Nico Ntumba Update

For more on Nico Ntumba see his MCF Victims' section.

Contents

Xrays of Implants
Mental Health Document
CIA Reply

From INMC - International
Network against Mind Control 

Recently we received some X-ray pictures of Mr. N'Tumba and our medical experts in Stockholm have examined those of his skull and can confirm that a transmitter has been implanted in his left nostril. Furthermore, it can be seen that electrodes placed in the occipital lobe are blocking the blood flow behind their delimitation where the oxygen depletion is caused and this is seen as well in his frontal brain just above the implanted transmitter. Among the changes caused by the frequencies affecting his brain the reduced oxygen levels have induced an alteration of neurological functions, impaired cognitive abilities including that of memory. Moreover he has obviously been anaesthetised without his knowledge so that this implantation could be performed.

This is the referred X-ray picture of Mr. N'Tumba's occipital lobe and electrodes can clearly be seen blocking the blood flow behind their delimitation.

The X-ray examination was performed at Brook Hospital Main, September 16, 1992. [London-Greenwich]

Contents

(DECISION FORM S75(2) - Conditionally Discharged Patient

MENTAL HEALTH ACT 1983
MENTAL HEALTH TRIBUNAL RULES 1983
DECISION OF MENTAL HEALTH REVIEW TRIBUNAL

South Thames  REGION

IN RESPECT OF AN APPLICATION DATED:  9th January 1997

1. NAME OF PATIENT:  Nico Kasaba N'Tumba
    

2. ADDRESS OF PATIENT:
   5A County Grove
   Camberwell
   London SE59LG
    

3. AUTHORITY FOR CONDITIONAL DISCHARGE:
   Decision of the Mental Health Review Tribunal dated 20th August 1993
    

4. CONDITIONS AT TIME OF APPLICATION:
   Immaterial
    

5. DECISION OF THE TRIBUNAL:  [a is selected, b, c, and d are struck out.]
    

   1. The restriction order or restriction direction to which the patient is subject shall cease to have effect and the patient is therefore ABSOLUTELY DISCHARGED.
       
      OR
       
   2. The patient be not absolutely discharged and shall remain subject to the existing conditions as shown at (4) above.
       
      OR
       
   3. The patient be not absolutely discharged but the conditions to which the patient is subject are varied in the following respect(s), namely:
       
       
      OR
       
   4. The following additional condition(s) is/are imposed.
       
6. THE REASONS FOR THE TRIBUNAL'S DECISION:
    
   1. The patient has been living independently in the community since November 1993 following his conditional discharge by a Mental Health Review Tribunal on 20th Aug 1993.
       
   2. He has been symptom free since then and has been co-operative with both social and psychiatric supervision and compliant with medication.
       
   3. The Tribunal is satisfied that arrangements will be made to continue social and psychiatric supervision on a voluntary basis after his discharge from restrictions, and also that he is to be placed on the supervision register. The Tribunal is therefore satisfied that it is no longer necessary for the patient to remain liable to be recalled to hospital for further treatment.
       
7. Signed:  (President) HIS HONOUR JUDGE PALMER  [signature]
    
   Date:  10th October 1997

Contents

20 AUG 1992

FROM:  Information and Privacy Coordinator  [signature or initials]

TO:

Ms. Kasaba Ntumba
94 Benares Road
Plumstead
London  SE181HT
UNITED KINGDOM

RE:  T92-0314

Dear Ms. Ntumba:

Your request for documents indexed to your name in our records systems has been received.

• Your request will be processed under the Privacy Act as requested. No fees are charged for processing under the Privacy Act.
   
• You have requested processing under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). It is the policy of this agency to process eligible requests that involve personal information on the requester under the provisions of the Privacy Act of 1974, and not under the better known Freedom of Information Act of 1974 (FOIA). The Privacy Act applies only to U.S. citizens and permanent resident aliens. Our search efforts under either Act are the same, and you will receive at least as much information pertaining to you ender the Privacy Act as you would under the FOIA. Therefore, unless we hear from you to the contrary, our processing of your request will be under the Privacy Act only.

The Privacy Act requires Federal agencies to ensure that improper disclosure of personally identifiable information on an individual will not be made and provides criminal penalties if such a disclosure should occur. Therefore, CIA Privacy Regulations, Title 32 C.F.R. section 1901.13, set forth the following requirements:

An individual seeking access to or notification of the existence of records about himself shall provide in the letter of request his full name, address, date and place of birth together with a notarized statement swearing to or affirming his identity... In the case of an individual who is an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence, said individual shall provide... his or her alien registration number.

Contents

Mind Control Forum