``By using very low frequency electromagnetic radiation -- the waves way below radio frequencies on the electromagnetic spectrum -- he [Eldon Byrd] found he could induce the brain to release behavior-regulating chemicals. `We could put animals into a stupor,' he says, by hitting them with these frequencies. `We got chick brains -- in vitro -- to dump 80 percent of the natural opioids in their brains,' Byrd says. He even ran a small project that used magnetic fields to cause certain brain cells in rats to release histamine. In humans, this would cause instant flulike symptoms and produce nausea. `These fields were extremely weak. They were undetectable,' says Byrd. `The effects were nonlethal and reversible. You could disable a person temporarily,' Byrd hypothesizes. `It [would have been] like a stun gun.'``Byrd never tested any of his hardware in the field, and his program, scheduled for four years, apparently was closed down after two, he says. `The work was really outstanding,' he grumbles. `We would have had a weapon in one year.' Byrd says he was told his work would be unclassified, `unless it works.' Because it worked, he suspects that the program `went black.' Other scientists tell similar tales of research on electromagnetic radiation turning top secret once successful results were achieved. There are clues that such work is continuing. In 1995, the annual meeting of four-star U.S. Air Force generals -- called CORONA -- reviewed more than 1,000 potential projects. One was called `Put the Enemy to Sleep/Keep the Enemy From Sleeping.' It called for exploring `acoustics,' `microwaves', and `brain-wave manipulation' to alter sleep patterns. It was one of only three projects approved for initial investigation.''
An html version of this paper can be found at ParaScope. (ParaScope also has CIA interrogation manuals, and some additional EM weapons and mind control information. Try the search feature.)
``...the way they were able to do it was essentially this acceptance in Washington of an absolutely phony reality, one which is accepted in sort of a consensus way ... there may be disagreements on some points -- but there is a general consensus of the world that is brought to bear, and often it is in absolute contradiction to the real world. It is a false reality -- it's a Washington reality.''
Robert Parry is currently with the Consortium for Independent Journalism.
``Suddenly, at the close of 1993, the public was bombarded with `news' about the feeding of radioactive substances to pregnant women and mentally retarded students, about the unethical irradiation of workers, soldiers, mental patients, and prison inmates, and about the government's own internal fears that those experiments had `a little of the Buchenwald touch.' But the story that appeared in The Albuquerque Tribune (circulation: 35,000) on November 15-17, and was then projected into national headlines by the forthright admissions and initiatives of Secretary of Energy Hazel O'Leary, was hardly new.The article goes on to list the chronology of this story no one would touch (and some of the truly outrageous abuses against American citizens that were ignored). Perhaps most shocking from the journalistic side is that the abuses were still ignored or misreported after 1986 when the House Subcommittee on Energy Conservation and Power issued a report listing all the abuses which were treated, years later, as new revelations. (Needless to say, the victims were not notified either. Some found out years later. Other radiation experiments which occurred after 1974 are still secret.)``By 1984, activists and researchers across the country were systematically investigating the human experimentation program and attempting to bring it to public attention. By 1986, documentation of the program was massive, solid, and publicly available.
``I am among those who persistently tried to get national media coverage of this outrageous example of government wrongdoing. To say the media were reluctant to listen would be an understatement. The fact is that, for more than a decade, documentation was ignored and facts were misreported.''
This story was selected as one of the 10 most under-reported news stories of 1994 by Project Censored, along with a document indicating that secrecy was invoked by the government to prevent possible lawsuits and ``adverse effect on public opinion.''
The Johnson administration utilized Army intelligence to spy on and disrupt anti-war protesters and other ``dissidents.'' An excerpt from V. Marchetti and J. Marks' book The CIA and the Cult of Intelligence, 1974:
``... Literal legal justification probably was not the sole reason why Army intelligence was assigned as the main instrument with which to attack the domestic targets; size was another consideration. Neither the CIA nor the FBI had the manpower for an all-out clandestine offensive against the radicals. Nor did either have available large numbers of young intelligence personnel who could actually penetrate the movement. But Army intelligence soon blundered and its domestic surveillance programs were exposed in January 1970 by ex-agent Christopher Pyle, writing in the Washington Monthly. During the following year the military services were forced to withdraw from their massive attack against domestic dissidents; the field was once again left to the `professionals' -- the FBI and the CIA.''
Marchetti and Marks' book also reports that the CIA secretly provided training to 14 New York City policemen, as well as providing ``training'' to officers in other localities. The book describes the Domestic Operations Division (DOD) of the CIA as one of that agency's most secretive divisions. Among its operations were espionage programs against foreign students.
