PDA

View Full Version : New Iranian long range missile is now in place.


Betsy Ross
09-25-2004, 11:14 AM
Today, the new Iranian long range missile, the Shahab 3 ( http://www.aberdeennews.com/mld/aberdeennews/news/9759465.htm), was delivered to the Iranian military and is now operative.

This means that any Israeli "preemptive" strike against Iran's nuclear program could be responded to in kind.

The Israeli's were, just a few day's ago, given a large supply of smart bombs and bunker busters (http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/meast/09/23/iran.israel.bomb.ap/index.html); the Iranians know the game :p .

If just one White nation were to break free, finally and genuinely free -- just one -- then the whole filthy house of cards would crash to the ground! [COLOR=Red]Now[/COLOR] is the time; which nation will it be?

JohnJizmTree
09-25-2004, 01:02 PM
Whats the betting that one of them will land at that small deadsville flyblown sandnigger place near to Jericho called Megiddo ?.

ArmSla
09-25-2004, 01:38 PM
So WW3 soon then?

Jenab
09-25-2004, 10:22 PM
[QUOTE=Betsy Ross]Today, the new Iranian long range missile, the Shahab 3 ( http://www.aberdeennews.com/mld/aberdeennews/news/9759465.htm), was delivered to the Iranian military and is now operative.

This means that any Israeli "preemptive" strike against Iran's nuclear program could be responded to in kind.

The Israeli's were, just a few day's ago, given a large supply of smart bombs and bunker busters (http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/meast/09/23/iran.israel.bomb.ap/index.html); the Iranians know the game :p .

If just one White nation were to break free, finally and genuinely free -- just one -- then the whole filthy house of cards would crash to the ground! [COLOR=Red]Now[/COLOR] is the time; which nation will it be?[/QUOTE]

Time isn't on Iran's side. If they have the capability to nuke Israel, they should do so at once, before Israel can find traitors in sensitive places within Iran and bribe them or kidnap family members to hold hostage. Sooner or later, kikes can subvert anything; they're masters of the game.

If Iran nukes Israel so thoroughly that nearly all the Israeli Jews are dead and Israel essentially no longer exists, the USA might counterattack with nukes, but on the other hand it might not.

Iran could, for example, hint that it has nuclear-armed operatives within the United States, which could even be true.

Iran has a window of opportunity to readjust the facts of the middle east, but it is a window that will not be open long.

Jerry Abbott

Steve B
09-26-2004, 02:00 AM
[QUOTE=Jenab]Time isn't on Iran's side. If they have the capability to nuke Israel, they should do so at once, before Israel can find traitors in sensitive places within Iran and bribe them or kidnap family members to hold hostage. Sooner or later, kikes can subvert anything; they're masters of the game.

If Iran nukes Israel so thoroughly that nearly all the Israeli Jews are dead and Israel essentially no longer exists, the USA might counterattack with nukes, but on the other hand it might not.

Iran could, for example, hint that it has nuclear-armed operatives within the United States, which could even be true.

Iran has a window of opportunity to readjust the facts of the middle east, but it is a window that will not be open long.

Jerry Abbott[/QUOTE]

Personally, I wouldn't put to much credence in Iranian sand niggers. At best they are chumps and at their worst ZOG puppets.

The Shahab 3 is a copy of a North korean No-Dong missile which was developed with Soviet era technical participation along with Chinese contributions and Iranian financial assistance.

If any WN's believe that this out of date, 1980's missile can be lobbed at Isseyreal without USZOG knowing about it or doing something about it or possibly allowing it to happen then you are sorely mistaken!

The best case scenario for ZOG would be to maneuver Iran into firing this piece of shit missile at Izzyreal...then they can shoot it down and say..ohhh...Iran shot a nuke at us we must retaliate!

Comon guys....don't get suckered in by ZOG bullshit for the umteenth time!

EdbergEdberg
09-26-2004, 05:06 PM
How accurate is this thing?

If it were accurate enough, they could fire several at the Demona nuclear facility in Israel, blow it up, and spread enough radioactive waste around Israel to really fuck the place up for a long time. They would not need a nuke of their own. They just use Israel's nuke facility as the target.

Can the Iranians do this?

Jim Crowe
09-26-2004, 05:16 PM
[QUOTE=EdbergEdberg]How accurate is this thing?

