Blowing Up Dangerous Germs with
"Nano Bombs" 5/30/99 Ann Arbor, Michigan - A few weeks ago I reported
on Dreamland that the U. S. government is very concerned about
biological warfare and bioterrorists. What would happen if anthrax
spores, small pox or other dangerous infectious diseases were sprayed
into the air above one or more U. S. cities?
One new possible answer seems surprisingly simple and
miraculously effective: drops of oil - droplets so small they can
adhere to the surface of deadly anthrax and small pox pathogens and
literally explode the germs. That's why these oil drops are called
"nano bombs." Nano means "one billionth." So, very small - smaller
than viruses and bacteria. This medical discovery is the work of Dr.
James Baker, Professor of Medicine, Chief of the Division of Allergy
and Immunology, and Director of
the Center for Biologic Nanotechnology at the University of Michigan
in Ann Arbor. He develops extremely small lipids and polymers that can
be engineered at the protein and amino acid level. The Defense
Advanced Research Projects Agency, known as DARPA, started trying five
years ago to find new ways to deal with bioterrorism. And for the last
two years, DARPA has funded Dr. Baker's research into blowing up germs
with a water and oil mixture in which the oil droplets are 1/100th the
size of a human blood cell. Dr. Baker: Interview
James Baker, M. D., Director of the Center for Biologic
Nanotechnology, University of Michigan:
"Essentially we've taken an old time observation that
you could basically use detergent to disrupt bacteria and viruses and
put a new spin on it. What we've done is actually encapsulate the
detergent as a layer on the outside of oil droplets suspended in
water. And because of the exact nature of this material, it very
readily fuses with bacteria and viruses and delivers the detergent and
the solvent on its surface to the bacteria and virus. This then causes
a disruption of the membrane surrounding the bacteria and virus so it
becomes unstable and literally explodes.
WHY IS IT THAT THE DROPLETS THAT BIND TO THE MEMBRANE
COATING ON THE GERMS OR VIRUSES - WHY IS IT THAT IT DISRUPTS THE
COATING SO MUCH THAT THESE ORGANISMS LITERALLY EXPLODE?
Well, there are two reasons for that. The first, and
probably the most important is that the droplets are very small. They
are actually on the same scale or smaller than the bacteria and virus.
COULD YOU PLEASE GIVE A WORD PICTURE FOR A RADIO
AUDIENCE TO UNDERSTAND HOW THIS OILY WATER SUBSTANCE COULD BE USED IF
THERE WAS AN ANTHRAX DROP OR DISPERSION IN THE AIR, LET'S SAY, OVER A
CITY.
All right, let me give you a specific scenario that's
been actually in the news. They held a mock attack in one of the
subway stations in New York City. The problem was that both materials
such as the train, the station and individuals were exposed.
Currently, the only way to decontaminate is to use very high
concentrations of formaldehyde and bleach - which number one, are very
destructive to material, will probably ruin any type of paint or
fabric or electrical type device in the area. And obviously are very
toxic to human beings. So, there is no real way to decontaminate the
area safely and to decontaminate the people safely.
This material can be used in a number of ways. It kills
up to a dilution of 1:100. And at 1:100, it literally looks like skim
milk and has about the same consistency and you could put it in a
sprayer type device and literally spray down the whole station, the
whole car, and within an hour or two, you could even spray it again.
But within an hour or two about 99.9% of the spores have been killed.
ALL OF THE ANTHRAX SPORES WILL HAVE EXPLODED FROM THIS
OILY WATER.
Right. In addition, you can take the people who have
been exposed and also treat them topically to decontaminate them. If
there are wounds that are contaminated, you can take this material and
irrigate in the wounds. So, in fact, you can go in and decontaminate
people as well as the environment. And in fact, by reducing the number
of spores that are on people or are
inhaled by people, you can go a long way in preventing the toxicity
and the death associated with anthrax.
DOES THIS ALSO WORK ON THINGS LIKE CHOLERA AND LET'S SAY
SOME OF THE BLOOD HEMORRHAGING EBOLA TYPE OF THING?
Yes, it does. So in fact, you could use it in a
situation where you don't even know what's been released. And have the
expectation that 99% of the potential organisms that might be used as
a weapon would be inactivated.
HOW ARE YOU GOING TO INTERFACE NOW WITH MILITARY AND
GOVERNMENT AGENCIES?
We are progressing through the Military Development
Command, the Materiel Command, to perform field trials for the
military this fall to evaluate this material as a decontamination
agent.
AND THIS WOULD BE UNDER DARPA'S SUPERVISION?
