A Home Office spokesman said: "The Government did not believe that
banning handguns by itself would eradicate gun crime. We recognise there is a continuing problem with the use of guns by criminals and that it has increased over recent years."
[Note: There it is folks, it is not about eradicating crime at all, but about control, and removing any effective obstacle to total governmental control, there and here]
Gun crimes soaring despite ban brought in following Dunblane
By David Bamber, Home Affairs Correspondent
(Filed: 15/07/2001) News.telegraph.co.uk
THE controversial ban on the ownership of handguns which was introduced
after the Dunblane massacre has failed to halt an increasing number of crimes involving firearms.
An independent report, Illegal Firearms in the UK, to be published by the
Centre for Defence Studies at King's College in London tomorrow, says that
handguns were used in 3,685 offences last year compared with 2,648 in 1997, an increase of 40 per cent.
The figures will renew the debate about the effectiveness of the gun ban,
introduced by the last Conservative government and then extended to cover
all pistols by Labour after winning the 1997 general election.
Legislation banning larger-calibre pistols was proposed by the previous
Conservative government in response to the murder of 16 pupils and their
teacher by Thomas Hamilton at Dunblane primary school in March 1996.
But Labour broadened the scope of the Act to cover smaller handguns as
well, despite opposition from the sporting community. The law is now so
restrictive that British Olympic shooting competitors go abroad to practise because their weapons are illegal in this country.
The new report, commissioned by the Countryside Alliance's Campaign for Shooting, was compiled by John Bryan, the former head of the firearms intelligence unit at New Scotland Yard.
Mr Bryan said that his report cast doubt on the wisdom of the ban. "The
increase in the use of handguns by criminals since the implementation of
the 1997 Act clearly raises important questions for policy-makers considering further controls on legally-held firearms."
David Bredin, the director of the Campaign for Shooting, said: "It is crystal clear from the research that the existing gun laws do not lead to crime reduction and a safer place.
"Policy-makers have targeted the legitimate sporting and farming
communities with ever-tighter laws. The research clearly demonstrates that
it is illegal guns which are the real threat to public safety."
The number of crimes involving handguns has increased, mostly due to a
flood of illegally imported weapons and the use of those already in
circulation before 1997.
The report also shows a dramatic rise in firearms incidents in general,
from 4,904 recorded incidents in 1997 to 6,843 last year. It reveals an
increase in crimes using shotguns, up from 580 in 1997 to 693 last year.
Offences involving air weapons show an even more startling rise, from
7,506 in 1997 to 10,103 last year. Mr Bryan compiled the statistics from Home
Office figures and information obtained by analysing individual forces'
crime totals.
A firearms amnesty at the time of the ban's introduction resulted in 160,000 handguns being surrendered to the police at a cost of £90 million to the taxpayer in compensation.
A Home Office spokesman said: "The Government did not believe that banning
handguns by itself would eradicate gun crime. We recognise there is a
continuing problem with the use of guns by criminals and that it has
increased over recent years".
"We are taking further measures against criminals who use guns and we already have schemes in the pipeline to curtail illegal gun use. These include a national register of legal guns, an intensified effort against illegally smuggled weapons and a determination to punish criminals who use guns."
"In other words more controls and restrictions on the people who just want to enjoy their hobby or sport".
"The strongest reason for the people to
retain the right to keep and bear arms is,
as a last resort, to protect themselves
against tyranny in government."
Thomas Jefferson -Letter to William S. Smith,
Paris, Nov. 13, 1787
BACK TO GUN LAWS IN AUSTRALIA PAGE
BACK TO NED'S HOME PAGE
|