The CIA even aided the White House ``plumbers'' in their break-ins (p. 218). Watergate is often trumpeted as proof that the press will expose government wrongdoing and can even bring down an administration. What it really shows is that an organization as powerful as the Democratic National Committee, along with national newspapers, could just barely manage to fight back against covert attacks from a truly corrupt administration. One is tempted to view the post-Watergate investigations into the CIA's abuses as simply political payback.
(I probably do not need to mention it, but one of the objectives of the secret experimenters -- and bullies in general -- is to turn victims against each other. They also seek to turn potential supporters against the victims. Whether someone has suffered less or more under the system is not really the point, nor is the ``private'' life of the victim. The torturers are the culprits. They try to get people -- even some of their own victims -- to buy into their torture-table ``extractions,'' rumormongering, voyeurism, and character assassinations. But anything which that poison touches is tainted. Stockholm syndrome is something to watch out for.)
There is a good article at this site about Operation Chaos, the CIA's long-running, illegal domestic surveillance program, with a sidebar on campus surveillance.
``... In 1988, Post owner Katharine Graham, Phil's widow, gave a speech at the CIA's Langley, Va. headquarters. `We live in a dirty and dangerous world,' Graham told agency leaders (Regardie's magazine, 1/90). `There are some things the general public does not need to know and shouldn't. I believe democracy flourishes when the government can take legitimate steps to keep its secrets and when the press can decide whether to print what it knows.'(Apparently secret human experimentation on American citizens is another one of the things the general public ``does not need to know.'' Is democracy ``flourishing'' for the victims of these domestic atrocities?) This essay also appears in the book Wizards of Media Oz: Behind the Curtain of Mainstream News by Norman Soloman and Jeff Cohen (Common Courage Press).``Readers, in turn, can decide how much faith to put in news outlets whose owners embrace such a philosophy.''
``Alan Scheflin [a law professor and researcher] doubts the promises of further disclosure will amount to much. After several boxes of CIA documents were released under the U.S. Freedom of Information Act in the 1970's, the flow slowed to a trickle. `I can't prove, without having the documents available, that what anybody is telling me, or part of what someone is telling me, is true or not,' said Mr. Scheflin. `But I can tell you that it's not out of the realm of possibility. And if it's not true, it will be true of someone else who has come forward.' Psychiatrist Colin Ross, a specialist in multiple identity disorders, has heard numerous stories of government experimentation from patients since moving to Texas from Canada six years ago. `It's really hard to tell how much of it is real. On the other hand, there's all this documentation that a tremendous amount of this stuff did go on. So the stories aren't impossible either.'(I found this article on the MINDCONTROL-L Mind Control and Psyops Mailing List. Look at the end of the article for info on subscribing, and for the web address of the list archive.)``Dr. Ross recently completed a manuscript based on the countless hours he has spent in libraries and archives uncovering information about government experiments on people and other unconventional research conducted by doctors and institutes across North America. Evidence that researchers have exposed children to LSD doses, radiation and other potentially harmful substances leads him to believe mind-control experimentation could also have occurred. `All kinds of unbelievable stuff has in fact been done to kids.' Mr. Scheflin notes that 149 projects involved work with children at juvenile facilities, but the records disclosed to date do not paint a complete picture.''
``Ms. Wolf [a New Orleans therapist] believes the truth about child experiments is slowly emerging, but wants to stall the disclosure as long as possible because officials realize the news will be met with outrage. `People will be very angry that this was done to children by the government.' ''
``Perhaps the most disturbing wanderer into this mind-field is Joseph A. Meyer, of the National Security Agency, the most formidable and secretive component of America's national security complex. Meyer has proposed implanting roughly half of all Americans arrested -- not necessarily convicted -- of any crime; the numbers of `subscribers' (his euphemism) would run into the tens of millions. `Subscribers' could be monitored continually by computer wherever they went. Meyer, who has carefully worked out the economics of his mass-implantation system, asserts that taxpayer liability should be reduced by forcing subscribers to `rent' the implant from the State. Implants are cheaper and more efficient than police, Meyer suggests, since the call to crime is relentless for the poor `urban dweller' -- who, this spook-scientist admits in a surprisingly candid aside, is fundamentally unnecessary to a post-industrial economy. `Urban dweller' may be another of Meyer's euphemisms: He uses New York's Harlem as his model community in working out the details of his mind-management system.44''This particular section is referenced to 44. Scheflin and Opton, The Mind Manipulators, 351-353; Tackwood, The Glass House Tapes, 228. Other sections, for example, discuss experiments in wiring up cats so their ears act as microphones to a loudspeaker in another room.