No, this will be under the supervision of the U. S. Army
Research and Development Command. I think we have very good data in
small scale decontamination studies in our own laboratory that this
material will be affective. The real issue now is how to translate it
into some type of workable solution. I'm embarrassed to admit this,
but we use garden sprayers and power painters to apply it. It's
actually a very simplistic approach, but very effective. The military
may want to use larger scale
decontamination application situations for things like airplanes and
other potential equipment that would be involved.
THAT WOULD SPEED UP THE PROCESS OF SPRAYING THE OILY
WATER.
Exactly.
ASSUMING THAT YOUR TRAILS WITH THE ARMY IN THE FALL OF
1999 GO WELL AND THAT THE OILY WATER IS EFFECTIVE IN THE FIELD
OPERATION THAT YOU'RE GOING TO STUDY, WOULD YOU IMAGINE THAT IF THERE
WAS AN AEROSOL DISPERSION, LET'S SAY, OVER NEW YORK CITY, THAT THE
ARMY OR DARPA OR SOMEBODY COULD COME IN WITH AIRPLANES THAT COULD DROP
THIS OILY WATER ALL OVER A CITY FROM THE AIR FOLLOWING THE INFORMATION
FROM INTELLIGENCE THAT THERE HAD BEEN AN AEROSOL DISPERSION AND DEAL
WITH IT LIKE THAT FROM THE AIR?
That is one potential scenario, yes. I mean, you need to
get good coverage. You need to make sure you get an appropriate layer
of this material to interact with the organisms. But certainly, the
most remarkable thing is that this doesn't hurt the environment,
doesn't hurt people and gives kill
rates that are equivalent to bleach or formaldehyde. So, where you
couldn't do that with any of the other agents available to treat this
type of infection, anthrax, you could potentially do it with this
material. You can go into a school and wash down children safely or go
into an office and wash down wherever the letter was dropped or
whatever and effectively take care of it and put people's minds at
ease without having to put them in
danger just from trying to clean up the place.
HOW LONG DO YOU THINK IT WILL BE BEFORE THIS IS BEING
PRODUCED ON A LARGE SCALE FOR ANTICIPATION OF ANY TYPE OF A
BIOTERRORISM ATTACK?
We have the capability to produce approximately 1600
liters/minute.
THERE AT THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN?
With one of our commercial associates. So we are already
up to industrial sized production. The real limitation will be
developing the lines of command and material transfer so that in that
type of scenario, we can rapidly deploy the material. But it's very
stable. We could storehouse it even in the concentrate which would
reduce the volume needed and have it
ready to go if something like that were to happen.
AND IT WOULD BE AFFECTIVE AGAINST ANTHRAX, CHOLERA,
SMALL POX - IS THERE ANY BACTERIA OR VIRUS YOU'VE TRIED IT ON THAT IT
DOESN'T WORK?
Yes. Non-envelope viruses. Things like adenovirus.
WHICH WOULD BE WHAT IN THE COMMON LANGUAGE?
Cold.
IT WILL NOT WORK AGAINST THE COLD VIRUS?
Well, adenovirus is one form of cold virus, yes. But
most of the agents that cause severe diseases and are used as
weaponized agents are envelope viruses or bacteria.
MEANING THE ENVELOPE IS WHAT CAN MERGE WITH THIS SOAPY
OR OILY WATER?
Right.
WHY COULDN'T THIS SAME NANO APPROACH BE APPLIED TO
INTERNAL MEDICINE THAT COULD KILL VIRUSES AND BACTERIA INSIDE PEOPLE?
Well, it can be used on mucosal surfaces. And in fact,
one of the applications we are looking at is using it as a nasal spray
where you would put it in your nose during flu season and if you
inhaled flu virus, it would destroy it before it could infect you. The
one problem with the material - there are a couple of problems and let
me make those very specific for you. The first is that under certain
conditions, it is unstable. You can't freeze it because that causes
the separation of the oil and water phases. So, for some applications
that require cold temperatures, it's unsuitable.
In addition, you can't give it intravenously because it
turns out the only cell that is susceptible to this material is the
red blood cell. Every other cell is resistant. So, you can't give it
intravenously.
BECAUSE THEN ALL THE BLOOD CELLS WOULD EXPLODE.
Right. You could take plasma or infected wounds and
whatever and irrigate it. And we have very nice animal studies that
suggest with anthrax or with gas gangrene or the flesh-eating
bacteria, we can actually have an effect in preventing wound
infections by irrigating the wound with this
material. So, there are internal applications where it can be used. It
just can't be used systemically because of the problem with red blood
cells."
More Info:
After the September field trials with the Army to test
the nano bombs, I'll have another update from Dr. Baker on Dreamland
and right here on EARTHFILES.COM Web Sites
Credits Webwizard: Keith Rowland Content Copyright © 1999 Linda Moulton Howe
by Linda Moulton Howe ©
HTML Copyright © 1999 Rowland Network Communications
All Rights Reserved