If it were accurate enough, they could fire several at the Demona nuclear facility in Israel, blow it up, and spread enough radioactive waste around Israel to really fuck the place up for a long time. They would not need a nuke of their own. They just use Israel's nuke facility as the target.

Can the Iranians do this?[/QUOTE]

More a question of would they do it. The nuclear radiation would also contaminate the surrounding Arab states. It will also most likely result in Iran's destruction.

This isn't beyond the action of some religious extremists, but I'm not sure Iran fits into that mold.

Jim Crowe
09-26-2004, 07:41 PM
[QUOTE=IronWorker]Why would Persian Iranians give a shit about Arabs?!?!?

Note the brutal almost decade long war in the 1980s between Iranian Persians and Iraqi Arabics.[/QUOTE]

They might not, but you'd better have some valid motivation rather than just not liking someone to launch an attack like this.

I suspect Iran is attempting to acquire nukes for defensive measures, as most sane states are.

Dasyurus Maculatus
09-27-2004, 05:16 AM
[QUOTE=Jim Crowe]

I suspect Iran is attempting to acquire nukes for defensive measures, as most sane states are.[/QUOTE]

But in this case we are not talking about a sane state.
It has a religious duty to send all and sundry in the world to 'Paradise' as per their Country's Constitution (the Quran).

999
09-27-2004, 07:20 AM
I think it's perfectly sane to kill the entire jewish population of Israel.

ArmSla
09-27-2004, 11:53 PM
In 7th grade literature class, one of the books we had to read was called:

"Izzy Willy Nilly"

Doppelhaken
09-28-2004, 12:14 AM
[QUOTE=Dasyurus Maculatus]But in this case we are not talking about a sane state.
[/QUOTE]

How can a state be insane?

Don't reply with "state of insanity" please. :(

And please don't imply that everyone in that state is insane or "they hate our freedom."

Kamangir42
09-28-2004, 04:23 PM
The newly deployed missile is not strictly the Shahab-3 but a heavily modified evolution of the design: more accurate, greater range, stealthier and harder to destroy. The original Shahab-3 was already deployed in 2002.

So the Shahab-3 is based on the Nodong? So what? Every ballistic missile is to some extent based on the V-2 isn't it? The Shahab-3 has been improved significantly with modern technology so if it was based on 1980s technology it certainly won't be 1980s technology today.

The Shahab-3 was always accurate (by ballistic missile standards) and the new version is more so. The following article postulates that the CEP is now 50m (or in that ballpark). Whatever is the case, it's not the 2km that FAS (For All Semites) initially suggested. You see the Jews will always paint Iran as a threat but never dangerous enough to hesitate taking Iran on. It could take out Dimona and Israel's nuclear weapons silos. But why would you use the Shahab-3 when you have thousands of short range ballistic and cruise missiles over the border in Lebanon. The Fateh-110 ballistic missile f.e. can hit almost all of Israel and is deadly accurate.

http://www.acig.org/artman/publish/article_396.shtml

Keep watching. Iran will be launching two satellites shortly. One scheduled for November and another for April. Iran will have ICBMs armed with nuclear warheads in a short time.

@ Steve B

You are a fucking kike. You'd much rather Iran lost than you would have the Jews lose. Iran is pretty much the only country in the world standing up to those bastards and all you can be is dismissive.

OttoRemer
09-28-2004, 04:39 PM
[QUOTE=Kamangir42]The newly deployed missile is not strictly the Shahab-3 but a heavily modified evolution of the design: more accurate, greater range, stealthier and harder to destroy. The original Shahab-3 was already deployed in 2002.

So the Shahab-3 is based on the Nodong? So what? Every ballistic missile is to some extent based on the V-2 isn't it? The Shahab-3 has been improved significantly with modern technology so if it was based on 1980s technology it certainly won't be 1980s technology today.

The Shahab-3 was always accurate (by ballistic missile standards) and the new version is more so. The following article postulates that the CEP is now 50m (or in that ballpark). Whatever is the case, it's not the 2km that FAS (For All Semites) initially suggested. You see the Jews will always paint Iran as a threat but never dangerous enough to hesitate taking Iran on. It could take out Dimona and Israel's nuclear weapons silos. But why would you use the Shahab-3 when you have thousands of short range ballistic and cruise missiles over the border in Lebanon. The Fateh-110 ballistic missile f.e. can hit almost all of Israel and is deadly accurate.

http://www.acig.org/artman/publish/article_396.shtml

Keep watching. Iran will be launching two satellites shortly. One scheduled for November and another for April. Iran will have ICBMs armed with nuclear warheads in a short time.