The article also touches on some of the marketing techniques that are being used to sell implanted chips. These techniques will likely be used to try to justify the chips already implanted in unknowing people. Attempts to blur the notion of consent, such as in the difference between consensual sex and rape, will also likely occur with regard to the devices implanted in unknowing subjects. Recall that in Orwell's 1984 one of the most repressive aspects of Big Brother surveillance was that it could not be turned off.
Demonizing the victims is another technique that will be used to ``justify'' the unjustifiable. How would your life look if you had been under 24-hour harassment and thought surveillance (and/or other invasive surveillance) for years, and your worst enemy got to edit this down to ``support'' any picture he wanted to paint about you? Remember, you do not get a bit of due process, you cannot face your accuser or hear the charges against you, and the audience for this farce may well be too stupid or caught up in voyeurism to understand what is really going on.
One publication they reference is the Radiofrequency Radiation Dosimetry Handbook, United States Air Force School of Aerospace Medicine, Brooks Air Force Base, Texas, October 1986. This is a compendium of information about medical RF effects, useful in designing weapons. (A principal reviewer and contributor, Dr. H.P. Schwan, is a Project Paperclip scientist from Nazi laboratories.)
The following are excerpts from the Final Report On Biotechnology Reaearch Requirements For Aeronautical Systems Through the Year 2000, Volumes I and II, Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio, Texas, pg. 181-188. Note the references to ``interrogating'' mental functioning, i.e., reading thoughts.
``... Experience with electroshock therapy, RFR [radiofrequency radiation] experiments, and the increasing understanding of the brain as an electrically mediated organ suggest the serious probability that impressed electromagnetic fields can be disruptive of purposeful behavior and may be capable of directing and/or interrogating such behavior. Further, the passage of approximately 100 milliamperes through the myocardium can lead to cardiac standstill and death, again pointing to a speed-of-light weapons effect.''Another document is Department of Defense Directive, Policy for Non-Lethal Weapons, Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense, Draft, July 21, 1994. This is the draft of a policy intended to take effect in January of 1995. It describes using non-lethal weapons against the government's domestic ``adversaries:''``... While initial attention should be toward degradation of human performance through thermal loading and electromagnetic field effects, subsequent work should address the possibilities of directing and interrogating mental functioning, using externally applied fields within the possibility of a revolutionary capability to defend against hostile actions, and to collect intelligence data prior to conflict onset.''
``The term `adversary' is used above in its broadest sense, including those who are not declared enemies but who are engaged in activities we wish to stop. This policy does not preclude legally authorized domestic use of the nonlethal weapons by United States military forces in support of law enforcement.''This sounds like a prescription for an American dirty war using secret, deniable technology.
Manning and Begich also describe (p. 162) a document by a Council on Foreign Relations task force, from 1995, that discusses using these weapons against [people labeled as] terrorists and drug traffickers. It recommends that these weapons be used secretly, so the victims do not know where the attack is from, or if there even is an attack. [How was this strategy tested and developed?] This is a policy recommendation for extrajudicial torture. If they would put that in an open document, what other ideas were going around behind the veil of secrecy? Judge, jury, and executioner: Did you vote for that?
Personal tracking and recovery system, patent number 5,629,678, filed Jan. 10, 1995There are also patents, for example, for devices to project a voice spoken into a microphone into a subject's head via microwaves. These are open patents, not ones that got slapped with a secrecy order. Here is a page listing many mind-control-related patents, from the Leading Edge Research Group. Remember when these devices ``did not exist,'' and the ``authorities'' who assured us that those who claimed otherwise were kooks? What will they tell us next?Apparatus for tracking and recovering humans utilizes an implantable transceiver incorporating a power supply and actuation system allowing the unit to remain implanted and functional for years without maintenance. The implanted transmitter may be remotely actuated, or actuated by the implantee. Power for the remote-activated receiver is generated electromechanically through the movement of body muscle. The device is small enough to be implanted in a child, facilitating use as a safeguard against kidnapping, and has a transmission range which also makes it suitable for wilderness sporting activities. A novel biological monitoring feature allows the device to be used to facilitate prompt medical dispatch in the event of heart attack or similar medical emergency. A novel sensation-feedback feature allows the implantee to control and actuate the device with certainty.
See also The Truth web page for more references, links, and information.
|
Of old those who excelled in the pursuit of the way did not use it to
enlighten the people but to hoodwink them. The reason why the people are difficult to govern is that they are too clever.
Will be to the detriment of the state; Not to rule a state by cleverness Will be a boon to the state.
|
what would you do if you knew it were true |