOT be tested on crash
dummies, and LIVE test subjects are required. This
is different than other classes of weapons.
5. Put the list of declassified technologies "in their
face" and KEEP THEM THERE. Don't EVER let a
psychiatrist tell you voices in your head must
indicate mental illness any more! Voice to skull
radio transmission is now a de-classified,
documented reality.
See unclass.htm
6. Tell your listener/reader that at least one
US PATENT exists for direct transmission of sound
into the human auditory cortex (a section of the
brain). It is # 4,858,612, issued Dec. 19, 1983
to Philip Stocklin.
7. Keep your story INEXTRICABLY tied in with the
CIA & military's programmes like MKULTRA et al.
When they were exposed by the US Congress in 1977,
all the intel agencies did were these three
simple steps:
1. "Retire", en masse, the key employees who
had worked on the MKULTRA programmes.
2. The "retirees" formed "private contractor"
companies, BEYOND CONGRESSIONAL OVERSIGHT.
3. The important projects, like the electronic
weapons projects, were able to continue
within these "contractor" companies.
The MKULTRA pogroms (not programs!) have never
actually stopped - they continue with in-home
involuntary testing to this day and hour.
Perhaps the acronym "EMKULTRA", electronic
MKULTRA, should come into use to describe the
current electronic war on innocent citizens.
8. Remind psychiatrists that:
- Their training does not qualify them to
speak authoritatively on electronic weapons
- They know nothing about CLASSIFIED weapons,
electronic or otherwise
Some psychiatrists develop an attitude that
their medical training means they "know better"
than their patients on ALL SUBJECTS. This is
not true, of course, and if you are being
treated as if electronic weapons attack is "all
a big mistake, all in your imagination", remind
them of their limitations.
9. If mental health workers butt into your life
and in so doing, say wordlessly that you are
not sane, ask them this question:
IF SOMEONE WERE BEING ASSAULTED BY ELECTRONIC
WEAPONS, WHAT WOULD YOU EXPECT A SANE PERSON
TO DO IN RESPONSE?
Fair's fair.
10. Suppose someone in authority tells you that you
cannot, say, demonstrate an electronic weapon
because you have been under a psychiatrist's
care, and maybe have been in a psychiatric
ward or hospital.
You can respond:
HOW MANY POLICE OFFICERS NOW ON DUTY, CARRYING
GUNS, HAVE ALSO BEEN UNDER PSYCHIATRIC CARE?
Again, fair's fair.
11. For electronic weapons victims who experience
effects, especially remote manipulation effects,
in the company of others:
Remote manipulation includes harassment effects
like pushing your shopping cart when your hands
are off it, simply banging objects around or
rapping or sliding them, or occasionally levi-
tation of part or all of your body. Closely
related to physical remote manipulation are
spurious operations of electrical equipment.
My (Eleanor's) spooks always try to do little
'tricks' as I pass through my place of employment.
Until Labour Day 1997, their favourite was beeping
every computer battery backup unit (UPS) at me as
I pass by on my normal rounds. Circa Labour Day
1997 I was able to switch off the beepers, and
although the spooks dropped the voltage and
triggered the units to go on battery, they did
not beep. Most employees did not notice this.
So they began looking for other 'tricks' to
keep me 'on edge'. One of their attempts is
cause calculator motors to whir unnaturally
loud as I pass. This is loud and is noticed
by employees, especially the calculator's
owner! (It often scares them!)
One of the ladies in the accounts receivable
department is an engineer and has been quite
curious, and has asked me in plain hearing of
others what is causing that.
Here's the key answer: I say "This is caused
by local microwave hackers". I do NOT relate
the hackers to intelligence agents or contractors,
nor to MKULTRA.
Furthermore, many people have no trouble at all
believing "microwaves" can cause motors to spin.
The combination of the phrases "local hackers"
and "microwaves" paints a picture which is sur-
prisingly acceptable to the general public.
When presented this way, the incident hints at
"just local kids who have tinkered with mom's
microwave oven", or some equally "homey" scen-
ario. This is VERY EASY for the general public
to accept, and introduces the public to what
is happening WITH VERY LITTLE SKEPTICISM.
I recommend to all e-weapon victims that they
consider using this type of approach to get
the events themselves linked to microwave
signals, WITHOUT triggering the public's
"mental immune system" to respond with dis-
belief.
Over time this, I think, can become one way to
get our foot in the public's door.
12. If you suspect you have an implant, find out what
the classic symptoms are for the body region of
concern, and complain loudly about those symtoms.
Usual result: You'll get your xray. Do attempt to
stay as close to the film as possible, to see it your-
self before leaving the xray clinic.
This has worked for others.
13. At time of writing this, I (Eleanor White) am in
contact with about 50 other electronic weapons
testing and harassment victims..
Put yourself on an imagnary jury panel - if you had
fifty independent witnesses, who have never met one
another, giving nearly identical testimony, what effect
would that have on your decision.
14. Many listeners have a hard time believing that our
saintly government officials would carry out or even
condone attacks on innocent citizens.
One response: "We have several corporate whistle-
blowers, and related workers' compensation claimants
who also receive regular doses of electronic weapons
harassment. You don't have trouble believing THAT
motive, do you?"
Another response: "One way this could have all come
about is for government agencies to assign the devel-
opment of neuro-influence weapons to their private
contractors followed by: '...and don't tell us how
you do it or who you test them on'. " This is a
readily acceptable scenario.