@ Steve B

You are a fucking kike. You'd much rather Iran lost than you would have the Jews lose. Iran is pretty much the only country in the world standing up to those bastards and all you can be is dismissive.[/QUOTE]

The only kike here is Dasyurus Maculatus

Steve B
09-28-2004, 09:57 PM
[QUOTE=Kamangir42]

@ Steve B

You are a fucking kike.[/QUOTE]

Holy shit!!! My cover has been blown!! Agent Double-0 Dumb has done it again! "Would you believe"....yer a moron?

Get a clue, O Illustrious One....Ziz is VNN....ve don't do Camels here!!!


[QUOTE=Kamangir42]You'd much rather Iran lost than you would have the Jews lose.[/QUOTE]

Actually the best case scenario for me is if they both blow themselves to smithereens. Ahh, one can only dream!


[QUOTE=Kamangir42]Iran is pretty much the only country in the world standing up to those bastards.[/QUOTE]

Well, then we're fucked!

Intrepid
09-28-2004, 10:12 PM
Originally Posted by Steve B
Holy shit!!! My cover has been blown!! Agent Double-0 Dumb has done it again! "Would you believe"....yer a moron?

Get a clue, O Illustrious One....Ziz is VNN....ve don't do Camels here!!!

Aye, I see they've caught you Mr. S. Bergman. An Ahab, Agent DOD, has done it, no less. Perhaps your Acme Hebe Shooter will allow a safe retreat; yet don't you know not to speak poorly of our Aryan brothers? :rolleyes:

Steve B
09-28-2004, 10:18 PM
[QUOTE=Intrepid] yet don't you know not to speak poorly of our Aryan brothers? :rolleyes:[/QUOTE]

Guilty as charged! I'll be nice to Key and Sean in the future! :p

Photon Torpedo
09-28-2004, 10:24 PM
[SIZE=4][COLOR=Indigo]Iran's new Shahab 3 missile... [/COLOR] [/SIZE]

http://membres.lycos.fr/mat66/shahab_3.jpg

torcher88
09-29-2004, 12:14 AM
[QUOTE=Jim Crowe]They might not, but you'd better have some valid motivation rather than just not liking someone to launch an attack like this.

I suspect Iran is attempting to acquire nukes for defensive measures, as most sane states are.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Dasyurus Maculatus]But in this case we are not talking about a sane state.
It has a religious duty to send all and sundry in the world to 'Paradise' as per their Country's Constitution (the Quran).[/QUOTE]
States tend to act, as best they can, out of pure, cold blooded, calculated, rational self-interest. Don't buy into the simplistic Zionist hype that middle eastern states are "insane" just because they happen to be Islamic. People's first priority is usually just to survive.

Iran is trying to acquire both nuclear weapons and the ballistic missles to deliver them as rapidly as possible, but that does not mean they desire to be blown in radiactive ruins (which would certainly happen given any nuclear exchange). The idea is simply to deter Israeli and American aggression. This is entirely justified given America's unprovoked invasion of Iraq and Israel's extensive nuclear stickpile. By holding hostage nuclear-wise, say, Tel Aviv, they have a good chance of securing their sovereignty. They also force the International Kike to step down his arrogance at least a little. In this light, the only "insane" option for Iran would be to not pursue nuclear weapons.

The interesting question is, will Jews in Israel or America attack Iran first. They really need to act fast if they want to bully Iran out of developing nukes. The world has a good chance of becoming a lot more interesting following the U.S. November elections. Wait and see.

Steve B
09-29-2004, 01:15 AM
[QUOTE=torcher88]

The interesting question is, will Jews in Israel or America attack Iran first. They really need to act fast if they want to bully Iran out of developing nukes. The world has a good chance of becoming a lot more interesting following the U.S. November elections. Wait and see.[/QUOTE]

Eyup! If Bush wins...and I think he will, things will get very interesting after November!

Look for an Israeli attack backed up by Americans on Irans nuke facilities. Possibly followed by a North Korean Slope attack!