15. You may find police and other authorities urging
you to "talk your problems over" with your harassers,
or, get asked why you didn't try.
I've said "I prefer not to speak with people who
persistently harass me - they are obviously not
rational people at all."
Another victim suggests that "People who harass
other people are predators. I don't plan to
have any conversations with predatory people
because they are a threat to my safety and are
very unlikely to listen to any kind of reason."
[This is kind of a difficult question to respond
to. Other suggestions for a response are welcome.]
16. For e-weapon victims who have electronic-telepathic
two-way communication with their torturers, it may
eventually help if you constantly remind them of
these spiritual truths, and you do not need to be
any particular faith to do this:
- Spend some of your (torturers') time reading
books about near-death experiences. Pay close
attention to experiences of those who have
lived thoroughly evil lives.
One chronic evil-doer's near-death experience
was to float horizontal, paralyzed, while small
demons cut off his entire flesh in pieces - and,
he did feel the pain. (This man became a
minister after recovery.)
- Being an atheist has no effect whatever on the
matter of God's existence, or the existence of
Heaven and Hell. The torturers cannot simply
"believe it away".
- The fact that God doesn't step in and stop the
e-weapon torture cannot be taken as evidence
that God doesn't exist or doesn't care. God
RARELY intervenes - in THIS life, that is.
- Once you're in the ground, it is too late.
- If a torturer DOES reform, unspeakably wonderful
pleasures of Heaven are then his inheritance,
and even forgiveness from his victims. The
beauties and simple pleasures which the torturer
denies himself to stay in that line of work will
suddenly return, and the fresh feeling of freedom
will welcome the torturer back into society.
When I 'speak' to my torturers electronically
(and pray for them too) I tell them that the
only thing I strive for is for the WEAPONS
to be made public. The torturers will probably
mostly get away with their deeds, in THIS life,
that is.
- I frequently 'tell' my tortures to step back and
look at the tide of mind control history. The
day this will be exposed IS approaching - and
our publicity efforts will NOT stop. New videos
and radio shows are being worked on all the time
now. Buttons are being worn in high places.
T-shirts are next. The torturers would be very
wise to heed the signs of the logjam breaking up.
17. Remind your listener/reader that our neuro-influence
effects ALWAYS STOP when the electric power fails,
and usually starts up immediately or soon after the
power comes back on.
18. Remind your listener/reader that we victims are
fighting this war for THEM too!
19. If a state or local politician or police official
tries to put you off saying "It's a federal matter",
remind them that the bulk of the laws in the U.S.
and Canada are state or provincial, and states or
provinces do pass laws concerning the use of
weapons.
Furthermore, the ADMINSTRATIVE REGULATIONS which
govern the immediate response of police agencies
are DEFINITELY governed at the state or local
level, even when it comes to how federal laws
are initially enforced.
20. If faced with someone who says "Why should I care?
This doesn't involve many people." Answer that
ethics in conducting research requires the same
ETERNAL vigilance which police corruption requires.
(Courtesy Roy Bercaw.)
21. If questioned as to why "experimenters" would use
in-home test subjects, you could answer like this:
"If you wanted to test weapons designed for use
on civilian populations, would you not test them
in civilian communities?"
22. If a listener/reader tells you they don't know if
they believe it, ask this question (courtesy of
Martti Koski):
"Well if there is any chance at ALL that this IS
really happening, don't you think someone should
FIND OUT?"
23. One item I've been challenged on is that MKULTRA
was "exposed" in 1977, so therefore (the challenger
reasons) it must not exist any more.
Here's a response:
"So the U.S. Senate exposed MKULTRA. OK -
for years, the U.S. Senate, the media, the police,
and private citizens spoke of the MAFIA too.
"Did that stop them from operating?"
Only the RICO laws have had an impact, and
only a set of laws to control intelligence actvities
will ever control whatever new project names
are in use today. All the 1977 exposure did
was force a project name change and give the
intelligence people a chance to lie to the public.
24. Over autumn 1998 I've been having amazing,
though small scale (i.e. me only) success with
publicity and persuasive efforts using "DEVICE"
instead of "WEAPON". (The requests for further
info POURED in after changing that one word.)
I've tried a SECOND tactic which works even
BETTER! I pretend to be a "concerned
citizen-researcher" who has "been researching"
neuro-influence technology (and it's misuse) for
the past 3 years.
I freely discuss OTHER targetted people, and
refer the listener/reader to web sites OTHER
than my own. I never mention my web site
until a reader/listener asks for detailed
specifics of how I came to research this.
25. No proof? The media constantly discusses
issues where there is no proof. President
Clinton's love life is a good recent example.
All a responsible reporter has to do is make
sure the lack of definitive proof is also
mentioned. Then they should feel able to
write about the "no proof" issue, as they
do quite often on issues other than mind
control.
26. No proof? One of the greatest public
services performed by the media is to talk
an issue up to where proof is forthcoming.
The media often HELPS FIND the proof - so
why not in an important issue such as
neuro-influence weapons?
27. "LACK OF EVIDENCE"
When confronted by someone in authority
making this statement, you can reply in
complete confidence:
"That can mean either there is no evidence,
or your agency chooses to ignore the
evidence."
People and agencies have agendas, and when
evidence is presented, sometimes they
CHOOSE to ignore it, resulting in a man-made
"lack of evidence" condition.