The naysayers will say that Iran will respond with a "devastating" counter attack on Izzyreal! What a joke! As if sand niggers, sitting on a twist of fate, vast oil supply could take on White male lemmings in the service of ZOG!

An attack by Iran on Jew central, using North Gook designed missles will result in... NO MORE IRAN!

Comon Volks....this ain't Nazi Germany we're taking on! These are camel jockys. That is, if it wasn't for a God given luck of the oil draw, sandniggers would be herding goats, riding camels and screwing 12 year old harem girls!

I know that this will piss off a lot of White Nationalists who believe that Arabs are our only hope against ZOG but the reality is we're being suckered into another jew war..this time against arabs.

WW3...ITZ!!!!

OttoRemer
09-29-2004, 01:42 AM
[QUOTE=Steve B]Eyup! If Bush wins...and I think he will, things will get very interesting after November!

Look for an Israeli attack backed up by Americans on Irans nuke facilities. Possibly followed by a North Korean Slope attack!

The naysayers will say that Iran will respond with a "devastating" counter attack on Izzyreal! What a joke! As if sand niggers, sitting on a twist of fate, vast oil supply could take on White male lemmings in the service of ZOG!

An attack by Iran on Jew central, using North Gook designed missles will result in... NO MORE IRAN!

Comon Volks....this ain't Nazi Germany we're taking on! These are camel jockys. That is, if it wasn't for a God given luck of the oil draw, sandniggers would be herding goats, riding camels and screwing 12 year old harem girls!

I know that this will piss off a lot of White Nationalists who believe that Arabs are our only hope against ZOG but the reality is we're being suckered into another jew war..this time against arabs.

WW3...ITZ!!!![/QUOTE]

I'm sure that Israel has the ability to shoot down these amateur North Korean missiles. Iran can't be serious that this is their threat?

I would suspect that Iran's much better defense against Israel would be to arm the Iranian-backed Hezbollah terrorist fighters in Lebanon with chemical weapons which they could fire at low range from rocket launchers into Israeli towns along the border. The state department has already made statements fearing this development several months ago.

Steve B
09-29-2004, 02:44 AM
[QUOTE=OttoRemer]I'm sure that Israel has the ability to shoot down these amateur North Korean missiles. Iran can't be serious that this is their threat?

I would suspect that Iran's much better defense against Israel would be to arm the Iranian-backed Hezbollah terrorist fighters in Lebanon with chemical weapons which they could fire at low range from rocket launchers into Israeli towns along the border. The state department has already made statements fearing this development several months ago.[/QUOTE]

Quite correct, Otto! An NVA-Vietcong style insurgency would serve the Arabs best! A head to head fight with ZOG is suicide!

I am going to get a lot of flack from WN's on this but Ho Chi Minh, the emaciated, goateed figure in a threadbare bush jacket and frayed rubber sandals who cultivated the image of a humble, benign "Uncle Ho" but turned out to be the smartest, toughest gook that ever came down the highway!

In point of fact he was a seasoned revolutionary and passionate nationalist obsessed by a single goal: independence for his country. Does George Washington ring a bell?

Ho's tattered guerrillas vaulted daunting obstacles to crush France's desperate attempt to retrieve its empire in Indochina, to say nothing of the Americans he spun and killed!

Later, Ho built a largely conventional army, he frustrated the massive U.S. effort to prevent the communist followers from controlling Vietnam. For us Americans, it was the longest war--and the first defeat--in our history, and it drastically changed the way we perceived our role in the world.

How could this possibly happen?

I'm championing a commie gook and I'm going to get hammered for it by VNNF members but I am doing it as an example for the simple fact that it seems inconceivable to us White guys that a commie gook, wearing pajamas, could make the tremendous sacrifices he did.

Ask Glenn Miller about Vietnam...he was there...how did we lose to an inferior enemy? Ask Glenn Miller how senior American officers nurtured the illusion that their sophisticated weapons would inevitably break enemy morale, but didn't!!!

Ask Glenn Miller how killing 10 gooks for every one American killed still resulted in our defeat?

I'll give you the fuckin answer! The gooks didn't care how long it took or how how many deaths were incured! "Twenty years, maybe 100 years--as long as it took to win, regardless of cost"-Ho Chi Minh!